Surfaces to control tissue adhesion for osteosynthesis with metal implants: in vitro and in vivo studies to bring solutions to the patient

References

• Alzahrani AG, Behairy YM, Alhossan MH, Arab FS, Alammari AA. Removal of internal fixation devices in pediatric patients. Saudi Med. J.24, 254–255 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson HA. Metallic implant removal in children. J. Pediatr. Orthop.25, 107–115 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busam ML, Esther RJ, Obremskey WT. Hardware removal: indications and expectations. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg.14, 113–120 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emel E, Karagöz Güzey F, Güzey D, Seyithanoğlu H, Sel B, Alataş I. Delayed infection 6 years after spinal instrumentation: a case report. Turk. Neurosurg.17(2), 116–120 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togrul E, Bayram H, Gulsen M, Kalaci A, Ozbarlas S. Fractures of the femoral neck in children: long-term follow up in 62 hip fractures. Injury36, 123–130 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmalzreid TP, Grogan TJ, Neumeier PA, Dorey FJ. Metal removal in a Pediatric population: benign procedure or necessary evil?. J. Pediatr. Orthop.11, 72–76 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahle WK. The case against routine metal removal. J. Pediatr. Orthop.14, 229–237 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton P, Doig S, Williamson O. Technical difficulty of metal removal after LISS plating. Injury35, 626–628 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgiadis GM, Gove NK, Smith AD, Rodway IP. Removal of the less invasive stabilisation system. J. Orthop. Trauma18, 562–564 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyan BD, Lossdorfer S, Wang L et al. Osteoblasts generate an osteogenic microenvironment when grown on surfaces with rough microtopographies. Eur. Cell Mater.6, 22–27 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kieswetter K, Schwartz Z, Hummert TW et al. Surface roughness modulates the local production of growth factors and cytokines by osteoblast-like MG-63 cells. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.32(1), 55–63 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes JS, Khan IM, Archer CW, Richards RG. The role of surface microtopography in the modulation of osteoblast phenotype. Eur. Cell Mater. (2009) (In Press).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter LC, Frauchiger V, Textor M, ap Gwynn I, Richards RG. Fibroblast and osteoblast adhesion and morphology on calcium phosphate surfaces. Eur. Cell Mater.30(4), 1–17 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Welton JL. Masters thesis. In vivoEvaluation of Defined Polished Surfaces to Prevent Soft Tissue Adhesion. AO Research Institute, Davos, Switzerland (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Nazzal A, Lozano-Calderón S, Jupiter JB, Rosenzweig JS, Randolph MA, Lee SG. A histologic analysis of the effects of stainless steel and titanium implants adjacent to tendons: an experimental rabbit study. J. Hand Surg. (Am.)31(7), 1123–1130 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meredith DO, Riehle MO, Curtis AS, Richards RG. Microtopography of metal surfaces influence fibroblast growth by modifying cell shape, cytoskeleton and adhesion. J. Orthop. Res.25(11), 1523–1533 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meredith DO, Eschbach L, Wood MA, Riehle MO, Curtis AS, Richards RG. Human fibroblast reactions to standard and electropolished titanium and Ti-6Al-7Nb, and electropolished stainless steel. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A.75, 541–555 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meredith DO, Riehle MO, Curtis AS, Richards RG. Is surface chemical composition important for orthopaedic implant materials?. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med.18, 405–413 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce AI, Pearce SG, Schwieger K et al. Effect of surface topography on removal of cortical bone screws in a novel sheep model. J. Orthop. Res.26(10), 1377–1383 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes JS, Seidenglanz U, Pearce AI, Pearce SG, Archer CW, Richards RG. Reducing implant removal related morbidity with surface polishing – a novel in vivo study. Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society. Las Vegas, NV, USA, 22–25 February 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenbarth E, Velten D, Schenk-Meuser K et al. Interactions between cells and titanium surfaces. Biomol. Eng.19, 243–249 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Howlett CR, Evans MD, Walsh WR, Johnson G, Steele JG. Mechanism of initial attachment of cells derived from human bone to commonly used prosthetic materials during cell culture. Biomaterials15, 213–222 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degasne I, Basle MF, Demais V et al. Effects of roughness, fibronectin and vitronectin on attachment, spreading, and proliferation of human osteoblast-like cells (SaOs-2) on titanium surfaces. Calcif. Tissue Int.64(6), 499–507 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Cavin R, Ong JL. Protein adsorption on titanium surfaces and their effect on osteoblast attachment. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A67, 344–349 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer AE, Baier RE, Natiella JR, Meenaghan MA. Investigation of tissue/implant interactions during the first two hours of implantation. J. Oral Implantol.14, 363–379 (1988).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klöppel H, Wieling R, Rahn BA, Richards RG. Influence of stainless steel implant surface microtopography on boney integration. Proceedings of the 18th European Conference on Biomaterials. Stuttgart, Germany, 1–4 October 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Probst A, Speigel HA. Cellular mechanisms of bone repair. J. Invest. Surg.10, 77–86 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schindeler A, McDonald MM, Bokko P, Little DG. Bone remodeling during fracture repair: the cellular picture. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol.19(5), 459–466 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deuel TF, Senior RM, Huang JS, Griffin GL. Chemotaxis of monocytes and neutrophils to platelet-derived growth factor. J. Clin. Invest.69, 1046–1049 (1982).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postlethwaite AE, Keski-Oja J, Moses HL, Kang AH. Stimulation of the chemotactic migration of human fibroblasts by transforming growth factor b. J. Exp. Med.165, 251–256 (1987).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horbett TA, Schway MB. Correlations between mouse 3T3 cell spreading and serum fibronectin adsorption on glass and hydroxyethylmethacrylate-ethylmethacrylate copolymers. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.22(9), 763–793 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keselowsky BG, Wang L, Schwartz Z, Garcia AJ, Boyan BD. Integrin a(5) controls osteoblastic proliferation and differentiation responses to titanium substrates presenting different roughness characteristics in a roughness independent manner. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A.80(3), 700–710 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Zhao G, Olivares-Navarrete R et al. Integrin β1 silencing in osteoblasts alters substrate-dependent responses to 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D3. Biomaterials27(20), 3716–3725 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin JY, Schwartz Z, Hummert TW et al. Effect of titanium surface roughness on proliferation, differentiation and protein synthesis of human osteoblast-like cells (MG-63). J. Biomed. Mater. Res.29, 389–401 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postiglione L, Di Domenico G, Ramaglia L et al. Behavior of SaOS-2 cells cultured on different titanium surfaces. J. Dent. Res.82, 692–696 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masaki C, Schneider GB, Zaharias R, Seabold D, Stanford C. Effects of implant surface microtopography on osteoblast gene expression. Clin. Oral Implants Res.16(6), 650–656 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider GB, Perinpanayagam H, Clegg M et al. Implant surface roughness affects osteoblast gene expression. J. Dent. Res.82, 372–376 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyan BD, Bonewald LF, Paschalis EP et al. Osteoblast-mediated mineral deposition in culture is dependent on surface microtopography. Calcif. Tissue Int.71(6), 519–529 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider GB, Zaharias R, Seabold D, Keller J, Stanford C. Differentiation of preosteoblasts is affected by implant surface microtopographies. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A.69, 462–468 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies JE. Mechanisms of endosseous integration. Int. J. Prosthodontics11(5), 391–400 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham QP, Kasper FK, Scott Baggett L, Raphael RM, Jansen JA, Mikos AG. The influence of an in vitro generated bone-like extracellular matrix on osteoblastic gene expression of marrow stromal cells. Biomaterials29(18), 2729–2739 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang D, Franceschi RT, Boules H, Xiao G. Parathyroid hormone induction of the osteocalcin gene. Requirement for an osteoblast-specific element 1 sequence in the promoter and involvement of multiple-signaling pathways. J. Biol. Chem.279(7), 5329–5337 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingber DE. Cellular tensegrity: defining new rules of biological design that govern the cytoskeleton. J. Cell Sci.104, 613–627 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forgacs G. On the possible role of cytoskeletal filamentous networks in intracellular signalling: an approach based on percolation. J. Cell Sci.108, 2131–2143 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingber DE. Tensegrity I. Cell structure and hierarchical systems biology. J. Cell Sci.116, 1157–1173 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalby MJ. Topographically induced direct cell mechanotransduction. Med. Eng. Phys.27(9), 730–742 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chicurel ME, Singer RH, Meyer CJ, Ingber DE. Integrin binding and mechanical tension induce movement of mRNA and ribosomes to focal adhesion. Nature392, 730–733 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunette DM. The effects of implant surface topography on the behavior of cells. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants3(4), 231–246 (1988).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boyan BD, Schwartz Z. Modulation of osteogenesis via implant surface design. In: Bone Engineering. Davies JE (Ed.). EM Squared Inc., ON, Canada, Chapter 21, 232–239 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Richards RG. The relevance of implant surfaces in hand fracture-fixation. In: Osteosynthesis in the Hand: Current Concepts. FESSH Instructional Course 2008. Karger, Basel, Switzerland, 20–30 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Parker JA, Walboomers XF, Von den Hoff JW, Maltha JC, Jansen JA. The effect of bone anchoring and micro-grooves on the soft tissue reaction to implants. Biomaterials23, 3887–3896 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gristina AG. Implant failure and the immuno-incompetent fibro-inflammatory zone. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.298, 106–118 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinicropi SM, Su BW, Raia FJ, Parisien M, Strauch RJ, Rosenwasser MP. The effects of implant composition on extensor tenosynovitis in a canine distal radius fracture model. J. Hand Surg. (Am.)30, 300–307 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes JS. PhD thesis: the efficacy of surface polishing clinically available internal fixation materials for ease of removal. AO Research Institute, Davos, Switzerland, Chapter 3–4 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Dalby MJ, McCloy D, Robertson M et al. Osteoprogenitor response to semi-ordered and random nano-topographies. Biomaterials27, 2980–2987 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalby MJ, Gadegaard N, Curtis AS, Oreffo RO. Nanotopographical control of human osteoprogenitor differentiation. Curr. Stem Cell Res. Ther.2(2), 129–138 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Biggs MJ, Richards RG, Gadegaard N, Wilkinson CD, Dalby MJ. The effects of nanoscale pits on primary human osteoblast adhesion formation and cellular spreading. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med.18(2), 399–404 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs MJ, Richards RG, Gadegaard N et al. Interactions with nanoscale topography: adhesion quantification and signal transduction in cells of osteogenic and multipotent lineage. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A.91(1), 195–208 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Highland TR, LaMont RL. Deep, late infections associated with internal fixation in children. J. Pediatr. Orthop.5, 59–64 (1985).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summer B, Fink U, Zeller R et al. Patch test reactivity to a cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy and stainless steel in metal-allergic patients in correlation to the metal ion release. Contact Dermatitis57(1), 35–39 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommer B, Felix R, Sprecher C, Leunig M, Ganz R, Hofstetter W. Wear particles and surface topographies are modulators of osteoclastogenesis in vitro. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A.72(1), 67–76 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seipel RC, Schmeling GJ, Daley R. Migration of a K-wire from the distal radius to the heart. Am. J. Orthop.30, 147–151 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kasai Y, Iida R, Uchida A. Metal concentrations in the serum and hair of patients with titanium alloy spinal implants. Spine15, 1320–1326 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Hayes JS, Vos DI, Hahn J, Pearce SG, Richards RG. An in vivo evaluation of surface polishing of TAN intramedullary nails for ease of removal. Eur. Cell Mater.18, 15–26 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albreksston T, Hansson HA. An ultrastructural characterisation of the interface between bone and sputtered titanium or steel surfaces. Biomaterials7, 201–205 (1986).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris LG, Meredith DO, Eschbach L, Richards RG. Staphylococcus aureus adhesion to standard micro-rough and electropolished implant materials. J. Mat. Sci. Mater. Med.18, 1151–1156 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moriarty TF, Debefve L, Boure L, Campoccia D, Schlegel U, Richards RG. Influence of material and microtopography on the development of local infection in vivo: experimental investigation in rabbits. Int. J. Artif. Organs32(9), 663–670 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moriarty TF, Boure L, Campoccia D, Richards RG. In vivo evaluation of the effect of intramedullary nail microtopography on the development of local infection in rabbits. Proceedings of the 22nd European Society for Biomaterials Conference. Lausanne, Switzerland, 7–11 September 2009. Abstract number 1098.
   Google Scholar