An Examination of a Multitiered System of Language Support for Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Preschoolers: Implications for Early and Accurate IdentificationFootnote

Article accepted by previous Editor

References

• Archer, A., & Hughes, C. (2011). Explicit instruction: Effective and efficient teaching. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Artiles, A. J., Trent, S. C., & Kuan, L. A. (1997). Learning disabilities research on ethnic minority students: An analysis of 22 years of studies published in selected refereed journals. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 12, 82–91.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, D. W., Daly, E. J., Jones, K. M., & Lentz, F. E., Jr. (2004). Response to intervention: Empirically based special service decisions from single-case designs of increasing and decreasing intensity. The Journal of Special Education, 38, 66–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, D. W., VanDerHeyden, A. M., & Witt, J. C. (2007). Achieving science-based practice through response to intervention: What it might look like in preschools. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 17, 31–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, D. V. M., & Snowling, M. (2004). Developmental dyslexia and specific language impairment: Same or different? Psychological Bulletin, 130, 858–886.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, M. K. (2013). Contextualizing school psychology practice: Introducing featured research commentaries. School Psychology Review, 42, 334–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, M. K., Appleton, J. J., & Stehouwer, J. D. (2005). Meta-analytic review of responsiveness-to-intervention research: Examining field-based and research-implemented models. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 381–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnine, D. (1997). Bridging the research-to-practice gap. Exceptional Children, 63, 513–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catts, H., Kamhi, A., & Adlof, S. (2012). Defining and classifying reading disabilities. In A. Kamhi & H. W. Catts (Eds.), Language and reading disabilities (3rd ed., pp. 45–76). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Catts, H. W. (1993). The relationship between speech-language impairments and reading disabilities. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 36, 948–958.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Catts, H. W., Adlof, S. M., Hogan, T. P., & Ellis Weismer, S. (2005). Are SLI and dyslexia distinct disorders? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 1378–1396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cirino, P. T., Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., Cardenas-Hagan, E., Fletcher, J. M., & Francis, D. J. (2009). One-year follow-up outcomes of Spanish and English interventions for English language learners at risk for reading problems. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 744–781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowley, J., & Glasgow, C. (1994). The Renfrew bus story. Centreville, DE: Centreville School.
   Google Scholar
• Demsky, Y. I., Mittenberg, W., Quintar, B., Katell, A. D., & Golden, C. J. (1998). Bias in the use of standard American norms with Spanish translations of the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised. Assessment, 5, 115–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deno, S. L. (2003). Developments in curriculum-based measurement. Journal of Special Education, 37, 184–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickinson, D. K., & Porche, M. V. (2011). Relation between language experiences in preschool classrooms and children's kindergarten and fourth-grade language and reading abilities. Child Development, 82, 870–886.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickinson, D. K., & Snow, C. E. (1987). Interrelationships among prereading and oral language skills in kindergartners from two social classes. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 2, 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Ehren, B., Erickson, K., Hatch, P., & Ukrainetz, T. A. (2012, November). SLPs—At the core of the Common Core State Standards. Panel presentation at the convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Fazio, B. B., Naremore, R. C., & Connell, P. J. (1996). Tracking children from poverty at risk for specific language impairments: A 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 611–624.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feagans, L., & Appelbaum, M. I. (1986). Validation of language subtypes in learning disabled children. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 78, 358–364.
   Google Scholar
• Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature (FMHI Publication No. 231). Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, National Implementation Research Network.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1998). Treatment validity: A unifying concept for reconceptualizing the identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13, 204–219.
   Google Scholar
• Gettinger, M., & Stoiber, K. (2008). Applying a response-to-intervention model for early literacy development in low-income children. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 27, 198–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, C. R., Bradfield, T., Kaminski, R., Linas, M., Carta, J. J., & Nylander, D. (2011). The response to intervention (RTI) approach in early childhood. Focus on Exceptional Children, 43, 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, C. R., Carta, J. J., Atwater, J., Goldstein, H., Kaminski, R., & McConnell, S. R. (2012). Is a response to intervention (RTI) approach to preschool language and early literacy instruction needed? Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 33, 48–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grigorenko, E. L. (2009). Dynamic assessment and response to intervention: Two sides of one coin. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 111–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart K., Fujiki M., Brinton B., & Hart, C. H. (2004). The relationship between social behavior and severity of language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 647–662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy, K., Vanderwood, M. L., & Edelston, D. (2005). Early literacy interventions for English language learners: Support for an RTI model. California School Psychologist, 10, 55–63.
   Google Scholar
• Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 127–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, D., McGillivray, L., & Schmidek, M. (1997). Guide to narrative language: Procedures for assessment. Eau Claire, WI: Thinking Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., & Shadish, W. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. Retrieved from What Works Clearinghouse website: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/wwc_scd.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Laing, S., & Kamhi, A. (2003). Assessment of language and literacy in culturally and linguistically diverse populations. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in the Schools, 34, 44–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linan-Thompson, S., Vaughn, S., Prater, K., & Cirino, P. (2006). The response to intervention of English language learners at risk for reading problems. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 390–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovett, M. W., De Palma, M., Frijters, J. C., Steinbach, K. A., Temple, M., Benson, N. J., & Lacerenza, L. (2008). Interventions for reading difficulties: A comparison of response to intervention by ELL and EFL struggling readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 333–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marston, D. (2005). Tiers of intervention in responsiveness to intervention: Prevention outcomes and learning disabilities identification patterns. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 539–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe, P., & Marshall, D. (2006). Measuring the social competence of preschool children with specific language impairment: Correspondence among informant ratings and behavioral observations. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 26, 234–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCardle, P., Mele-McCarthy, J., Cutting, L., Leos, K., & D'Emilio, T. (2005). Learning disabilities in English language learners: Identifying the issues. Learning Disabilities: Research & Practice, 20, 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• McCardle, P., Mele-McCarthy, J., & Leos, K. (2005). English language learners and disabilities: Research agenda and implications for practice. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 20, 68–78.
   Google Scholar
• McCauley, R. J., & Swisher, L. (1984). Psychometric review of language and articulation tests for preschool children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49, 34–42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCloskey, D., & Athanasiou, M. S. (2000). Assessment and intervention practices with second-language learners among school psychologists. Psychology in the Schools, 37, 209–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. F., Iglesias, A., Heilmann, J., Fabiano, L., Nockerts, A., & Francis, D. (2006). Oral language and reading in bilingual children. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 20, 30–43.
   Google Scholar
• National Early Literacy Panel. (2008). Developing early literacy: Report of the national early literacy panel. Washington, DC: National Institute for Family Literacy. Retrieved from http://lincs.ed.gov/publications/pdf/NELPReport09.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Professional Development Center on Inclusion. (2012). Response to intervention (RTI) in early childhood: Building consensus on the defining features. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina, FPG Child Development Institute, National Professional Development Center on Inclusion.
   Google Scholar
• National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., Davis, J. L., & Sauber, S. B. (2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42, 284–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, D. B. (2011). A systematic review of narrative-based language intervention with children who have language impairment. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 32, 207–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, D. B., Brown, C., Ukrainetz, T. A., Wise, C., Spencer, T. D., & Zebre, J. (2014). Systematic individualized narrative language intervention on the personal narratives of children with autism. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 45, 67–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, D. B., & Spencer, T. D. (2012). The narrative language measures: Tools for language screening, progress monitoring, and intervention planning. Perspectives on Language Learning and Education, 19, 119–129.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, C., & McCabe, A. (1983). Developmental psycholinguistics: Three ways of looking at a child's narrative. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodekohr, R. K., & Haynes, W. O. (2001). Differentiating dialect from disorder: A comparison of two processing tasks and a standardized language test. Journal of Communication Disorders, 34, 255–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheffner-Hammer, C. S., Pennock-Roman, M., Rzasa, S., & Tomblin, J. B. (2002). An analysis of the Test of Language Development—Primary for item bias. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 11, 274–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaulding, T. J., Plante, E., & Farinella, K. A. (2006). Eligibility criteria for language impairment: Is the low end of normal always appropriate? Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 37, 61–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speece, D. L., & Case, L. P. (2001). Classification in context: An alternative approach to identifying early reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 735–749.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, T. D., Kajian, M., Petersen, D. B., & Bilyk, N. (2014). Effects of an individualized narrative intervention on children's storytelling and comprehension skills. Journal of Early Intervention, 35, 243–259. doi:10.1177/1053815114540002
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, T. D., & Petersen, D. B. (2012a). Story Champs: A multi-tiered language intervention program. Laramie, WY: Language Dynamics Group. Available at www.languagedynamicsgroup.com
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, T. D., & Petersen, D. B. (2012b). The test of narrative intervention: Preschool. Laramie, WY: Language Dynamics Group. Available at www.languagedynamicsgroup.com
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, T. D., Petersen, D. B., Slocum, T. A., & Allen, M. M. (2014). Large group narrative intervention in Head Start classrooms: Implications for response to intervention. Journal of Early Childhood Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1476718X13515419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, T. D., & Slocum, T. A. (2010). The effect of a narrative intervention on story retelling and personal story generation skills of preschoolers with risk factors and narrative language delays. Journal of Early Intervention, 32, 178–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vannest, K. F., Davis, J. L., & Parker, R. I. (2013). Single case research in schools: Practical guidelines for school-based professionals. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau, American Factfinder. (2010). American community survey. Retrieved from http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/index.xhtml
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. (2013). Common Core of Data (CCD), local education agency universe survey, 2002-03 through 2011-12. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/ccd/pubagency.asp
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Office of Head Start. (2013). Services snapshot. Retrieved from http://eclkc.ohs.acf.hhs.gov/hslc/data/psr/national-all.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Valencia, R., & Rankin, R. J. (1985). Evidence of content bias on the McCarthy scales with Mexican American children: Implications for test translation and nonbiased assessment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 197–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valencia, R., & Suzuki, L. (2001). Intelligence testing and minority students: Foundations, performance factors, and assessment issues. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• VanDerHeyden, A. M., Witt, J. C., & Gilbertson, D. (2007). A multi-year evaluation of the effects of a response to intervention (RTI) model on identification of children for special education. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 225–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L. S. (2006). A response to “Competing views: A dialogue on response to intervention”: Why response to intervention is necessary but not sufficient for identifying students with learning disabilities. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 32, 58–61.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., Mathes, P., Linan-Thompson, S., Cirino, P., Carlson, C., Pollard-Durodola, S., … Francis, D. (2006). Effectiveness of an English intervention for first-grade English language learners at risk for reading problems. The Elementary School, 2, 153–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, R. K., Francis, D. J., & Morris, R. D. (2005). Identifying English language learners with disabilities: Key challenges and possible approaches. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20, 6–15.
   Google Scholar
• Westby, C. (1985). Learning to talk-talking to learn: Oral-literate language differences. In C. S. Simon (Ed.), Communication skills and classroom success (pp. 181–218). San Diego, CA: College Hill Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehurst, G., & Lonigan, C. (2001). Emergent literacy: Development from prereaders to readers. In S. B Neuman & D. K. Dickensen (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 11–29). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiig, E. H., Secord, W. A., & Semel, E. (2004). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals—Preschool, second edition (CELF Preschool-2). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: The Psychological Corporation, A Harcourt Assessment Company.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., & Drame, E. (2008). Culturally appropriate context: Unlocking the potential of response to intervention for English language learners. Early Childhood Education Journal, 35, 305–311. doi:10.1007/s10643-007-0213-4
   Google Scholar