MRI of acute vascular syndromes: the emerging role of cardiovascular MRI in the diagnosis and treatment of AMI and stroke

References

• Smith SC. Reducing the global burden of ischemic heart disease and stroke: a challenge for the cardiovascular community and the United Nations. Circulation 124(3), 278–279 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pennell DJ. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation 121(5), 692–705 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grothues F, Smith GC, Moon JC et al. Comparison of interstudy reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance with two-dimensional echocardiography in normal subjects and in patients with heart failure or left ventricular hypertrophy. Am. J. Cardiol. 90(1), 29–34 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwee RM, van Engelshoven JM, Mess WH et al. Reproducibility of fibrous cap status assessment of carotid artery plaques by contrast-enhanced MRI. Stroke 40(9), 3017–3021 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wieben O, Francois C, Reeder SB. Cardiac MRI of ischemic heart disease at 3 T: potential and challenges. Eur. J. Radiol. 65(1), 15–28 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zemrak F, Petersen SE. Late gadolinium enhancement CMR predicts adverse cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in patients with coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 54(3), 215–229 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cury RC, Shash K, Nagurney JT et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance with T2-weighted imaging improves detection of patients with acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department. Circulation 118(8), 837–844 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Green JD, Sykes JM et al. Detection and quantification of myocardial reperfusion hemorrhage using T2*-weighted CMR. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 4(12), 1274–1283 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu KC, Zerhouni EA, Judd RM et al. Prognostic significance of microvascular obstruction by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 97(8), 765–772 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiele H, Nagel E, Paetsch I et al. Functional cardiac MR imaging with steady-state free precession (SSFP) significantly improves endocardial border delineation without contrast agents. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 14(4), 362–367 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzka DA, Guttman MA, McVeigh ER. Myocardial tagging with SSFP. Magn. Reson. Med. 49(2), 329–340 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Parrish TB et al. Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. Circulation 100(19), 1992–2002 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael Aet al. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. N. Engl. J. Med. 343(20), 1445–1453 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dall’Armellina E, Karia N, Lindsay AC et al. Dynamic changes of edema and late gadolinium enhancement after acute myocardial infarction and their relationship to functional recovery and salvage index. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 4(3), 228–236 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyne JC, Gatehouse PD, Assomull RG et al. Direct comparison of myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance sequences with parallel acquisition. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 26(6), 1444–1451 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nagel E, Klein C, Paetsch I et al. Magnetic resonance perfusion measurements for the noninvasive detection of coronary artery disease. Circulation 108(4), 432–437 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood JP, Maredia N, Younger JF et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial. Lancet 379(9814), 453–460 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingkanisorn WP, Kwong RY, Bohme NS et al. Prognosis of negative adenosine stress magnetic resonance in patients presenting to an emergency department with chest pain. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 47(7), 1427–1432 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaandorp TA, Lamb HJ, Viergever EP et al. Scar tissue on contrast-enhanced MRI predicts left ventricular remodelling after acute infarction. Heart 93(3), 375–376 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Friedrich MG, Kim HW, Kim RJ. T2-weighted imaging to assess post-infarct myocardium at risk. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 4(9), 1014–1021 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’Regan DP, Ahmed R, Karunanithy N et al. Reperfusion hemorrhage following acute myocardial infarction: assessment with T2* mapping and effect on measuring the area at risk. Radiology 250(3), 916–922 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kwong RY, Schussheim AE, Rekhraj S et al. Detecting acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 107(4), 531–537 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedrich MG, Sechtem U, Schulz-Menger J et al.; International Consensus Group on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Myocarditis. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in myocarditis: a JACC white paper. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 53(17), 1475–1487 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eitel I, von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Bernhardt P et al. Clinical characteristics and cardiovascular magnetic resonance findings in stress (takotsubo) cardiomyopathy. JAMA 306(3), 277–286 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assomull RG, Lyne JC, Keenan N et al. The role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients presenting with chest pain, raised troponin, and unobstructed coronary arteries. Eur. Heart J. 28(10), 1242–1249 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim WY, Danias PG, Stuber M et al. Coronary magnetic resonance angiography for the detection of coronary stenoses. N. Engl. J. Med. 345(26), 1863–1869 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakuma H, Ichikawa Y, Chino S, Hirano T, Makino K, Takeda K. Detection of coronary artery stenosis with whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 48(10), 1946–1950 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber OM, Martin AJ, Higgins CB. Whole-heart steady-state free precession coronary artery magnetic resonance angiography. Magn. Reson. Med. 50(6), 1223–1228 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayad ZA, Fuster V, Fallon JT et al. Noninvasive in vivo human coronary artery lumen and wall imaging using black-blood magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 102(5), 506–510 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka A, Kawasaki T, Noguchi T et al. Hyperintense plaque with noncontrast T1-weighted magnetic resonance coronary plaque imaging leading to acute coronary syndrome. Circulation 120(23), 2400–2401 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim WY, Christiansen EH, Thrysøe SA et al. First in vivo demonstration of coronary edema in culprit lesion of patient with acute coronary syndrome by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 4(3), 344–346 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chalela JA, Kidwell CS, Nentwich LM et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in emergency assessment of patients with suspected acute stroke: a prospective comparison. Lancet 369(9558), 293–298 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay AC, Biasiolli L, Lee JM et al. Plaque features associated with increased cerebral infarction after minor stroke and TIA: a prospective, case–control, 3-T carotid artery MR imaging study. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 5(4), 388–396 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold GE, Pauly JM, Glover GH, Moretto JC, Macovski A, Herfkens RJ. Characterization of atherosclerosis with a 1.5-T imaging system. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 3(2), 399–407 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai JM, Hatsukami TS, Ferguson MS, Small R, Polissar NL, Yuan C. Classification of human carotid atherosclerotic lesions with in vivo multicontrast magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 106(11), 1368–1373 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Bouwhuijsen QJ, Vernooij MW, Hofman A, Krestin GP, van der Lugt A, Witteman JC. Determinants of magnetic resonance imaging detected carotid plaque components: the Rotterdam Study. Eur. Heart J. 33(2), 221–229 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cai J, Hatsukami TS, Ferguson MS et al. In vivo quantitative measurement of intact fibrous cap and lipid-rich necrotic core size in atherosclerotic carotid plaque: comparison of high-resolution, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and histology. Circulation 112(22), 3437–3444 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerwin W, Hooker A, Spilker M et al. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging analysis of neovasculature volume in carotid atherosclerotic plaque. Circulation 107(6), 851–856 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altaf N, MacSweeney ST, Gladman J, Auer DP. Carotid intraplaque hemorrhage predicts recurrent symptoms in patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. Stroke 38(5), 1633–1635 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatsukami TS, Ross R, Polissar NL, Yuan C. Visualization of fibrous cap thickness and rupture in human atherosclerotic carotid plaque in vivo with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 102(9), 959–964 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan C, Zhang SX, Polissar NL et al. Identification of fibrous cap rupture with magnetic resonance imaging is highly associated with recent transient ischemic attack or stroke. Circulation 105(2), 181–185 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parmar JP, Rogers WJ, Mugler JP 3rd et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of carotid atherosclerotic plaque in clinically suspected acute transient ischemic attack and acute ischemic stroke. Circulation 122(20), 2031–2038 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman BA, Wityk RJ, Trout HH 3rd, Virmani R. Low-grade carotid stenosis: looking beyond the lumen with MRI. Stroke. 36(11), 2504–2513 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teng Z, Degnan AJ, Sadat U et al. Characterization of healing following atherosclerotic carotid plaque rupture in acutely symptomatic patients: an exploratory study using in vivo cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 13, 64 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Corti R, Fuster V, Fayad ZA et al. Effects of aggressive versus conventional lipid-lowering therapy by simvastatin on human atherosclerotic lesions: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 46(1), 106–112 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JM, Robson MD, Yu LM et al. Effects of high-dose modified-release nicotinic acid on atherosclerosis and vascular function: a randomized, placebo-controlled, magnetic resonance imaging study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 54(19), 1787–1794 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Underhill HR, Yuan C, Yarnykh VL et al. Arterial remodeling in [corrected] subclinical carotid artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2(12), 1381–1389 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McAteer MA, Sibson NR, von Zur Muhlen C et al. In vivo magnetic resonance imaging of acute brain inflammation using microparticles of iron oxide. Nat. Med. 13(10), 1253–1258 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang TY, Howarth SP, Miller SR et al. The ATHEROMA (Atorvastatin Therapy: Effects on Reduction of Macrophage Activity) Study. Evaluation using ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in carotid disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 53(22), 2039–2050 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar