References
- Briesch, A. M., Chafouleas, S. M., & Riley-Tillman, T. C. (2010). Generalizability and dependability of behavior assessment methods to estimate academic engagement: A comparison of systematic direct observation and direct behavior rating. School Psychology Review, 39, 408–421.
- Briesch, A. M., Swaminathan, H., Welsh, M., & Chafouleas, S. M. (2014). Generalizability theory: A practical guide to study design, implementation, and interpretation. Journal of School Psychology, 52, 13–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2013.11.008
- Briesch, A. M., Volpe, R. J., & Ferguson, T. D. (2014). The influence of student characteristics on the dependability of behavioral observation data. School Psychology Quarterly, 29, 171–181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/spq0000042
- Brulle, A. R., & Repp, A. C. (1984). An investigation of the accuracy of momentary time sampling procedures with time series data. British Journal of Psychology, 75, 481–485.
- Ferguson, T. D., Briesch, A. M., Volpe, R. J., & Daniels, B. (2012). The influence of observation length on the dependability of data. School Psychology Quarterly, 27, 187–197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/spq0000005
- Greenwood, C. R. (1996). The case for performance-based instructional models. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 283–296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0088935
- Gunter, P. L., Venn, M. L., Patrick, J., Miller, K. A., & Kelly, L. (2003). Efficacy of using momentary time samples to determine on-task behavior of students with emotional/behavioral disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 26, 400–412.
- Hintze, J. M., & Matthews, W. J. (2004). The generalizability of systematic direct observations across time and setting: A preliminary investigation of the psychometrics of behavioral observation. School Psychology Review, 33, 258–270.
- Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2529310
- Lane, J. D., & Ledford, J. R. (2014). Using interval-based systems to measure behavior in early childhood special education and early intervention. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 34, 83–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0271121414524063
- Murphy, G., & Goodall, E. (1980). Measurement error in direct observation: A comparison of common recording methods. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 18(2), 147–150.
- Salvia, J., Ysseldyke, J. E., & Bolt, S. (2010). Assessment in special and inclusive education (11th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
- Saudargas, R. A., & Zanolli, K. (1990). Momentary time sampling as an estimate of percentage time: A field validation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 533–537. http://dx.doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1990.23-533
- Shapiro, E. S. (2004). Academic skills problems workbook. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
- Shapiro, E. S., & Heick, P. F. (2004). School psychologist assessment practices in the evaluation of students referred for social/behavioral/emotional problems. Psychology in the Schools, 41, 551–561. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pits.10176
- Shavelson, R. J., & Webb, N. M. (1991). Generalizability theory: A primer. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
- Smith, P. L. (1981). Gaining accuracy in generalizability theory: Using multiple designs. Journal of Educational Measurement, 18(3), 147–154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1981.tb00849.x
- Stinnett, T. A., Havey, J. M., & Oehler-Stinnett, J. (1994). Current test usage by practicing school psychologists: A national survey. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 12(4), 331–350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/073428299401200403
- Suen, H. K., & Ary, D. (1989). Analyzing quantitative observation data. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
- Thorndike, R. M. (2005). Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
- Zakszeski, B. N., Hojnoski, R. L., & Wood, B. K. (2016). Considerations for time sampling interval durations in the measurement of young children's classroom engagement. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education. doi: 10.1177/0271121416659054