Cardiac output monitoring in pediatric patients

References

• Ganz W, Donoso R, Marcus HS, Forrester JS, Swan HJ. A new technique for measurement of cardiac output by thermodilution in man. Am. J. Cardiol.27(4), 392–396 (1971).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLuckie A, Murdoch IA, Marsh MJ, Anderson D. A comparison of pulmonary and femoral artery thermodilution cardiac indices in paediatric intensive care patients. Acta Paediatr.85(3), 336–338 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tibby SM, Hatherill M, Marsh MJ, Morrison G, Anderson D, Murdoch IA. Clinical validation of cardiac output measurements using femoral artery thermodilution with direct Fick in ventilated children and infants. Intensive Care Med.23(9), 987–991 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tibby SM, Murdoch IA. Monitoring cardiac function in intensive care. Arch. Dis. Child.88(1), 46–52 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skowno JJ, Broadhead M. Cardiac output measurement in pediatric anesthesia. Paediatr. Anaesth.18(11), 1019–1028 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morgan P, Al-Subaie N, Rhodes A. Minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring. Curr. Opin. Crit. Care14(3), 322–326 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Waal EE, Wappler F, Buhre WF. Cardiac output monitoring. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol.22(1), 71–77 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cholley BP, Payen D. Noninvasive techniques for measurements of cardiac output. Curr. Opin. Crit. Care11(5), 424–429 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berton C, Cholley B. Equipment review: new techniques for cardiac output measurement – oesophageal Doppler, Fick principle using carbon dioxide, and pulse contour analysis. Crit. Care6(3), 216–221 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaney JC, Derdak S. Minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring for the intensivist: current and emerging technology. Crit. Care Med.30(10), 2338–2345 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funk DJ, Moretti EW, Gan TJ. Minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring in the perioperative setting. Anesth. Analg.108(3), 887–897 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mathews L, Singh RK. Cardiac output monitoring. Ann. Card. Anaesth.11(1), 56–68 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hofer CK, Ganter MT, Zollinger A. What technique should I use to measure cardiac output? Curr. Opin. Crit. Care13(3), 308–317 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan JR, Festa M, Cole AD, Nunn GR, Gillis J, Winlaw DS. Clinical assessment of cardiac performance in infants and children following cardiac surgery. Intensive Care Med.31(4), 568–573 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tibby SM, Hatherill M, Marsh MJ, Murdoch IA. Clinicians’ abilities to estimate cardiac index in ventilated children and infants. Arch. Dis. Child.77(6), 516–518 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gratama JW, Meuzelaar JJ, Dalinghaus M et al. Myocardial blood flow and VO2 in lambs with an aortopulmonary shunt during strenuous exercise. Am. J. Physiol.264(3 Pt 2), H938–H945 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Dean DA, Jia CX, Cabreriza SE et al. Validation study of a new transit time ultrasonic flow probe for continuous great vessel measurements. ASAIO J.42(5), M671–M676 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Hartman JC, Olszanski DA, Hullinger TG, Brunden MN. In vivo validation of a transit-time ultrasonic volume flow meter. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods31(3), 153–160 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lundell A, Bergqvist D, Mattsson E, Nilsson B. Volume blood flow measurements with a transit time flowmeter: an in vivo and in vitro variability and validation study. Clin. Physiol.13(5), 547–557 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lemson J, de Boode WP, Hopman JC, Singh SK, van der Hoeven JG. Validation of transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output measurement in a pediatric animal model. Pediatr. Crit. Care Med.9(3), 313–319 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tibby S. Transpulmonary thermodilution: finally, a gold standard for pediatric cardiac output measurement. Pediatr. Crit. Care Med.9(3), 341–342 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet1(8476), 307–310 (1986).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Critchley LA, Critchley JA. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J. Clin. Monit. Comput.15(2), 85–91 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cecconi M, Rhodes A, Poloniecki J, Della RG, Grounds RM. Bench-to-bedside review: the importance of the precision of the reference technique in method comparison studies – with specific reference to the measurement of cardiac output. Crit. Care13(1), 201 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spohr F, Hettrich P, Bauer H, Haas U, Martin E, Bottiger BW. Comparison of two methods for enhanced continuous circulatory monitoring in patients with septic shock. Intensive Care Med.33(10), 1805–1810 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Squara P, Cecconi M, Rhodes A, Singer M, Chiche JD. Tracking changes in cardiac output: methodological considerations for the validation of monitoring devices. Intensive Care Med.35(10), 1801–1808 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zierler KL. Theoretical basis of indicator-dilution methods for measuring flow and volume. Circ. Res.10(), 393–407 (1962).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadeau S, Noble WH. Limitations of cardiac output measurements by thermodilution. Can. Anaesth. Soc. J.33(6), 780–784 (1986).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nishikawa T, Dohi S. Errors in the measurement of cardiac output by thermodilution. Can. J. Anaesth.40(2), 142–153 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reuter DA, Huang C, Edrich T, Shernan SK, Eltzschig HK. Cardiac output monitoring using indicator-dilution techniques: basics, limits, and perspectives. Anesth. Analg.110(3), 799–811 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Graves PW, Davis AL, Maggi JC, Nussbaum E. Femoral artery cannulation for monitoring in critically ill children: prospective study. Crit. Care Med.18(12), 1363–1366 (1990).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Agnoletti G, Boudjemline Y, Largen E et al. Use of 3 French catheters for diagnostic and interventional procedures in newborns and small infants. Heart89(11), 1350–1351 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ruperez M, Lopez-Herce J, Garcia C, Sanchez C, Garcia E, Vigil D. Comparison between cardiac output measured by the pulmonary arterial thermodilution technique and that measured by the femoral arterial thermodilution technique in a pediatric animal model. Pediatr. Cardiol.25(2), 119–123 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauli C, Fakler U, Genz T, Hennig M, Lorenz HP, Hess J. Cardiac output determination in children: equivalence of the transpulmonary thermodilution method to the direct Fick principle. Intensive Care Med.28(7), 947–952 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weyland A, Wietasch G, Hoeft A et al. [The effect of an intracardiac left-right shunt on thermodilution measurements of cardiac output. An extracorporeal circulation model]. Anaesthesist44(1), 13–23 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pearl RG, Siegel LC. Thermodilution cardiac output measurement with a large left-to-right shunt. J. Clin. Monit.7(2), 146–153 (1991).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Michard F, Alaya S, Zarka V, Bahloul M, Richard C, Teboul JL. Global end-diastolic volume as an indicator of cardiac preload in patients with septic shock. Chest124(5), 1900–1908 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monnet X, Anguel N, Osman D, Hamzaoui O, Richard C, Teboul JL. Assessing pulmonary permeability by transpulmonary thermodilution allows differentiation of hydrostatic pulmonary edema from ALI/ARDS. Intensive Care Med.33(3), 448–453 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Herce J, Bustinza A, Sancho L et al. Cardiac output and blood volume parameters using femoral arterial thermodilution. Pediatr. Int.51(1), 59–65 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lemson J, Backx AP, van Oort AM, Bouw TP, van der Hoeven JG. Extravascular lung water measurement using transpulmonary thermodilution in children. Pediatr. Crit. Care Med.10(2), 227–233 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cecchetti C, Lubrano R, Cristaldi S et al. Relationship between global end-diastolic volume and cardiac output in critically ill infants and children. Crit. Care Med.36(3), 928–932 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schiffmann H, Erdlenbruch B, Singer D et al. Assessment of cardiac output, intravascular volume status, and extravascular lung water by transpulmonary indicator dilution in critically ill neonates and infants. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth.16(5), 592–597 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt S, Westhoff TH, Hofmann C et al. Effect of the venous catheter site on transpulmonary thermodilution measurement variables. Crit. Care Med.35(3), 783–786 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michard F. Looking at transpulmonary thermodilution curves: the cross-talk phenomenon. Chest126(2), 656–657 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lemson J, Eijk RJ, van der Hoeven JG. The “cross-talk phenomenon” in transpulmonary thermodilution is flow dependent. Intensive Care Med.32(7), 1092 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Linton R, Band D, O’Brien T, Jonas M, Leach R. Lithium dilution cardiac output measurement: a comparison with thermodilution. Crit. Care Med.25(11), 1796–1800 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Linton RA, Jonas MM, Tibby SM et al. Cardiac output measured by lithium dilution and transpulmonary thermodilution in patients in a paediatric intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med.26(10), 1507–1511 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jonas MM, Tanser SJ. Lithium dilution measurement of cardiac output and arterial pulse waveform analysis: an indicator dilution calibrated beat-by-beat system for continuous estimation of cardiac output. Curr. Opin. Crit. Care8(3), 257–261 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jonas MM, Linton RAF, O’Brien TK et al. The pharmacokinetics of intravenous lithium chloride in patients and normal volunteers. Lithium notes in biology and medicine. J. Trace Microprobe Techn.19(2), 313–320 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Imai T, Takahashi K, Fukura H, Morishita Y. Measurement of cardiac output by pulse dye densitometry using indocyanine green: a comparison with the thermodilution method. Anesthesiology87(4), 816–822 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reekers M, Simon MJ, Boer F et al. Cardiovascular monitoring by pulse dye densitometry or arterial indocyanine green dilution. Anesth. Analg.109(2), 441–446 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hofer CK, Buhlmann S, Klaghofer R, Genoni M, Zollinger A. Pulsed dye densitometry with two different sensor types for cardiac output measurement after cardiac surgery: a comparison with the thermodilution technique. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand.48(5), 653–657 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kroon M, Groeneveld AB, Smulders YM. Cardiac output measurement by pulse dye densitometry: comparison with pulmonary artery thermodilution in post-cardiac surgery patients. J. Clin. Monit. Comput.19(6), 395–399 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kusaka T, Okubo K, Nagano K, Isobe K, Itoh S. Cerebral distribution of cardiac output in newborn infants. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.90(1), F77–F78 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Nagano K, Kusaka T, Okubo K et al. Estimation of circulating blood volume in infants using the pulse dye densitometry method. Paediatr. Anaesth.15(2), 125–130 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aladangady N, Leung T, Costeloe K, Delpy D. Measuring circulating blood volume in newborn infants using pulse dye densitometry and indocyanine green. Paediatr. Anaesth.18(9), 865–871 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taguchi N, Nakagawa S, Miyasaka K, Fuse M, Aoyagi T. Cardiac output measurement by pulse dye densitometry using three wavelengths. Pediatr. Crit. Care Med.5(4), 343–350 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krivitski NM, Kislukhin VV, Thuramalla NV. Theory and in vitro validation of a new extracorporeal arteriovenous loop approach for hemodynamic assessment in pediatric and neonatal intensive care unit patients. Pediatr. Crit. Care Med.9(4), 423–428 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Boode WP, van Heijst AF, Hopman JC, Tanke RB, van der Hoeven HG, Liem KD. Cardiac output measurement using an ultrasound dilution method: a validation study in ventilated piglets. Pediatr. Crit. Care Med.11(1), 103–108 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulenberg A, Harmon W, Rubenstein J. A novel method to measure cardiac output in the pediatric ICU: animal validation and preliminary clinical study. Crit. Care Med.34(12), A12 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Mayer J, Suttner S. Cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveform. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol.22(6), 804–808 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Langewouters GJ, Wesseling KH, Goedhard WJ. The static elastic properties of 45 human thoracic and 20 abdominal aortas in vitro and the parameters of a new model. J. Biomech.17(6), 425–435 (1984).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godje O, Hoke K, Goetz AE et al. Reliability of a new algorithm for continuous cardiac output determination by pulse-contour analysis during hemodynamic instability. Crit. Care Med.30(1), 52–58 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felbinger TW, Reuter DA, Eltzschig HK, Moerstedt K, Goedje O, Goetz AE. Comparison of pulmonary arterial thermodilution and arterial pulse contour analysis: evaluation of a new algorithm. J. Clin. Anesth.14(4), 296–301 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lopez-Herce J, Ruperez M, Sanchez C, Garcia C, Garcia E. Correlation between cardiac output measured by the femoral arterial thermodilution technique pulmonary arterial and that measured by contour pulse analysis in a paediatric animal model. J. Clin. Monit. Comput.20(1), 19–23 (2006)
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Piehl MD, Manning JE, McCurdy SL et al. Pulse contour cardiac output analysis in a piglet model of severe hemorrhagic shock. Crit. Care Med.36(4), 1189–1195 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahajan A, Shabanie A, Turner J, Sopher MJ, Marijic J. Pulse contour analysis for cardiac output monitoring in cardiac surgery for congenital heart disease. Anesth. Analg.97(5), 1283–1288 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fakler U, Pauli C, Balling G et al. Cardiac index monitoring by pulse contour analysis and thermodilution after pediatric cardiac surgery. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.133(1), 224–228 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim JJ, Dreyer WJ, Chang AC, Breinholt JP III, Grifka RG. Arterial pulse wave analysis: an accurate means of determining cardiac output in children. Pediatr. Crit. Care Med.7(6), 532–535 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Manecke GR. Edwards FloTrac sensor and Vigileo monitor: easy, accurate, reliable cardiac output assessment using the arterial pulse wave. Expert Rev. Med. Devices2(5), 523–527 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compton FD, Zukunft B, Hoffmann C, Zidek W, Schaefer JH. Performance of a minimally invasive uncalibrated cardiac output monitoring system (FloTrac/Vigileo) in haemodynamically unstable patients. Br. J. Anaesth.100(4), 451–456 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mayer J, Boldt J, Poland R, Peterson A, Manecke GR Jr. Continuous arterial pressure waveform-based cardiac output using the FloTrac/Vigileo: a review and meta-analysis. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth.23(3), 401–406 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sakka SG, Kozieras J, Thuemer O, van Hout N. Measurement of cardiac output: a comparison between transpulmonary thermodilution and uncalibrated pulse contour analysis. Br. J. Anaesth.99(3), 337–342 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scheeren TW, Wiesenack C, Compton FD et al. Performance of a minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring system (FloTrac/Vigileo). Br. J. Anaesth.101(2), 279–280 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Romano SM, Pistolesi M. Assessment of cardiac output from systemic arterial pressure in humans. Crit. Care Med.30(8), 1834–1841 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Calamandrei M, Mirabile L, Muschetta S, Gensini GF, De Simone L, Romano SM. Assessment of cardiac output in children: a comparison between the pressure recording analytical method and Doppler echocardiography. Pediatr. Crit. Care Med.9(3), 310–312 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown JM. Use of echocardiography for hemodynamic monitoring. Crit. Care Med.30(6), 1361–1364 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lai WW, Geva T, Shirali GS et al. Guidelines and standards for performance of a pediatric echocardiogram: a report from the Task Force of the Pediatric Council of the American Society of Echocardiography. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr.19(12), 1413–1430 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB et al. Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr.18(12), 1440–1463 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu X, Xie M, Tomberlin D et al. How accurately, reproducibly, and efficiently can we measure left ventricular indices using M-mode, 2-dimensional, and 3-dimensional echocardiography in children? Am. Heart J.155(5), 946–953 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turner MA. Doppler-based hemodynamic monitoring: a minimally invasive alternative. AACN Clin. Issues14(2), 220–231 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chew MS, Poelaert J. Accuracy and repeatability of pediatric cardiac output measurement using Doppler: 20-year review of the literature. Intensive Care Med.29(11), 1889–1894 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cholley BP, Singer M. Esophageal Doppler: noninvasive cardiac output monitor. Echocardiography20(8), 763–769 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murdoch IA, Marsh MJ, Tibby SM, McLuckie A. Continuous haemodynamic monitoring in children: use of transoesophageal Doppler. Acta Paediatr.84(7), 761–764 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tibby SM, Hatherill M, Murdoch IA. Use of transesophageal Doppler ultrasonography in ventilated pediatric patients: derivation of cardiac output. Crit. Care Med.28(6), 2045–2050 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tibby SM, Hatherill M, Durward A, Murdoch IA. Are transoesophageal Doppler parameters a reliable guide to paediatric haemodynamic status and fluid management? Intensive Care Med.27(1), 201–205 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mohan UR, Britto J, Habibi P, de MC, Nadel S. Noninvasive measurement of cardiac output in critically ill children. Pediatr. Cardiol.23(1), 58–61 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert S, Schmitz T, Weiss M et al. Continuous, non-invasive techniques to determine cardiac output in children after cardiac surgery: evaluation of transesophageal Doppler and electric velocimetry. J. Clin. Monit. Comput.22(4), 299–307 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Knirsch W, Kretschmar O, Tomaske M et al. Comparison of cardiac output measurement using the CardioQP oesophageal Doppler with cardiac output measurement using thermodilution technique in children during heart catheterisation. Anaesthesia63(8), 851–855 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schober P, Loer SA, Schwarte LA. Perioperative hemodynamic monitoring with transesophageal Doppler technology. Anesth. Analg.109(2), 340–353 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Knirsch W, Kretschmar O, Tomaske M et al. Cardiac output measurement in children: comparison of the ultrasound cardiac output monitor with thermodilution cardiac output measurement. Intensive Care Med.34(6), 1060–1064 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meyer S, Todd D, Shadboldt B. Assessment of portable continuous wave Doppler ultrasound (ultrasonic cardiac output monitor) for cardiac output measurements in neonates. J. Paediatr. Child Health45(7–8), 464–468 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nidorf SM, Picard MH, Triulzi MO et al. New perspectives in the assessment of cardiac chamber dimensions during development and adulthood. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.19(5), 983–988 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Lelyveld-Haas LE, van Zanten AR, Borm GF, Tjan DH. Clinical validation of the non-invasive cardiac output monitor USCOM-1A in critically ill patients. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol.25(11), 917–924 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Critchley LA, Peng ZY, Fok BS, Lee A, Phillips RA. Testing the reliability of a new ultrasonic cardiac output monitor, the USCOM, by using aortic flowprobes in anesthetized dogs. Anesth. Analg.100(3), 748–753 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Phillips R, Paradisis M, Evans N, Southwell D, Burstdow D, West M. Cardiac output measurement in preterm neonates: validation of USCOM against echocardiography. Crit. Care10(Suppl. 1), S144 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buheitel G, Scharf J, Hofbeck M, Singer H. Estimation of cardiac index by means of the arterial and the mixed venous oxygen content and pulmonary oxygen uptake determination in the early post-operative period following surgery of congenital heart disease. Intensive Care Med.20(7), 500–503 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wippermann CF, Huth RG, Schmidt FX, Thul J, Betancor M, Schranz D. Continuous measurement of cardiac output by the Fick principle in infants and children: comparison with the thermodilution method. Intensive Care Med.22(5), 467–471 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Botte A, Leclerc F, Riou Y et al. Evaluation of a noninvasive cardiac output monitor in mechanically ventilated children. Pediatr. Crit. Care Med.7(3), 231–236 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levy RJ, Chiavacci RM, Nicolson SC et al. An evaluation of a noninvasive cardiac output measurement using partial carbon dioxide rebreathing in children. Anesth. Analg.99(6), 1642–7, table (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jaffe MB. Partial CO2 rebreathing cardiac output – operating principles of the NICO system. J. Clin. Monit. Comput.15(6), 387–401 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tibby SM. Indirect Fick principle: great idea, but can we use it in critical care? Pediatr Crit. Care Med.7(3), 284–285 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Boode WP, Hopman JC, Daniels O, van der Hoeven HG, Liem KD. Cardiac output measurement using a modified carbon dioxide Fick method: a validation study in ventilated lambs. Pediatr. Res.61(3), 279–283 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kubicek WG, Karnegis JN, Patterson RP, Witsoe DA, Mattson RH. Development and evaluation of an impedance cardiac output system. Aerosp. Med.37(12), 1208–1212 (1966).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osypka MJ, Bernstein DP. Electrophysiologic principles and theory of stroke volume determination by thoracic electrical bioimpedance. AACN Clin. Issues10(3), 385–399 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Osthaus WA, Huber D, Beck C et al. Comparison of electrical velocimetry and transpulmonary thermodilution for measuring cardiac output in piglets. Paediatr. Anaesth.17(8), 749–755 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tomaske M, Knirsch W, Kretschmar O et al. Cardiac output measurement in children: comparison of Aesculon cardiac output monitor and thermodilution. Br. J. Anaesth.100(4), 517–520 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tomaske M, Knirsch W, Kretschmar O et al. Evaluation of the Aesculon cardiac output monitor by subxiphoidal Doppler flow measurement in children with congenital heart defects. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol.26(5), 412–415 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Norozi K, Beck C, Osthaus WA, Wille I, Wessel A, Bertram H. Electrical velocimetry for measuring cardiac output in children with congenital heart disease. Br. J. Anaesth.100(1), 88–94 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raval NY, Squara P, Cleman M, Yalamanchili K, Winklmaier M, Burkhoff D. Multicenter evaluation of noninvasive cardiac output measurement by bioreactance technique. J. Clin. Monit. Comput.22(2), 113–119 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Squara P, Denjean D, Estagnasie P, Brusset A, Dib JC, Dubois C. Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring (NICOM): a clinical validation. Intensive Care Med.33(7), 1191–1194 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squara P, Rotcajg D, Denjean D, Estagnasie P, Brusset A. Comparison of monitoring performance of bioreactance vs. pulse contour during lung recruitment maneuvers. Crit. Care13(4), R125 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Penaz J. Photoelectric measurement of blood pressure, volume and flow in the finger. In: Digest of the International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering. Dresden, Germany 104 (1974).
   Google Scholar
• Wesseling KH, Settels WB, Klawer WH. On the indirect registration of finger blood pressure after penaz. Funct. Biol. Med.1, 245–250 (1982)
   Google Scholar
• Kurki TS, Smith NT, Sanford TJ Jr, Head N. Pulse oximetry and finger blood pressure measurement during open-heart surgery. J. Clin. Monit.5(4), 221–228 (1989).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bos WJ, van GJ, van Montfrans GA, van den Meiracker AH, Wesseling KH. Reconstruction of brachial artery pressure from noninvasive finger pressure measurements. Circulation94(8), 1870–1875 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imholz BP, Wieling W, van Montfrans GA, Wesseling KH. Fifteen years experience with finger arterial pressure monitoring: assessment of the technology. Cardiovasc. Res.38(3), 605–616 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eeftinck Schattenkerk DW, van Lieshout JJ, van den Meiracker AH et al. Nexfin noninvasive continuous blood pressure validated against Riva-Rocci/Korotkoff. Am. J. Hypertens.22(4), 378–383 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Association for the advancement of medical instrumentation (AAMI). American National Standard. Electronic or Automated Sphygmomanometers. ANSI/AAMI SP 10-1992. AAMI, Arlington, VA, USA 40 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Andriessen P, Schraa O, van DB-R et al. Feasibility of noninvasive continuous finger arterial blood pressure measurements in very young children, aged 0–4 years. Pediatr. Res.63(6), 691–696 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hofhuizen CM, Lemson J, Hemelaar AEA, Singh SK, van der Hoeven HG, Scheffer GJ. Continuous non-invasive finger blood pressure monitoring reflects blood pressure changes in children undergoing cardiac surgery. Br. J. Anaesth. (2010) (In press).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lemson J, Hofhuizen CM, Schraa O, Settels JJ, Scheffer GJ, van der Hoeven JG. The reliability of continuous noninvasive finger blood pressure measurement in critically ill children. Anesth. Analg.108(3), 814–821 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Wilde RB, Schreuder JJ, van den Berg PC, Jansen JR. An evaluation of cardiac output by five arterial pulse contour techniques during cardiac surgery. Anaesthesia62(8), 760–768 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stover JF, Stocker R, Lenherr R et al. Noninvasive cardiac output and blood pressure monitoring cannot replace an invasive monitoring system in critically ill patients. BMC Anesthesiol.9, 6 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pitt MS, Marshall P, Diesch JP, Hainsworth R. Cardiac output by Portapres. Clin. Sci. (Lond.)106(4), 407–412 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam E, Azabji KM, Cautero M et al. Correction of cardiac output obtained by Modelflow from finger pulse pressure profiles with a respiratory method in humans. Clin. Sci. (Lond.)106(4), 371–376 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Azabji KM, Lador F, Licker M et al. Cardiac output by Modelflow method from intra-arterial and fingertip pulse pressure profiles. Clin. Sci. (Lond.)106(4), 365–369 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar