Robotic surgery in urologic oncology: gathering the evidence

References

• Bagrodia A, Raman J. Ergonomics considerations of radical prostatectomy: physician perspective of open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted techniques. J. Endourol.23(4), 627–633 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotan Y. Economics of robotics in urology. Curr. Opin. Urol.20(1), 92–97 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu JC, Gu X, Lipsitz SR et al. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy. JAMA302(14), 1557–1564 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. J. Urol.146(2), 278–282 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blute ML. Radical prostatectomy by open or laparoscopic/robotic techniques: an issue of surgical device or surgical expertise? J. Clin. Oncol.26(14), 2248–2249 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scales C, Jones P, Eisenstein E, Preminger G, Albala D. Local cost structures and the economics of robot assisted radical prostatectomy. J. Urol.174(6), 2323–2329 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianco FJ Jr, Riedel ER, Begg CB, Kattan MW, Scardino PT. Variations among high-volume surgeons in the rate of complications after radical prostatectomy: further evidence that technique matters. J. Urol.173(6), 2099–2103 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Palmer KJ, Rocco B, Patel MB, Patel VR. Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a review of current outcomes. BJU Int.104(10), 1428–1435 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur. Urol.55(5), 1037–1063 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fracalanza S, Ficarra V, Cavalleri S et al. Is robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy less invasive than retropubic radical prostatectomy? Results from a prospective, unrandomized, comparative study. BJU Int.101(9), 1145–1149 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlering TE, Woo D, Eichel L, Lee DI, Edwards R, Skarecky DW. Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparison of one surgeon’s outcomes. Urology63(5), 819–822 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewari A, Srivasatava A, Menon M. A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int.92(3), 205–210 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon M, Tewari A, Baize B, Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute experience. Urology60(5), 864–868 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel VR, Palmer KJ, Coughlin G, Samavedi S. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: perioperative outcomes of 1500 cases. J. Endourol.22(10), 2299–2305 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Touijer K, Eastham JA, Secin FP et al. Comprehensive prospective comparative analysis of outcomes between open and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy conducted in 2003 to 2005. J. Urol.179(5), 1811–1817 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith JA Jr, Chan RC, Chang SS et al. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. J. Urol.178(6), 2385–2389 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artibani W, Grosso G, Novara G et al. Is laparoscopic radical prostatectomy better than traditional retropubic radical prostatectomy? An analysis of peri-operative morbidity in two contemporary series in Italy. Eur. Urol.44(4), 401–406 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu JC, Wang Q, Pashos CL, Lipsitz SR, Keating NL. Utilization and outcomes of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. J. Clin. Oncol.26(14), 2278–2284 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel VR, Thaly R, Shah K. Robotic radical prostatectomy: outcomes of 500 cases. BJU Int.99(5), 1109–1112 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon M, Shrivastava A, Kaul S et al. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: contemporary technique and analysis of results. Eur. Urol.51(3), 648–657 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh PC, Marschke P, Ricker D, Burnett AL. Patient-reported urinary continence and sexual function after anatomic radical prostatectomy. Urology55(1), 58–61 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacco E, Prayer-Galetti T, Pinto F et al. Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: incidence by definition, risk factors and temporal trend in a large series with a long-term follow-up. BJU Int.97(6), 1234–1241 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillonneau B, Cathelineau X, Doublet JD, Baumert H, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 550 procedures. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol.43(2), 123–133 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curto F, Benijts J, Pansadoro A et al. Nerve sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: our technique. Eur. Urol.49(2), 344–352 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorn KC, Gofrit ON, Orvieto MA, Mikhail AA, Zagaja GP, Shalhav AL. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: functional and pathologic outcomes with interfascial nerve preservation. Eur. Urol.51(3), 755–762 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anastasiadis AG, Salomon L, Katz R, Hoznek A, Chopin D, Abbou CC. Radical retropubic versus laparoscopic prostatectomy: a prospective comparison of functional outcome. Urology62(2), 292–297 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon M, Kaul S, Bhandari A, Shrivastava A, Tewari A, Hemal A. Potency following robotic radical prostatectomy: a questionnaire based analysis of outcomes after conventional nerve sparing and prostatic fascia sparing techniques. J. Urol.174(6), 2291–2296 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaul S, Savera A, Badani K, Fumo M, Bhandari A, Menon M. Functional outcomes and oncological efficacy of Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy with Veil of Aphrodite nerve-sparing: an analysis of 154 consecutive patients. BJU Int.97(3), 467–472 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon M, Shrivastava A, Bhandari M, Satyanarayana R, Siva S, Agarwal PK. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: technical modifications in 2009. Eur. Urol.56(1), 89–96 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewari A, Rao S, Martinez-Salamanca JI et al. Cancer control and the preservation of neurovascular tissue: how to meet competing goals during robotic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int.101(8), 1013–1018 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaul SA, Peabody JO, Shah N, Neal D, Menon M. Establishing a robotic prostatectomy programme: the impact of mentoring using a structured approach. BJU Int.97(6), 1143–1144 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhandari A, McIntire L, Kaul SA, Hemal AK, Peabody JO, Menon M. Perioperative complications of robotic radical prostatectomy after the learning curve. J. Urol.174(3), 915–918 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller DC, Hollingsworth JM, Hafez KS, Daignault S, Hollenbeck BK. Partial nephrectomy for small renal masses: an emerging quality of care concern? J. Urol.175(3 Pt 1), 853–857 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huynh PN, Hollander JB. Trends toward laparoscopic nephrectomy at a community hospital. J. Urol.173(2), 547–551 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novick AC. Laparoscopic and partial nephrectomy. Clin. Cancer Res.10(18 Pt 2), 6322S–6327S (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma D, Brown C, Kouriefs C, Grange P. Robotic nephrectomy for the treatment of benign and malignant disease. BJU Int.103(6), 842 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Lane BR et al. Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors. J. Urol.178(1), 41–46 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhayani SB, Clayman RV, Sundaram CP et al. Surgical treatment of renal neoplasia: evolving toward a laparoscopic standard of care. Urology62(5), 821–826 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benway BM, Bhayani SB, Rogers CG et al. Robot assisted partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors: a multi-institutional analysis of perioperative outcomes. J. Urol.182(3), 866–872 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai PJ, Andrews PE, Ferrigni RG, Castle EP. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy at the Mayo Clinic Arizona: follow-up surveillance of positive margin disease. Urology71(2), 283–286 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yossepowitch O, Thompson RH, Leibovich B et al. Positive surgical margins at partial nephrectomy: predictors and oncological outcomes. J. Urol.179(6), 2158–2163 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang AJ, Bhayani SB. Robotic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: single-surgeon analysis of >100 consecutive procedures. Urology73(2), 306–310 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane BR, Samplaski MK, Herts BR, Zhou M, Novick AC, Campbell SC. Renal mass biopsy – a renaissance? J. Urol.179(1), 20–27 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konety B, Allareddy V. Influence of post-cystectomy complications on cost and subsequent outcome. J. Urol.177(1), 280–287 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallancien G, Cathelineau X, Baumert H, Doublet JD, Guillonneau B. Complications of transperitoneal laparoscopic surgery in urology: review of 1,311 procedures at a single center. J. Urol.168(1), 23–26 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin B, Gill I, Haber G-P, Campbell S. Laparoscopic radical cystectomy: current status, outcomes, and patient selection. Curr. Treat. Options Oncol.10(3–4), 243–255 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruthi RS, Nielsen ME, Nix J, Smith A, Schultz H, Wallen EM. Robotic radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: surgical and pathological outcomes in 100 consecutive cases. J. Urol.183(2), 510–514 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowrance WT, Rumohr JA, Chang SS, Clark PE, Smith JA Jr, Cookson MS. Contemporary open radical cystectomy: analysis of perioperative outcomes. J. Urol.179(4), 1313–1318 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruthi RS, Nielsen M, Smith A, Nix J, Schultz H, Wallen EM. Fast track program in patients undergoing radical cystectomy: results in 362 consecutive patients. J. Am. Coll. Surg.210(1), 93–99 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dotan Z, Kavanagh K, Yossepowitch O et al. Positive surgical margins in soft tissue following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer and cancer specific survival. J. Urol.178(6), 2308–2312 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein JP, Skinner DG. The role of lymphadenectomy in high-grade invasive bladder cancer. Urol. Clin. North Am.32(2), 187–197 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herr HW, Bochner BH, Dalbagni G, Donat SM, Reuter VE, Bajorin DF. Impact of the number of lymph nodes retrieved on outcome in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer. J. Urol.167(3), 1295–1298 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert SM, Wood DP, Dunn RL et al. Measuring health-related quality of life outcomes in bladder cancer patients using the Bladder Cancer Index (BCI). Cancer109(9), 1756–1762 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atug F, Castle EP, Srivastav SK, Burgess SV, Thomas R, Davis R. Positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact of learning curve on oncologic outcomes. Eur. Urol.49(5), 866–871 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor GT, Plume SK, Olmstead EM et al. A regional intervention to improve the hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. JAMA275(11), 841–846 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Englesbe M, Dimick J, Sonnenday C, Share D, Campbell D. The Michigan surgical quality collaborative: will a statewide quality improvement initiative pay for itself? Ann. Surg.246(6), 1100–1103 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones JS, Rewcastle JC, Donnelly BJ, Lugnani FM, Pisters LL, Katz AE. Whole gland primary prostate cryoablation: initial results from the cryo on-line data registry. J. Urol.180(2), 554–558 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorn K, Gautam G, Shalhav A et al. Training, credentialing, proctoring and medicolegal risks of robotic urological surgery: recommendations of the society of urologic robotic surgeons. J. Urol.182(3), 1126–1132 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith JA Jr. Practice makes perfect. J. Urol.180(4), 1216 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolenz C, Gupta A, Hotze T et al. Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Eur. Urol.57(3), 453–458 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouraviev V, Nosnik I, Sun L et al. Financial comparative analysis of minimally invasive surgery to open surgery for localized prostate cancer: a single-institution experience. Urology69(2), 311–314 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess S, Atug F, Castle E, Davis R, Thomas R. Cost analysis of radical retropubic, perineal, and robotic prostatectomy. J. Endourol.20(10), 827–830 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith A, Kurpad R, Lal A, Nielsen M, Wallen EM, Pruthi RS. Cost analysis of robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. J. Urol.183(2), 505–509 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasser MS, Renzulli J 2nd, Turini GA 3rd, Haleblian G, Sax HC, Pareek G. An unbiased prospective report of perioperative complications of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology75(5), 1083–1089 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krambeck AE, DiMarco DS, Rangel LJ et al. Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques. BJU Int.103(4), 448–453 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy DG, Kerger M, Crowe H, Peters JS, Costello AJ. Operative details and oncological and functional outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 400 cases with a minimum of 12 months follow-up. Eur. Urol.55(6), 1358–1366 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mottrie A, Van Migem P, De Naeyer G, Schatteman P, Carpentier P, Fonteyne E. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncologic and functional results of 184 cases. Eur. Urol.52(3), 746–750 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu JC, Nelson RA, Wilson TG et al. Perioperative complications of laparoscopic and robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J. Urol.175(2), 541–546 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Appledorn S, Bouchier-Hayes D, Agarwal D, Costello AJ. Robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: setup and procedural techniques after 150 cases. Urology67(2), 364–367 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph JV, Rosenbaum R, Madeb R, Erturk E, Patel HR. Robotic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: an alternative approach. J. Urol.175(3 Pt 1), 945–950 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scoll BJ, Uzzo RG, Chen DY et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a large single-institutional experience. Urology75(6), 1328–1334 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong Y, Du C, Josephson DY, Wilson TG, Nelson R. Four-arm robotic partial nephrectomy for complex renal cell carcinoma. World J. Urol.28(1), 111–115 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michli EE, Parra RO. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: initial clinical experience. Urology73(2), 302–305 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho H, Schwentner C, Neururer R, Steiner H, Bartsch G, Peschel R. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: surgical technique and clinical outcomes at 1 year. BJU Int.103(5), 663–668 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deane LA, Lee HJ, Box GN et al. Robotic versus standard laparoscopic partial/wedge nephrectomy: a comparison of intraoperative and perioperative results from a single institution. J. Endourol.22(5), 947–952 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aron M, Koenig P, Kaouk JH, Nguyen MM, Desai MM, Gill IS. Robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison from a high-volume centre. BJU Int.102(1), 86–92 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers CG, Singh A, Blatt AM, Linehan WM, Pinto PA. Robotic partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors: surgical technique. Eur. Urol.53(3), 514–521 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaul S, Laungani R, Sarle R et al. da Vinci-assisted robotic partial nephrectomy: technique and results at a mean of 15 months of follow-up. Eur. Urol.51(1), 186–191; discussion 191–182 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caruso RP, Phillips CK, Kau E, Taneja SS, Stifelman MD. Robot assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: initial experience. J. Urol.176(1), 36–39 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gettman MT, Blute ML, Chow GK, Neururer R, Bartsch G, Peschel R. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique and initial clinical experience with DaVinci robotic system. Urology64(5), 914–918 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauffman EC, Ng CK, Lee MM et al. Critical analysis of complications after robotic-assisted radical cystectomy with identification of preoperative and operative risk factors. BJU Int.105(4), 520–527 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacher MC, Jonsson MN, Wiklund NP. Robotic cystectomy. Scand. J. Surg.98(2), 89–95 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee D, Rothberg M, McKiernan J, Benson M, Badani K. Robot-assisted radical cystoprostatectomy in complex surgical patients: single institution report. Can. J. Urol.16(3), 4664–4669 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods M, Thomas R, Davis R et al. Robot-assisted extended pelvic lymphadenectomy. J. Endourol.22(6), 1297–1302 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy DG, Challacombe BJ, Elhage O et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy with extracorporeal urinary diversion: initial experience. Eur. Urol.54(3), 570–580 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuh B, Padalino J, Butt ZM et al. Impact of tumour volume on surgical and pathological outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy. BJU Int.102(7), 840–843 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhee J, Lebeau S, Smolkin M, Theodorescu D. Radical cystectomy with ileal conduit diversion: early prospective evaluation of the impact of robotic assistance. BJU Int.98(5), 1059–1063 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galich A, Sterrett S, Nazemi T, Pohlman G, Smith L, Balaji KC. Comparative analysis of early perioperative outcomes following radical cystectomy by either the robotic or open method. JSLS10(2), 145–150 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Menon M, Hemal AK, Tewari A et al. Nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical cystoprostatectomy and urinary diversion. BJU Int.92(3), 232–236 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beecken WD, Wolfram M, Engl T et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy and intra-abdominal formation of an orthotopic ileal neobladder. Eur. Urol.44(3), 337–339 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar