Cellular electrical impedance spectroscopy: an emerging technology of microscale biosensors

References

• Torrents JM, Juan-Garcia P, Aguado A. Electrical impedance spectroscopy as a technique for the surveillance of civil engineering structures: considerations on the galvanic insulation of samples. Meas. Sci. Technol.18, 1958–1962 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Wu J, Ben Y, Chang HC. Particle detection by electrical impedance spectroscopy with asymmetric-polarization AC electroosmotic trapping. Microfluid. Nanofluid.1, 161–167 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Casas O, Bragos R, Riu PJ et al.In vivo and in situ ischemic tissue characterization using electrical impedance spectroscopy. Ann. NY Acad. Sci.873, 51–58 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• da Silva JE, de Sa JP, Jossinet J. Classification of breast tissue by electrical impedance spectroscopy. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput.38, 26–30 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyle AH, Chan CT, Minchinton AI. Characterization of three-dimensional tissue cultures using electrical impedance spectroscopy. Biophys. J.76, 2640–2648 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amirudin A, Thierry D. Application of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy to study the degradation of polymer-coated metals. Prog. Org. Coat.26, 1–28 (1995).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drexler J, Steinem C. Pore-suspending lipid bilayers on porous alumina investigated by electrical impedance spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. B.107, 11245–11254 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Chilcott TC, Chan M, Gaedt L, Nantawisarakul T, Fane AG, Coster HGL. Electrical impedance spectroscopy characterisation of conducting membranes: I. Theory. J. Memb. Sci.195, 153–167 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanfredi S, Rodrigues ACM. Impedance spectroscopy study of the electrical conductivity and dielectric constant of polycrystalline LiNbO3. J. Appl. Phys.86, 2215–2219 (1999).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwan HP. Electrical properties of blood and its constitutents: alternating current spectroscopy. Ann. Hematol.46, 185–197 (1983).
   Google Scholar
• McGuinness R. Impedance-based cellular assay technologies: recent advances, future promise. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol.7, 535–540 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giaever IC. Keese R. Micromotion of mammalian cells measured electrically. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA88, 7896–7900 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zudaire E, Cuesta N, Murty V et al. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor repressor is a putative tumor suppressor gene in multiple human cancers. J. Clin. Invest.118, 640–650 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charrier L, Yan YH, Nguyen TT et al. ADAM-15/metargidin mediates homotypic aggregation of human T lymphocytes and heterotypic interactions of T lymphocytes with intestinal epithelial cells. J. Biol. Chem.282, 16948–16958 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saxena NK, Sharma D, Ding XL et al. Concomitant activation of the JAK/STAT, P13K/AKT and ERK signaling is involved in leptin-mediated promotion of invasion and migration of hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Cancer Res.2497–2507 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alocilja R. Design and fabrication of a microimpedance biosensor for bacterial detection. IEEE Sens. J.4, 434–440 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Varshney M, Li Y. Interdigitated array microelectrodes based impedance biosensors for detection of bacterial cells. Biosens. Bioelectron.24, 2951–2960 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Wang H, Mitchelson K, Yu Z, Cheng J. Analysis of the sensitivity and frequency characteristics of coplanar electrical cell-substrate impedance sensors. Biosens. Bioelectron.24, 14–21 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brischwein M, Herrmann S, Vonau W et al. Electric cell-substrate impedance sensing with screen printed electrode structures. Lab. Chip6, 819–822 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pan Y, Guo M, Nie Z et al. Selective collection and detection of leukemia cells on a magnet-quartz crystal microbalance system using aptamer-conjugated magnetic beads. Biosens. Bioelectron.25(7), 1609–1614 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hewa P, Thamara M, Tannock GA, Mainwaring DE, Harrison S, Fecondo JV. The detection of influenza A and B viruses in clinical specimens using a quartz crystal microbalance. J. Virol. Methods162(1–2), 14–21 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen K, Obinata H, Izumi T. Detection of G protein-coupled receptor-mediated cellular response involved in cytoskeletal rearrangement using surface plasmon resonance. Biosens. Bioelectron.25(7), 1675–1680 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang Y, Zhu X, Wu M, Xia N, Wang J, Zhou F. Simultaneous and label-free determination of wild-type and mutant p53 at a single surface plasmon resonance chip preimmobilized with consensus DNA and monoclonal antibody. Anal. Chem.1813–1823 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Fritz J. Cantilever biosensors. Analyst133, 855–863 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouafsoun A, Helali S, Mebarek S et al. Electrical probing of endothelial cell behaviour on a fibronectin/polystyrene/thiol/gold electrode by Faradaic electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). Bioelectrochemistry70, 401–407 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bouafsoun A, Helali S, Othmane A et al. Evaluation of endothelial cell adhesion onto different protein/gold electrodes by EIS. Macromol. Biosci.7, 599–610 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Thielemann C, Reuning U, Johannsmann D. Monitoring of integrin-mediated adhesion of human ovarian cancer cells to model protein surfaces by quartz crystal resonators: evaluation in the impedance analysis mode. Biosens. Bioelectron.20, 1333–1340 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang WG, Ablin RJ, Kynaston HG, Mason MD. The prostate transglutaminase (TGase-4, TGaseP) regulates the interaction of prostate cancer and vascular endothelial cells, a potential role for the ROCK pathway. Microvasc. Res.77, 150–157 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen J, Ye L, Zhang L, Jiang WG. Placenta growth factor, PLGF, influences the motility of lung cancer cells, the role of Rho associated kinase, Rock1. J. Cell. Biochem.105, 313–320 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prodan E, Prodan C, Miller JH Jr. The dielectric response of spherical live cells in suspension: an analytic solution. Biophys. J.95, 4174–4182 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao C, Luong JH. Assessment of cytotoxicity by emerging impedance spectroscopy. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.206, 102–112 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keshtkar A, Keshtkar A, Smallwood RH. Electrical impedance spectroscopy and the diagnosis of bladder pathology. Physiol. Meas.27, 585–596 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tijero M, Gabriel G, Caro J et al. SU-8 microprobe with microelectrodes for monitoring electrical impedance in living tissues. Biosens. Bioelectron.24, 2410–2416 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xiao C, Luong JH. A simple mathematical model for electric cell–substrate impedance sensing with extended applications. Biosens. Bioelectron.25, 1774–1780 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hug TS. Biophysical methods for monitoring cell-substrate interactions in drug discovery. Assay Drug Dev. Technol.1, 479–488 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman AR, Lo CM, Bhansali S. A detailed model for high-frequency impedance characterization of ovarian cancer epithelial cell layer using ECIS electrodes. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.56, 485–492 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster K, Schwan H. Dielectric properties of tissues and biological materials: a critical review. Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng.17, 25–104 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun T, Bernabini C, Morgan H. Single-colloidal particle impedance spectroscopy: complete equivalent circuit analysis of polyelectrolyte microcapsules. Langmuir26, 3821–3828 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pethig R, Markx GH. Applications of dielectrophoresis in biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol.15, 426–432 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owicki JC, Parce JW. Biosensors based on the energy metabolism of living cells: the physical chemistry and cell biology of extracellular acidification. Biosens. Bioelectron.7, 255–272 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquhoun D. Ion channels: this year’s Nobel prize in physiology or medicine. BMJ303, 938–939 (1991).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Richard S, Lory P, Bourinet E, Nargeot J. Molecular physiology of human cardiovascular ion channels: from electrophysiology to molecular genetics. Meth. Enzymol.293, 71–88 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nishida H, Matsumoto A, Tomono N, Hanakai T, Harada S, Nakaya H. Biochemistry and physiology of mitochondrial ion channels involved in cardioprotection. FEBS Lett.584(10), 2161–2166 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Banales JM, Gradilone SA. Primers on molecular pathways - ion channels: key regulators of pancreatic physiology. Pancreatology9, 556–559 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dunne MJ, Petersen OH. Potassium selective ion channels in insulin-secreting cells: physiology, pharmacology and their role in stimulus-secretion coupling. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1071, 67–82 (1991).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Han A, Frazier AB. Ion channel characterization using single cell impedance spectroscopy. Lab. Chip6, 1412–1414 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neher E, Sakmann B. The patch clamp technique. Sci. Am.266, 44–51 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okada Y, Kohara M. [Principle and practice of patch-clamp technique]. Nippon. Seirigaku. Zasshi.56, 133–145 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walker K, Ripandelli N, Flint S. Rapid enumeration of Bifidobacterium lactis in milk powders using impedance. Int. Dairy J.15, 183–188 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Gomez R, Bashir R, Bhunia AK. Microscale electronic detection of bacterial metabolism. Sens. Actuators B. Chem.86, 198–208 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang L. Electrical impedance spectroscopy for detection of bacterial cells in suspensions using interdigitated microelectrodes. Talanta74, 1621–1629 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang L, Li Y, Griffis CL, Johnson MG. Interdigitated microelectrode (IME) impedance sensor for the detection of viable Salmonella typhimurium. Biosens. Bioelectron.19, 1139–1147 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varshney M, Li Y. Double interdigitated array microelectrode-based impedance biosensor for detection of viable Escherichia coli O157: H7 in growth medium. Talanta74, 518–525 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang L, Bashir R. Electrical/electrochemical impedance for rapid detection of foodborne pathogenic bacteria. Biotechnol. Adv.26(2), 135–150 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pnke O, Balkenhohl T, Kafka J, Schfer D, Lisdat F. Impedance spectroscopy and biosensing. Biosensing for the 21st Century, 195–237 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Park G, Choi CK, English AE, Sparer TE. Electrical impedance measurements predict cellular transformation. Cell Biol. Int.33, 429–433 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price DT, Rahman RA, Bhansali S. Design rule for optimization of microelectrodes used in electric cell-substrate impedance sensing (ECIS). Biosens. Bioelectron.24, 2071–2076 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wegener J, Keese CR, Giaever I. Electric cell-substrate impedance sensing (ECIS) as a noninvasive means to monitor the kinetics of cell spreading to artificial surfaces. Exp. Cell Res.259, 158–166 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao C, Lachance B, Sunahara G, Luong JH. An in-depth analysis of electric cell-substrate impedance sensing to study the attachment and spreading of mammalian cells. Anal. Chem.74, 1333–1339 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goda N, Kataoka N, Shimizu J et al. Evaluation of micromotion of vascular endothelial cells in electrical cell–substrate impedance sensing (ECIS) method using a mathematical model. J. Mech. Med. Biol.5, 357–268 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Guo M, Chen J, Yun X, Chen K, Nie L, Yao S. Monitoring of cell growth and assessment of cytotoxicity using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1760, 432–439 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ceriotti L, Ponti J, Colpo P, Sabbioni E, Rossi F. Assessment of cytotoxicity by impedance spectroscopy. Biosens. Bioelectron.22, 3057–3063 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Male KB, Lachance B, Hrapovic S, Sunahara G, Luong JH. Assessment of cytotoxicity of quantum dots and gold nanoparticles using cell-based impedance spectroscopy. Anal. Chem.80, 5487–5493 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ponti J, Ceriotti L, Munaro B et al. Comparison of impedance-based sensors for cell adhesion monitoring and in vitro methods for detecting cytotoxicity induced by chemicals. Altern. Lab. Anim.34, 515–525 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glamann J, Hansen AJ. Dynamic detection of natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity and cell adhesion by electrical impedance measurements. Assay Drug Dev. Technol.4, 555–563 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao C, Luong JH. On-line monitoring of cell growth and cytotoxicity using electric cell-substrate impedance sensing (ECIS). Biotechnol. Prog.19, 1000–1005 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeon JH, Park JK. Cytotoxicity test based on electrochemical impedance measurement of HepG2 cultured in microfabricated cell chip. Anal. Biochem.341, 308–315 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Male KB, Rao YK, Tzeng YM, Montes J, Kamen A, Luong JH. Probing inhibitory effects of Antrodia camphorata isolates using insect cell-based impedance spectroscopy: inhibition vs chemical structure. Chem. Res. Toxicol.21, 2127–2133 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Male KB, Tzeng YM, Montes J et al. Probing inhibitory effects of destruxins from metarhizium anisopliae using insect cell based impedance spectroscopy: inhibition vs chemical structure. Analyst134, 1447–1452 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Male KB, Lachance B, Hrapovic S, Sunahara G, Luong JHT. Assessment of cytotoxicity of quantum dots and gold nanoparticles using cell-based impedance spectroscopy. Anal. Chem.80, 5487–5493 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Curtis TM, Tabb J, Romeo L, Schwager SJ, Widder MW, van der Schalie WH. Improved cell sensitivity and longevity in a rapid impedance-based toxicity sensor. J. Appl. Toxicol.29, 374–380 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Asphahani F, Zhang M. Cellular impedance biosensors for drug screening and toxin detection. Analyst132, 835–841 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin H, Wang FL, Wang AL, Cheng J, Zhou Y. Bioelectrical impedance assay to monitor changes in aspirin-treated human colon cancer HT-29 cell shape during apoptosis. Anal. Lett.40, 85–94 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arias RL, Perry CA, Yang L. Real-time electrical impedance detection of cellular activities of oral cancer cells. Biosens. Bioelectron.25(10), 2225–2231 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JF, Zeng Q, Ozaki H et al. Dual roles of tight junction-associated protein, zonula occludens-1, in sphingosine 1-phosphate-mediated endothelial chemotaxis and barrier integrity. J. Biol. Chem.281, 29190–29200 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kucharzik T, Lugering A, Yan Y et al. Activation of epithelial CD98 glycoprotein perpetuates colonic inflammation. Lab. Invest.85, 932–941 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charrier L, Yan Y, Driss A, Laboisse CL, Sitaraman SV, Merlin D. ADAM-15 inhibits wound healing in human intestinal epithelial cell monolayers. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.288, G346–G353 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Earley S, Plopper GE. Disruption of focal adhesion kinase slows transendothelial migration of AU-565 breast cancer cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.350, 405–412 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung G, Tang HR, McGuinness R, Verdonk E, Michelotti JM, Liu VF. Cellular dielectric spectroscopy: a label-free technology for drug discovery. JALA Charlottesv Va.10, 258–269 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Mancuso L, Liuzzo MI, Fadda S et al.In vitro ovine articular chondrocyte proliferation: experiments and modelling. Cell Prolif.43, 310–320 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bryan AK, Goranov A, Amon A, Manalis SR. Measurement of mass, density, volume during the cell cycle of yeast. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA107(3), 999–1004 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gawad S, Schild L, Renaud PH. Micromachined impedance spectroscopy flow cytometer for cell analysis and particle sizing. Lab. Chip1, 76–82 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lowe W. Understanding disuse atrophy. Massage Today5, 10 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Zeng H, Zhao Y. Rheological analysis of non-newtonian blood flow using a microfluidic device. Sens. Actuators A Phys. DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2010.01.031 (2010) (In press).
   Google Scholar
• Cho S, Thielecke H. Micro hole-based cell chip with impedance spectroscopy. Biosens. Bioelectron.22, 1764–1768 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang LS, Wang MH. Microfluidic device for cell capture and impedance measurement. Biomed. Microdevices9, 737–743 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayliffe HE, Frazier AB, Rabbitt RD. Electric impedance spectroscopy using microchannels with integrated metal electrodes. J. Microelectromech. Syst.8, 50–57 (1999).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suehiro J, Hamada R, Noutomi D, Shutou M, Hara M. Selective detection of viable bacteria using dielectrophoretic impedance measurement method. J. Electrostat.57, 157–168 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iliescu C, Poenar DP, Carp M, Loe FC. A microfluidic device for impedance spectroscopy analysis of biological samples. Sens. Actuators B. Chem.123, 168–176 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Gomez-Sjoberg R, Morisette DT, Bashir R. Impedance microbiology-on-a-chip: Microfluidic bioprocessor for rapid detection of bacterial metabolism. J. Microelectromech. Syst.14, 829–838 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medoro G, Manaresi N, Leonardi A, Altomare L, Tartagni M, Guerrieri R. A lab-on-a-chip for cell detection and manipulation. IEEE Sens. J.3, 317–325 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Wu J, Ben YX, Battigelli D, Chang HC. Long-range AC electroosmotic trapping and detection of bioparticles. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.44, 2815–2822 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Minerick AR, Zhou R, Takhistov P, Chang HC. Manipulation and characterization of red blood cells with alternating current fields in microdevices. Electrophoresis24, 3703–3717 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ichiki T, Shinbashi S, Ujiie T, Horiike Y. Microchip technologies for the analysis of biological cells. J. Photopolym. Sci. Technol.15, 487–492 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Yang M, Lim CC, Liao R, Zhang X. A novel microfluidic impedance assay for monitoring endothelin-induced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. Biosens. Bioelectron.22, 1688–1693 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gascoyne PR, Vykoukal JV. Dielectrophoresis-based sample handling in general-purpose programmable diagnostic instruments. Proc. IEEE Inst. Electr. Electron Eng.92, 22–42 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu YS, Walter TM, Chang WJ et al. Electrical detection of germination of viable model Bacillus anthracis spores in microfluidic biochips. Lab. Chip7, 603–610 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suehiro J, Hatano T, Shutou M, Hara M. Improvement of electric pulse-shape for electropermeabilizationassisted dielectrophoretic impedance measurement for high sensitive bacteria detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem.109, 209–215 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes D, Pettigrew D, Reccius CH et al. Leukocyte analysis and differentiation using high speed microfluidic single cell impedance cytometry. Lab. Chip9, 2881–2889 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins N, Venkatesan BM, Toner M, Rodriguez W, Bashir R. A robust electrical microcytometer with 3-dimensional hydrofocusing. Lab. Chip9, 3177–3184 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mishra NN, Retterer S, Zieziulewicz TJ et al. On-chip micro-biosensor for the detection of human CD4(+) cells based on AC impedance and optical analysis. Biosens. Bioelectron.21, 696–704 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boehm DA, Gottlieb PA, Hua ZS. On-chip microfluidic biosensor for bacterial detection and identification. Sens. Actuators B. Chem.126, 508–514 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hon KB, Li L, Hutchings IM. Direct writing technology – advances and developments. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol.57, 601–620 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar