State of the art in hard-on-hard bearings: how did we get here and what have we achieved?

References

• Crowninshield RD, Rosenberg AG, Sporer SM. Changing demographics of patients with total joint replacement. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.443, 266–272 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee M, Bouillon B, Banerjee C et al. Sports activity after total hip resurfacing. Am. J. Sports Med.38(6), 1229–1236 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chatterji U, Ashworth MJ, Lewis PL, Dobson PJ. Effect of total hip arthroplasty on recreational and sporting activity. ANZ J. Surg.74(6), 446–449 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naal FD, Maffiuletti NA, Munzinger U, Hersche O. Sports after hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Am. J. Sports Med.35(5), 705–711 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundfeldt M, Carlsson LV, Johansson CB, Thomsen P, Gretzer C. Aseptic loosening, not only a question of wear: a review of different theories. Acta Orthop.77(2), 177–197 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iannotti JP, Balderston RA, Booth RE, Rothman RH, Cohn JC, Pickens G. Aseptic loosening after total hip arthroplasty. Incidence, clinical significance, and etiology. J. Arthroplasty1(2), 99–107 (1986).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Revell PA, Weightman B, Freeman MA, Roberts BV. The production and biology of polyethylene wear debris. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg.91(3), 167–181 (1978).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmalzried TP, Jasty M, Harris WH. Periprosthetic bone loss in total hip arthroplasty. Polyethylene wear debris and the concept of the effective joint space. J. Bone Joint Surg.74(6), 849–863 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendenhall Associates Inc. 2009 Hip and Knee Implant Review. Orthopaedic Network News20(3), 1–20 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Oral E, Christensen SD, Malhi AS, Wannomae KK, Muratoglu OK. Wear resistance and mechanical properties of highly cross-linked, ultrahigh-molecular weight polyethylene doped with vitamin E. J. Arthroplasty21(4), 580–591 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumbleton JH, D’Antonio JA, Manley MT, Capello WN, Wang A. The basis for a second-generation highly cross-linked UHMWPE. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.453, 265–271 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tower SS, Currier JH, Currier BH, Lyford KA, Van Citters DW, Mayor MB. Rim cracking of the cross-linked longevity polyethylene acetabular liner after total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg.89(10), 2212–2217 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currier BH, Currier JH, Mayor MB, Lyford KA, Collier JP, Van Citters DW. Evaluation of oxidation and fatigue damage of retrieved crossfire polyethylene acetabular cups. J. Bone Joint Surg.89(9), 2023–2029 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furmanski J, Anderson M, Bal S et al. Clinical fracture of cross-linked UHMWPE acetabular liners. Biomaterials30(29), 5572–5582 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKee GK, Watson-Farrar J. Replacement of arthritic hips by the McKee–Farrar prosthesis. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.48(2), 245–259 (1966).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dandy DJ, Theodorou BC. The management of local complications of total hip replacement by the McKee–Farrar technique. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.57(1), 30–35 (1975).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McKee GK. Total hip replacement – past, present and future. Biomaterials3(3), 130–135 (1982).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahiri CA, Schmalzried TP, Ebramzadeh E et al. Lessons learned from loosening of the McKee–Farrar metal-on-metal total hip replacement. J. Arthroplasty14(3), 326–332 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• August AC, Aldam CH, Pynsent PB. The McKee–Farrar hip arthroplasty. A long-term study. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.68(4), 520–527 (1986).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higuchi F, Inoue A, Semlitsch M. Metal-on-metal CoCrMo McKee–Farrar total hip arthroplasty: characteristics from a long-term follow-up study. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg.116(3), 121–124 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown SR, Davies WA, DeHeer DH, Swanson AB. Long-term survival of McKee–Farrar total hip prostheses. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.402, 157–163 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gerritsma CL, Deutman R, Mulder TJ, Steinberg JD. The Stanmore total hip replacement. A 22-year follow-up. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.82(1), 97–102 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim RH, Dennis DA, Carothers JT. Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty23(7 Suppl.), 44–46 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuli R, Parvizi J. Alternative bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty. Expert Rev. Med. Devices2(4), 445–452 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt M, Weber H, Schon R. Cobalt chromium molybdenum metal combination for modular hip prostheses. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.329(Suppl.), S35–S47 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Long WT. The clinical performance of metal-on-metal as an articulation surface in total hip replacement. Iowa Orthop. J.25, 10–16 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walker PS, Salvati E, Hotzler RK. The wear on removed McKee–Farrar total hip prostheses. J. Bone Joint Surg.56(1), 92–100 (1974).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Willert HG, Buchhorn GH, Gobel D et al. Wear behavior and histopathology of classic cemented metal on metal hip endoprostheses. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.329(Suppl.), S160–S186 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Howie DW, McCalden RW, Nawana NS, Costi K, Pearcy MJ, Subramanian C. The long-term wear of retrieved McKee–Farrar metal-on-metal total hip prostheses. J. Arthroplasty20(3), 350–357 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieker CB, Schon R, Konrad R et al. Influence of the clearance on in-vitro tribology of large diameter metal-on-metal articulations pertaining to resurfacing hip implants. Orthop. Clin. North Am.36(2), 135–142, vii (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dowson D, Hardaker C, Flett M, Isaac GH. A hip joint simulator study of the performance of metal-on-metal joints: part II: design. J. Arthroplasty19(8 Suppl. 3), 124–130 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yew A, Udofia I, Jagatia M, Jin ZM. Analysis of elastohydrodynamic lubrication in McKee–Farrar metal-on-metal hip joint replacement. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H.218(1), 27–34 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weber BG. Experience with the Metasul total hip bearing system. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.329, S69–S77 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Berton C, Girard J, Krantz N, Migaud H. The Durom large diameter head acetabular component: early results with a large-diameter metal-on-metal bearing. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.92(2), 202–208 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Long WT, Dastane M, Harris MJ, Wan Z, Dorr LD. Failure of the Durom Metasul acetabular component. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.468(2), 400–405 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorr LD, Wan Z, Longjohn DB, Dubois B, Murken R. Total hip arthroplasty with use of the Metasul metal-on-metal articulation. Four to seven-year results. J. Bone Joint Surg.82(6), 789–798 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eswaramoorthy V, Moonot P, Kalairajah Y, Biant LC, Field RE. The Metasul metal-on-metal articulation in primary total hip replacement: clinical and radiological results at ten years. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.90(10), 1278–1283 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Long WT, Dorr LD, Gendelman V. An American experience with metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties: a 7-year follow-up study. J. Arthroplasty19(8 Suppl. 3), 29–34 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saito S, Ryu J, Watanabe M, Ishii T, Saigo K. Midterm results of Metasul metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty21(8), 1105–1110 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma S, Vassan U, Bhamra MS. Metal-on-metal total hip joint replacement: a minimum follow-up of five years. Hip Int.17(2), 70–77 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner M, Wagner H. Medium-term results of a modern metal-on-metal system in total hip replacement. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.379, 123–133 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Grubl A, Marker M, Brodner W et al. Long-term follow-up of metal-on-metal total hip replacement. J. Orthop. Res.25(7), 841–848 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dastane MR, Long WT, Wan Z, Chao L, Dorr LD. Metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty does equally well in osteonecrosis and osteoarthritis. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.466(5), 1148–1153 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Delaunay CP, Bonnomet F, Clavert P, Laffargue P, Migaud H. THA using metal-on-metal articulation in active patients younger than 50 years. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.466(2), 340–346 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs M, Gorab R, Mattingly D, Trick L, Southworth C. Three- to six-year results with the Ultima metal-on-metal hip articulation for primary total hip arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty19(7 Suppl. 2), 48–53 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombardi AV Jr, Mallory TH, Alexiades MM et al. Short-term results of the M2a-taper metal-on-metal articulation. J. Arthroplasty16(8 Suppl. 1), 122–128 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milosev I, Trebse R, Kovac S, Cor A, Pisot V. Survivorship and retrieval analysis of Sikomet metal-on-metal total hip replacements at a mean of seven years. J. Bone Joint Surg.88(6), 1173–1182 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zijlstra WP, Cheung J, Sietsma MS, van Raay JJ, Deutman R. No superiority of cemented metal-on-metal vs metal-on-polyethylene THA at 5-year follow-up. Orthopedics32(7), 479 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wagner M, Wagner H. Preliminary results of uncemented metal on metal stemmed and resurfacing hip replacement arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.329(Suppl.), S78–S88 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Neumann DR, Thaler C, Hitzl W, Huber M, Hofstadter T, Dorn U. Long-term results of a contemporary metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a 10-year follow-up study. J. Arthroplasty25(5), 700–708 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Paleochorlidis IS, Badras LS, Skretas EF, Georgaklis VA, Karachalios TS, Malizos KN. Clinical outcome study and radiological findings of Zweymuller metal on metal total hip arthroplasty: a follow-up of 6 to 15 years. Hip Int.19(4), 301–308 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sieber HP, Rieker CB, Kottig P. Analysis of 118 second-generation metal-on-metal retrieved hip implants. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.81(1), 46–50 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schmalzried TP, Peters PC, Maurer BT, Bragdon CR, Harris WH. Long-duration metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties with low wear of the articulating surfaces. J. Arthroplasty11(3), 322–331 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St John KR, Zardiackas LD, Poggie RA. Wear evaluation of cobalt-chromium alloy for use in a metal-on-metal hip prosthesis. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater.68(1), 1–14 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldsmith AA, Dowson D, Isaac GH, Lancaster JG. A comparative joint simulator study of the wear of metal-on-metal and alternative material combinations in hip replacements. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H.214(1), 39–47 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firkins PJ, Tipper JL, Saadatzadeh MR et al. Quantitative analysis of wear and wear debris from metal-on-metal hip prostheses tested in a physiological hip joint simulator. Biomed. Mater. Eng.11(2), 143–157 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varano R, Bobyn JD, Medley JB, Yue S. The effect of microstructure on the wear of cobalt-based alloys used in metal-on-metal hip implants. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H.220(2), 145–159 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Daniel J, Ziaee H, Kamali A, Pradhan C, Band T, McMinn DJ. Ten-year results of a double-heat-treated metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.92(1), 20–27 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Medley JB, Chan FW, Krygier JJ, Bobyn JD. Comparison of alloys and designs in a hip simulator study of metal on metal implants. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.329(Suppl), S148–S159 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cawley J, Metcalf JEP, Jones AH. A tribological study of cobalt-chromium molybdenum alloys used in metal-on-metal resurfacing hip prosthesis. Wear255, 999–1006 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan FW, Bobyn JD, Medley JB, Krygier JJ, Tanzer M. The Otto Aufranc Award. Wear and lubrication of metal-on-metal hip implants. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.369, 10–24 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Wang A, Yue S, Bobyn JD. Surface characterisation of metal-on-metal implants tested in a hip simulator. Wear708, 225–232 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• McKellop H, Park SH, Chiesa R et al.In vivo wear of three types of metal on metal hip prostheses during two decades of use. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.329(Suppl.), S128–S140 (1996).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Antonio JA, Pagnano MW, Naughton M et al. Controversies regarding bearing surfaces in total hip replacement. J. Bone Joint Surg.91(Suppl. 5), 5–9 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Livermore J, Ilstrup D, Morrey B. Effect of femoral head size on wear of the polyethylene acetabular component. J. Bone Joint Surg.72(4), 518–528 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith SL, Dowson D, Goldsmith AA. The effect of femoral head diameter upon lubrication and wear of metal-on-metal total hip replacements. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H.215(2), 161–170 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leslie I, Williams S, Brown C et al. Effect of bearing size on the long-term wear, wear debris, and ion levels of large diameter metal-on-metal hip replacements – an in vitro study. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater.87(1), 163–172 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matsushita A, Nakashima Y, Jingushi S, Yamamoto T, Kuraoka A, Iwamoto Y. Effects of the femoral offset and the head size on the safe range of motion in total hip arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty24(4), 646–651 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartz RL, Nobel PC, Kadakia NR, Tullos HS. The effect of femoral component head size on posterior dislocation of the artificial hip joint. J. Bone Joint Surg.82(9), 1300–1307 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burroughs BR, Hallstrom B, Golladay GJ, Hoeffel D, Harris WH. Range of motion and stability in total hip arthroplasty with 28-, 32-, 38-, and 44-mm femoral head sizes. J. Arthroplasty20(1), 11–19 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowninshield RD, Maloney WJ, Wentz DH, Humphrey SM, Blanchard CR. Biomechanics of large femoral heads: what they do and don’t do. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. (429), 102–107 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kluess D, Martin H, Mittelmeier W, Schmitz KP, Bader R. Influence of femoral head size on impingement, dislocation and stress distribution in total hip replacement. Med. Eng. Phys.29(4), 465–471 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padgett DE, Lipman J, Robie B, Nestor BJ. Influence of total hip design on dislocation: a computer model and clinical analysis. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.447, 48–52 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuckler JM, Moore KD, Lombardi AV Jr, McPherson E, Emerson R. Large versus small femoral heads in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty19(8 Suppl. 3), 41–44 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters CL, McPherson E, Jackson JD, Erickson JA. Reduction in early dislocation rate with large-diameter femoral heads in primary total hip arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty22(6 Suppl. 2), 140–144 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mertl P, Boughebri O, Havet E, Triclot P, Lardanchet JF, Gabrion A. Large diameter head metal-on-metal bearings total hip arthroplasty: preliminary results. Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res.96(1), 14–20 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clarke MT, Lee PT, Villar RN. Dislocation after total hip replacement in relation to metal-on-metal bearing surfaces. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.85(5), 650–654 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Ochoa JA, Haas BD, Hammill C. In vivo comparison of hip separation after metal-on-metal or metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg.84-A(10), 1836–1841 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Holloway I, Walter WL, Zicat B, Walter WK. Osteolysis with a cementless second generation metal-on-metal cup in total hip replacement. Int. Orthop.33(6), 1537–1542 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Delaunay CP. Metal-on-metal bearings in cementless primary total hip arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty19(8 Suppl. 3), 35–40 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dorr LD, Hilton KR, Wan Z, Markovich GD, Bloebaum R. Modern metal on metal articulation for total hip replacements. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. (333), 108–117 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim SY, Kyung HS, Ihn JC, Cho MR, Koo KH, Kim CY. Cementless Metasul metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty in patients less than fifty years old. J. Bone Joint Surg.86-A(11), 2475–2481 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Migaud H, Jobin A, Chantelot C, Giraud F, Laffargue P, Duquennoy A. Cementless metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty in patients less than 50 years of age: comparison with a matched control group using ceramic-on-polyethylene after a minimum 5-year follow-up. J. Arthroplasty19(8 Suppl. 3), 23–28 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girard J, Combes A, Herent S, Migaud H. Metal-on-metal cups cemented into reinforcement rings: a possible new acetabular reconstruction procedures for young and active patients. J. Arthroplasty26(1), 103–109 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doorn PF, Campbell PA, Worrall J, Benya PD, McKellop HA, Amstutz HC. Metal wear particle characterization from metal on metal total hip replacements: transmission electron microscopy study of periprosthetic tissues and isolated particles. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.42(1), 103–111 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antoniou J, Zukor DJ, Mwale F, Minarik W, Petit A, Huk OL. Metal ion levels in the blood of patients after hip resurfacing: a comparison between twenty-eight and thirty-six-millimeter-head metal-on-metal prostheses. J. Bone Joint Surg.90(Suppl. 3), 142–148 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engh CA Jr, MacDonald SJ, Sritulanondha S, Thompson A, Naudie D, Engh CA. 2008 John Charnley award: metal ion levels after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomized trial. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.467(1), 101–111 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs JJ, Skipor AK, Doorn PF et al. Cobalt and chromium concentrations in patients with metal on metal total hip replacements. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.329(Suppl.), S256–S263 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savarino L, Granchi D, Ciapetti G et al. Ion release in patients with metal-on-metal hip bearings in total joint replacement: a comparison with metal-on-polyethylene bearings. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.63(5), 467–474 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skipor AK, Campbell PA, Patterson LM, Anstutz HC, Schmalzried TP, Jacobs JJ. Serum and urine metal levels in patients with metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med.13(12), 1227–1234 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodner W, Bitzan P, Meisinger V, Kaider A, Gottsauner-Wolf F, Kotz R. Serum cobalt levels after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg.85-A(11), 2168–2173 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Hart AJ, Buddhdev P, Winship P, Faria N, Powell JJ, Skinner JA. Cup inclination angle of greater than 50 degrees increases whole blood concentrations of cobalt and chromium ions after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. Hip Int.18(3), 212–219 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Haan R, Pattyn C, Gill HS, Murray DW, Campbell PA, De Smet K. Correlation between inclination of the acetabular component and metal ion levels in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing replacement. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.90(10), 1291–1297 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Langton DJ, Jameson SS, Joyce TJ, Webb J, Nargol AV. The effect of component size and orientation on the concentrations of metal ions after resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.90(9), 1143–1151 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodner W, Grubl A, Jankovsky R, Meisinger V, Lehr S, Gottsauner-Wolf F. Cup inclination and serum concentration of cobalt and chromium after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty19(8 Suppl. 3), 66–70 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath JC, Freeman MA, Swanson SA. Carcinogenic properties of wear particles from prostheses made in cobalt–chromium alloy. Lancet1(7699), 564–566 (1971).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladon D, Doherty A, Newson R, Turner J, Bhamra M, Case CP. Changes in metal levels and chromosome aberrations in the peripheral blood of patients after metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty19(8 Suppl. 3), 78–83 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunstan E, Ladon D, Whittingham-Jones P, Carrington R, Briggs TW. Chromosomal aberrations in the peripheral blood of patients with metal-on-metal hip bearings. J. Bone Joint Surg.90(3), 517–522 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visuri T, Pukkala E, Paavolainen P, Pulkkinen P, Riska EB. Cancer risk after metal on metal and polyethylene on metal total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.329(Suppl.), S280–S289 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luetzner J, Krummenauer F, Lengel AM, Ziegler J, Witzleb WC. Serum metal ion exposure after total knee arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.461, 136–142 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ziaee H, Daniel J, Datta AK, Blunt S, McMinn DJ. Transplacental transfer of cobalt and chromium in patients with metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty: a controlled study. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.89(3), 301–305 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mont MA, Schmalzried TP. Modern metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: important observations from the first ten years. J. Bone Joint Surg.90(Suppl. 3), 3–11 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith TM, Berend KR, Lombardi AV Jr, Emerson RH Jr, Mallory TH. Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty with large heads may prevent early dislocation. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.441, 137–142 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Willert HG, Buchhorn GH, Fayyazi A et al. Metal-on-metal bearings and hypersensitivity in patients with artificial hip joints. A clinical and histomorphological study. J. Bone Joint Surg.87(1), 28–36 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witzleb WC, Hanisch U, Kolar N, Krummenauer F, Guenther KP. Neo-capsule tissue reactions in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop.78(2), 211–220 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies AP, Willert HG, Campbell PA, Learmonth ID, Case CP. An unusual lymphocytic perivascular infiltration in tissues around contemporary metal-on-metal joint replacements. J. Bone Joint Surg.87(1), 18–27 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korovessis P, Petsinis G, Repanti M, Repantis T. Metallosis after contemporary metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Five to nine-year follow-up. J. Bone Joint Surg.88(6), 1183–1191 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson O, Mathiesen EB, Reinholt FP, Blomgren G. Formation of a fulminant soft-tissue pseudotumor after uncemented hip arthroplasty. A case report. J. Bone Joint Surg.70(8), 1238–1242 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas P, Braathen LR, Dorig M et al. Increased metal allergy in patients with failed metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty and peri-implant T-lymphocytic inflammation. Allergy64(8), 1157–1165 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glyn-Jones S, Pandit H, Kwon YM, Doll H, Gill HS, Murray DW. Risk factors for inflammatory pseudotumour formation following hip resurfacing. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.91(12), 1566–1574 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pandit H, Glyn-Jones S, McLardy-Smith P et al. Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.90(7), 847–851 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jameson SS, Langton DJ, Nargol AV. Articular surface replacement of the hip: a prospective single-surgeon series. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.92(1), 28–37 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steffen RT, Pandit HP, Palan J et al. The five-year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: an independent series. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.90(4), 436–441 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malviya A, Holland JP. Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: 10-year Newcastle experience. Acta Orthop. Belg.75(4), 477–483 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruber FW, Bock A, Trattnig S, Lintner F, Ritschl P. Cystic lesion of the groin due to metallosis: a rare long-term complication of metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty22(6), 923–927 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerard Y. Hip arthroplasty by matching cups. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. (134), 25–35 (1978).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Müller M, Boltzy X. Artificial hip joints made from Protasul. Bull. Ass. Study Probl. Internal Fixation1–5 (1968).
   Google Scholar
• Amstutz HC, Graff-Radford A, Gruen TA, Clarke IC. THARIES surface replacements: a review of the first 100 cases. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. (134), 87–101 (1978).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tanaka S. Surface replacement of the hip joint. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.134, 75–79 (1978).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner H. Surface replacement arthroplasty of the hip. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. (134), 102–130 (1978).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Amstutz HC, Dorey F, O’Carroll PF. THARIES resurfacing arthroplasty. Evolution and long-term results. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.213, 92–114 (1986).
   Google Scholar
• Howie DW, Campbell D, McGee M, Cornish BL. Wagner resurfacing hip arthroplasty. The results of one hundred consecutive arthroplasties after eight to ten years. J. Bone Joint Surg.72(5), 708–714 (1990).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mont MA, Rajadhyaksha AD, Hungerford DS. Outcomes of limited femoral resurfacing arthroplasty compared with total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J. Arthroplasty16(8 Suppl. 1), 134–139 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tooke SM, Amstutz HC, Delaunay C. Hemiresurfacing for femoral head osteonecrosis. J. Arthroplasty2(2), 125–133 (1987).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Amstutz HC, Grigoris P, Dorey FJ. Evolution and future of surface replacement of the hip. J. Orthop. Sci.3(3), 169–186 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McMinn D, Treacy R, Lin K, Pynsent P. Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip. Experience of the McMinn prothesis. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.329(Suppl.), S89–S98 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amstutz HC, Le Duff MJ. Eleven years of experience with metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing: a review of 1000 conserve plus. J. Arthroplasty23(6 Suppl. 1), 36–43 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan M, Kuiper JH, Edwards D, Robinson E, Richardson JB. Birmingham hip arthroplasty: five to eight years of prospective multicenter results. J. Arthroplasty24(7), 1044–1050 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel J, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJ. Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.86(2), 177–184 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Valle CJ, Nunley RM, Raterman SJ, Barrack RL. Initial American experience with hip resurfacing following FDA approval. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.467(1), 72–78 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vail TP, Mina CA, Yergler JD, Pietrobon R. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compares favorably with THA at 2 years followup. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.453, 123–131 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vendittoli PA, Ganapathi M, Roy AG, Lusignan D, Lavigne M. A comparison of clinical results of hip resurfacing arthroplasty and 28 mm metal on metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomised trial with 3–6 years follow-up. Hip Int.20(1), 1–13 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zywiel MG, Marker DR, McGrath MS, Delanois RE, Mont MA. Resurfacing matched to standard total hip arthroplasty by preoperative activity levels – a comparison of postoperative outcomes. Bull. NYU Hosp. Jt Dis.67(2), 116–119 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bergeron SG, Desy NM, Nikolaou VS, Debiparshad K, Antoniou J. The early results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing – a prospective study at a minimum two-year follow-up. Bull. NYU Hosp. Jt Dis.67(2), 132–134 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heilpern GN, Shah NN, Fordyce MJ. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a series of 110 consecutive hips with a minimum five-year clinical and radiological follow-up. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.90(9), 1137–1142 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim PR, Beaule PE, Laflamme GY, Dunbar M. Causes of early failure in a multicenter clinical trial of hip resurfacing. J. Arthroplasty23(6 Suppl. 1), 44–49 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marker DR, Seyler TM, Jinnah RH, Delanois RE, Ulrich SD, Mont MA. Femoral neck fractures after metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing: a prospective cohort study. J. Arthroplasty22(7 Suppl. 3), 66–71 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohm R, Schraml A, Schuh A. Long-term results with the Wagner metal-on-metal hip resurfacing prosthesis. Hip Int.16(Suppl. 4), 58–64 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gross TP, Liu F. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with an uncemented femoral component. A seven-year follow-up study. J. Bone Joint Surg.90(Suppl. 3), 32–37 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nunley RM, Zhu J, Brooks PJ et al. The learning curve for adopting hip resurfacing among hip specialists. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.468(2), 382–391 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witjes S, Smolders JM, Beaule PE, Pasker P, Van Susante JL. Learning from the learning curve in total hip resurfacing: a radiographic analysis. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg.129(10), 1293–1299 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebel T, Maubach S, Morlock MM. Lessons learned from early clinical experience and results of 300 ASR hip resurfacing implantations. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H.220(2), 345–353 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little CP, Ruiz AL, Harding IJ et al. Osteonecrosis in retrieved femoral heads after failed resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.87(3), 320–323 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Campbell P, Beaule PE, Ebramzadeh E et al. The John Charnley Award: a study of implant failure in metal-on-metal surface arthroplasties. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.453, 35–46 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill HS, Campbell PA, Murray DW, De Smet KA. Reduction of the potential for thermal damage during hip resurfacing. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.89(1), 16–20 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Little JP, Gray HA, Murray DW, Beard DJ, Gill HS. Thermal effects of cement mantle thickness for hip resurfacing. J. Arthroplasty23(3), 454–458 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vendittoli PA, Lavigne M, Girard J, Roy AG. A randomised study comparing resection of acetabular bone at resurfacing and total hip replacement. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.88(8), 997–1002 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ball ST, Le Duff MJ, Amstutz HC. Early results of conversion of a failed femoral component in hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg.89(4), 735–741 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McGrath MS, Marker DR, Seyler TM, Ulrich SD, Mont MA. Surface replacement is comparable to primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.467(1), 94–100 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther KP, Witzleb WC, Stiehler M, Kirschner S. Revision surgery of hip resurfacing. Orthopade37(7), 685–694 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mont MA, Seyler TM, Ragland PS, Starr R, Erhart J, Bhave A. Gait analysis of patients with resurfacing hip arthroplasty compared with hip osteoarthritis and standard total hip arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty22(1), 100–108 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nantel J, Termoz N, Vendittoli PA, Lavigne M, Prince F. Gait patterns after total hip arthroplasty and surface replacement arthroplasty. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.90(3), 463–469 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavigne M, Therrien M, Nantel J, Roy A, Prince F, Vendittoli PA. The John Charnley Award: the functional outcome of hip resurfacing and large-head THA is the same: a randomized, double-blind study. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.468(2), 326–336 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girard J, Lavigne M, Vendittoli PA, Roy AG. Biomechanical reconstruction of the hip: a randomised study comparing total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.88(6), 721–726 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Smet KA. Belgium experience with metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty. Orthop. Clin. North Am.36(2), 203–213, ix (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, LeDuff M, Gruen T, Amstutz HC. Risk factors affecting outcome of metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty of the hip. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.418, 87–93 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Loughead JM, Chesney D, Holland JP, McCaskie AW. Comparison of offset in Birmingham hip resurfacing and hybrid total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.87(2), 163–166 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva M, Lee KH, Heisel C, Dela Rosa MA, Schmalzried TP. The biomechanical results of total hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg.86-A(1), 40–46 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad R, Gillespie G, Annamalai S et al. Leg length and offset following hip resurfacing and hip replacement. Hip Int.19(2), 136–140 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robb C, Harris R, O’Dwyer K, Aslam N. Radiographic assessment of biomechanical parameters following hip resurfacing and cemented total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int.19(3), 251–256 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shimmin AJ, Back D. Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing: a national review of 50 cases. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.87(4), 463–464 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis ET, Olsen M, Zdero R, Papini M, Waddell JP, Schemitsch EH. A biomechanical and finite element analysis of femoral neck notching during hip resurfacing. J. Biomech. Eng.131(4), 041002 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Bin Nasser A, Beaule PE, O’Neill M, Kim PR, Fazekas A. Incidence of groin pain after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.468(2), 392–399 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lavigne M, Rama KR, Roy A, Vendittoli PA. Painful impingement of the hip joint after total hip resurfacing: a report of two cases. J. Arthroplasty23(7), 1074–1079 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mont MA, Seyler TM, Ulrich SD et al. Effect of changing indications and techniques on total hip resurfacing. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.465, 63–70 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boutin P. Alumina and its use in surgery of the hip. (Experimental study). Presse Med.79(14), 639–640 (1971).
   Google Scholar
• Griss P, Werner E, Buchinger R, Heimke G. The Mannheimer oxide ceramic-metal composite hip prostheses (author’s translation). Arch. Orthop. Unfallchir.87(1), 73–84 (1977).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mittelmeier H. New development of wear-resistant ceramic and metal composite prostheses with ribbed support shafts for cement-free implantation. Hefte. Unfallheilkd.126, 333–336 (1975).
   Google Scholar
• Salzer M, Locke H, Engelhardt H, Zweymuller K. Ceramic endoprostheses of the upper extremities. Z. Orthop. Ihre. Grenzgeb.113(4), 458–461 (1975).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mittelmeier H, Heisel J. Sixteen-years’ experience with ceramic hip prostheses. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.282, 64–72 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boehler M, Plenk H Jr, Salzer M. Alumina ceramic bearings for hip endoprostheses: the Austrian experiences. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.379, 85–93 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Huo MH, Martin RP, Zatorski LE, Keggi KJ. Cementless total hip arthroplasties using ceramic-on-ceramic articulation in young patients. A minimum 5-year follow-up study. J. Arthroplasty11(6), 673–678 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’Leary JF, Mallory TH, Kraus TJ, Lombardi AV Jr, Lye CL. Mittelmeier ceramic total hip arthroplasty. A retrospective study. J. Arthroplasty3(1), 87–96 (1988).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petsatodis GE, Papadopoulos PP, Papavasiliou KA, Hatzokos IG, Agathangelidis FG, Christodoulou AG. Primary cementless total hip arthroplasty with an alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearing: results after a minimum of twenty years of follow-up. J. Bone Joint Surg.92(3), 639–644 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mahoney OM, Dimon JH 3rd. Unsatisfactory results with a ceramic total hip prosthesis. J. Bone Joint Surg.72(5), 663–671 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedel L, Nizard RS, Kerboull L, Witvoet J. Alumina-alumina hip replacement in patients younger than 50 years old. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.298, 175–183 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lewis PM, Al-Belooshi A, Olsen M, Schemitch EH, Waddell JP. Prospective randomized trial comparing alumina ceramic-on-ceramic with ceramic-on-conventional polyethylene bearings in total hip arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty25(3), 392–397 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter M, Griss P, Scheller G, Moser T. Ten- to 14-year results of a ceramic hip prosthesis. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.282, 73–80 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boutin P, Christel P, Dorlot JM et al. The use of dense alumina-alumina ceramic combination in total hip replacement. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.22(12), 1203–1232 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Antonio J, Capello W, Manley M, Naughton M, Sutton K. Alumina ceramic bearings for total hip arthroplasty: five-year results of a prospective randomized study. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.436, 164–171 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bizot P, Hannouche D, Nizard R, Witvoet J, Sedel L. Hybrid alumina total hip arthroplasty using a press-fit metal-backed socket in patients younger than 55 years. A six- to 11-year evaluation. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.86(2), 190–194 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murphy SB, Ecker TM, Tannast M. Two- to 9-year clinical results of alumina ceramic-on-ceramic THA. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.453, 97–102 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Capello WN, D’Antonio JA, Feinberg JR, Manley MT, Naughton M. Ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty: update. J. Arthroplasty23(7 Suppl.), 39–43 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garino JP. Modern ceramic-on-ceramic total hip systems in the United States: early results. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.379, 41–47 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Yoo JJ, Kim YM, Yoon KS et al. Contemporary alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty performed in patients younger than forty years: a 5-year minimum follow-up study. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater.78(1), 70–75 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yoo JJ, Kim YM, Yoon KS, Koo KH, Song WS, Kim HJ. Alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty. A five-year minimum follow-up study. J. Bone Joint Surg.87(3), 530–535 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummer CD, 3rd, Rothman RH, Hozack WJ. Catastrophic failure of modular zirconia-ceramic femoral head components after total hip arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty10(6), 848–850 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masonis JL, Bourne RB, Ries MD, McCalden RW, Salehi A, Kelman DC. Zirconia femoral head fractures: a clinical and retrieval analysis. J. Arthroplasty19(7), 898–905 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukatsu K, Pezzotti G, Hayaishi Y, Sugano N. Evaluation of phase stability in zirconia femoral heads from different manufacturers after in vitro testing or in vivo retrieval. J. Arthroplasty24(8), 1225–1230 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haraguchi K, Sugano N, Nishii T, Miki H, Oka K, Yoshikawa H. Phase transformation of a zirconia ceramic head after total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.83(7), 996–1000 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayaishi Y, Miki H, Yoshikawa H, Sugano N. Phase transformation of a new generation yttria-stabilized zirconia femoral head after total hip arthroplasty. Mod. Rheumatol.18(6), 647–650 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maccauro G, Piconi C, Burger W et al. Fracture of a Y-TZP ceramic femoral head. Analysis of a fault. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.86(8), 1192–1196 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Allain J, Le Mouel S, Goutallier D, Voisin MC. Poor eight-year survival of cemented zirconia-polyethylene total hip replacements. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.81(5), 835–842 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Norton MR, Yarlagadda R, Anderson GH. Catastrophic failure of the Elite Plus total hip replacement, with a Hylamer acetabulum and Zirconia ceramic femoral head. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.84(5), 631–635 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Streicher RM, Semlitsch M, Schon R, Weber H, Rieker C. Metal-on-metal articulation for artificial hip joints: laboratory study and clinical results. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H.210(3), 223–232 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hamilton WG, McAuley JP, Dennis DA, Murphy JA, Blumenfeld TJ, Politi J. THA with Delta ceramic on ceramic: results of a multicenter investigational device exemption trial. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.468(2), 358–366 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR, Seng BE, Clarke IC, Adams JB. Delta ceramic-on-alumina ceramic articulation in primary THA: prospective, randomized FDA-IDE study and retrieval analysis. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.468(2), 367–374 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bal BS, Khandkar A, Lakshminarayanan R, Clarke I, Hoffman AA, Rahaman MN. Testing of silicon nitride ceramic bearings for total hip arthroplasty. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater.87(2), 447–454 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bal BS, Khandkar A, Lakshminarayanan R, Clarke I, Hoffman AA, Rahaman MN. Fabrication and testing of silicon nitride bearings in total hip arthroplasty: winner of the 2007 ‘HAP’ PAUL Award. J. Arthroplasty24(1), 110–116 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzocchi M, Gardini D, Traverso PL, Faga MG, Bellosi A. On the possibility of silicon nitride as a ceramic for structural orthopaedic implants. Part II: chemical stability and wear resistance in body environment. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med.19(8), 2889–2901 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oonishi H, Clarke IC, Good V, Amino H, Ueno M. Alumina hip joints characterized by run-in wear and steady-state wear to 14 million cycles in hip-simulator model. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A70(4), 523–532 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dorlot JM, Christel P, Meunier A. Wear analysis of retrieved alumina heads and sockets of hip prostheses. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.23(A3 Suppl.), 299–310 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prudhommeaux F, Hamadouche M, Nevelos J, Doyle C, Meunier A, Sedel L. Wear of alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasties at a mean 11-year followup. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.379, 113–122 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Hamadouche M, Boutin P, Daussange J, Bolander ME, Sedel L. Alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty: a minimum 18.5-year follow-up study. J. Bone Joint Surg.84-A(1), 69–77 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nizard RS, Sedel L, Christel P, Meunier A, Soudry M, Witvoet J. Ten-year survivorship of cemented ceramic-ceramic total hip prosthesis. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.282, 53–63 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borssen B, Karrholm J, Snorrason F. Osteolysis after ceramic-on-ceramic hip arthroplasty. A case report. Acta Orthop. Scand.62(1), 73–75 (1991).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shih CH, Wu CC, Lee ZL, Yang WE. Localized femoral osteolysis in cementless ceramic total hip arthroplasty. Orthop. Rev.23(4), 325–328 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wirganowicz PZ, Thomas BJ. Massive osteolysis after ceramic on ceramic total hip arthroplasty. A case report. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.338, 100–104 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Yoon TR, Rowe SM, Jung ST, Seon KJ, Maloney WJ. Osteolysis in association with a total hip arthroplasty with ceramic bearing surfaces. J. Bone Joint Surg.80(10), 1459–1468 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatton A, Nevelos JE, Matthews JB, Fisher J, Ingham E. Effects of clinically relevant alumina ceramic wear particles on TNF-α production by human peripheral blood mononuclear phagocytes. Biomaterials24(7), 1193–1204 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusty PJ, Tai CC, Sew-Hoy RP, Walter WL, Walter WK, Zicat BA. Third-generation alumina-on-alumina ceramic bearings in cementless total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg.89(12), 2676–2683 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim YH, Choi Y, Kim JS. Cementless total hip arthroplasty with ceramic-on-ceramic bearing in patients younger than 45 years with femoral-head osteonecrosis. Int. Orthop.34(8), 1123–1127 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Germain MA, Hatton A, Williams S et al. Comparison of the cytotoxicity of clinically relevant cobalt–chromium and alumina ceramic wear particles in vitro. Biomaterials24(3), 469–479 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatton A, Nevelos JE, Nevelos AA, Banks RE, Fisher J, Ingham E. Alumina–alumina artificial hip joints. Part I: a histological analysis and characterisation of wear debris by laser capture microdissection of tissues retrieved at revision. Biomaterials23(16), 3429–3440 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allain J, Goutallier D, Voisin MC, Lemouel S. Failure of a stainless-steel femoral head of a revision total hip arthroplasty performed after a fracture of a ceramic femoral head. A case report. J. Bone Joint Surg.80(9), 1355–1360 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Allain J, Roudot-Thoraval F, Delecrin J, Anract P, Migaud H, Goutallier D. Revision total hip arthroplasty performed after fracture of a ceramic femoral head. A multicenter survivorship study. J. Bone Joint Surg.85-A(5), 825–830 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kempf I, Semlitsch M. Massive wear of a steel ball head by ceramic fragments in the polyethylene acetabular cup after revision of a total hip prosthesis with fractured ceramic ball. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg.109(5), 284–287 (1990).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boutin P, Blanquaert D. A study of the mechanical properties of alumina-on-alumina total hip prosthesis (author’s translation). Rev. Chir. Orthop. Reparatrice Appar. Mot.67(3), 279–287 (1981).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Griss P, Heimke G. Five years experience with ceramic-metal-composite hip endoprostheses. I. Clinical evaluation. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg.98(3), 157–164 (1981).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knahr K, Bohler M, Frank P, Plenk H, Salzer M. Survival analysis of an uncemented ceramic acetabular component in total hip replacement. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg.106(5), 297–300 (1987).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Antonio JA, Sutton K. Ceramic materials as bearing surfaces for total hip arthroplasty. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg.17(2), 63–68 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willmann G. Ceramic femoral head retrieval data. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.379, 22–28 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Masson B. Emergence of the alumina matrix composite in total hip arthroplasty. Int. Orthop.33(2), 359–363 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clarke IC. Role of ceramic implants. Design and clinical success with total hip prosthetic ceramic-to-ceramic bearings. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. (282), 19–30 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hasegawa M, Sudo A, Hirata H, Uchida A. Ceramic acetabular liner fracture in total hip arthroplasty with a ceramic sandwich cup. J. Arthroplasty18(5), 658–661 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang SK, Oh JR, Her MS, Shim YJ, Cho TY, Kwon SM. Fracture-dissociation of ceramic liner. Orthopedics31(8), 804 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Popescu D, Gallart X, Garcia S, Bori G, Tomas X, Riba J. Fracture of a ceramic liner in a total hip arthroplasty with a sandwich cup. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg.128(8), 783–785 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuh A, Mittelmeier W, Zeiler G, Behrend D, Kircher J, Bader R. Severe damage of the femoral head after dislocation and difficult reduction maneuvers after total hip arthroplasty. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg.126(2), 134–137 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hasegawa M, Sudo A, Uchida A. Alumina ceramic-on-ceramic total hip replacement with a layered acetabular component. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.88(7), 877–882 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iwakiri K, Iwaki H, Minoda Y, Ohashi H, Takaoka K. Alumina inlay failure in cemented polyethylene-backed total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.466(5), 1186–1192 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• D’Antonio JA, Capello WN, Manley MT, Naughton M, Sutton K. A titanium-encased alumina ceramic bearing for total hip arthroplasty: 3- to 5-year results. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.441, 151–158 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carvajal Alba JA, Schiffman ED, Scully SP, Parvataneni HK. Incomplete seating of a metal-backed alumina liner in ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics33(1), 15 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Langdown AJ, Pickard RJ, Hobbs CM, Clarke HJ, Dalton DJ, Grover ML. Incomplete seating of the liner with the Trident acetabular system: a cause for concern? J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.89(3), 291–295 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller AN, Su EP, Bostrom MP, Nestor BJ, Padgett DE. Incidence of ceramic liner malseating in Trident acetabular shell. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.467(6), 1552–1556 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jarrett CA, Ranawat AS, Bruzzone M, Blum YC, Rodriguez JA, Ranawat CS. The squeaking hip: a phenomenon of ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg.91(6), 1344–1349 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keurentjes JC, Kuipers RM, Wever DJ, Schreurs BW. High incidence of squeaking in THAs with alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearings. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.466(6), 1438–1443 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mai K, Verioti C, Ezzet KA, Copp SN, Walker RH, Colwell CW Jr. Incidence of ‘squeaking’ after ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.468(2), 413–417 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Restrepo C, Parvizi J, Kurtz SM, Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH. The noisy ceramic hip: is component malpositioning the cause? J. Arthroplasty23(5), 643–649 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter WL, O’Toole G C, Walter WK, Ellis A, Zicat BA. Squeaking in ceramic-on-ceramic hips: the importance of acetabular component orientation. J. Arthroplasty22(4), 496–503 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toni A, Traina F, Stea S et al. Early diagnosis of ceramic liner fracture. Guidelines based on a twelve-year clinical experience. J. Bone Joint Surg.88(Suppl. 4), 55–63 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taylor S, Manley MT, Sutton K. The role of stripe wear in causing acoustic emissions from alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearings. J. Arthroplasty22(7 Suppl. 3), 47–51 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matar WY, Restrepo C, Parvizi J, Kurtz SM, Hozack WJ. Revision hip arthroplasty for ceramic-on-ceramic squeaking hips does not compromise the results. J. Arthroplasty25(6 Suppl.), 81–86 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chevillotte C, Trousdale RT, Chen Q, Guyen O, An KN. The 2009 Frank Stinchfield Award: ‘Hip squeaking’: a biomechanical study of ceramic-on-ceramic bearing surfaces. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.468(2), 345–350 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ecker TM, Robbins C, van Flandern G et al. Squeaking in total hip replacement: no cause for concern. Orthopedics31(9), 875–876, 884 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yang CC, Kim RH, Dennis DA. The squeaking hip: a cause for concern-disagrees. Orthopedics30(9), 739–742 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Firkins PJ, Tipper JL, Ingham E, Stone MH, Farrar R, Fisher J. A novel low wearing differential hardness, ceramic-on-metal hip joint prosthesis. J. Biomech.34(10), 1291–1298 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishida T, Clarke IC, Donaldson TK, Shirasu H, Shishido T, Yamamoto K. Comparing ceramic-metal to metal-metal total hip replacements – a simulator study of metal wear and ion release in 32- and 38-mm bearings. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater.91(2), 887–896 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams S, Schepers A, Isaac G et al. The 2007 Otto Aufranc Award. Ceramic-on-metal hip arthroplasties: a comparative in vitro and in vivo study. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.465, 23–32 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Figuerido-Pina CG, Yan Y, Neville A, Fisher J. Understanding the differences between the wear of metal-on-metal and ceramic-on-metal total hip replacements Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H.222, 285–296 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Isaac GH, Brockett C, Breckon A et al. Ceramic-on-metal bearings in total hip replacement: whole blood metal ion levels and analysis of retrieved components. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.91(9), 1134–1141 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neumann DR, Thaler C, Hitzl W, Huber M, Hofstadter T, Dorn U. Long-term results of a contemporary metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a 10-year follow-up study. J. Arthroplasty25(5), 700–708 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald SJ, McCalden RW, Chess DG et al. Metal-on-metal versus polyethylene in hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.406, 282–296 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madhu TS, Akula MR, Raman RN, Sharma HK, Johnson VG. The Birmingham hip resurfacing prosthesis an independent single surgeon’s experience at 7-year follow-up. J. Arthroplasty26(1), 1–8 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Killampalli VV, Hayes A, Parsons N, Costa ML, Prakash U. Hip resurfacing using the trochanteric flip osteotomy. Hip Int.19(2), 131–135 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mont MA, Marker DR, Smith JM, Ulrich SD, McGrath MS. Resurfacing is comparable to total hip arthroplasty at short-term follow-up. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.467(1), 66–71 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ollivere B, Duckett S, August A, Porteous M. The Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: 5-year clinical and radiographic results from a District General Hospital. Int. Orthop.34(5), 631–634 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Falez F, Favetti F, Casella F, Panegrossi G. Hip resurfacing: why does it fail? Early results and critical analysis of our first 60 cases. Int. Orthop.32(2), 209–216 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McGrath MS, Desser DR, Ulrich SD, Seyler TM, Marker DR, Mont MA. Total hip resurfacing in patients who are sixty years of age or older. J. Bone Joint Surg.90(Suppl. 3), 27–31 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nishii T, Sugano N, Miki H, Takao M, Koyama T, Yoshikawa H. Five-year results of metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty in Asian patients. J. Arthroplasty22(2), 176–183 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollard TC, Baker RP, Eastaugh-Waring SJ, Bannister GC. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.88(5), 592–600 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lilikakis AK, Vowler SL, Villar RN. Hydroxyapatite-coated femoral implant in metal-on-metal resurfacing hip arthroplasty: minimum of two years follow-up. Orthop. Clin. North Am.36(2), 215–222 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treacy RB, McBryde CW, Pynsent PB. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.87(2), 167–170 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rousseau MA, Le Mouel S, Goutallier D, Van Driessche S. Long-term results of alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty. Rev. Chir. Orthop. Reparatrice Appar. Mot.90(8), 741–748 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lazzaro F, Verdoia C, Gorla P, Balbino C, Benvenuti R. Ceramic–ceramic in total hip arthroplasty. An analysis of 7–13 year survival rate. Chir. Organi. Mov.84(4), 319–328 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Riska EB. Ceramic endoprosthesis in total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.297, 87–94 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Sedel L, Kerboull L, Christel P, Meunier A, Witvoet J. Alumina-on-alumina hip replacement. Results and survivorship in young patients. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.72(4), 658–663 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bascarevic Z, Vukasinovic Z, Slavkovic N et al. Alumina-on-alumina ceramic versus metal-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene bearings in total hip arthroplasty: a comparative study. Int. Orthop.34(8), 1129–1135 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Greene JW, Malkani AL, Kolisek FR, Jessup NM, Baker DL. Ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty24(6 Suppl.), 15–18 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ha YC, Koo KH, Jeong ST, Joon Yoo J, Kim YM, Joong Kim H. Cementless alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 50 years: a 5-year minimum follow-up study. J. Arthroplasty22(2), 184–188 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sugano N, Nishii T, Miki H, Yoshikawa H, Sato Y, Tamura S. Mid-term results of cementless total hip replacement using a ceramic-on-ceramic bearing with and without computer navigation. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.89(4), 455–460 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar