Assessing and demonstrating data saturation in qualitative inquiry supporting patient-reported outcomes research

References

• Patrick DL, Burke LB, Powers JH et al. Patient-reported outcomes to support medical product labeling claims: FDA perspective. Value Health10(2), S125–S137 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman ML, Beltran P, Cappelleri JC, Lipscomb J, Teschendorf B; Mayo/FDA Patient-Reported Outcomes Consensus Meeting Group. Patient-reported outcomes: conceptual issues. Value Health10(Suppl. 2), S66–S75 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline Leidy N, Vernon M. Perspectives on patient-reported outcomes: content validity and qualitative research in a changing clinical trial environment. Pharmacoeconomics26(5), 363–370 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• US Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH). Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medicinal product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance. Health Qual. Life Outcomes4, 79 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke LB, Kennedy DL, Miskala PH, Papdopoulos EJ, Trentacosti AM. The use of patient-reported outcome measures in the evaluation of medical products for regulatory approval. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther.84(2), 281–283 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychology3, 77–101 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Brod M, Tesler LE, Christensen TL. Qualitative research and content validity: developing best practices based on science and experience. Qual. Life Res.18, 1263–1278 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caelli K, Ray L, Mill J. Clear and mud: toward greater clarity in generic qualitative research. Int. J. Qual. Methods2(2), 1–13 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Yardley L, Marks DF. Introduction to research methods in clinical and health psychology. In: Research Methods for Clinical and Health Psychology. Marks D, Yardley L (Eds). SAGE Publications Ltd, London, UK 1–20 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson S, Joffe H, Yardley L. Qualitative data collection: interviews and focus groups. In: Research Methods for Clinical and Health Psychology. Marks D, Yardley L (Eds). SAGE Publications Ltd, London, UK 39–55 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Fallowfield L. The Quality of Life: The Missing Measurement in Healthcare. Souvenir Press (Educational & Academic), London, UK (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Rapley M. Quality of Life Research: A Critical Introduction. SAGE Publications Ltd, London, UK (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Rothman M, Burke L, Erickson P, Kline Leidy N, Patrick DL, Petrie C. Use of existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments and their modification: the ISPOR good research practices for evaluating and documenting content validity for the use of existing instruments and their modification PRO task force report. Value Health12(8), 1075–1083 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner RR, Quittner AL, Parasuraman BM, Kallich JD, Cleeland CS; Mayo/FDA Patient-Reported Outcomes Consensus Meeting Group. Patient-reported outcomes: instrument development and selection issues. Value Health10(2), S86–S93 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wild D, Grove A, Martin M et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Health8(2), 94–104 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coons SJ, Gwaltney CJ, Hays RD et al. Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report. Value Health12(4), 419–429 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adair CE, Marcoux G, Williams A, Reimer M. The internet as a source of data to support the development of a quality-of-life measure for eating disorders. Qual. Health Res.16, 538–546 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yardley L, Bishop F. Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: a pragmatic approach. In: The SAGE Handbook Of Qualitative Research In Psychology. Willig C, Stainton-Rogers W (Eds.). SAGE Publications Ltd, London, UK 352–369 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Morse JM, Barrett M, Mayan M, Olson K, Spiers J. Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. Int. J. Qual. Methods1(2), 13–22 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Whittemore R, Chase SK, Mandle CL. Validity in qualitative research. Qual. Health Res.11, 522–537 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yardley L. Dilemmas in qualitative health research. Psychol. Health15(2), 215–228 (2000).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yardley L. Demonstrating validity in qualitative psychology. In: Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide To Research Methods. Smith J (Ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd, London, UK 235–251 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Morse JM. The significance of saturation. Qual. Health Res.5(2), 147–149 (1995).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M. Sample size in qualitative research. Res. Nurs. Health18(2), 179–183 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen GA. Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: a research note. Qual. Res.8, 137–152 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser BG, Strauss A. Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies for Qualitative Research. Wiedenfield and Nicolson, London, UK (1967).
   Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J. Grounded theory methodology: an overview. In: Handbook of Qualitative Research. Denzin N, Lincoln Y (Eds). SAGE Publications Ltd, CA, USA 273–285 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Marshall MN. Sampling for qualitative research. Family Practice13, 522–525 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse J. Determining sample size. Qual. Health Res.10, 3–5 (2000).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods18(1), 59–82 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie AJ, Leech N. A call for qualitative power analyses. Qual. Quant.41, 105–121 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse J. Silent debates in qualitative enquiry. Qual. Health Res.9, 163–165 (1999).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacQueen KM, McLellan E, Kay K, Niedig J. Codebook development for team-based qualitative analysis. Cultural Anthropology Methods J.10(12), 31–36 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Gallop K, Wild D, Verdian L et al. Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS): development of conceptual models of health-related quality of life (HRQL) for caregivers and children. Seizure19, 23–30 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar