Stroke rehabilitation using noninvasive cortical stimulation: hemispatial neglect

References

• Appelros P, Karlsson GM, Seiger A, Nydevik I. Neglect and anosognosia after first-ever stroke: incidence and relationship to disability. J. Rehabil. Med. 34(5), 215–220 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerkhoff G. Rehabilitation of visuospatial cognition and visual exploration in neglect: a cross-over study. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 12(1), 27–40 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schindler I, Kerkhoff G, Karnath HO, Keller I, Goldenberg G. Neck muscle vibration induces lasting recovery in spatial neglect. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatr. 73(4), 412–419 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen A, Lincoln NB. Cognitive rehabilitation for spatial neglect following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2, CD003586 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frassinetti F, Angeli V, Meneghello F, Avanzi S, Làdavas E. Long-lasting amelioration of visuospatial neglect by prism adaptation. Brain 125(Pt 3), 608–623 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerkhoff G, Keller I, Ritter V, Marquardt C. Repetitive optokinetic stimulation induces lasting recovery from visual neglect. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 24(4–6), 357–369 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayache SS, Farhat WH, Zouari HG, Hosseini H, Mylius V, Lefaucheur JP. Stroke rehabilitation using noninvasive cortical stimulation: motor function. Expert. Rev. Neurother. 12(8), 949–972 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mylius V, Zouari HG, Farhat WH, Ayache SS, Lefaucheur JP. Stroke rehabilitation using noninvasive cortical stimulation: aphasia. Expert. Rev. Neurother. 12(8), 973–982 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse MD, Sparing R, Fink GR. Ameliorating spatial neglect with non-invasive brain stimulation: from pathophysiological concepts to novel treatment strategies. Neuropsychol. Rehabil. 21(5), 676–702 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallar G. Spatial hemineglect in humans. Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 2(3), 87–97 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisiach E, Geminiani G, Berti A, Rusconi ML. Perceptual and premotor factors of unilateral neglect. Neurology 40(8), 1278–1281 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisiach E, Perani D, Vallar G, Berti A. Unilateral neglect: personal and extra-personal. Neuropsychologia 24(6), 759–767 (1986).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buxbaum LJ, Ferraro MK, Veramonti T et al. Hemispatial neglect: subtypes, neuroanatomy, and disability. Neurology 62(5), 749–756 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjoertomt O, Cowey A, Walsh V. Spatial neglect in near and far space investigated by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain 125(Pt 9), 2012–2022 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauthier L, Dehaut F, Joanette Y. The Bells Test: a quantitative and qualitative test for visual neglect. Int. J. Clin. Neuropsychol. 11, 49–53 (1989).
   Google Scholar
• Schenkenberg T, Bradford DC, Ajax ET. Line bisection and unilateral visual neglect in patients with neurologic impairment. Neurology 30(5), 509–517 (1980).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson B, Cockburn J, Halligan P. Development of a behavioral test of visuospatial neglect. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 68(2), 98–102 (1987).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann P, Fimm B. Test Battery for Attention Performance (TAP). PSYTEST, Herzogenrath, Germany (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Ota H, Fujii T, Suzuki K, Fukatsu R, Yamadori A. Dissociation of body-centered and stimulus-centered representations in unilateral neglect. Neurology 57(11), 2064–2069 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buxbaum LJ, Permaul P. Hand-centered attentional and motor asymmetries in unilateral neglect. Neuropsychologia 39(7), 653–664 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ghacibeh GA, Shenker JI, Winter KH, Triggs WJ, Heilman KM. Dissociation of neglect subtypes with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology 69(11), 1122–1127 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdon V, Schwartz S, Lovblad KO, Hauert CA, Vuilleumier P. Neuroanatomy of hemispatial neglect and its functional components: a study using voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping. Brain 133(Pt 3), 880–894 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbetta M, Kincade MJ, Lewis C, Snyder AZ, Sapir A. Neural basis and recovery of spatial attention deficits in spatial neglect. Nat. Neurosci. 8(11), 1603–1610 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveri M, Bisiach E, Brighina F et al. rTMS of the unaffected hemisphere transiently reduces contralesional visuospatial hemineglect. Neurology 57(7), 1338–1340 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveri M, Rossini PM, Cicinelli P et al. Neurophysiological evaluation of tactile space perception deficits through transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain Res. Brain Res. Protoc. 5(1), 25–29 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oliveri M, Rossini PM, Filippi MM et al. Time-dependent activation of parieto-frontal networks for directing attention to tactile space. A study with paired transcranial magnetic stimulation pulses in right-brain-damaged patients with extinction. Brain 123 (Pt 9), 1939–1947 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hilgetag CC, Théoret H, Pascual-Leone A. Enhanced visual spatial attention ipsilateral to rTMS-induced ‘virtual lesions’ of human parietal cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 4(9), 953–957 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsbourne M. Hemi-neglect and hemisphere rivalry. Adv. Neurol. 18, 41–49 (1977).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koch G, Oliveri M, Cheeran B et al. Hyperexcitability of parietal-motor functional connections in the intact left-hemisphere of patients with neglect. Brain 131(Pt 12), 3147–3155 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallett M. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the human brain. Nature 406(6792), 147–150 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvanto J, Muggleton NG. New light through old windows: moving beyond the ‘virtual lesion’ approach to transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuroimage 39(2), 549–552 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kujirai T, Caramia MD, Rothwell JC et al. Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 471, 501–519 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Chen R, Classen J, Gerloff C et al. Depression of motor cortex excitability by low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology 48(5), 1398–1403 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeda F, Keenan JP, Tormos JM, Topka H, Pascual-Leone A. Modulation of corticospinal excitability by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin. Neurophysiol. 111(5), 800–805 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fierro B, Brighina F, Piazza A, Oliveri M, Bisiach E. Timing of right parietal and frontal cortex activity in visuo-spatial perception: a TMS study in normal individuals. Neuroreport 12(11), 2605–2607 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveri M, Rossini PM, Pasqualetti P et al. Interhemispheric asymmetries in the perception of unimanual and bimanual cutaneous stimuli. A study using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain 122 (Pt 9), 1721–1729 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dambeck N, Sparing R, Meister IG et al. Interhemispheric imbalance during visuospatial attention investigated by unilateral and bilateral TMS over human parietal cortices. Brain Res. 1072(1), 194–199 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meister IG, Wienemann M, Buelte D et al. Hemiextinction induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the right temporo-parietal junction. Neuroscience 142(1), 119–123 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fierro B, Brighina F, Oliveri M et al. Contralateral neglect induced by right posterior parietal rTMS in healthy subjects. Neuroreport 11(7), 1519–1521 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karnath HO, Ferber S, Himmelbach M. Spatial awareness is a function of the temporal not the posterior parietal lobe. Nature 411(6840), 950–953 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison A, Schindler I, Pattison LL, Milner AD. An exploration of the role of the superior temporal gyrus in visual search and spatial perception using TMS. Brain 127(Pt 10), 2307–2315 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch G, Oliveri M, Torriero S, Caltagirone C. Modulation of excitatory and inhibitory circuits for visual awareness in the human right parietal cortex. Exp. Brain Res. 160(4), 510–516 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fierro B, Brighina F, Giglia G, Palermo A, Francolini M, Scalia S. Paired pulse TMS over the right posterior parietal cortex modulates visuospatial perception. J. Neurol. Sci. 247(2), 144–148 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyal M, Ro T, Rafal R. Increased sensitivity to ipsilateral cutaneous stimuli following transcranial magnetic stimulation of the parietal lobe. Ann. Neurol. 38(2), 264–267 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveri M, Caltagirone C, Filippi MM et al. Paired transcranial magnetic stimulation protocols reveal a pattern of inhibition and facilitation in the human parietal cortex. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 529 Pt 2, 461–468 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Bolognini N, Fregni F, Casati C, Olgiati E, Vallar G. Brain polarization of parietal cortex augments training-induced improvement of visual exploratory and attentional skills. Brain Res. 1349, 76–89 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveri M, Rossini PM, Traversa R et al. Left frontal transcranial magnetic stimulation reduces contralesional extinction in patients with unilateral right brain damage. Brain 122 (Pt 9), 1731–1739 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nyffeler T, Cazzoli D, Hess CW, Müri RM. One session of repeated parietal theta burst stimulation trains induces long-lasting improvement of visual neglect. Stroke. 40(8), 2791–2796 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko MH, Han SH, Park SH, Seo JH, Kim YH. Improvement of visual scanning after DC brain polarization of parietal cortex in stroke patients with spatial neglect. Neurosci. Lett. 448(2), 171–174 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparing R, Thimm M, Hesse MD, Küst J, Karbe H, Fink GR. Bidirectional alterations of interhemispheric parietal balance by non-invasive cortical stimulation. Brain 132(Pt 11), 3011–3020 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brighina F, Bisiach E, Oliveri M et al. 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere ameliorates contralesional visuospatial neglect in humans. Neurosci. Lett. 336(2), 131–133 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim JY, Kang EK, Paik NJ. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to hemispatial neglect in patients after stroke: an open-label pilot study. J. Rehabil. Med. 42(5), 447–452 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shindo K, Sugiyama K, Huabao L, Nishijima K, Kondo T, Izumi S. Long-term effect of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the unaffected posterior parietal cortex in patients with unilateral spatial neglect. J. Rehabil. Med. 38(1), 65–67 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song W, Du B, Xu Q, Hu J, Wang M, Luo Y. Low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation for visual spatial neglect: a pilot study. J. Rehabil. Med. 41(3), 162–165 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herwig U, Satrapi P, Schönfeldt-Lecuona C. Using the International 10-20 EEG System for positioning of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain Topogr. 16(2), 95–99 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mort DJ, Malhotra P, Mannan SK et al. The anatomy of visual neglect. Brain 126(Pt 9), 1986–1997 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae EH, Schrader LM, Machii K et al. Safety and tolerability of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with epilepsy: a review of the literature. Epilepsy Behav. 10(4), 521–528 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefaucheur JP. Why image-guided navigation becomes essential in the practice of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurophysiol. Clin. 40(1), 1–5 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minhas P, Bansal V, Patel J et al. Electrodes for high-definition transcutaneous DC stimulation for applications in drug delivery and electrotherapy, including tDCS. J. Neurosci. Methods 190(2), 188–197 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khedr EM, Kotb H, Kamel NF, Ahmed MA, Sadek R, Rothwell JC. Longlasting antalgic effects of daily sessions of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in central and peripheral neuropathic pain. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatr. 76(6), 833–838 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarri M, Kalra L, Greenwood R, Driver J. Prism adaptation changes perceptual awareness for chimeric visual objects but not for chimeric faces in spatial neglect after right-hemisphere stroke. Neurocase 12(3), 127–135 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullerton KJ, McSherry D, Stout RW. Albert’s test: a neglected test of perceptual neglect. Lancet 1(8478), 430–432 (1986).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar