Pacing-induced heart disease: understanding the pathophysiology and improving outcomes

References

• Mcwilliams MJ. Electrical stimulation of the heart in man. BMJ1(1), 348 (1889).
   Google Scholar
• Wilkoff BL, Cook JR, Epstein AE et al. Dual-chamber pacing or ventricular backup pacing in patients with an implantable defibrillator: the Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) trial. JAMA288(24), 3115–3123 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeney MO, Hellkamp AS, Ellenbogen KA et al. Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction. Circulation107(23), 2932–2937 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg JS, Fischer A, Wang P et al. The clinical implications of cumulative right ventricular pacing in the multicenter automatic defibrillator trial II. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol.16(4), 359–365 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma AD, Rizo-Patron C, Hallstrom AP et al. Percent right ventricular pacing predicts outcomes in the DAVID trial. Heart Rhythm2(8), 830–834 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shukla HH, Hellkamp AS, James EA et al. Heart failure hospitalization is more common in pacemaker patients with sinus node dysfunction and a prolonged paced QRS duration. Heart Rhythm2(3), 245–251 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elder D, Szwejkowski BR, Jain R et al. Younger age at time of pacemaker implantation is associated with worse survival. Circulation122(21), (2010) (Meeting Abstracts).
   Google Scholar
• Auricchio A, Stellbrink C, Sack S et al. Long-term clinical effect of hemodynamically optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure and ventricular conduction delay. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.39(12), 2026–2033 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bristow MR, Saxon LA, Boehmer J et al. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure. N. Engl. J. Med.350(21), 2140–2150 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey JS, Toff WD, Lamas GA et al. Cardiovascular outcomes with atrial-based pacing compared with ventricular pacing: meta-analysis of randomized trials, using individual patient data. Circulation114(1), 11–17 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly SJ, Kerr CR, Gent M et al. Effects of physiologic pacing versus ventricular pacing on the risk of stroke and death due to cardiovascular causes. Canadian Trial of Physiologic Pacing Investigators. N. Engl. J. Med.342(19), 1385–1391 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr CR, Connolly SJ, Abdollah H et al. Canadian Trial of Physiological Pacing: effects of physiological pacing during long-term follow-up. Circulation109(3), 357–362 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamas GA, Lee KL, Sweeney MO et al. Ventricular pacing or dual-chamber pacing for sinus-node dysfunction. N. Engl. J. Med.346(24), 1854–1862 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen HR, Nielsen JC, Thomsen PE et al. Long-term follow-up of patients from a randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing for sick-sinus syndrome. Lancet350(9086), 1210–1216 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen JC, Kristensen L, Andersen HR, Mortensen PT, Pedersen OL, Pedersen AK. A randomized comparison of atrial and dual-chamber pacing in 177 consecutive patients with sick sinus syndrome: echocardiographic and clinical outcome. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.42(4), 614–623 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeney MO, Bank AJ, Nsah E et al. Minimizing ventricular pacing to reduce atrial fibrillation in sinus-node disease. N. Engl. J. Med.357(10), 1000–1008 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen JC, Thomsen PE, Højberg S et al. A comparison of single-lead atrial pacing with dual-chamber pacing in sick sinus syndrome. Eur. Heart J.32(6), 686–696 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varma N. Left ventricular conduction delays induced by right ventricular apical pacing: effect of left ventricular dysfunction and bundle branch block. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol.19(2), 114–122 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sagar S, Shen WK, Asirvatham SJ et al. Effect of long-term right ventricular pacing in young adults with structurally normal heart. Circulation121(15), 1698–1705 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho GY, Kim HK, Kim YJ et al. Electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony for prediction of cardiac events in patients with systolic heart failure. Heart96(13), 1029–1032 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Fang F, Yip GW et al. Difference in prevalence and pattern of mechanical dyssynchrony in left bundle branch block occurring in right ventricular apical pacing versus systolic heart failure. Am. Heart J.156(5), 989–995 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Auricchio A, Fantoni C, Regoli F et al. Characterization of left ventricular activation in patients with heart failure and left bundle-branch block. Circulation109(9), 1133–1139 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bax JJ, Bleeker GB, Marwick TH et al. Left ventricular dyssynchrony predicts response and prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.44(9), 1834–1840 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molhoek SG, Van Erven L, Bootsma M, Steendijk P, Van Der Wall EE, Schalij MJ. QRS duration and shortening to predict clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with end-stage heart failure. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.27(3), 308–313 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achilli A, Sassara M, Ficili S et al. Long-term effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with refractory heart failure and ‘narrow’ QRS. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.42(12), 2117–2124 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinzen FW, Peschar M. Relation between the pacing induced sequence of activation and left ventricular pump function in animals. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.25(4 Pt 1), 484–498 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahlawi M, Waligora M, Spies SM, Bonow RO, Kadish AH, Goldberger JJ. Left ventricular function during and after right ventricular pacing. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.44(9), 1883–1888 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tantengco MV, Thomas RL, Karpawich PP. Left ventricular dysfunction after long-term right ventricular apical pacing in the young. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.37(8), 2093–2100 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tops LF, Schalij MJ, Holman ER, Van Erven L, Van Der Wall EE, Bax JJ. Right ventricular pacing can induce ventricular dyssynchrony in patients with atrial fibrillation after atrioventricular node ablation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.48(8), 1642–1648 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcdonald IG. Echocardiographic demonstration of abnormal motion of the interventricular septum in left bundle branch block. Circulation48(2), 272–280 (1973).
   Google Scholar
• Frais MA, Botvinick EH, Shosa DW et al. Phase image characterization of ventricular contraction in left and right bundle branch block. Am. J. Cardiol.50(1), 95–105 (1982).
   Google Scholar
• Bashore TM, Stine RA, Shaffer PB, Bush CA, Leier CV, Schaal SF. The noninvasive localization of ventricular pacing sites by radionuclide phase imaging. Circulation70(4), 681–694 (1984).
   Google Scholar
• Prinzen FW, Hunter WC, Wyman BT, Mcveigh ER. Mapping of regional myocardial strain and work during ventricular pacing: experimental study using magnetic resonance imaging tagging. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.33(6), 1735–1742 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenqvist M, Isaaz K, Botvinick EH et al. Relative importance of activation sequence compared to atrioventricular synchrony in left ventricular function. Am. J. Cardiol.67(2), 148–156 (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Askenazi J, Alexander JH, Koenigsberg DI, Belic N, Lesch M. Alteration of left ventricular performance by left bundle branch block simulated with atrioventricular sequential pacing. Am. J. Cardiol.53(1), 99–104 (1984).
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman R, Padeletti L, Schreuder J et al. Ventricular pacing lead location alters systemic hemodynamics and left ventricular function in patients with and without reduced ejection fraction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.48(8), 1634–1641 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Choy AM, Su HH, Elder DHJ et al. Right ventricular pacing impairs endothelial function in man. Europace13(6), 853–858 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Lang CC, Karlin P, Haythe J, Lim TK, Mancini DM. Peak cardiac power output, measured noninvasively, is a powerful predictor of outcome in chronic heart failure. Circ. Heart Fail.2(1), 33–38 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Oosterhout MF, Prinzen FW, Arts T et al. Asynchronous electrical activation induces asymmetrical hypertrophy of the left ventricular wall. Circulation98(6), 588–595 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vernooy K, Dijkman B, Cheriex EC, Prinzen FW, Crijns HJ. Ventricular remodeling during long-term right ventricular pacing following His bundle ablation. Am. J. Cardiol.97(8), 1223–1227 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barold SS, Ovsyshcher IE. Pacemaker-induced mitral regurgitation. Pacing Clin.28(5), 357–360 (2005)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thambo JB, Bordachar P, Garrigue S et al. Detrimental ventricular remodeling in patients with congenital complete heart block and chronic right ventricular apical pacing. Circulation110(25), 3766–3772 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpawich PP, Rabah R, Haas JE. Altered cardiac histology following apical right ventricular pacing in patients with congenital atrioventricular block. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.22(9), 1372–1377 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tse HF, Lau CP. Long-term effect of right ventricular pacing on myocardial perfusion and function. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.29(4), 744–749 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skalidis EI, Kochiadakis GE, Koukouraki SI et al. Myocardial perfusion in patients with permanent ventricular pacing and normal coronary arteries. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.37(1), 124–129 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mcgowan RL, Welch TG, Zaret BL, Bryson AL, Martin ND, Flamm MD. Noninvasive myocardial imaging with potassium-43 and rubidium-81 in patients with left bundle branch block. Am. J. Cardiol.38(4), 422–428 (1976).
   Google Scholar
• Ono S, Nohara R, Kambara H, Okuda K, Kawai C. Regional myocardial perfusion and glucose metabolism in experimental left bundle branch block. Circulation85(3), 1125–1131 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prinzen FW, Augustijn CH, Arts T, Allessie MA, Reneman RS. Redistribution of myocardial fiber strain and blood flow by asynchronous activation. Am. J. Physiol.259(2 Pt 2), H300–H308 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baller D, Wolpers HG, Zipfel J, Bretschneider HJ, Hellige G. Comparison of the effects of right atrial, right ventricular apex and atrioventricular sequential pacing on myocardial oxygen consumption and cardiac efficiency: a laboratory investigation. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.11(4), 394–403 (1988).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sweeney MO, Prinzen FW. A new paradigm for physiologic ventricular pacing. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.47(2), 282–288 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Hesayen A, Parker JD. Adverse effects of atrioventricular synchronous right ventricular pacing on left ventricular sympathetic activity, efficiency, and hemodynamic status. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.291(5), H2377–H2379 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamdan MH, Zagrodzky JD, Joglar JA et al. Biventricular pacing decreases sympathetic activity compared with right ventricular pacing in patients with depressed ejection fraction. Circulation102(9), 1027–1032 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubaj A, Ruciåski P, Rejdak K, et al. Biventricular versus right ventricular pacing decreases immune activation and augments nitric oxide production in patients with chronic heart failure. Eur. J. Heart Fail.8(6), 615–620 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Akar JG, Al-Chekakie MO, Fugate T et al. Endothelial dysfunction in heart failure identifies responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Rhythm5(9), 1229–1235 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Al Chekakie MO, Gavigan T, Martin B et al. Abstract 3378: response to biventricular pacing is associated with improvement in endothelial function. Circulation114(18 Meeting Abstracts), (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Styliadis IH, Gouzoumas NI, Karvounis HI et al. Effects of variation of atrioventricular interval on left ventricular diastolic filling dynamics and atrial natriuretic peptide levels in patients with DDD pacing for complete heart block. Europace7(6), 576–583 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Brunner M, Olschewski M, Geibel A, Bode C, Zehender M. Long-term survival after pacemaker implantation. Prognostic importance of gender and baseline patient characteristics. Eur. Heart J.25(1), 88–95 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thackray SD, Witte KK, Nikitin NP, Clark AL, Kaye GC, Cleland JG. The prevalence of heart failure and asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction in a typical regional pacemaker population. Eur. Heart J.24(12), 1143–1152 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristensen L, Nielsen JC, Mortensen PT, Pedersen OL, Pedersen AK, Andersen HR. Incidence of atrial fibrillation and thromboembolism in a randomised trial of atrial versus dual chamber pacing in 177 patients with sick sinus syndrome. Heart90(6), 661–666 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselme F. First clinical results of AAISAFER 2, a new mode to prevent ventricular pacing. Heart Rhythm2(1 Suppl.), 4–99 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Savoure A, Fröhlig G, Galley D et al. A new dual-chamber pacing mode to minimize ventricular pacing. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.28(Suppl. 1), S43–S46 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Gillis AM, Pürerfellner H, Israel CW et al. Reducing unnecessary right ventricular pacing with the managed ventricular pacing mode in patients with sinus node disease and AV block. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.29(7), 697–705 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deshmukh P, Casavant DA, Romanyshyn M, Anderson K. Permanent, direct His-bundle pacing: a novel approach to cardiac pacing in patients with normal His-Purkinje activation. Circulation101(8), 869–877 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deshmukh PM, Romanyshyn M. Direct His-bundle pacing: present and future. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.27(6 Pt 2), 862–870 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Kronborg MB, Mortensen PT, Gerdes JC, Jensen HK, Nielsen JC. His and para-His pacing in AV block: feasibility and electrocardiographic findings. J. Interv. Card. Electrophysiol. DOI: 10.1007/s10840-011-9565-1 (2011) (Epub ahead of print).
   Google Scholar
• De Cock CC, Giudici MC, Twisk JW. Comparison of the haemodynamic effects of right ventricular outflow-tract pacing with right ventricular apex pacing: a quantitative review. Europace5(3), 275–278 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanerio G, Vidal JL, Fernandez Banizi P, Banina Aguerre D, Viana P, Tejada J. Medium- and long-term survival after pacemaker implant: improved survival with right ventricular outflow tract pacing. J. Interv. Card. Electrophysiol.21(3), 195–201 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Vlay SC. Right ventricular outflow tract pacing: practical and beneficial. A 9-year experience of 460 consecutive implants. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.29(10), 1055–1062 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Medi C, Mond HG. Right ventricular outflow tract septal pacing: long-term follow-up of ventricular lead performance. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.32(2), 172–176 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Burri H, Sunthorn H, Dorsaz PA, Viera I, Shah D. Thresholds and complications with right ventricular septal pacing compared to apical pacing. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.30(Suppl. 1), S75–S78 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Kypta A, Steinwender C, Kammler J, Leisch F, Hofmann R. Long-term outcomes in patients with atrioventricular block undergoing septal ventricular lead implantation compared with standard apical pacing. Europace10(5), 574–579 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Mcgavigan AD, Roberts-Thomson KC, Hillock RJ, Stevenson IH, Mond HG. Right ventricular outflow tract pacing: radiographic and electrocardiographic correlates of lead position. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.29(10), 1063–1068 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lane RE, Mayet J, Peters NS, Davies DW, Chow AW. Comparison of temporary bifocal right ventricular pacing and biventricular pacing for heart failure: evaluation by tissue Doppler imaging. Heart94(1), 53–58 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vardas PE, Auricchio A, Blanc JJ et al. Guidelines for cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur. Heart J.28(18), 2256–2295 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elder D. Left ventricular dysfunction in patients referred for pacemakers – implications for pacemaker choice. Eur. J. Heart Fail.7(Suppl.), 183–184 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Kindermann M, Hennen B, Jung J, Geisel J, Bohm M, Frohlig G. Biventricular versus conventional right ventricular stimulation for patients with standard pacing indication and left ventricular dysfunction: the Homburg Biventricular Pacing Evaluation (HOBIPACE). J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.47(10), 1927–1937 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vardas PE, Auricchio A, Blanc JJ et al. Guidelines for cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the Task Force for Cardiac Pacing and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association. Eur. Heart J.28(18), 2256–2295 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu CM, Chan JY, Zhang Q et al. Biventricular pacing in patients with bradycardia and normal ejection fraction. N. Engl. J. Med.361(22), 2123–2134 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miura T, Bhargava V, Guth BD et al. Increased afterload intensifies asynchronous wall motion and impairs ventricular relaxation. J. Appl. Physiol.75(1), 389–396 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• White JA, Yee R, Yuan X et al. Delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with intraventricular dyssynchrony. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.48(10), 1953–1960 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell GF, Lamas GA, Vaughan DE, Pfeffer MA. Left ventricular remodeling in the year after first anterior myocardial infarction: a quantitative analysis of contractile segment lengths and ventricular shape. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.19(6), 1136–1144 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brilla CG, Reams GP, Maisch B, Weber KT. Renin–angiotensin system and myocardial fibrosis in hypertension: regulation of the myocardial collagen matrix. Eur. Heart J.14(Suppl. J), 57–61 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Kawai H, Stevens SY, Liang CS. Renin–angiotensin system inhibition on noradrenergic nerve terminal function in pacing-induced heart failure. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.279(6), H3012–H3019 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Hornig B, Arakawa N, Haussmann D, Drexler H. Differential effects of quinaprilat and enalaprilat on endothelial function of conduit arteries in patients with chronic heart failure. Circulation98(25), 2842–2848 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funabiki K, Onishi K, Dohi K et al. Combined angiotensin receptor blocker and ACE inhibitor on myocardial fibrosis and left ventricular stiffness in dogs with heart failure. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.287(6), H2487–H2492 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Kurita T, Onishi K, Dohi K et al. Conventional therapy with an ACE inhibitor diminishes left ventricular dyssynchrony during the progression of heart failure. Int. J. Cardiol.140(1), 48–54 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams SG, Connelly DT, Jackson M, Bennett A, Albouaini K, Todd DM. Does treatment with ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor antagonists prevent atrial fibrillation after dual chamber pacemaker implantation? Europace7(6), 554–559 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Curtis AB, Adamson PB, Chung E, Sutton MS, Tang F, Worley S. Biventricular versus right ventricular pacing in patients with AV block (BLOCK HF): clinical study design and rationale. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol.18(9), 965–971 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Teresa E, Gómez-Doblas JJ, Lamas G et al. Preventing ventricular dysfunction in pacemaker patients without advanced heart failure: rationale and design of the PREVENT-HF study. Europace9(6), 442–446 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Funck RC, Blanc JJ, Mueller HH, Schade-Brittinger C, Bailleul C, Maisch B. Biventricular stimulation to prevent cardiac desynchronization: rationale, design, and endpoints of the ‘Biventricular Pacing for Atrioventricular Block to Prevent Cardiac Desynchronization (BioPace)’ study. Europace8(8), 629–635 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spickler JW, Rasor NS, Kezdi P, Misra SN, Robins KE, Leboeuf C. Totally self-contained intracardiac pacemaker. J. Electrocardiol.3(3–4), 325–331 (1970).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee KL, Lau CP, Tse HF et al. First human demonstration of cardiac stimulation with transcutaneous ultrasound energy delivery: implications for wireless pacing with implantable devices. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.50(9), 877–883 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamas GA, Orav EJ, Stambler BS et al. Quality of life and clinical outcomes in elderly patients treated with ventricular pacing as compared with dual-chamber pacing. N. Engl. J. Med.338, 1097–1104 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toff WD, Camm AJ, Skehan JD et al. Single-chamber versus dual-chamber pacing for high-grade atrioventricular block. N. Engl. J. Med.353, 145–155 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar