Synthetic, biological and composite scaffolds for abdominal wall reconstruction

References

• Ray NF, Denton WG, Thamer M et al. Abdominal adhesiolysis: inpatient care and expenditures in the United States in 1994. J. Am. Coll. Surg.186(1), 1–9 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinge U, Si ZY, Zheng H et al. Abnormal collagen I to III distribution in the skin of patients with incisional hernia. Eur. Surg. Res.32(1), 43–48 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinge U, Zheng H, Si Z et al. Expression of the extracellular matrix proteins collagen I, collagen III and fibronectin and matrix metalloproteinase-1 and-13 in the skin of patients with inguinal hernia. Eur. Surg. Res.31(6), 480–490 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng H, Si ZY, Kasperk R et al. Recurrent inguinal hernia: disease of the collagen matrix? World J. Surg.26(4), 401–408 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bringman S, Conze J, Cuccurullo D et al. Hernia repair: the search for ideal meshes. Hernia14(1), 81–87 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellon JM, Rodriguez M, Garcia-Honduvilla N et al. Peritoneal effects of prosthetic meshes used to repair abdominal wall defects: monitoring adhesions by sequential laparoscopy. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech.17(2), 160–166 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Earle DB, Mark LA. Prosthetic material in inguinal hernia repair: how do I choose? Surg. Clin. North Am.88(1), 179–201 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollinsky C, Sandberg S, Koch T et al. Biomechanical properties of lightweight versus heavyweight meshes for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair and their impact on recurrence rates. Surg. Endosc.22(12), 2679 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Birkenhauer V et al. Impact of polymer pore size on the interface scar formation in a rat model. J. Surg. Res.103(2), 208–214 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb WS, Kercher KW, Heniford BT. The argument for lightweight polypropylene mesh in hernia repair. Surg. Innov.12(1), 63–69 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schumpelick V, Klinge U, Rosch R et al. Light weight meshes in incisional hernia repair. J. Minim. Access Surg.2(3), 117 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Engelsman AF, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ et al. Morphological aspects of surgical meshes as a risk factor for bacterial colonization. Br. J. Surg.95(8), 1051–1059 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Usher FC, Ochsner J, Tuttle LL Jr. Use of marlex mesh in the repair of incisional hernias. Am. Surg.24(12), 969–974 (1958).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Halm JA, de Wall LL, Steyerberg EW et al. Intraperitoneal polypropylene mesh hernia repair complicates subsequent abdominal surgery. World J. Surg.31(2), 423–430 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Junge K, Binnebosel M, Rosch R et al. Adhesion formation of a polyvinylidenfluoride/polypropylene mesh for intra-abdominal placement in a rodent animal model. Surg. Endosc.23(2), 327–333 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klosterhalfen B, Klinge U, Schumpelick V. Functional and morphological evaluation of different polypropylene-mesh modifications for abdominal wail repair. Biomaterials19(24), 2235–2246 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreinemacher MH, Emans PJ, Gijbels MJ et al. Degradation of mesh coatings and intraperitoneal adhesion formation in an experimental model. Br. J. Surg.96(3), 305–313 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou FF, Sheen-Chen SM, Chen YS et al. The repair of ventral hernia with Marlex mesh. Asian J. Surg.15(1), 24–27 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Bell RCW, Price JG. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using an anatomically contoured three-dimensional mesh. Surg. Endosc.17(11), 1784–1788 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cobb WS, Carbonell AM, Kalbaugh CL et al. Infection risk of open placement of intraperitoneal composite mesh. Am. Surg.75(9), 762–767 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heniford BT. Laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias: nine years’ experience with 850 consecutive hernias. Ann. Surg.238(3), 391 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himpens JM. Laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty. Repair with a conventional vs a new self-expandable mesh. Surg. Endosc.7(4), 315–318 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leber GE, Garb JL, Alexander AI et al. Long-term complications associated with prosthetic repair of incisional hernias. Arch. Surg.133(4), 378–382 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kiudelis M, Jonciauskiene J, Deduchovas O et al. Effects of different kinds of meshes on postoperative adhesion formation in the New Zealand white rabbit. Hernia11(1), 19–23 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen CCG, Ridgeway B, Paraiso MFR. Biologic grafts and synthetic meshes in pelvic reconstructive surgery. Clin. Obstetr. Gynecol.50(2), 383–411 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dayton MT, Buchele BA, Shirazi SS et al. Use of an absorbable mesh to repair contaminated abdominal-wall defects. Arch. Surg.121(8), 954–960 (1986).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nagy KK, Perez F, Fildes JJ et al. Optimal prosthetic for acute replacement of the abdominal wall. J. Trauma47(3), 529–532 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klinge U, Schumpelick V, Klosterhalfen B. Functional assessment and tissue response of short- and long-term absorbable surgical meshes. Biomaterials22(11), 1415–1424 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbott DE, Dumanian GA, Halverson AL. Management of laparotomy wound dehiscence. Am. Surg.73(12), 1224–1227 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bee TK, Croce MA, Magnotti LJ et al. Temporary abdominal closure techniques: A prospective randomized trial comparing polyglactin 910 mesh and vacuum-assisted closure. J. Trauma65(2), 337–342 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobias AM, Low DW. The use of a subfascial Vicryl mesh buttress to aid in the closure of massive ventral hernias following damage-control laparotomy. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.112(3), 766–776 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van’t Riet M, van de Vos SPJ, Bonjer HJ et al. Mesh repair for postoperative wound dehiscence in the presence of infection: is absorbable mesh safer than non-absorbable mesh? Hernia11(5), 409–413 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boukerrou M, Boulanger L, Rubod C et al. Study of the biomechanical properties of synthetic mesh implanted in vivo. Eur. J. Obstetr. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol.134(2), 262–267 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reilingh TSD, van Goor H, Koppe MJ et al. Interposition of polyglactin mesh does not prevent adhesion formation between viscera and polypropylene mesh. J. Surg. Res.140(1), 27–30 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ersoy E, Ozturk V, Yazgan A et al. Comparison of the two types of bioresorbable barriers to prevent intra-abdominal adhesions in rats. J. Gastrointest. Surg.13(2), 282–286 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasika UK, Does lining polypropylene with polyglactin mesh reduce intraperitoneal adhesions? Am. Surg.64(9), 817–819 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urman B, Gomel V. Effect of hyaluronic acid on postoperative intraperitoneal adhesion formation and reformation in the rat model. Fertil. Steril.56(3), 568–570 (1991).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alponat A, Lakshminarasappa SR, Teh M et al. Effects of physical barriers in prevention of adhesions: an incisional hernia model in rats. J. Surg. Res.68(2), 126 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold PB, Green CW, Foresman PA et al. Evaluation of resorbable barriers for preventing surgical adhesions. Fertil. Steril.73(1), 157–161 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chelala E, Thoma M, Tatete B et al. The suturing concept for laparoscopic mesh fixation in ventral and incisional hernia repair: mid-term analysis of 400 cases. Surg. Endosc.21(3), 391–395 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Butler CE, Prieto VG. Reduction of adhesions with composite AlloDerm/polypropylene mesh implants for abdominal wall reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.114(2), 464–473 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanderrest M, Garrone R. Collagen family of proteins. FASEB J.5(13), 2814–2823 (1991).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Badylak SF. Xenogeneic extracellular matrix as a scaffold for tissue reconstruction. Transplant Immun.12(3–4), 367–377 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert TW, Freund JM, Badylak SF. Quantification of DNA in biologic scaffold materials. J. Surg. Res.152(1), 135–139 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng MH, Chen J, Kirilak Y et al. Porcine small intestine submucosa (SIS) is not an acellular collagenous matrix and contains porcine DNA: possible implications in human implantation. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater.73(1), 61–67 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorge-Herrero E, Fernández P, Turnay J et al. Influence of different chemical cross-linking treatments on the properties of bovine pericardium and collagen. Biomaterials20(6), 539–545 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petite H, Rault I, Huc A et al. Use of the acyl azide method for cross-linking collagen-rich tissues such as pericardium. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.24(2), 179–187 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damink L, Dijkstra PJ, vanLuyn MJA et al. Cross-linking of dermal sheep collagen using a water-soluble carbodiimide. Biomaterials17(8), 765–773 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damink L, Dijkstra PJ, Vanluyn MJA et al. Cross-linking of dermal sheep collagen using hexamethylene diisocyanate. J. Mater. Sci.6(7), 429–434 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Charulatha V, Rajaram A. Influence of different crosslinking treatments on the physical properties of collagen membranes. Biomaterials24(5), 759–767 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abraham GA, Murray J, Billiar K, Sullivan SJ. Evaluation of the porcine intestinal collagen layer as a biomaterial. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.51(3), 442–452 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courtman DW, Errett BF, Wilson GJ. The role of crosslinking in modification of the immune response elicited against xenogenic vascular acellular matrices. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.55(4), 576–586 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodde J. Naturally occurring scaffolds for soft tissue repair and regeneration. Tissue Eng.8(2), 295–308 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Franklin ME, Gonzalez JJ, Michaelson RP et al. Preliminary experience with new bioactive prosthetic material for repair of hernias in infected fields. Hernia6(4), 171–174 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Franklin ME, Trevino JM, Portillo G et al. The use of porcine small intestinal submucosa as a prosthetic material for laparoscopic hernia repair in infected and potentially contaminated fields: long-term follow-up. Surg. Endosc.22(9), 1941–1946 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candage R, Jones K, Luchette FA et al. Use of human acellular dermal matrix for hernia repair: friend or foe? Surgery144(4), 703–711 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Diaz JJ, Conquest AM, Ferzoco SJ et al. Multi-institutional experience using human acellular dermal matrix for ventral hernia repair in a compromised surgical field. Arch. Surg.144(3), 209–215 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hammond TM, Huang A, Frye JN et al. Parastomal hernia prevention using a novel collagen implant: a randomised controlled Phase 1 study. Hernia12(5), 475–481 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catena F, Ansaloni L, Gazzotti F et al. Use of porcine dermal collagen graft (Permacol) for hernia repair in contaminated fields. Hernia11(1), 57–60 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gaertner WB, Bonsack ME, Delaney JP. Experimental evaluation of four biologic prostheses for ventral hernia repair. J. Gastrointest. Surg.11(10), 1275–1285 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert TW, Stewart-Akers AM, Simmons-Byrd A et al. Degradation and remodeling of small intestinal submucosa in canine Achilles tendon repair. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.89A(3), 621 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Record RD, Hillegonds D, Simmons C et al.In vivo degradation of 14C-labeled small intestinal submucosa (SIS) when used for urinary bladder repair. Biomaterials22(19), 2653–2659 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Greene MA, Mullins RJ, Malangoni MA et al. Laparotomy wound closure with absorbable polyglycolic acid mesh. Surg. Gynecol. Obstetr.176(3), 213–218 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sauerland S, Schmedt CG, Lein S et al. Primary incisional hernia repair with or without polypropylene mesh: a report on 384 patients with 5-year follow-up. Langenbeck Arch. Surg.390(5), 408–412 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liakakos T, Karanikas I, Panagiotidis H, Dendrinos S. Use of Marlex mesh in the repair of recurrent incisional hernia. Br. J. Surg.81(2), 248–249 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patt HH. Marlex mesh grafts inguinal hernia repair. Arch. Surg.94(5), 734–736 (1967).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berger D, Bientzle M, Muller A. Postoperative complications after laparoscopic incisional hernia repair – incidence and treatment. Surg. Endosc.16(12), 1720–1723 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gananadha S, Samra JS, Smith GS et al. Laparoscopic ePTFE mesh repair of incisional and ventral hernias. ANZ J. Surg.78(10), 907–913 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lau H, Patil NG, Yuen WK. Outcomes of laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: a prospective evaluation. Surg. Pract.9(1), 13–17 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Topart P, Ferrand L, Vandenbroucke F et al. Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with the Goretex DUALMESH: long-term results and review of the literature. Hernia9(4), 348–352 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ballas KD, Rafailidis SF, Marakis GN et al. Intraperitoneal ePTFE mesh repair of parastomal hernias. Hernia10(4), 350–353 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cerise EJ, Busuttil RW, Craighead CC et al. The use of Mersilene mesh in repair of abdominal wall hernias: a clinical and experimental study. Ann. Surg.181(5), 728–734 (1975).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Machairas A, Misiakos EP, Liakakos T et al. Incisional hernioplasty with extraperitoneal onlay polyester mesh. Am. Surg.70(8), 726–729 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ramshaw B, Abiad F, Voeller G et al. Polyester (Parietex) mesh for total extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: Initial experience in the United States. Surg. Endosc.17(3), 498–501 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosenberg J, Burcharth J. Feasibility and outcome after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair using Proceed mesh. Hernia12(5), 453–456 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koch A, Bringman S, Myrelid P et al. Randomized clinical trial of groin hernia repair with titanium-coated lightweight mesh compared with standard polypropylene mesh. Br. J. Surg.95, 1226–1231 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosch R, Junge K, Quester R et al. Vypro II mesh in hernia repair: impact of polyglactin on long-term incorporation in rats. Eur. Surg. Res.35(5), 445–450 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olmi S, Erba L, Magnone S et al. Prospective clinical study of laparoscopic treatment of incisional and ventral hernia using a composite mesh: Indications, complications and results. Hernia10(3), 243–247 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ammaturo C, Bassi G. Surgical treatment of large incisional hernias with an intraperitoneal Parietex Composite mesh: our preliminary experience on 26 cases. Hernia8(3), 242–246 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moreno-Egea A, Liron R, Girela E et al. Laparoscopic repair of ventral and incisional hernias using a new composite mesh (Parietex) – initial experience. Surg. Laparosc. Endosc.11(2), 103–106 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Gillian GK, Geis WP, Grover G. Laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair (LIVH): an evolving outpatient technique. JSLS6(4), 315–322 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cobb WS, Harris JB, Lokey JS et al. Incisional herniorrhaphy with intraperitoneal composite mesh: a report of 95 cases. Am. Surg.69(9), 784–787 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadi HIA, Maw A, Sarmah S et al. Intraperitoneal tension-free repair of small midline ventral abdominal wall hernias with a Ventralex hernia patch: initial experience in 51 patients. Hernia10(5), 409–413 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martin DF, Williams RF, Mulrooney T et al. Ventralex mesh in umbilical/epigastric hernia repairs: clinical outcomes and complications. Hernia12(4), 379–383 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Verbo A, Petito L, Manno A et al. Laparoscopic approach to recurrent incisional hernia repair: a 3-year experience. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech.17(5), 591–595 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Catani M, De M, Pietroletti R et al. Is there a place for intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair (IPOM) of inguinal hernia among laparoscopic techniques? Hepato-gastroenterology51(59), 1387–1392 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lo Monte AI, Damiano G, Maione C et al. Use of intraperitoneal ePTFE GORE DUAL-MESH PLUS in a giant incisional hernia after kidney transplantation: a case report. Transplant. Proc.41(4), 1398–1401 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Catena F, Ansaloni L, Leone A et al. Lichtenstein repair of inguinal hernia with Surgisis inguinal hernia matrix soft-tissue graft in immunodepressed patients. Hernia9(1), 29–31 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ansaloni L, Catena F, D’Alessandro L. Prospective randomized, double-blind, controlled trial comparing Lichtenstein’s repair of inguinal hernia with polypropylene mesh versus Surgisis gold soft tissue graft: preliminary results. Acta Bio-Medica74(Suppl. 2), 10–14 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Ueno T, Pickett LC, de la Fuente SG et al. Clinical application of porcine small intestinal submucosa in the management of infected or potentially contaminated abdominal defects. J. Gastrointest. Surg.8(1), 109–112 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hammond TM, Chin-Aleong J, Navsaria H et al. Human in vivo cellular response to a cross-linked acellular collagen implant. Br. J. Surg.95(4), 438–446 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker DM, Armstrong PJ, Frizzi JD et al. Porcine dermal collagen (Permacol) for abdominal wall reconstruction. Curr. Surg.63(4), 255–258 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liyanage SH, Purohit GS, Frye JNR et al. Anterior abdominal wall reconstruction with a Permacol implant. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg.59(5), 553–555 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smart N, Immanuel A, Mercer-Jones M. Laparoscopic repair of a Littre’s hernia with porcine dermal collagen implant (Permacol). Hernia11(4), 373–376 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jin J, Rosen MJ, Blatnik J et al. Use of acellular dermal matrix for complicated ventral hernia repair: does technique affect outcomes? J. Am. Coll. Surg.205(5), 654–660 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Diaz JJ Jr, Guy J, Berkes MB et al. Acellular dermal allograft for ventral hernia repair in the compromised surgical field. Am. Surg.72(12), 1181–1187 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buinewicz B, Rosen B. Acellular cadaveric dermis (AlloDerm): a new alternative for abdominal hernia repair. Ann. Plast. Surg.52(2), 188–194 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolker AR, Brown DJ, Redstone JS et al. Multilayer reconstruction of abdominal wall defects with acellular dermal allograft (AlloDerm) and component separation. Ann. Plast. Surg.55(1), 36–42 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Butler CE, Langstein HN, Kronowitz SJ. Pelvic, abdominal, and chest wall reconstruction with AlloDerm in patients at increased risk for mesh-related complications. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.116(5), 1263–1275 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott BG, Welsh FJ, Pham HQ et al. Early aggressive closure of the open abdomen. J. Trauma60(1), 17–22 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar