Oligonucleotide microarrays in constitutional genetic diagnosis

References

• Lejeune J, Gauthier M, Turpin R. Human chromosomes in tissue cultures. C. R. Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci.248, 602–603 (1959).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schouten JP, McElgunn CJ, Waaijer R, Zwijnenburg D, Diepvens F, Pals G. Relative quantification of 40 nucleic acid sequences by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Nucleic Acids Res.30, e57 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi OP, Sudar D et al. Comparative genomic hybridization for molecular cytogenetic analysis of solid tumors. Science258, 818–821 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichter P, Joos S, Bentz M, Lampel S. Comparative genomic hybridization: uses and limitations. Semin. Hematol.37, 348–357 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kirchhoff M, Rose H, Lundsteen C. High resolution comparative genomic hybridisation in clinical cytogenetics. J. Med. Genet.38, 740–744 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pinkel D, Segraves R, Sudar D et al. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays. Nat. Genet.20, 207–211 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solinas-Toldo S, Lampel S, Stilgenbauer S et al. Matrix-based comparative genomic hybridization: biochips to screen for genomic imbalances. Genes Chromosomes Cancer20, 399–407 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veltman JA, Schoenmakers EF, Eussen BH et al. High-throughput analysis of subtelomeric chromosome rearrangements by use of array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Am. J. Hum. Genet.70, 1269–1276 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vissers LE, de Vries BB, Osoegawa K et al. Array-based comparative genomic hybridization for the genomewide detection of submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities. Am. J. Hum. Genet.73, 1261–1270 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Menten B, Maas N, Thienpont B et al. Emerging patterns of cryptic chromosomal imbalance in patients with idiopathic mental retardation and multiple congenital anomalies: a new series of 140 patients and review of published reports. J. Med. Genet.43, 625–633 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu X, Shaw CA, Patel A et al. Clinical implementation of chromosomal microarray analysis: summary of 2513 postnatal cases. PLoS One2, e327 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vissers LE, van Ravenswaaij CM, Admiraal R et al. Mutations in a new member of the chromodomain gene family cause CHARGE syndrome. Nat. Genet.36, 955–957 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redon R, Ishikawa S, Fitch KR et al. Global variation in copy number in the human genome. Nature444, 444–454 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry GH, Ben-Dor A, Tsalenko A et al. The fine-scale and complex architecture of human copy-number variation. Am. J. Hum. Genet.82, 685–695 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller DT, Adam MP, Aradhya S et al. Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies. Am. J. Hum. Genet.86, 749–764 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone PM, Bacino CA, Shaw CA et al. Detection of clinically relevant exonic copy-number changes by aCGH. Hum. Mutat.31, 1326–1342 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy GC, Matsuzaki H, Dong S et al. Large-scale genotyping of complex DNA. Nat. Biotechnol.21, 1233–1237 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steemers FJ, Chang W, Lee G, Barker DL, Shen R, Gunderson KL. Whole-genome genotyping with the single-base extension assay. Nat. Methods3, 31–33 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker T, Montpetit A, Chai D et al. Comparison of genome-wide array genomic hybridization platforms for the detection of copy number variants in idiopathic mental retardation. BMC Med. Genomics4, 25 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Firth HV, Richards SM, Bevan AP et al. DECIPHER: Database of Chromosomal Imbalance and Phenotype in Humans Using Ensembl Resources. Am. J. Hum. Genet.84, 524–533 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feenstra I, Fang J, Koolen DA et al. European Cytogeneticists Association Register of Unbalanced Chromosome Aberrations (ECARUCA); an online database for rare chromosome abnormalities. Eur. J. Med. Genet.49, 279–291 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Itsara A, Cooper GM, Baker C et al. Population analysis of large copy number variants and hotspots of human genetic disease. Am. J. Hum. Genet.84, 148–161 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunetti-Pierri N, Berg JS, Scaglia F et al. Recurrent reciprocal 1q21.1 deletions and duplications associated with microcephaly or macrocephaly and developmental and behavioral abnormalities. Nat. Genet.40, 1466–1471 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mefford HC, Sharp AJ, Baker C et al. Recurrent rearrangements of chromosome 1q21.1 and variable pediatric phenotypes. N. Engl. J. Med.359, 1685–1699 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas NM, Van de Putte T, Melotte C et al. The C20orf133 gene is disrupted in a patient with Kabuki syndrome. J. Med. Genet.44, 562–569 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Durand CM, Betancur C, Boeckers TM et al. Mutations in the gene encoding the synaptic scaffolding protein SHANK3 are associated with autism spectrum disorders. Nat. Genet.39, 25–27 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauthier J, Champagne N, Lafrenière RG et al. De novo mutations in the gene encoding the synaptic scaffolding protein SHANK3 in patients ascertained for schizophrenia. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA107, 7863–7868 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecointre C, Pichon O, Hamel A et al. Familial acampomelic form of campomelic dysplasia caused by a 960 kb deletion upstream of SOX9. Am. J. Med. Genet. A149A, 1183–1189 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gribble SM, Prigmore E, Burford DC et al. The complex nature of constitutional de novo apparently balanced translocations in patients presenting with abnormal phenotypes. J. Med. Genet.42, 8–16 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baptista J, Mercer C, Prigmore E et al. Breakpoint mapping and array CGH in translocations: comparison of a phenotypically normal and an abnormal cohort. Am. J. Hum. Genet.82, 927–936 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Gregori M, Ciccone R, Magini P et al. Cryptic deletions are a common finding in ‘balanced’ reciprocal and complex chromosome rearrangements: a study of 59 patients. J. Med. Genet.44, 750–762 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schluth-Bolard C, Delobel B, Sanlaville D et al. Cryptic genomic imbalances in de novo and inherited apparently balanced chromosomal rearrangements: array CGH study of 47 unrelated cases. Eur. J. Med. Genet.52, 291–296 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gruchy N, Lebrun M, Herlicoviez M et al. Supernumerary marker chromosomes management in prenatal diagnosis. Am. J. Med. Genet. A.146A, 2770–2776 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liehr T, Ewers E, Kosyakova N et al. Handling small supernumerary marker chromosomes in prenatal diagnostics. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn.9, 317–324 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballif BC, Hornor SA, Sulpizio SG et al. Development of a high-density pericentromeric region BAC clone set for the detection and characterization of small supernumerary marker chromosomes by array CGH. Genet. Med.9, 150–162 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Veyver IB, Patel A, Shaw CA et al. Clinical use of array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) for prenatal diagnosis in 300 cases. Prenat. Diagn.29, 29–39 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Caignec C, Boceno M, Saugier-Veber P et al. Detection of genomic imbalances by array based comparative genomic hybridisation in fetuses with multiple malformations. J. Med. Genet.42, 121–128 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Caignec C, Spits C, Sermon K et al. Single-cell chromosomal imbalances detection by array CGH. Nucleic Acids Res.34, e68 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson DS, Gemelos G, Baner J et al. Preclinical validation of a microarray method for full molecular karyotyping of blastomeres in a 24-h protocol. Hum. Reprod.25, 1066–1075 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanneste E, Melotte C, Voet T et al. PGD for a complex chromosomal rearrangement by array comparative genomic hybridization. Hum. Reprod.26, 941–949 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koolen DA, Vissers LE, Pfundt R et al. A new chromosome 17q21.31 microdeletion syndrome associated with a common inversion polymorphism. Nat. Genet.38, 999–1001 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp AJ, Hansen S, Selzer RR et al. Discovery of previously unidentified genomic disorders from the duplication architecture of the human genome. Nat. Genet.38, 1038–1042 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw-Smith C, Pittman AM, Willatt L et al. Microdeletion encompassing MAPT at chromosome 17q21.3 is associated with developmental delay and learning disability. Nat. Genet.38, 1032–1037 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp AJ, Mefford HC, Li K et al. A recurrent 15q13.3 microdeletion syndrome associated with mental retardation and seizures. Nat. Genet.40, 322–328 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar RA, KaraMohamed S, Sudi J et al. Recurrent 16p11.2 microdeletions in autism. Hum. Mol. Genet.17, 628–638 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall CR, Noor A, Vincent JB et al. Structural variation of chromosomes in autism spectrum disorder. Am. J. Hum. Genet.82, 477–488 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss LA, Shen Y, Korn JM et al. Association between microdeletion and microduplication at 16p11.2 and autism. N. Engl. J. Med.358, 667–675 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijlsma EK, Gijsbers AC, Schuurs-Hoeijmakers JH et al. Extending the phenotype of recurrent rearrangements of 16p11.2: deletions in mentally retarded patients without autism and in normal individuals. Eur. J. Med. Genet.52, 77–87 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bochukova EG, Huang N, Keogh J et al. Large, rare chromosomal deletions associated with severe early-onset obesity. Nature463, 666–670 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters RG, Jacquemont S, Valsesia A et al. A new highly penetrant form of obesity due to deletions on chromosome 16p11.2. Nature463, 671–675 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zody MC, Jiang Z, Fung HC et al. Evolutionary toggling of the MAPT 17q21.31 inversion region. Nat. Genet.40, 1076–1083 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zweier C, Peippo MM, Hoyer J et al. Haploinsufficiency of TCF4 causes syndromal mental retardation with intermittent hyperventilation (Pitt–Hopkins syndrome). Am. J. Hum. Genet.80, 994–1001 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klopocki E, Schulze H, Strauss G et al. Complex inheritance pattern resembling autosomal recessive inheritance involving a microdeletion in thrombocytopenia-absent radius syndrome. Am. J. Hum. Genet.80, 232–240 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefansson H, Rujescu D, Cichon S et al. Large recurrent microdeletions associated with schizophrenia. Nature455, 232–236 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone JL, O’Donovan MC, Gurling H et al. Rare chromosomal deletions and duplications increase risk of schizophrenia. Nature455, 237–241 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsson M, Scholz SW, Scheet P et al. Genotype, haplotype and copy-number variation in worldwide human populations. Nature451, 998–1003 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Szpiech ZA, Degnan JH et al. Comparing spatial maps of human population-genetic variation using Procrustes analysis. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol.9(1), Article 13 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Newman TL, Tuzun E, Morrison VA et al. A genome-wide survey of structural variation between human and chimpanzee. Genome Res.15, 1344–1356 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kehrer-Sawatzki H, Cooper DN. Understanding the recent evolution of the human genome: insights from human–chimpanzee genome comparisons. Hum. Mutat.28, 99–130 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kehrer-Sawatzki H, Cooper DN. Molecular mechanisms of chromosomal rearrangement during primate evolution. Chromosome Res.16, 41–56 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cottrell CE, Prior TW, Pyatt R et al. Unexpected detection of dystrophin gene deletions by array comparative genomic hybridization. Am. J. Med. Genet. A152A, 2301–2307 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibáñez P, Bonnet AM, Débarges B et al. Causal relation between α-synuclein gene duplication and familial Parkinson’s disease. Lancet364, 1169–1171 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chartier-Harlin MC, Kachergus J, Roumier C et al. α-synuclein locus duplication as a cause of familial Parkinson’s disease. Lancet364, 1167–1169 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaaf CP, Scott DA, Wiszniewska J, Beaudet A et al. Identification of incestuous parental relationships by SNP-based DNA microarrays. Lancet377, 555–556 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Talkowski ME, Ernst C, Heilbut A et al. Next-generation sequencing strategies enable routine detection of balanced chromosome rearrangements for clinical diagnostics and genetic research. Am. J. Hum. Genet.88, 469–481 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu RW, Lo YM. Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis by fetal nucleic acid analysis in maternal plasma: the coming of age. Semin. Fetal Neonatal. Med.16, 88–93 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maitra A, Arking DE, Shivapurkar N et al. Genomic alterations in cultured human embryonic stem cells. Nat. Genet.37, 1099–1103 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefort N, Feyeux M, Bas C et al. Human embryonic stem cells reveal recurrent genomic instability at 20q11.21. Nat. Biotechnol.26, 1364–1366 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hussein SM, Batada NN, Vuoristo S et al. Copy number variation and selection during reprogramming to pluripotency. Nature471, 58–62 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayshar Y, Ben-David U, Lavon N et al. Identification and classification of chromosomal aberrations in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell7, 521–531 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurent LC, Ulitsky I, Slavin I et al. Dynamic changes in the copy number of pluripotency and cell proliferation genes in human ESCs and iPSCs during reprogramming and time in culture. Cell Stem Cell8, 106–118 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar