References
- Jaik NP, Umakanthan R, Leacche M et al. Current status of hybrid coronary revascularization. Expert Rev. Cardiovasc. Ther. 9(10), 1331–1337 (2011).
- Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP et al.; SYNTAX Investigators. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 360(10), 961–972 (2009).
- The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) Investigators. The final 10-year follow-up results from the BARI randomized trial. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 49(15), 1600–1606 (2007).
- Puskas JD, Williams WH, Mahoney EM et al. Off-pump vs conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: early and 1-year graft patency, cost, and quality-of-life outcomes: a randomized trial. JAMA 291(15), 1841–1849 (2004).
- Balacumaraswami L, Taggart DP. Intraoperative imaging techniques to assess coronary artery bypass graft patency. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 83(6), 2251–2257 (2007).
- Zhao DX, Leacche M, Balaguer JM et al.; Writing Group of the Cardiac Surgery, Cardiac Anesthesiology, and Interventional Cardiology Groups at the Vanderbilt Heart and Vascular Institute. Routine intraoperative completion angiography after coronary artery bypass grafting and 1-stop hybrid revascularization results from a fully integrated hybrid catheterization laboratory/operating room. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 53(3), 232–241 (2009).
- Bachinsky WB, Abdelsalam M, Boga G, Kiljanek L, Mumtaz M, McCarty C. Comparative study of same sitting hybrid coronary artery revascularization versus off-pump coronary artery bypass in multivessel coronary artery disease. J. Interv. Cardiol. 25(5), 460–468 (2012).