Preventing surgical site infections

References

• Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.20, 250–278 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephan F, Sax H, Wachsmuth M, Hoffmeyer P, Clergue F, Pittet D. Reduction of urinary tract infection and antibiotic use after surgery: a controlled, prospective, before–after intervention study. Clin. Infect. Dis.42, 1544–1551 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prokuski L. Prophylactic antibiotics in orthopaedic surgery. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg.16, 283–293 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broex EC, van Asselt AD, Bruggeman CA, van Tiel FH. Surgical site infections, how high are the costs?. J. Hosp. Infect.72, 193–201 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittet D, Harbarth S, Ruef C et al. Prevalence and risk factors for nosocomial infections in four university hospitals in Switzerland. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.20, 37–42 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawn MT, Itani KM, Gray SH, Vick CC, Henderson W, Houston TK. Association of timely administration of prophylactic antibiotics for major surgical procedures and surgical site infection. J. Am. Coll. Surg.206, 814–819 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graf K, Sohr D, Haverich A, Kuhn C, Gastmeier P, Chaberny IF. Decrease of deep sternal surgical site infection rates after cardiac surgery by a comprehensive infection control program. Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg.9, 282–286 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Park C, Hsu C, Neelakanta G et al. Severe intraoperative hyperglycemia is independently associated with surgical site infection after liver transplantation. Transplantation87, 1031–1036 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lübbeke A, Moons KG, Garavaglia G, Hoffmeyer P. Outcomes of obese and obese patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty. Arthritis. Rheum.59, 738–745 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rioux C, Grandbastien B, Astagneau P. The standardized incidence ratio as a reliable tool for surgical site infection surveillance. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.27, 817–824 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trussell J, Gerkin R, Coates B et al. Impact of a patient care pathway protocol on surgical site infection rates in cardiothoracic surgery patients. Am. J. Surg.196, 883–889 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casey AL, Elliott TS. Progress in the prevention of surgical site infection. Curr. Opinion. Infect. Dis.22, 370–375 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berwick DM, Calkins DR, McCan CJ, Hackbarth AD. The 100,000 lives campaign: setting a goal and a deadline for improving health care quality. JAMA295, 324–327 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry DE. Surgical site infections and the surgical care improvement project (SCIP): evolution of national quality measures. Surg. Infect.9, 579–584 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR et al. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N. Engl. J. Med.360, 491–499 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittet D, Allegranzi B, Boyce J. The World Health Organization Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care and their consensus recommendations. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.30, 611–622 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittet D, Allegranzi B, Storr J, Donaldson L. ‘Clean Care is Safer Care’: the Global Patient Safety Challenge 2005–2006. Int. J. Infect. Dis.10, 419–424 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Uçkay I, Ahmed QA, Sax H, Pittet D. Ventilator-associated pneumonia as a quality indicator for patient safety?. Clin. Infect. Dis.46, 557–563 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brümmer S, Brandt C, Sohr D, Gastmeier P. Does stratifying surgical site infection rates by the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance risk index influence the rank order of the hospitals in a surveillance system?. J. Hosp. Infect.69, 295–300 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lizioli A, Privitera G, Alliata E et al. Prevalence of nosocomial infections in Italy, result from the Lombardy survey in 2000. J. Hosp. Infect.54, 141–148 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klavs I, Bufon Luznik T, Skerl M et al. Prevalence of and risk factors for hospital-acquired infections in Slovenia – results of the first national survey, 2001. J. Hosp. Infect.54, 149–157 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astagneau P, L’Heriteau F, Daniel F et al. Reducing surgical site infection incidence through a network, results from the French ISO-RAISIN surveillance system. J. Hosp. Infect.72, 127–134 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barnes S, Salemi C, Fithian D et al. An enhanced benchmark for prosthetic joint replacement infection rates. Am. J. Infect. Control34, 669–672 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannien J, Wille JC, Snoeren RL, van den Hof S. Impact of postdischarge surveillance on surgical site infection rates for several surgical procedures, results from the nosocomial surveillance network in The Netherlands. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.27, 809–816 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manniën J, van den Hof S, Muilwijk J et al. Trends in the incidence of surgical site infection in The Netherlands. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.29, 1132–1138 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibsen Sorensen A, Sandberg Sorensen T, Bremmelgaard A. Quality of the surveillance of surgical wound infections: a 10-year prospective study of 12,364 wounds. Acta. Orthop. Scand.74, 175–179 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Romaniszyn D, Wojkowska-Mach J, Jaje E, Bulanda M, Franczuk B, Heczko PB. Epidemiological and microbiological surveillance of surgical site infections in orthopedic unit. Ortop. Traumatol. Rehabil.8, 639–645 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Uçkay I, Lübbeke A, Emonet S et al. Low incidence of haematogenous seeding to total hip and knee prostheses in patients with remote infections. J. Infect.59, 337–345 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trampuz A, Piper KE, Jacobson MJ et al. Sonication of removed hip and knee prostheses for diagnosis of infection. N. Engl. J. Med.357, 654–663 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harbarth S, Sax H, Gastmeier P. The preventable proportion of nosocomial infections: an overview of published reports. J. Hosp. Infect.54, 258–266 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S et al. An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N. Engl. J. Med.355, 2725–2732 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlet J, Fabry J, Amalberti R, Degos L. The ‘zero risk’ concept for hospital-acquired infections: a risky business! Clin. Infect. Dis.49, 747–749 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Choksey MS, Malik IA. Zero tolerance to shunt infections, can it be achieved?. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry.75, 87–91 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haridas M, Malangoni MA. Predictive factors for surgical site infection in general surgery. Surgery144, 496–501 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt C, Sohr D, Behnke M, Daschner F, Ruden H, Gastmeier P. Reduction of surgical site infection rates associated with active surveillance. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.27, 1347–1351 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thu LT, Dibley MJ, Ewald B, Tien NP, Lam LD. Incidence of surgical site infections and accompanying risk factors in Vietnamese orthopaedic patients. J. Hosp. Infect.60, 360–367 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saxer F, Widmer A, Fehr J et al. Benefit of a single preoperative dose of antibiotics in a sub-saharan district hospital: minimal input, massive impact. Ann. Surg.24, 322–326 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Maksimovic J, Markovic-Denic L, Bumbasirevic M, Marinkovic J, Vlajinac H. Surgical site infections in orthopedic patients: prospective cohort study. Croat. Med. J.49, 58–65 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd JC, Braga-Mele R. Incidence of postoperative endophthalmitis in a high-volume cataract surgicentre in Canada. Can. J. Ophthalmol.44, 288–292 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Babcock HM, Carroll C, Matava M, L’Ecuyer P, Fraser V. Surgical site infections after arthroscopy: outbreak investigation and case control study. Arthroscopy.19, 172–181 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wieck JA, Jackson JK, O’Brien TJ, Lurate RB, Russell JM, Dorchak JD. Efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics in arthroscopic surgery. Orthopedics20, 133–134 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• D’Angelo GL, Ogilvie-Harris DJ. Septic arthritis following arthroscopy, with cost/benefit analysis of antibiotic prophylaxis. Arthroscopy4, 10–14 (1988).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Havelin LI, Engesaeter LB, Espehaug B, Furnes O, Lie SA, Vollset SE. The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: 11 years and 73,000 arthroplasties. Acta. Orthop. Scand.71, 337–353 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engesaeter LB, Lie SA, Espehaug B, Furnes O, Vollset SE, Havelin LI. Antibiotic prophylaxis in total hip arthroplasty: effects of antibiotic prophylaxis systemically and in bone cement on the revision rate of 22,170 primary hip replacements followed 0–14 years in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta. Orthop. Scand.74, 644–651 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paavolainen P, Hamalainen M, Mustonen H, Slatis P. Registration of arthroplasties in Finland. A nationwide prospective project. Acta. Orthop. Scand.241, 27–30 (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Kurtz SM, Lau E, Schmier J, Ong KL, Zhao K, Parvizi J. Infection burden for hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States. J. Arthroplasty23, 984–991 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahomed NN, Barrett JA, Katz JN et al. Rates and outcomes of primary and revision total hip replacement in the United States medicare population. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.85, 27–32 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayliffe GA. Role of the environment of the operating suite in surgical wound infection. Rev. Infect. Dis.13, 800–804 (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Boyce JM, Potter-Bynoe G, Opal SM, Dziobek L, Medeiros AA. A common-source outbreak of Staphylococcus epidermidis infections among patients undergoing cardiac surgery. J. Infect. Dis.161, 493–499 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mermel LA, McKay M, Dempsey J, Parenteau S. Pseudomonas surgical-site infections linked to a healthcare worker with onychomycosis. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.24, 749–752 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Hill C, Flamant R, Mazas F, Evrard J. Prophylactic cefazolin versus placebo in total hip replacement. Report of a multicentre double-blind randomised trial. Lancet1, 795–796 (1981).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb BG, Lichtman DM, Wagner RA. Risk factors in total joint arthroplasty, comparison of infection rates in patients with different socioeconomic backgrounds. Orthopedics31, 445 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Akça O, Melischek M, Scheck T et al. Postoperative pain and subcutaneous oxygen tension. Lancet354, 41–42 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beldi G, Bisch-Knaden S, Banz V, Mühlemann K, Candinas D. Impact of intraoperative behavior on surgical site infections. Am. J. Surg.198, 157–162 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widmer AF, Rotter M, Voss A et al. Surgical hand preparation: state-of-the-art. J. Hosp. Infect.74(2), 112–122 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Niel-Weise BS, Wille JC, van den Broek PJ. Hair removal policies in clean surgery: systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.26, 923–928 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horgan MA, Kernan JC, Schwartz MS, Kellogg JX, McMenomey SO, Delashaw JB. Shaveless brain surgery, safe, well tolerated, and cost effective. Skull Base Surg.9, 253–258 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tanner J, Woodings D, Moncaster K. Preoperative hair removal to reduce surgical site infection. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.19, CD004122 (2006)
   Google Scholar
• Sax H, Allegranzi B, Uçkay I, Larson E, Boyce J, Pittet D. ‘My five moments for hand hygiene’: a user-centred design approach to understand, train, monitor and report hand hygiene. J. Hosp. Infect.67, 9–21 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittet D, Hugonnet S, Harbarth S et al. Effectiveness of a hospital-wide programme to improve compliance with hand hygiene. Lancet356, 1307–1312 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotter M, Sattar SA, Dharan S, Webber P, Voss A, Pittet D. Comparative efficacy of hand hygiene agents in the reduction of bacteria and viruses. Am. J. Infect. Control33, 558–560 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vernaz N, Sax H, Pittet D, Bonnabry P, Schrenzel J, Harbarth S. Temporal effects of antibiotic use and hand rub consumption on the incidence of MRSA and Clostridium difficile. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.62, 601–607 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hugonnet S, Pittet D. Hand hygiene –beliefs or science?. Clin. Microbiol. Infect6, 350–356 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nthumba P, Stepita-Poenaru E, Poenaru D et al. Surgical site infections: a cluster-randomized, cross-over study of the efficacy of plain soap and water versus alcohol-based rub for surgical hand preparation. Presented at: Fifth Decennial International Conference on Healthcare-Associated Infection. Atlanta, GA, USA, 18–22 March 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Parienti JJ, Thibon P, Heller R et al. Hand-rubbing with an aqueous alcoholic solution vs. traditional surgical hand-scrubbing and 30-day surgical site infection rates: a randomized equivalence study. JAMA288, 722–727 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner J, Swarbrook S, Stuart J. Surgical hand antisepsis to reduce surgical site infection. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.1, CD004288 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Dharan S, Pittet D. Environmental controls in operating theatres. J. Hosp. Infect.51, 79–84 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meehan J, Jamali AA, Nguyen H. Prophylactic antibiotics in hip and knee arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.91, 2480–2490 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi MS, Wilson SE. Is there a current role for preoperative-absorbable oral antimicrobial agents for prophylaxis of infection after colorectal surgery?. Surg. Infect.10, 285–288 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jaeger M, Maier D, Kern WV, Sudkamp NP. Antibiotics in trauma and orthopedic surgery – a primer of evidence-based recommendations. Injury37, 74–80 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright TI, Baddour LM, Berbari EF et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in dermatologic surgery: advisory statement 2008. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.59, 464–473 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnley J. Postoperative infection after total hip replacement with special reference to air contamination in the operating room. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.87, 167–187 (1972).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fogelberg EV, Zitzmann EK, Stinchfield FE. Prophylactic penicillin in orthopaedic surgery. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.52, 95–98 (1970).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavel A, Smith RL, Ballard A, Larson IJ. Prophylactic antibiotics in elective orthopedic surgery: a prospective study of 1,591 cases. South. Med. J.70, 50–55 (1977).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Henley MB, Jones RE, Wyatt RW, Hofmann A, Cohen RL. Prophylaxis with cefamandole in elective orthopedic surgery. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.209, 249–254 (1986).
   Google Scholar
• Lew D, Pittet D, Waldvogel F. Infections that complicate the insertion of prosthetic devices. In: Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Control (3rd Ed.). Mayhall G (Ed.). Williams & Wilkins, MD, USA, 731–748 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Harbarth S, Huttner B, Gervaz P et al. Risk factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus surgical site infection. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.29, 890–893 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suffoletta TJ, Jennings HR, Oh JJ, Stephens D, Poe KL. Continuous versus intermittent infusion of prophylactic cefoxitin after colorectal surgery: a pilot study. Pharmacotherapy28, 1133–1139 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cranny G, Elliott R, Weatherly H et al. A systematic review and economic model of switching from non-glycopeptide to glycopeptide antibiotic prophylaxis for surgery. Health Technol. Assess.12, 1–147 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Engesaeter LB, Espehaug B, Lie SA, Furnes O, Havelin LI. Does cement increase the risk of infection in primary total hip arthroplasty?. Revision rates in 56,275 cemented and uncemented primary THAs followed for 0–16 years in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta. Orthopaedica77, 351–358 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Classen DC, Evans RS, Pestotnik SL, Horn SD, Menlove RL, Burke JP. The timing of prophylactic administration of antibiotics and the risk of surgical-wound infection. N. Engl. J. Med.326, 281–286 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg JP, Braun BI, Hellinger WC et al. Timing of antimicrobial prophylaxis and the risk of surgical site infections: results from the Trial to Reduce Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Errors. Ann. Surg.250, 10–16 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber WP, Marti WR, Zwahlen M et al. The timing of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis. Ann. Surg.247, 918–926 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald M, Grabsch E, Marshall C, Forbes A. Single-versus multiple-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis for major surgery: a systematic review. Aust. N. Z. J. Surg.68, 388–396 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mauerhan DR, Nelson CL, Smith DL et al. Prophylaxis against infection in total joint arthroplasty. One day of cefuroxime compared with three days of cefazolin. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.76, 39–45 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harbarth S, Samore MH, Lichtenberg D, Carmeli Y. Prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis after cardiovascular surgery and its effect on surgical site infections and antimicrobial resistance. Circulation101, 2916–2921 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson DP. Antibiotic prophylaxis with cefuroxime in arthroplasty of the knee. J. Bone Joint. Surg. Br.69, 787–789 (1987).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barbour A, Schmidt S, Rout WR, Ben-David K, Burkhardt O, Derendorf H. Soft tissue penetration of cefuroxime determined by clinical microdialysis in morbidly obese patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents34, 231–235 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerli W, Trampuz A, Ochsner PE. Prosthetic-joint infections. N. Engl. J. Med.14, 1645–1654 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Glynn MK, Sheehan JM. The significance of asymptomatic bacteriuria in patients undergoing hip/knee arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.185, 151–154 (1984).
   Google Scholar
• Koulouvaris P, Sculco P, Finerty E, Sculco T, Sharrock NE. Relationship between perioperative urinary tract infection and deep infection after joint arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.467, 1859–1867 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aggarwal R, Darzi A. Symposium on surgical simulation for training and certification. World. J. Surg.32, 139–140 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vincent A, Ayzac L, Girard R et al. Downward trends in surgical site and urinary tract infections after cesarean delivery in a French surveillance network, 1997–2003. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.29, 227–233 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rioux C, Grandbastien B, Astagneau P. Impact of a six-year control programme on surgical site infections in France: results of the INCISO surveillance. J. Hosp. Infect.66, 217–223 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gastmeier P, Sohr D, Schwab F et al. Ten years of KISS: the most important requirements for success. J. Hosp. Infect.70, 11–16 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geubbels EL, Nagelkerke NJ, Mintjes-De Groot AJ, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CM, Grobbee DE, De Boer AS. Reduced risk of surgical site infections through surveillance in a network. Int. J. Qual. Health. Care18, 127–133 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haley RW, Culver DH, White JW et al. The efficacy of infection surveillance and control programs in preventing nosocomial infections in US hospitals. Am. J. Epidemiol.121, 182–205 (1985).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittet D. The Lowbury lecture: behaviour in infection control. J. Hosp. Infect.58, 1–13 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys H. Preventing surgical site infection. Where now?. J. Hosp. Infect.73, 316–322 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robicsek A, Beaumont JL, Paule SM et al. Universal surveillance for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in 3 affiliated hospitals. Ann. Intern. Med.148, 409–418 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keshtgar MR, Khalili A, Coen PG et al. Impact of rapid molecular screening for meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in surgical wards. Br. J. Surg.95, 381–386 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pofahl WE, Goettler CE, Ramsey KM, Cochran MK, Nobles DL, Rotondo MF. Active surveillance screening of MRSA and eradication of the carrier state decreases surgical-site infections caused by MRSA. J. Am. Coll. Surg.208, 981–986 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harbarth S, Fankhauser C, Schrenzel J et al. Universal screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at hospital admission and nosocomial infection in surgical patients. JAMA299, 1149–1157 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeyaratnam D, Whitty CJ, Phillips K et al. Impact of rapid screening tests on acquisition of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, cluster randomised crossover trial. Br. Med. J.336, 927–930 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Munoz P, Hortal J, Giannella M et al. Nasal carriage of S. aureus increases the risk of surgical site infection after major heart surgery. J. Hosp. Infect.68, 25–31 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Rijen MM, Bonten M, Wenzel RP, Kluytmans JA. Intranasal mupirocin for reduction of Staphylococcus aureus infections in surgical patients with nasal carriage: a systematic review. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.61, 254–261 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalmeijer MD, Coertjens H, van Nieuwland-Bollen PM et al. Surgical site infections in orthopedic surgery, the effect of mupirocin nasal ointment in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Clin. Infect. Dis.35, 353–358 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perl TM, Cullen JJ, Wenzel RP et al. Intranasal mupirocin to prevent postoperative Staphylococcus aureus infections. N. Engl. J. Med.346, 1871–1877 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallen AJ, Wilson CT, Larson RJ. Perioperative intranasal mupirocin for the prevention of surgical-site infections, systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.26, 916–922 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacek DM, Robb WJ, Paule SM, Kudrna JC, Stamos VP, Peterson LR. Staphylococcus aureus nasal decolonization in joint replacement surgery reduces infection. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.466, 1349–1355 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao N, Cannella B, Crossett LS, Yates AJ Jr, McGough R 3rd. A preoperative decolonization protocol for Staphylococcus aureus prevents orthopaedic infections. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.466, 1343–1348 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode LG, Kluytmans JA, Wertheim HF et al. Preventing surgical-site infections in nasal carriers of Staphylococcus aureus. N. Engl. J. Med.362, 9–17 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Wong PF, Melling AC, Leaper DJ. Effects of perioperative hypothermia and warming in surgical practice. Int. Wound J.2, 193–204 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scott EM, Buckland R. A systematic review of intraoperative warming to prevent postoperative complications. AORN J.83, 1090–1104 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kurz A, Sessler DI, Lenhardt R. Perioperative normothermia to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection and shorten hospitalization. Study of Wound Infection and Temperature Group. N. Engl. J. Med.334, 1209–1215 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melling AC, Ali B, Scott EM, Leaper DJ. Effects of preoperative warming on the incidence of wound infection after clean surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet358, 876–880 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambiru S, Kato A, Kimura F et al. Poor postoperative blood glucose control increases surgical site infections after surgery for hepato–biliary–pancreatic cancer, a prospective study in a high-volume institute in Japan. J. Hosp. Infect.68, 230–233 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marchant MH Jr, Viens NA, Cook C, Vail TP, Bolognesi MP. The impact of glycemic control and diabetes mellitus on perioperative outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.91, 1621–1629 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao LS, Meeks D, Moyer VA, Lally KP. Peri-operative glycaemic control regimens for preventing surgical site infections in adults. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.8, CD006806 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Maragakis LL, Cosgrove SE, Martinez EA, Tucker MG, Cohen DB, Perl TM. Intraoperative fraction of inspired oxygen is a modifiable risk factor for surgical site infection after spinal surgery. Anesthesiology110, 556–562 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Belda FJ, Aguilera L, Garcia de la Asuncion J et al. Supplemental perioperative oxygen and the risk of surgical wound infection, a randomized controlled trial. JAMA294, 2035–2342 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardella C, Goltra LB, Laschansky E et al. High-concentration supplemental perioperative oxygen to reduce the incidence of postcesarean surgical site infection, a randomized controlled trial. Obstet. Gynecol.112, 545–552 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pryor KO, Fahey TJ 3rd, Lien CA, Goldstein PA. Surgical site infection and the routine use of perioperative hyperoxia in a general surgical population: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA291, 79–87 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greif R, Akça O, Horn EP, Kurz A, Sessler DI. Supplemental perioperative oxygen to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection. Outcomes Research Group. N. Engl. J. Med.342, 161–167 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qadan M, Akca O, Mahid SS, Hornung CA, Polk HC Jr. Perioperative supplemental oxygen therapy and surgical site infection: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch. Surg.144, 359–366 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meyhoff CS, Wetterslev J, Jorgensen LN et al. Effect of high perioperative oxygen fraction on surgical site infection and pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery: the PROXI randomized clinical trial. JAMA302, 1543–1550 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt TK, Hopf HW. High inspired oxygen fraction and surgical site infection. JAMA302, 1588–1589 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Segers P, Speekenbrink RG, Ubbink DT, van Ogtrop ML, de Mol BA. Prevention of nosocomial infection in cardiac surgery by decontamination of the nasopharynx and oropharynx with chlorhexidine gluconate: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA296, 2460–2466 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollef M, Pittet D, Sanchez Garcia M et al. A randomized double-blind trial of iseganan in prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.173, 91–97 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milstone AM, Passaretti CL, Perl TM. Chlorhexidine: expanding the armamentarium for infection control and prevention. Clin. Infect. Dis.46, 274–281 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squadrone V, Coha M, Cerutti E et al. Continuous positive airway pressure for treatment of postoperative hypoxemia, a randomized controlled trial. JAMA293, 589–595 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaines RJ, Dunbar RP. The use of surgical drains in orthopedics. Orthopedics31, 702–705 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster J, Osborne S. Preoperative bathing or showering with skin antiseptics to prevent surgical site infection. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.2, CD004985 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Darouiche RO, Wall MJ Jr, Itani KM et al. Chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone-iodine for surgical-site antisepsis. N. Engl. J. Med.362, 18–26 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durani P, Leaper D. Povidone-iodine: use in hand disinfection, skin preparation and antiseptic irrigation. Int. Wound J.5, 376–387 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stonecypher K. Going around in circles: is this the best practice for preparing the skin?. Crit. Care. Nurs. Q.32, 94–98 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhao X, Chen J, Fang XQ, Fan SW. Surgical site marking will not affect sterility of the surgical field. Med. Hypotheses73, 319–320 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laine T, Aarnio P. Glove perforation in orthopaedic and trauma surgery. A comparison between single, double indicator gloving and double gloving with two regular gloves. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.86, 898–900 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Misteli H, Weber WP, Reck S et al. Surgical glove perforation and the risk of surgical site infection. Arch. Surg.144, 553–558 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas S, Agarwal M, Mehta G. Intraoperative glove perforation-single versus double gloving in protection against skin contamination. Postgrad. Med. J.77, 458–460 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner J, Parkinson H. Double gloving to reduce surgical cross-infection. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.3, CD003087 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Webster J, Alghamdi AA. Use of plastic adhesive drapes during surgery for preventing surgical site infection. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.4, CD006353 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Horgan MA, Piatt JH Jr. Shaving of the scalp may increase the rate of infection in CSF shunt surgery. Pediatr. Neurosurg.264, 180–184 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Whyte W, Hodgson R, Tinkler J. The importance of airborne bacterial contamination of wounds. J. Hosp. Infect.3, 123–135 (1982).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lidwell OM, Lowbury EJ, Whyte W, Blowers R, Stanley SJ, Lowe D. Effect of ultraclean air in operating rooms on deep sepsis in the joint after total hip or knee replacement: a randomised study. Br. Med. J.285, 10–14 (1982).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt C, Hott U, Sohr D, Daschner F, Gastmeier P, Ruden H. Operating room ventilation with laminar airflow shows no protective effect on the surgical site infection rate in orthopedic and abdominal surgery. Ann. Surg.248, 695–700 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsett PA. Do we really need laminar flow ventilation in the operating room to prevent surgical site infections?. Ann. Surg.248, 701–703 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Slim K, Vicaut E, Launay-Savary MV, Contant C, Chipponi J. Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials on the role of mechanical bowel preparation before colorectal surgery. Ann. Surg.249, 203–209 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullen JC, Bentley MJ, Mong K et al. Reduction of leg wound infections following coronary artery bypass surgery. Can. J. Cardiol.15, 65–68 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chughtai T, Chen LQ, Salasidis G, Nguyen D, Tchervenkov C, Morin JF. Clips versus suture technique: is there a difference?. Can. J. Cardiol.16, 1403–1407 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohn SM, Giannotti G, Ong AW et al. Prospective randomized trial of two wound management strategies for dirty abdominal wounds. Ann. Surg.233, 409–413 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duttaroy DD, Jitendra J, Duttaroy B et al. Management strategy for dirty abdominal incisions: primary or delayed primary closure?. Surg. Infect.10, 129–136 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson SE. Microbial sealing: a new approach to reducing contamination. J. Hosp. Infect.70, 11–14 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• W-Dahl A, Toksvig-Larsen S, Lindstrand A. No difference between daily and weekly pin site care: a randomized study of 50 patients with external fixation. Acta Orthop. Scand.7, 704–708 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Lethaby A, Temple J, Santy J. Pin site care for preventing infections associated with external bone fixators and pins. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.CD004551 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Eggimann P, Pittet D. Overview of catheter-related infections with special emphasis on prevention based on educational programs. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.8, 295–309 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dosseh Eacute Koue D, Doleaglenou A, Fortey YK, Ayite AE. Randomized trial comparing dressing to no dressing of surgical wounds in a tropical setting. J. Chir. (Paris)145, 143–146 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cosker T, Elsayed S, Gupta S, Mendonca AD, Tayton KJ. Choice of dressing has a major impact on blistering and healing outcomes in orthopaedic patients. J. Wound Care14, 27–29 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vermeulen H, Ubbink D, Goossens A, de Vos R, Legemate D. Dressings and topical agents for surgical wounds healing by secondary intention. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.CD003554 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Shinohara T, Yamashita Y, Satoh K et al. Prospective evaluation of occlusive hydrocolloid dressing versus conventional gauze dressing regarding the healing effect after abdominal operations, randomized controlled trial. Asian J. Surg.31, 1–5 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ubbink DT, Vermeulen H, Goossens A, Kelner RB, Schreuder SM, Lubbers MJ. Occlusive vs. gauze dressings for local wound care in surgical patients: a randomized clinical trial. Arch. Surg.143, 950–955 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wynne R, Botti M, Stedman H et al. Effect of three wound dressings on infection, healing comfort, and cost in patients with sternotomy wounds: a randomized trial. Chest125, 43–49 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys H, Cunney R. Performance indicators and the public reporting of healthcare-associated infection rates. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.14, 892–894 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCall JL, Macchiaroli S, Brown RB et al. A method to track surgical site infections. Qual. Manag. Health Care6, 52–62 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McKibben L, Horan T, Tokars JI et al. Guidance on public reporting of healthcare-associated infections: recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am. J. Infect. Control33, 217–226 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKibben L, Fowler G, Horan T, Brennan PJ. Ensuring rational public reporting systems for health care-associated infections: systematic literature review and evaluation recommendations. Am. J. Infect. Control34, 142–149 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petrosillo N, Drapeau CM, Nicastri E, Martini L, Ippolito G, Moro ML. Surgical site infections in Italian Hospitals: a prospective multicenter study. BMC Infect. Dis.8, 34–45 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kompatscher P, von Planta A, Spicher I et al. Comparison of the incidence and predicted risk of early surgical site infections after breast reduction. Aesthetic. Plast. Surg.27, 308–314 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pittet B, Montandon D, Pittet D. Infection in breast implants. Lancet Infect. Dis.5, 94–106 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith RL, Bohl JK, McElearney ST et al. Wound infection after elective colorectal resection. Ann. Surg.239, 599–605 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wick EC, Gibbs L, Indorf LA, Varma MG, Garcia-Aguilar J. Implementation of quality measures to reduce surgical site infection in colorectal patients. Dis. Colon Rectum51, 1004–1009 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinert JM, Hoffmann J, Miller Crain G, Larsen CF, Goldsmith LJ, Firrell JC. Postoperative infection in a double-occupancy operating room. A prospective study of two thousand four hundred and fifty-eight procedures on the extremities. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.79, 503–513 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Merrer J, Girou E, Lortat-Jacob A, Montravers P, Lucet JC. Surgical site infection after surgery to repair femoral neck fracture: a French multicenter retrospective study. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.28, 1169–1174 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parameswaran AD, Roberts CS, Seligson D, Voor M. Pin tract infection with contemporary external fixation: how much of a problem?. J. Orthop. Trauma17, 503–507 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zgonis T, Jolly GP, Garbalosa JC. The efficacy of prophylactic intravenous antibiotics in elective foot and ankle surgery. J. Foot Ankle Surg.43, 97–103 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Popelka S, Vavrik P, Hromadka R, Sosna A. Our results of the Lapidus procedure in patients with hallux valgus deformity. Acta Chir. Orthop. Traumatol. Cech.75, 271–276 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kürklü M, Demiralp B, Yurttaş Y, Çiçek EI, Ateşalp AS. Modified chevron osteotomy fixed with stofella pin for hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Int.29, 478–482 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Campbell DA Jr, Henderson WG, Englesbe MJ et al. Surgical site infection prevention, the importance of operative duration and blood transfusion – results of the first American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Best Practices Initiative. J. Am. Coll. Surg.207, 810–820 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alexander JW, Fischer JE, Boyajian M, Palmquist J, Morris MJ. The influence of hair-removal methods on wound infections. Arch. Surg.118, 347–352 (1983).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar