The place of robotics in post-stroke rehabilitation

References

• Harwin WS, Patton JL, Edgerton VR. Challenges and opportunities for robot-mediated neurorehabilitation. Proc. IEEE94(9), 1717–1726 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmermans AA, Seelen AMH, Willmann RD, Kingma H. Technology-assisted training of arm – hand skills in stroke: concepts on reacquisition of motor control and therapist guidelines for rehabilitation technology design. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil.6, 1 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masiero S, Carraro E, Ferraro C, Gallina P, Rossi A, Rosati G. Upper limb rehabilitation robotics after stroke: a perspective from the University of Padua, Italy. J. Rehabil. Med.41(12), 981–985 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nudo RJ. Postinfarct cortical plasticity and behavioral recovery. Stroke38(2), 840–845 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards L, Hanson C, Wellborn M, Sethi A. Driving motor recovery after stroke. Top. Stroke Rehabil.15(5), 397–411 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. World Health Statistics 2008. WHO Press, Geneva, Switzerland (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd-Jones D, Adams RJ, Brown TM et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2009 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation119, E21–E181 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor TN, Davis PH, Torner JC, Holmes J, Meyer JW, Jacobson MF. Lifetime cost of stroke in the United States. Stroke27, 1459–1466 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolominsky-Rabas P, Heuschmann PU, Marschall D et al. Lifetime cost of ischemic stroke in Germany: results and national projections from a population-based stroke registry. Stroke37, 1179–1183 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truelsen T, Piechowski-Jozwiak B, Bonita R, Mathers C, Bogousslavsky J, Boysen G. Stroke incidence and prevalence in Europe: a review of available data. Eur. J. Neurol.13(6), 581–598 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Reith J, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Acute stroke with atrial fibrillation: the Copenhagen stroke study. Stroke27, 1765–1769 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr JH, Shepherd RB. Stroke Rehabilitation – Guidelines for Exercise and Training to Optimize Motor Skill. PA, USA, Butterworth-Heinemann Inc, PA, USA (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Stroke Unit Trialists’ Collaboration. Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.4, CD000197 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet. Neurol.8, 741–754 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosecker C, Dipietro L, Volpe BT, Krebs HI. Kinematic robot-based evaluation scales and clinical counterparts to measure upper limb motor performance in patients with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair24(1), 62–69 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosati G, Gallina P, Masiero S. Design, implementation and clinical tests of a wire-based robot for neurorehabilitation. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng.15(4), 560–569 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Vliet PM, Wulf G. Extrinsic feedback for motor learning after stroke: what is the evidence?. Disabil. Rehabil.28, 831–840 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butter M, Rensma A, van Boxsel J et al. Robotics for Healthcare: Final Report. European Commission – Directorate-General for Information Society and Media, October (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Prange GB, Jannink MJ, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG, Hermens HJ, Ijzerman MJ. Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev.43(2), 171–184 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrholz J, Platz T, Kugler J, Pohl M. Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving arm function and activities of daily living after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.4, CD006876 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Mehrholz J, Werner C, Kugler J, Pohl M. Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.4 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Hornby TG, Campbell DD, Kahn JH, Demott T, Moore JL, Roth HR. Enhanced gait-related improvements after therapist- versus robotic-assisted locomotor training in subjects with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled study. Stroke39, 1786–1792 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidler J, Nichols D, Pelliccio M et al. Multicenter randomized clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of the Lokomat in subacute stroke. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair23(1), 5–13 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollen B, Kwakkel G, Lindeman E. Functional recovery after stroke: a review of current developments in stroke rehabilitation research. Rev. Recent Clin. Trials1, 75–80 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosati G, Bobrow JE, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Compliant control of post-stroke rehabilitation robots: using movement-specific models to improve controller performance. Proceedings of: The ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition IMECE 2008. Boston, MA, USA, October 31–November 6 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Johnson MJ. Recent trends in robot-assisted therapy environments to improve real-life functional performance after stroke. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil.3, 29 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolbrecht ET, Chan V, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Bobrow JE. Optimizing compliant, model-based robotic assistance to promote neurorehabilitation. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng.16(3), 286–297 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang VS, Krakauer JW. Robotic neurorehabilitation: a computational motor learning perspective. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil.6, 5 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinkensmeyer DJ, Galvez JA, Marchal L, Wolbrecht ET, Bobrow JE. Some key problems for robot-assisted movement therapy research: a perspective from the University of California. Proceedings of: The IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics ICORR2007. Noordwijk, The Netherlands, 13–15 June, 1009–1015 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Krebs HI, Volpe B, Hogan N. A working model of stroke recovery from rehabilitation robotics practitioners. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil.6, 6 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Secoli R, Rosati G, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Using sound feedback to counteract visual distractor during robot-assisted movement training. Presented at: The IEEE 8th International Workshop on Haptic Audio-Visual Environments and Games HAVE2009. Lecco, Italy, November 7–8 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. The World Health Report 2008: Primary Health Care, Mow more Than Ever. WHO Press, Geneva, Switzerland (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Ward D, Drahota A, Gal D, Severs M, Dean TP. Care home versus hospital and own home environments for rehabilitation of older people. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.4, CD003164 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Outpatient Service Trialists. Therapy-based rehabilitation services for stroke patients at home. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.1, CD002925 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil. Neural. Repair22, 111–121 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiles R, Ashburn A, Payne S, Murphy C. Discharge from physiotherapy following stroke: the management of disappointment. Soc. Sci. Med.59(6), 1263–1273 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krebs HI, Ferraro M, Buerger SP et al. Rehabilitation robotics: pilot trial of a spatial extension for MIT-Manus. J. Neuroengineering Rehab.1(1), 5 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar