Contemporary pacemaker and ICD lead management: techniques for lead extraction

References

• Powell BD, Asirvatham SJ. Innovative techniques stem from classical electrophysiology: completing the circle. J. Innov. Card. Rhythm Manage. 1, 1–8 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Wilkoff BL, Love CJ, Byrd CL et al.; Heart Rhythm Society; American Heart Association. Transvenous lead extraction: Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus on facilities, training, indications, and patient management: this document was endorsed by the American Heart Association (AHA). Heart Rhythm 6(7), 1085–1104 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein LM, Byrd CL, Wilkoff BL et al. Initial experience with larger laser sheaths for the removal of transvenous pacemaker and implantable defibrillator leads. Circulation 100(5), 516–525 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wazni O, Epstein LM, Carrillo RG et al. Lead extraction in the contemporary setting: the LExICon study: an observational retrospective study of consecutive laser lead extractions. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 55(6), 579–586 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkoff BL, Byrd CL, Love CJ et al. Pacemaker lead extraction with the laser sheath: results of the Pacing Lead Extraction With The Excimer Sheath (PLEXES) trial. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 33(6), 1671–1676 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klug D, Lacroix D, Savoye C et al. Systemic infection related to endocarditis on pacemaker leads: clinical presentation and management. Circulation 95(8), 2098–2107 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddour LM, Epstein AE, Erickson CC et al.; American Heart Association Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease Committee; Council on Cardiovascular Disease in Young; Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; Council on Clinical Cardiology; Interdisciplinary Council on Quality of Care; American Heart Association. Update on cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections and their management: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 121(3), 458–477 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamis AL, Peterson GE, Cabell CH et al. Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in patients with permanent pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Circulation 104(9), 1029–1033 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uslan DZ, Dowsley TF, Sohail MR et al. Cardiovascular implantable electronic device infection in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 33(4), 407–413 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chua JD, Wilkoff BL, Lee I, Juratli N, Longworth DL, Gordon SM. Diagnosis and management of infections involving implantable electrophysiologic cardiac devices. Ann. Intern. Med. 133(8), 604–608 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu WS, Nguyen D. Pacemaker lead extraction in pacemaker endocarditis with lead vegetation: usefulness of transesophageal echocardiography. Can. J. Cardiol. 14(1), 87–89 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sohail MR, Uslan DZ, Khan AH et al. Infective endocarditis complicating permanent pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator infection. Mayo Clin. Proc. 83(1), 46–53 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gula LJ, Ames A, Woodburn A et al. Central venous occlusion is not an obstacle to device upgrade with the assistance of laser extraction. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 28(7), 661–666 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shetty AK, Walker F, Cullen S, Lambiase PD. Extraction of pacing leads jailed by a stent in a mustard circulation. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 33(7), e65–e67 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Baranowski B, Wazni O, Chung R et al. Percutaneous extraction of stented device leads. Heart Rhythm 9(5), 723–727 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Smith HJ, Fearnot NE, Byrd CL, Wilkoff BL, Love CJ, Sellers TD. Five-years experience with intravascular lead extraction. U.S. Lead Extraction Database. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 17(11 Pt 2), 2016–2020 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmutz M, Delacrétaz E, Schwick N et al. Prevalence of asymptomatic and electrically undetectable intracardiac inside-out abrasion in silicon-coated Riata® and Riata® ST implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads. Int. J. Cardiol. (2012) (In Press).
   Google Scholar
• Parvathaneni SV, Ellis CR, Rottman JN. High prevalence of insulation failure with externalized cables in St. Jude Medical Riata family ICD leads: fluoroscopic grading scale and correlation to extracted leads. Heart Rhythm (2012) (In Press).
   Google Scholar
• Erkapic D, Duray GZ, Bauernfeind T, De Rosa S, Hohnloser SH. Insulation defects of thin high-voltage ICD leads: an underestimated problem? J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 22(9), 1018–1022 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Hauser RG, McGriff D, Retel LK. Riata implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead failure: analysis of explanted leads with a unique insulation defect. Heart Rhythm 9(5), 742–749 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser RG, Abdelhadi R, McGriff D, Retel LK. Deaths caused by the failure of Riata and Riata ST implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads. Heart Rhythm (2012) (In Press).
   Google Scholar
• Silvetti MS, Drago F. Outcome of young patients with abandoned, nonfunctional endocardial leads. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 31(4), 473–479 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Suga C, Hayes DL, Hyberger LK, Lloyd MA. Is there an adverse outcome from abandoned pacing leads? J. Interv. Card. Electrophysiol. 4(3), 493–499 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glikson M, Suleiman M, Luria DM et al. Do abandoned leads pose risk to implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients? Heart Rhythm 6(1), 65–68 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams SE, Arujuna A, Whitaker J et al. Percutaneous lead and system extraction in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices and coronary sinus leads. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 34(10), 1209–1216 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• di Cori A, Bongiorni MG, Zucchelli G et al. Large, single-center experience in transvenous coronary sinus lead extraction: procedural outcomes and predictors for mechanical dilatation. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 35(2), 215–222 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maytin M, Carrillo RG, Baltodano P et al. Multicenter experience with transvenous lead extraction of active fixation coronary sinus leads. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 35(6), 641–647 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Baranowski B, Yerkey M, Dresing T, Wilkoff BL. Fibrotic tissue growth into the extendable lobes of an active fixation coronary sinus lead can complicate extraction. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 34(7), e64–e65 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Byrd CL, Wilkoff BL, Love CJ, Sellers TD, Reiser C. Clinical study of the laser sheath for lead extraction: the total experience in the United States. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 25(5), 804–808 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennergren C, Bucknall CA, Butter C et al.; PLESSE investigators group. Laser-assisted lead extraction: the European experience. Europace 9(8), 651–656 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuzil P, Taborsky M, Rezek Z et al. Pacemaker and ICD lead extraction with electrosurgical dissection sheaths and standard transvenous extraction systems: results of a randomized trial. Europace 9(2), 98–104 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussein AA, Wilkoff BL, Martin DO et al. Initial experience with the Evolution mechanical dilator sheath for lead extraction: safety and efficacy. Heart Rhythm 7(7), 870–873 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Bongiorni MG, Soldati E, Zucchelli G et al. Transvenous removal of pacing and implantable cardiac defibrillating leads using single sheath mechanical dilatation and multiple venous approaches: high success rate and safety in more than 2000 leads. Eur. Heart J. 29(23), 2886–2893 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordachar P, Defaye P, Peyrouse E et al. Extraction of old pacemaker or cardioverter-defibrillator leads by laser sheath versus femoral approach. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 3(4), 319–323 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar