Better guidelines for better care: enhancing the implementability of clinical practice guidelines

References

• Institute of Medicine: Guidelines for Clinical Practice: From Development to Use. National Academic Press, Washington, DC, USA (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Kendall E, Sunderland N, Muencheberger H, Armstrong K. When guidelines need guidance: considerations and strategies for improving the adoption of chronic disease evidence by general practitioners. J. Eval. Clin. Prac.15, 1082–1090 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan G et al. Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol. Assess.8(6), iii–iv, 1–72 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolf SH, Grol R, Hutchinson A, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ318, 527–530 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor PJ. Adding value to evidence-based clinical guidelines. JAMA294(6), 741–743 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimshaw J, Eccles M, Thomas R et al. Toward evidence-based quality improvement. J. Gen. Intern. Med.21, S14–S20 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagliardi AR, Brouwers M, Palda VA et al. An exploration of how guideline developer capacity and guideline implementability influence implementation and adoption: study protocol. Impl. Sci.4, 36 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimshaw JM, Russell IT. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet342, 1317–1322 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown LC, Johnson JA, Majumdar SR et al. Evidence of suboptimal management of cardiovascular risk in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus and symptomatic atherosclerosis. Can. Med. Assoc. J.171(10), 1189–1192 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straus SE, Tetroe J, Graham ID. Knowledge Translation in Health Care: Moving from Evidence to Practice. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP. Is evidence-based implementation of evidence-based care possible? Med. J. Aust.180, S50–S51 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimshsaw J, Russell I. Achieving health gain through clinical guidelines I: developing scientifically valid guidelines. Qual. Health Care2, 243–248 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grol R, Dalhuijsen J, Thomas S et al. Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: observational study. BMJ317, 858–861 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michie S, Johnston M. Changing clinical behaviour by making guidelines specific. BMJ328, 343–345 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gollwitzer PM. Implementation intentions: strong effects of simple plans. Am. Psychol.54, 493–503 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Gagliardi AR, Brouwers MC, Palda VA, Lemieux-Charles L, Grimshaw JM. How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementability. Impl. Sci.6, 26 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell NRC, Tobe S. The Canadian effort to prevent and control hypertension: can other countries adopt Canadian strategies? Curr. Opin. Cardiol.25(4), 366–372 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leenen FH, Dumais J, McInnis NH et al. Results of the Ontario survey on the prevalence and control of hypertension. Can. Med. Assoc. J.178(11), 1441–1449 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tricoci P, Allen JM, Kramer JM, Califf RM, Smith SC Jr. Scientific evidence underlying the ACC/AHA clinical practice guidelines. JAMA301(8), 831–841 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP et al. AGREE II: Advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. CMAJ 182(18), E839–E842 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• GRADE Working Group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ328, 1490 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillier S, Grimmer-Somers K, Merlin T et al. FORM: an Australian method for fourmulating and grading recommendations in evidence-based clinical guidelines. BMC Med. Res. Methodol.11, 23 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiffman R, Dixon J, Brandt C et al. The Guideline Implementability Appraisal (GLIA): development of an instrument to identify obstacles to guideline implementation. BMC Med. Info Dec. Mak.5, 23 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fervers B, Brugers JS, Haugh MC et al. Adaptation of clinical guidelines: literature review and proposition for a framework and procedure. Int. J. Qual. Health Care18(3), 167–176 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahm P, Djulbegovic B. The Australian ‘FORM’ approach to guideline development: the quest for the perfect system. BMC Med. Res. Methodol.11, 17 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Improved Clinical Effectiveness through Behavioural Research Group (ICEBeRG). Designing theoretically-informed implementation interventions. Impl. Sci.1, 4 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB et al. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J. Contin. Educ. Health Prof.26, 13–24 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations (Fifth Edition). Free Press, NY, USA (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn TS. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Third Edition). The University of Chicago Press Ltd., Chicago, IL, USA (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes50, 179–211 (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Armitage CJ, Conner M. Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analytic review. Br. J. Soc. Psychol.40, 471–499 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham ID, Harrison MB, Logan J; KT Theories Research Group. A review of planned change (knowledge translation) models, frameworks and theories. Presented at: JBI International Convention. Adelaide, Australia, 28–30 November 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Graham ID, Tetroe J; KT Theories Research Group. Some theoretical underpinnings of knowledge translation. Acad. Emerg. Med.14, 936–941 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giesbrecht M, Crooks VA, Schuuman N, Williams A. Spatially informed knowledge translation: informing potential users of Canada’s Compassionate Care Benefit. Soc. Sci. Med.69(3), 411–419 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straus SE, Graham ID, Taylor M, Lockyer J. Development of a mentorship strategy: a knowledge translation case study. J. Cont. Educ. Health Prof.28(3), 117–122 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stacey D, Higuchi KAS, Menard P et al. Integrating patient decision support in an undergraduate nursing curriculum: an implementation project. Int. J. Nurs. Ed. Scholarship6(1), Article 10 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kastner M, Straus SE. From theory to practice: application of the knowledge-to-action (KTA) cycle and the MRC framework of complex interventions in the development of a KT intervention. J. Clin. Epidemiol. (2011) (In Press).
   Google Scholar
• Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, Walshe K. Realist review – a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy19(Suppl. 1), S21–S34 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T, Peacock R. Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources. BMJ331, 1064–1065 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR et al. Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA282, 1458–1465 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravel K, Legare F, Graham ID. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: a systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions. Implement Sci.1, 16 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kushniruk AW, Patel VL. Cognitive and usability engineering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems. J. Biomed. Inform.37(1), 56–76 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumas JS. User-based evaluations. In: The Human–Computer Interaction Handbook. Jacko JA, Sears A (Eds). Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, NJ, USA, 1093–1117 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Daniels J, Fels S, Kushniruk AW et al. A framework for evaluating usability of clinical monitoring technology. J. Clin. Mon. Comp.21, 323–330 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vizri RA. Refining the test phase of usability evaluation: how many subjects is enough? Human Factors34, 457–468 (1992).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes RB, Sackett DL, Guyatt GH, Tugwell P. Clinical Epidemiology: How to do Clinical Practice Research. Third Edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, PA, USA (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Shekelle PG, Kravitz RL, Beart J et al. Are nonspecific practice guidelines potentially harmful? A randomized comparison of the effect of nonspecific versus specific guidelines on physician decision making. Health Serv. Res.34(7), 1429–1448 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciaschini P, Straus SE, Dolovich L et al. Community-based randomized controlled trial evaluating falls and osteoporosis risk management strategies. Trials9, 62 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. Fifth Edition. Free Press, NY, USA (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Graham TAD, Kushniruk AW, Bullard MJ et al. How usability of a web-based clinical decision support system has the potential to contribute to adverse medical events. AMIA Ann. Symp. Proc.257–261 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kushniruk AW, Triola MM, Borycki EM. et al. Technology induced error and usability: the relationship between usability problems and prescription errors when using handheld application. Int. J. Med. Inform.74(7–8), 519–526 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ash JS, Berg M, Coiera E. Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: the nature of patient care information system-related errors. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.11, 104–112 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trivedi MH, Daly EJ, Kern JK et al. Barriers to implementation of a computerized decision support system for depression: an observational report on lessons learned in ‘real world’ clinical settings. BMC Med. Inform. Dec. Mak.9, 6 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varonen H, Korteeisto T, Kaia M, EBMeDs Study Group. What may help or hinder the implementation of computerized decision support systems (CDSSs): a focus group study with physicians. Fam. Pract.25, 162–167 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastian H, Glasziou P, Chalmers I. Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up? PLoS Med.7(9), e1000326 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamtvedt G, Young JM, Kristoffersen DT, O‘Brien MA, Oxman AD. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.2, CD000259 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T, Kristjansson E, Robinson V. Realist review to understand the efficacy of school feeding programmes. BMJ335(7625), 858–861 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar