Optimizing the use of patient data to improve outcomes for patients: narcotics for chronic noncancer pain

References

• Parsells Kelly J, Cook SF, Kaufman DW, Anderson T, Rosenberg L, Mitchell AA. Prevalence and characteristics of opioid use in the US adult population. Pain138(3), 507–513 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caudill-Slosberg MA, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S. Office visits and analgesic prescriptions for musculoskeletal pain in US: 1980 vs. 2000. Pain109(3), 514–519 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pletcher MJ, Kertesz SG, Kohn MA, Gonzales R. Trends in opioid prescribing by race/ethnicity for patients seeking care in US emergency departments. JAMA299(1), 70–78 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan MD, Edlund MJ, Fan MY, Devries A, Brennan Braden J, Martin BC. Trends in use of opioids for non-cancer pain conditions 2000–2005 in Commercial and Medicaid insurance plans: the TROUP study. Pain138(2), 440–449 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furlan AD, Sandoval JA, Mailis-Gagnon A, Tunks E. Opioids for chronic noncancer pain: a meta-analysis of effectiveness and side effects. CMAJ174(11), 1589–1594 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raja SN, Haythornthwaite JA, Pappagallo M et al. Opioids versus antidepressants in postherpetic neuralgia: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Neurology59(7), 1015–1021 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamison RN, Raymond SA, Slawsby EA, Nedeljkovic SS, Katz NP. Opioid therapy for chronic noncancer back pain. A randomized prospective study. Spine23(23), 2591–2600 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Højsted J, Sjøgren P. Addiction to opioids in chronic pain patients: a literature review. Eur. J. Pain11(5), 490–518 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djulbegovic B, Lacevic M, Cantor A et al. The uncertainty principle and industry-sponsored research. Lancet356(9230), 635–638 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montori VM, Jaeschke R, Schünemann HJ et al. Users’ guide to detecting misleading claims in clinical research reports. BMJ329(7474), 1093–1096 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turk DC, Dworkin RH, Revicki D et al. Identifying important outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: an IMMPACT survey of people with pain. Pain137(2), 276–285 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Wyrwich KW et al. Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. J. Pain9(2), 105–121 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt G, Montori V, Devereaux PJ et al. Patients at the center: in our practice, and in our use of language. ACP J. Club140(1), A11–A12 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Berger M, Muhlhauser I. Diabetes care and patient-oriented outcomes. JAMA281(18), 1676–1678 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Sweeney KG, MacAuley D, Gray DP. Personal significance: the third dimension. Lancet351(9096), 134–136 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turk DC, Dworkin RH, McDermott MP et al. Analyzing multiple endpoints in clinical trials of pain treatments: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain139(3), 485–493 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner JA, Franklin G, Heagerty PJ et al. The association between pain and disability. Pain112(3), 307–314 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Côté P, Hogg-Johnson S, Cassidy JD, Carroll L, Frank JW. The association between neck pain intensity, physical functioning, depressive symptomatology and time-to-claim-closure after whiplash. J. Clin. Epidemiol.54(3), 275–286 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassidy JD, Carroll L, Côté P, Berglund A, Nygren A. Low back pain after traffic collisions: a population-based cohort study. Spine28(10), 1002–1009 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassidy JD, Carroll LJ, Côté P, Lemstra M, Berglund A, Nygren A. Effect of eliminating compensation for pain and suffering on the outcome of insurance claims for whiplash injury. N. Engl. J. Med.342(16), 1179–1186 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schofferman J. Restoration of function: the missing link in pain medicine? Pain Med.7(Suppl. 1), S159–S165 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell JR, Rapoport RJ, Davis JC et al. Efficacy and safety of a once-daily morphine formulation in chronic, moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis pain: results from a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial and an open-label extension trial. J. Pain Symptom Manage.23(4), 278–291 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harati Y, Gooch C, Swenson M et al. Double-blind randomized trial of tramadol for the treatment of the pain of diabetic neuropathy. Neurology50(6), 1842–1846 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peloso PM, Fortin L, Beaulieu A, Kamin M, Rosenthal N; Protocol TRP-CAN-1 Study Group. Analgesic efficacy and safety of tramadol/acetaminophen combination tablets (Ultracet) in treatment of chronic low back pain: a multicenter, outpatient, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trial. J. Rheumatol.31(12), 2454–2463 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier C, Hildebrandt J, Klinger R, Henrich-Eberl C, Lindena G; MONTAS Study Group. Morphine responsiveness, efficacy and tolerability in patients with chronic non-tumor associated pain – results of a double-blind placebo-controlled trial (MONTAS). Pain97(3), 223–233 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson CP, Moulin D, Watt-Watson J, Gordon A, Eisenhoffer J. Controlled-release oxycodone relieves neuropathic pain: a randomized controlled trial in painful diabetic neuropathy. Pain105(1–2), 71–78 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavelka K, Peliskova Z, Stehlikova H et al. Intraindividual differences in pain relief and functional improvement in osteoarthritis with diclofenac or tramadol. Clin. Drug Invest.16(6), 421–429 (1998).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrow L, Taylor WC, Arnold RM. Absolutely relative: how research results are summarized can affect treatment decisions. Am. J. Med.92(2), 121–124 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naylor CD, Chen E, Strauss B. Measured enthusiasm: does the method of reporting trial results alter perceptions of therapeutic effectiveness? Ann. Intern. Med.117(11), 916–921 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobbio M, Demichelis B, Giustetto G. Completeness of reporting trial results: effect on physicians’ willingness to prescribe. Lancet343(8907), 1209–1211 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeschke R, Guyatt G, Shannon H, Walter S, Cook D, Heddle N. Basic statistics for clinicians: 3. Assessing the effects of treatment: measures of association. CMAJ152(3), 351–357 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook RJ, Sackett DL. The number needed to treat: a clinically useful measure of treatment effect. BMJ310(6977), 452–454 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristiansen IS, Gyrd-Hansen D, Nexoe J, Nielsen JB. Number needed to treat: easily understood and intuitively meaningful? Theoretical considerations and a randomized trial. J. Clin Epidemiol.55(9), 888–892 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nexoe J, Gyrd-Hansen D, Kragstrup J, Kristiansen IS, Nielsen JB. Danish GPs’ perception of disease risk and benefit of prevention. Fam. Pract.19(1), 3–6 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gigerenzer G. The psychology of good judgment: frequency formats and simple algorithms. Med. Decis. Making16(3), 273–280 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer G, Edwards A. Simple tools for understanding risks: from innumeracy to insight. BMJ327(7417), 741–744 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffrage U, Gigerenzer G. Using natural frequencies to improve diagnostic inferences. Acad. Med.73(5), 538–540 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosinski M, Zhao SZ, Dedhiya S, Osterhaus JT, Ware JE Jr. Determining minimally important changes in generic and disease-specific health-related quality of life questionnaires in clinical trials of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum.43(7), 1478–1487 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulkarni AV. Distribution-based and anchor-based approaches provided different interpretability estimates for the Hydrocephalus Outcome Questionnaire. J. Clin. Epidemiol.59(2), 176–184 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coeytaux RR, Kaufman JS, Chao R, Mann JD, Devellis RF. Four methods of estimating the minimal important difference score were compared to establish a clinically significant change in Headache Impact Test. J. Clin. Epidemiol.59, 374–380 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control. Clin. Trials10(4), 407–415 (1989).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deyo RA, Inui TS. Toward clinical applications of health status measures: sensitivity of scales to clinically important changes. Health Serv. Res.19(3), 275–289 (1984).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson MS, Read JL, Hutchings HC, Paterson M, Harris ED Jr. The cost effectiveness of auranofin: results of a randomized clinical trial. J. Rheumatol.15(1), 35–42 (1988).
   Google Scholar
• Fergusson D, Aaron SD, Guyatt G, Hebert P. Post-randomisation exclusions: the intention to treat principle and excluding patients from analysis. BMJ325(7365), 652–654 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furukawa T. From effect size into number needed to treat. Lancet353(9165), 1680 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks WB, Jordan JS, Divine GW, Smith KS, Neelon FA. The impact of psychologic factors on measurement of functional status. Assessment of the sickness impact profile. Med. Care28(9), 793–804 (1990).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fletcher A, McLoone P, Bulpitt C. Quality of life on angina therapy: a randomised controlled trial of transdermal glyceryl trinitrate against placebo. Lancet2(8601), 4–8 (1988).
   Google Scholar
• King TK, Ali N, Briscoe WA. Treatment of hypoxia with 24 percent oxygen. A new approach to the interpretation of data collected in a pulmonary intensive care unit. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis.108(1), 19–29 (1973).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS. The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med. Care19(8), 787–805 (1981).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware JE Jr, Manning WG Jr, Duan N, Wells KB, Newhouse JP. Health status and the use of outpatient mental health services. Am. Psychol.39(10), 1090–1100 (1984).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brook RH, Ware JE Jr, Rogers WH et al. Does free care improve adults’ health? Results from a randomized controlled trial. N. Engl. J. Med.309(23), 1426–1434 (1983).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todd KH, Funk KG, Funk JP, Bonacci R. Clinical significance of reported changes in pain severity. Ann. Emerg. Med.27(4), 485–489 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salaffi F, Stancati A, Silvestri CA, Ciapetti A, Grassi W. Minimal clinically important changes in chronic musculoskeletal pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale. Eur J. Pain8(4), 283–291 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauridsen HH, Hartvigsen J, Manniche C, Korsholm L, Grunnet-Nilsson N. Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference for pain and disability instruments in low back pain patients. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord.7, 82 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovacs FM, Abraira V, Royuela A et al. Minimal clinically important change for pain intensity and disability in patients with nonspecific low back pain. Spine32(25), 2915–2920 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostelo RW, Deyo RA, Stratford P et al. Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine33(1), 90–94 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruoff GE, Rosenthal N, Jordan D et al; Protocol CAPSS-112 Study Group. Tramadol/acetaminophen combination tablets for the treatment of chronic lower back pain: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled outpatient study. Clin. Ther.25(4), 1123–1141 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan K, Dunn KM, Lewis M, Croft P. A minimal clinically important difference was derived for the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for low back pain. J. Clin. Epidemiol.59(1), 45–52 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt GH, Juniper EF, Walter SD et al. Interpreting treatment effects in randomised trials. BMJ316(7132), 690–693 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derose K, Kanouse D, Weidmer B et al. Developing a Spanish-language sample report for CAHPS. Jt Comm. J. Qual. Patient Saf.33(11), 681–688 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med. Care41(5), 582–592 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman GR, Sridhar FG, Guyatt GH, Walter SD. Relation of distribution- and anchor-based approaches in interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life. Med. Care39(10), 1039–1047 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Supina AL, Feeny DH, Carroll LJ, Johnson JA. Misinterpretation with norm-based scoring of health status in adults with type 1 diabetes. Health Qual. Life Outcomes4, 15–23 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Guyatt G, Hayward R, Richardson WS et al. Moving from evidence to action. In: The Users’ Guides to the Medical Literature: a Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice. Guyatt G, Drummond R (Eds). AMA Publications, IL, USA (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Oxman A, Guyatt G, Cook D, Montori V. Summarizing the evidence. In: The Users’ Guides to the Medical Literature: a Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice. Guyatt G, Drummond R (Eds). AMA Publications, IL, USA (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis in the Behavioral Sciences (2nd Edition). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, NJ, USA (1988).
   Google Scholar
• Lacasse Y, Wong E, Guyatt GH, King D, Cook DJ, Goldstein RS. Meta-analysis of respiratory rehabilitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Lancet348(9035), 1115–1119 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glowinski J, Boccard E. Placebo-controlled study of the analgesic efficacy of a paracetamol 500 mg/codeine 30 mg combination together with low-dose vs high-dose diclofenac in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin. Drug Invest.18(3), 189–197 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Gobel H, Stadler TH. Treatment of pain due to postherpetic neuralgia with tramadol: results of an open, parallel pilot study vs clomipramine with and without levomepromazine. Clin. Drug Invest.10(4), 208–214 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Parr G, Darekar B, Fletcher A et al. Joint pain and quality of life: results of a randomised trial. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol.27, 235–242 (1989).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salzman RT, Brobyn RD. Long-term comparison of suprofen and propoxyphene in patients with osteoarthritis. Pharmacology27(Suppl. 1), 55–64 (1983).
   Google Scholar
• Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Cont. Clin. Trials17(1), 1–12 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berger VW. Is the Jadad score the proper evaluation of trials? J. Rheumatol.33(8), 1710–1712 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA et al.; GRADE Working Group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ328(7454), 1490–1497 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt G, Gutterman D, Baumann MH et al. Grading strength of recommendations and quality of evidence in clinical guidelines: report from an American College of Chest Physicians task force. Chest129(1), 174–181 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballantyne JC, Mao J. Opioid therapy for chronic pain. N. Engl. J. Med.349(20), 1943–1953 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke KA, Iphofen R. A phenomenological hermeneutic study into unseen chronic pain. Br. J. Nurs.17(10), 658–663 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario. Evidence-Based Recommendations for Medical Management of Chronic Non-Malignant Pain: Reference Guide for Physicians. College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Chronic Pain Initiative. Report of the Chronic Pain Expert Advisory Panel. Ontario Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, Toronto, ON, Canada (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Von Korff M, Deyo RA. Potent opioids for chronic musculoskeletal pain: flying blind? Pain109(3), 207–209 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar