93
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Patients’ decision-making in radiation oncology

&
Pages 95-104 | Published online: 09 Jan 2014

References

  • Barnato AE, Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Peters EM, Siminoff L, Collins D, Barry MJ. Communication and decision making in cancer care: setting research priorities for decision support/patients’ decision aids. Med. Decis. Making27, 626–634 (2007).
  • Coleman N. Radiation oncology – linking technology and biology in the treatment of cancer. Acta Oncol.41, 6–13 (2002).
  • Bruera E, Sweeney C, Calder K, Palmer L, Benisch-Tolley S. Patient preferences versus physician perceptions of treatment decisions in cancer care. J. Clin. Oncol.19, 2883–2885 (2001).
  • O’Connor AM, Edward A. The role of decision aid in promoting evidence-based patients choice. In: Evidence-Based Patient Choice. Edwards A, Elwyn G (Eds). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 220–242 (2001).
  • O’Connor A, Wennberg J, Légaré F et al. Towards the tipping point: accelerating the diffusion of decision aids that help patients to weigh benefits versus risks. Policy paper on implementing patient decision aids. Health Aff.26(3), (2007).
  • Mandelblatt JS, Kreling B, Figeuriedo M, Feng S. What is the impact of shared decision-making on treatment and outcomes for older women with breast cancer? J. Clin. Oncol.24, 4908–4913 (2006).
  • Mandelblatt JS, Edge SB, Meropol NJ et al. Predictors of long-term outcomes in older breast cancer survivors: perceptions versus patterns of care. J. Clin. Oncol.21, 855–863 (2003).
  • Laing W, Burnett CB, Rowland JH et al. Communication between physicians and older women with localized breast cancer: implications for treatment and patient satisfaction. J. Clin. Oncol.20, 1008–1016 (2002).
  • Janz NK, Wren PA, Copeland LA, Lowery JC, Goldfarb SL, Wilkins EG. Patient-physician confordance: preferences, perceptions and factors influencing the breast cancer surgical decision. J. Clin. Oncol.22, 3091–3098 (2004).
  • O’Brien MA, Whelan TJ, Villais-Keever M et al. Are cancer-related decision aids effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Clin. Oncol.27, 974–985 (2009).
  • Waljee JF, Rogers MA, Alderman AK. Decision aids and breast cancer: do they influence choice for surgery and knowledge of treatment options? J. Clin. Oncol.25, 1067–1073 (2007).
  • O’Connor AM, Stacey D, Entwistle V et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Sys. Rev.2, CD001431 (2007).
  • Stacey D, Samant R, Bennett C. Decision making in oncology: a review of patient decision aids to support patient participation. CA Cancer J. Clin.58, 293–304 (2008).
  • Mills ME, Sullivan K. The importance of giving for patients newly diagnosed with cancer: a review of the literature. J. Clin. Nurs.8, 631–642 (1999).
  • Poroch D. The effect of preparatory patient education on the anxiety and satisfaction of cancer patients receiving radiation therapy. Cancer Nurs.18, 206–214 (1985).
  • Degner LF, Kristjanson LJ, Bowman D et al. Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer. JAMA277, 1485–1492 (1997).
  • Tariman JD, Berry DL, Cochrane B, Doorenbos A, Schepp K. Preferred and actual participation roles during health care decision making in persons with cancer: a systematic review. Ann. Oncol.21, 1145–1151 (2010).
  • Keating N, Guadagnoli E, Landrum M, Borbas C, Weeks J. Treatment decision making in early-stage breast cancer: should surgeons match patients’ desired level of involvement. J. Clin. Oncol.20, 1473–1479 (2002).
  • Lantz P, Janz N, Fagerlin A et al. Satisfaction with surgery outcomes and the decision process in a population-based sample of women with breast cancer. Health Serv. Res.40, 745–767 (2005).
  • Sinding C, Wiernikowski J. Treatment decision-making and its discontents. Soc. Work Health Care48, 614–634 (2009).
  • Sinding C, Wiernikowski J. Disruption foreclosed: older women’s cancer narratives. Health12, 389–411 (2008).
  • Charles C, Redko C, Whelan T, Gafni A, Reyno L. Doing nothing is no choice: lay constructions of treatment decision-making among women with early-stage breast cancer. Soc. Health Ill.20, 71–95 (1998).
  • Stalmeier P, van Tol-Geerdink JJ, van Lin E et al. Doctors’ and patients’ preferences for participation in curative prostate cancer radiotherapy. J. Clin. Oncol.25, 3096–3100 (2007).
  • Szumacher E, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Franssen E et al. Treatment of bone metastases with palliative radiotherapy: patients’ treatment preferences. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.61, 1473–1481 (2005).
  • Sepucha KR, Belkora JK, Tripathy D, Esserman LJ. Building bridges between physicians and patients: results of a pilot study examining new tools for collaborative decision making in breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol.18(6), 1230–1238 (2000).
  • Fallowfield LJ. Patient decision-making in breast cancer: the patient–doctor relationship. Breast Cancer Res. Treat.112, 5–13 (2008).
  • Rapley T. Distributed decision making: the anatomy of decisions-in-action. Soc. Health Ill.30, 429–444 (2008).
  • Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc. Sci. Med.49, 651–661 (1999).
  • Entwistle VA, Watt IS, Gilhooly K. Assessing patients’ participation and quality of decision-making: insights from a study of routine practice in diverse settings. Patient Educ. Couns.55, 105–113 (2004).
  • Ramirez A, Graham J, Richards M et al. Burnout and psychiatric disorder among cancer clinicians. Br. J. Cancer71, 1263–1269 (1995).
  • Ramirez A, Graham J, Richards M et al. Mental health of hospital consultants: the effects of stress and satisfaction at work. Lancet347, 724–728 (1996).
  • Sandelowski M. Focus on research methods: whatever happened to qualitative description? Res. Nurs. Health23, 334–340 (2000).
  • Landmark BT, Bohler A, Loberg K et al. Women with newly diagnosed breast cancer and their perceptions of needs in a health-care context. J. Clin. Nurs.17, 192–200 (2008).
  • Leydon GM, Boulton M, Moynihan C et al. Cancer patients’ information needs and information seeking behaviour: in depth interview study. BMJ320, 909–913 (2000).
  • O’Connor AM, Tugwell P, Wells GA et al. A decision aid for women considering hormone therapy after menopause: decision support framework and evaluation. Patient Educ. Couns.33, 267–279 (1998).
  • O’Connor AM. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med. Decis. Making15, 25–30 (1995).
  • Elwyn G, O’Connor A, Stacey D et al. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ333, 417–422 (2006).
  • Feldman-Stewart D, Brundage MD. Challenges for designing and implementing decision aids. Patient Educ. Couns.54, 265–273 (2004).
  • Aus G, Abbou CC, Bolla M et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Eur. Urol.48, 546–551 (2005).
  • Fowler FJ, McNaughton Collins M, Albertsen PC et al. Comparison of recommendations by urologists and radiation oncologists for treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA283, 3217–3222 (2000).
  • Van Tol-Geerdink JJ, Stalmeier P, Van Lin E et al. Do prostate cancer patients want to choose their own treatment? Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.66, 1105–1111 (2006).
  • Gwede CK, Pow-Sang J, Seigne J et al. Treatment decision-making strategies and influences in patients with localized prostate carcinoma. Cancer104, 1381–1390 (2005).
  • Feldman-Stewart D, Brundage MD, Nickel JC, Mackillop WJ. The information required by patients with early-stage prostate cancer in choosing their treatment. BJU Int.87, 218–223 (2001).
  • Schapira MM, Meade C, Nattinger AB. Enhanced decision-making: the use of a videotape decision-aid for patients with prostate cancer. Patient Educ. Couns.30, 119–127 (1997).
  • Holmes-Revner M, Stableford S, Fagerlin A et al. Evidence-based patient choice: a prostate cancer decision aid in plain language. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak.5, 16 (2005).
  • Van Tol-Geerdink JJ, Stalmeier P, van Lin E et al. Do patients with localized prostate cancer treatment really want more aggressive treatment? J. Clin. Oncol.28, 4581–4586 (2006).
  • Whelan TJ, Levine MN, Gafni A et al. Breast irradiation post-lumpectomy: development and evaluation of a decision instrument. J. Clin. Oncol.13, 847–853 (1995).
  • Whelan TJ, Levin MN, Willan A et al. Effect of a decision aid on knowledge and treatment decision making for breast cancer surgery: a randomized trial. JAMA292, 435–441 (2004).
  • Wong J, D’Alimonte L, Angus J et al. What do older women with breast cancer want to know while undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy? J. Cancer Educ.26(2), 254–261 (2011).
  • Hughes KS, Schnaper LA, Berry D et al.; Cancer and Leukemia Group B; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Lumpectomy plus tamoxifen with or without irradiation in women 70 years of age or older with early breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med.351, 971–977 (2004).
  • Sharp HM, List M, MacCracken E, Stenson K, Stocklng C, Slegler M. In head and neck cancer: evaluation of a new assessment tool. Head Neck21, 538–546 (1999).
  • List MA, Stracks J, Colangelo L et al. How do head and neck cancer patients priorities treatment outcomes before initiating treatment? J. Clin. Oncol.18, 877–884 (2000).
  • List MA, Rutherford JL, Stracks J et al. Prioritizing treatment outcomes: head and neck cancer patients versus nonpatients. Head Neck26, 163–170 (2004).
  • Wright J, Jones G, Whelan T, Lukka H. Patient preference for high or low dose rate brachytherapy in carcinoma of the cervix. Radiother. Oncol.33, 187–194 (1994).
  • Leighl NB, Butow PN, Tattersall MHN. Treatment decision aids in advanced cancer: when the goal is not cure and the answer is not clear. J. Clin. Oncol.22, 1759–1763 (2004).
  • Gaston CM, Mitchell G. Information giving and decision making in patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review. Soc. Sci. Med.61(10), 2252–2264 (2005).
  • Rose CM, Kagan R. The final report of the Expert Panel for the Radiation Oncology Bone Metastases Work Group of the American College of Radiology. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.40, 1117–1124 (1998).
  • Streenland E, Leer J, van Houwelingen H et al. The effect of a single fraction compared to multiple fractions on painful bone metastases: a global analysis of the Dutch bone metastases study. Radiother. Oncol.52, 101–109 (1998).
  • Tong D, Gillick L, Hendricson R. The palliation of symptomatic metastases: final results of the study by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Cancer50, 893–899 (1982).
  • McQuay HJ, Collins SL, Carroll D et al. Radiotherapy for the palliation of painful bone metastases. Cochrane Databse Sys. Rev.2, CD001793 (2000).
  • Shakespeare TP, Lu JJ, Back MF, Liang S, Mukherjee RK, Wynne CJ. Patient preference for radiotherapy fractionation schedule in the palliation of painful bone metastases. J. Clin. Oncol.21, 2156–2162 (2003).
  • Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T, O’Brien MA. Cultural influences on the physician–patient encounter: the case of shared treatment decision-making. Patient Educ. Couns.63, 262–267 (2006).
  • Tang JI, Shakespeare TP, Lu JJ et al. Patients’ preference for radiotherapy fractionation schedule in the palliation of symptomatic unresectable lung cancer. JMIRS52, 497–502 (2008).
  • Brundage MD, Feldman-Stewart D, Cosby R et al. Cancer patients’ attitudes toward treatment options for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: implications for patient education and decisional support. Patient Educ. Couns.45, 149–157 (2001).
  • Sze J, Marisette S, Williams D et al. Decision making in palliative radiation therapy: reframing home in caregivers and patients with brain metastases. Support. Care Cancer14, 1055–1063 (2006).
  • Szumacher E, Barnes E. Palliative care: patient understanding, preference and physician communication. J. Altern. Med. Res.2(3), 297–308 (2010).
  • Rodin G, Mackay JA, Zimmermann C et al. Clinician–patient communication: a systematic review. Support. Care Cancer17, 627–644 (2009).
  • Siminoff LA, Graham GC, Gordon NH. Cancer communication patterns and the influence of patient characteristics: disparities in information giving and affective behaviours. Patient Educ. Couns.62, 355–360 (2006).

Website

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.