The use of titanium and stainless steel in fracture fixation

References

• Rüedi TP, Buckley RE, Moran CG. AO Philosophy and evolution. In: AO Principles of Fracture Management 2nd Edition. Rüedi TP, Buckley RE, Moran CG (Eds). Thieme NY, USA, 1, 1–9 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Disegi J, Eschbach L. Stainless steel in bone surgery. Injury31(Suppl. 4), D2–D6 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Disegi J. AO ASIF wrought 18% chromium-14% nickel-2.5% molybdenum stainless steel implant material. AO ASIF technical Commission pamphlet, 1st edition (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Disegi J. AO ASIF unalloyed titanium implant material. AO ASIF technical Commission pamphlet, 4th edition (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Pohler OEM. Unalloyed titanium for implants in bone surgery. Injury31, 7–13 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner M, Frigg R. Internal fixators: concepts and cases using LCP and LISS. In: AO Manual of Fracture Management. Buckley R, Gautier E, Schütz M, Sommer C (Eds). Thieme, NY, USA, 3, 87–159 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Wagner M, Frigg R. Internal fixators: concepts and cases using LCP and LISS. In: AO Manual of Fracture Management. Buckley R, Gautier E, Schütz M, Sommer C (Eds). Thieme, NY, USA, 4, 163–179 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Cleek TM, Reynolds KJ, Hearn TC. Effect if screw torque level on cortical bone pullout strength. J. Orthop. Trauma21(2), 117–123 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Disegi JA. Titanium alloys for fracture fixation implants. Injury31(Suppl. 4), 14–17 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Albreksston T, Hansson HA. An ultrastructural characterisation of the interface between bone and sputtered titanium or steel surfaces. Biomaterials7, 201–205 (1986).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce AI, Pearce SG, Schwieger K et al. Effect of surface topography on removal of cortical bone screws in a novel sheep model. J. Orthop. Res.26(10), 1377–1383 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes JS, Vos DI, Hahn J, Pearce SG, Richards RG. An in vivo evaluation of surface polishing of TAN intramedullary nails for ease of removal. Eur. Cells Mat.18, 15–26 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degasne I, Basle MF, Demais V et al. Effects of roughness, fibronectin and vitronectin on attachment, spreading, and proliferation of human osteoblast-like cells (SaOs-2) on titanium surfaces. Calcif. Tissue Int.64(6), 499–507 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Cavin R, Ong JL. Protein adsorption on titanium surfaces and their effect on osteoblast attachment. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A.67, 344–349 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Textor M, Sittig C, Frauchiger V, Tosatti S, Brunette DM. Properties and biological significance of natural oxide films on titanium and its alloys In: Titanium in Medicine. Brunette DM, Tengvall P, Textor M, Thomsen P (Eds). Springer, NY, USA, 7, 171–230 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Morita M, Sasada T, Hayashi H, Tsukamoto Y. The corrosion fatigue properties of surgical implants in a living body. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.22(6), 529–540 (1988).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hanawa T. Metal ion release from metal implants. Mater. Sci. Eng. C24, 745–752 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shellock FG, Crues JV. MR procedures: biologic effects, safety, patient care. Radiology232, 635–652 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudisch A, Kremser C, Peer S, Kathrein A, Judmaier W, Daniaux H. Metallic artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging of patients with spinal fusion: a comparison of implant materials and imaging sequences. Spine23, 692–699 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Suh JS, Jeong EK, Shin KH et al. Minimising artifacts caused by metallic implants at MR imaging: experimental and clinical studies. AJR171, 1207–1213 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eschbach L. 10 frequently asked questions 3D-surface magnetic resonance imaging in patients with metal implants. First edition. AO ASIF Materials Expert Group 5–25 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Case CP, Langkamer VG, James C et al. Widespread dissemination of metal debris from implants. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.76(5), 701–712 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keegan GM, Learmonth ID, Case CP. Orthopaedic metals and their potential toxicity in the arthroplasty patient. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.89(5), 567–573 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valko M, Rhodes CJ, Moncol J, Izakovic M, Mazur M. Free radicals, metals and antioxidants in oxidative stress-induced cancer. Chem. Biol. Interact160, 1–40 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivieri G, Novakovic M, Savaskan E et al. The effects of β-estradiol on SHSY5Y neuroblastoma cells during heavy metal induced oxidative stress, neurotoxicity and betaamyloid secretion. Neuroscience113, 849–855 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbetieha A, Al-Hamood MH. Long-term exposure of male and female mice to trivalent and hexavalent chromium compounds: effect on fertility. Toxicology116, 39–47 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanojia RK, Junaid M, Murthy RC. Embryo and fetotoxicity of hexavalent chromium: a long-term study. Toxicol. Lett.95(3), 165–172 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domingo J. Metal-induced developmental toxicity in mammals: a review. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health42, 123–141 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira H, Santos TM, Ramalho-Santos J, de Lourdes Pereira M. Histopathological effects of hexavalent chromium in mouse kidney. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.76, 977–983 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallab NJ, Caicedo M, Finnegan A, Jacobs JJ. Th1 type lymphocyte reactivity to metals in patients with total hip athroplasty. J. Orthop. Surg. Res.3, 6–16 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doorn PF, Campbell PA, Worrall J, Benya PD, McKellop HA, Amstutz HC. Metal wear particle characterization from metal on metal total hip replacements: transmission electron microscopy study of periprosthetic tissues and isolated particles. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.42(1), 103–111 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elfick AP, Green SM, Krikler S, Unsworth A. The nature and dissemination of UHMWPE wear debris retrieved from periprosthetic tissue of THR. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A.65(1), 95–108 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan MS, Schaller KH. An analysis of criteria for biological limit values developed in Germany and in the United States. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health.72(4), 195–204 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schaffer AW, Pilger A, Engelhardt C, Zweymueller K, Ruediger HW. Increased blood cobalt and chromium after total hip replacement. J. Toxicol. Clin. Toxicol.37(7), 839–844 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilger A, Schaffer A, Rüdiger HW, Osterode W. Urinary 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine and sister chromatid exchanges in patients with total hip replacements. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A.65(9), 655–664 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lhotka C, Szekeres T, Steffan I, Zhuber K, Zweymüller K. Four-year study of cobalt and chromium blood levels in patients managed with two different metal-on-metal total hip replacements. J. Orthop. Res.21(2), 189–195 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Kasai Y, Iida R, Uchida A. Metal concentrations in the serum and hair of patients with titanium alloy spinal implants. Spine15, 1320–1326 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Hayes JS, Seidenglanz U, Pearce SG, Archer CW, Richards RG. Surface polishing positively influences ease of fracture fixation plate and screw removal. Eur. Cells Mat.19, 117–126 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klinger MM, Rahemtulla F, Prince CW, Lucas LC, Lemons JE. Proteoglycans at the bone-implant interface. Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med.9(4), 449–463 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davies JE. Mechanisms of endosseous integration. Int. J. Prosthodont.11(5), 391–400 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes JS, Richards RG. Surfaces to control tissue adhesion for osteosynthesis with metal implants: in vitro and in vivo studies to bring solutions to the patient. Expert Rev. Med. Devices7(1), 131–142 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tay SC, Theo LC. Soft tissue complications in Osteosynthesis. In: Osteosynthesis In The Hand: Current Concepts. Herren DB, Nagy L, Campbell D (Eds). Karger, Basel, Switzerland, 135–141 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Sinicropi SM, Su BW, Raia FJ, Parisien M, Strauch RJ, Rosenwasser MP. The effects of implant composition on extensor tenosynovitis in a canine distal radius fracture model. J. Hand Surg. Am.30, 300–307 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klöppel H, Wieling R, Rahn BA, Richards RG. Influence of stainless steel implant surface microtopography on boney integration. Proceedings from the 18th European Conference on Biomaterials, October 1–4, Stuttgart, Germany (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Meredith DO, Riehle MO, Curtis AS, Richards RG. Microtopography of metal surfaces influence fibroblast growth by modifying cell shape, cytoskeleton and adhesion. J. Orthop. Res.25(11), 1523–1533 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Im GI, Lee KB. Difficulties in removing ACE tibial intramedullary nail. Int. Orthop.27, 355–358 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milia MJ, Vincent AB, Bosse MJ. Retrograde removal of an incarcerated solid titanium femoral nail after subtrochanteric fracture. J. Orthop. Trauma17, 521–524 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Woodruff MJ, Hanson JR, Shaw DL. Intramedullary tibial nails: a novel approach to removal when the standard method is not possible. Injury34, 789–790 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gösling T, Hufner T, Hankemeier S, Zelle BA, Muller-Heine A, Krettek C. Femoral nail removal should be restricted in asymptomatic patients. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.423, 222–226 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton P, Doig S, Williamson O. Technical difficulty of metal removal after LISS plating. Injury35, 626–628 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgiadis GM, Gove NK, Smith AD, Rodway IP. Removal of the less invasive stabilisation system. J. Orthop. Trauma18, 562–564 (2004)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes JS, Khan IM, Archer CW, Richards RG. The role of surface microtopography in the modulation of osteoblast differentiation. Eur. Cells Mat.20, 98–108 (2010)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauke C, Schlegel U, Melcher GA. Local infection in relation to different implant materials. An experimental study using stainless steel and titanium solid, unlocked intramedullary nails in rabbits. Orthop. Trans.21, 835–836 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Arens ST, Schlegel U, Printzen G, Ziegler WJ, Perren SM, Hansis M. Influence of materials for fixation implants on local infection. An experimental study of steel versus titanium DC-plates in rabbits. J. Bone Joint Surg.78, 647–651 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Moriarty TF, Debefve L, Boure L, Campoccia D, Schlegel U, Richards RG. Influence of material and microtopography on the development of local infection in vivo: experimental investigation in rabbits. Int. J. Artif. Organs32(9), 663–670 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuhoff D, Thompson RE, Frauchiger VM, Ganser A, Steiner A, Ito K. Anodic plasma chemical treatment of titanium Schanz screws reduces pin loosening. J. Orthop. Trauma19(8), 543–550 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leung F, Tu YK, Chew WY, Chow SP. Comparison of external and percutaneous pin fixation with plate fixation for intra-articular distal radial fractures. A randomized study. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.90(1), 16–22 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pieske O, Geleng P, Zaspel J, Piltz S. Titanium alloy pins versus stainless steel pins in external fixation at the wrist: a randomized prospective study. J. Trauma64(5), 1275–1280 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar