438
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Two Women, a Bottle of Wine, and The Bachelor

Duoethnography as a Means to Explore Experiences of Femininity in a Leisure Setting

&
Pages 695-716 | Published online: 13 Dec 2017

References

  • Aitchison, C. (2000). Poststructural feminist theories of representing Others: A response to the ‘crisis’ in leisure studies' discourse. Leisure Studies, 19, 127–144.
  • Andrejevic, M. (2004). Reality TV: The work of being watched. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
  • Barton, K. M. (2009). Reality television programming and diverging gratifications: The influence of content on gratifications obtained. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53(3), 460–467.
  • Behar, R. (1995). Introduction: out of exile. In R. Behar & D. Gordon (Eds.), Women writing culture (pp. 1–33). Berkeley, CA: University of California.
  • Behar, R., & Gordon, D. (1995). Women writing culture. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
  • Berbary, L. A. (2008). Subject to sorority: Women's negotiations of competing discourses of femininity. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from: http://dbs.galib.uga.edu
  • Berbary, L. A. (2011). Post-structural writerly representation: Screenplay as creative analytic practice. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(2), 186–196.
  • Berbary, L. A., & Johnson, C. W. (2012). The American sorority girl recast: An ethnographic screenplay of leisure in context. Leisure/Loisir, 36(3–4), 243–268.
  • Bonsu, S. K., Darmody, A., & Parmentier, M. (2010). Arrested emotions in reality television. Consumption Markets & Culture, 13(1), 91–107.
  • Brophy-Baermann, M. (2005). True love on TV. Poroi, 4(2), 17–51.
  • Brown, L. S. (2005). Outwit, outlast, out-flirt? The women of reality TV. In E. Cole & D. J. Henderson (Eds.), Featuring females: Feminist analyses of media (pp. 71–83). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
  • Bureau of Labor. (June 6, 2011). American Time Use Survey Summary-2010 Results. Retrieved April 30, 2012 from http://www.bls.gov/news.release/atus.nr0.htm
  • Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble. New York: Routledge.
  • Butler, J. (1997). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. New York: Routledge.
  • Cato, M., & Carpentier, R.D. (2010). Conceptualizations of female empowerment and enjoyment of sexualized characters in reality television. Mass Communication and Society, 13, 270–288.
  • Couldry, N. (2008). Reality TV, or the secret theater of neoliberalism. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 30(1), 3–13.
  • Dubrofsky, R. E. (2005). The Bachelor industry: The surveillance and governing of women. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, http://search.proquest.com/docview/304985891?accountid=14677
  • Dubrofsky, R. E. (2006). The Bachelor: Whiteness in the harem. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 23(1), 39–56.
  • Dubrofsky, R. E. (2007). Therapeutics of the self: Surveillance in the service of the therapeutic. Television & New Media, 8(4), 263–284.
  • Dubrofsky, R. E., & Hardy, A. (2008). Performing race in Flavor of Love and The Bachelor. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 25(4), 373–392.
  • Dubrofsky, R. E. (2009). Fallen women in reality TV: A pornography of emotion. Feminist Media Studies, 9(3), 353–368.
  • Dubrofsky, R. E. (2011). The surveillance of women on reality television: Watching The Bachelor and The Bachelorette. Plymouth, UK: Lexington Books.
  • Durrant, P., & Kennedy, E. (2007). Sonic Sport: Sound Art in Leisure Research. Leisure Sciences, 29(2), 181–194.
  • Fairclough, K. (2004). Women's work? Wife Swap and the reality problem. Feminist Media Studies, 4(3), 344–347.
  • Ferris, A. L., Smith, S. W., Greenberg, B. S., & Smith, S. L. (2007). The content of reality dating shows and viewer perceptions of dating. Journal of Communication, 57, 490–510.
  • Glover, T. D. (2007). Ugly on the diamonds: An examination of White privilege in youth baseball. Leisure Sciences, 29, 195–208.
  • Graham-Bertolini, A. (2004). Joe Millionaire as fairy tale: A feminist critique. Feminist Media Studies, 4(3), 341–344.
  • Gray, J. (2009). Cinderella burps: Gender performativity and the dating show. In S. Murray & L. Ouellette (Eds.), Reality TV: Remaking television culture (2nd ed.) (pp. 260–277). New York: New York University.
  • Hautakangas, M. (2010). Trans-audiencehood of Big Brother: Discourses of fans, producers and participants. In S. Van Bauwel & N. Carpenter (Eds.), Trans-reality television: The transgression of reality, genre, politics, and audience (pp. 229–250). Lanham, MD: Lexington.
  • Henderson, K. A. (1994). Perspectives on analyzing gender, women, and leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 20(2), 119–137.
  • Henderson, K. A., & Bialeschki, M. D. (1999). Markers of meanings: Feminist perspectives on leisure research. In E. L. Jackson & T. L. Burton (Eds.), Leisure studies: Prospects for the twenty-first century (pp. 167–176). State College, PA: Venture.
  • Henderson, K. A., & Gibson, H. J. (2013). An integrative review of women, gender, and leisure: Increasing complexities. Journal of Leisure Research, 45(2), 115–135.
  • Hill, A. (2002). Big Brother: The real audience. Television & New Media, 3(August), 323–340.
  • Hill, A. (2005). Reality TV: Audiences and popular factual television. New York: Routledge.
  • Hirschman, E. C. (1985). A multidimensional analysis of content preferences for leisure-time media. Journal of Leisure Research, 17(1), 14–28.
  • Johnson, C. (2005). ‘The first step is the two-step’: hegemonic masculinity and dancing in a country-western gay bar. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education (QSE), 18(4), 445–464.
  • Johnson, C. W. (2009). Writing ourselves at risk: Using self-narrative in working for social justice. Leisure Sciences, 31(5), 483–489.
  • Jacobson, S. A., & Samdahl, D. M. (1998). Leisure in the lives of old lesbians: Experiences with and responses to discrimination. Journal of Leisure Research, 30(2), 233–255.
  • Lather, P. (2006). Paradigm proliferation as a good thing to think with: Teaching research in education as a wild profusion. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19(1), 35–57.
  • Lather, P., & Smithies, C. (1997). Troubling the angels: Women living with HIV/AIDS. Boulder, CO: Westview.
  • McRobbie, A. (2007). Postfeminism and popular culture: Bridget Jones and the new gender Regime. In Y. Tasker, & D. Negra (Eds.), Interrogating postfeminism: Gender and the politics of popular culture (pp. 26–39). Durham, NC: Duke University.
  • Mendible, M. (2004). Humiliation, subjectivity, and reality TV. Feminist Media Studies, 4(3), 335–338.
  • Norris, J., & Sawyer, R. D. (2012). Toward a dialogic methodology. In J. Norris, R. D. Sawyer, & D. Lund (Eds.), Duoethnography: Dialogic methods for social, health, and educational research (pp. 9–39). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast.
  • Parry, D. C., & Johnson, C.W. (2007). Contextualizing leisure research to encompass complexityin lived leisure experience: The need for creative analytic practice. Leisure Sciences, 29, 119–130.
  • Pillow, W. S. (2003). Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(2), 175–196.
  • Pozner, J. L. (2010). Reality bites back: The troubling truth about guilty pleasure TV. Berkeley, CA: Seal Press.
  • Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. Oxford, UK: Oxford University.
  • Rhodes, R. E., & Dean, R. N. (2009). Understanding Physical Inactivity: Prediction of Four Sedentary Leisure Behaviors. Leisure Sciences, 31(2), 124–135.
  • Richardson, L. (1993). Poetics, dramatics, and transgressive validity: The case of the skipped line. The Sociological Quarterly, 34(4), 695–710.
  • Richardson, L. (2000). Evaluating Ethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 6, 253–255.
  • Richardson, L., & St. Pierre, E. A. (2005). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 959–978). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Roberti, J. W. (2007). Demographic characteristics and motives of individuals viewing reality dating shows. The Communication Review, 10, 117–134.
  • Samdahl, D. M., Jacobson, S. A., & Hutchinson, S. L. (2001). When gender is problematic: Leisure and gender negotiation for marginalized women. In S. Clough & J. White (Eds.), Women's leisure experiences: Ages, stages and roles (pp. 139–146). Eastburn, UK: Leisure Studies Association.
  • Shaw, S. M. (1994). Gender, leisure and constraint: Toward a framework for the analysis of women's leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 26(1), 8–22.
  • Shaw, S. M. (1999). Gender and leisure. In E. L. Jackson & T. L. Burton (Eds.), Leisure Studies: Prospects for the twenty-first century (pp. 271–282). State College, PA: Venture.
  • Snyder, R. C. (2008). What is third-wave feminism? A new directions essay. Signs, 34(1), 175–196.
  • Snyder-Hall, R. C. (2010). Third-wave feminism and the defense of ‘choice.’ Perspectives on Politics, 8(1), 255–261.
  • St. Pierre, E. A., & Pillow, W. S. (2000). Inquiry among the ruins. In E. A. St. Pierre, & W. S. Pillow (Eds.), Working the ruins: Feministpoststructural theory and methods in education (pp. 1–24). New York: Routledge.
  • Villenas, S. (2000). This ethnography called my back: Writings of the exotic gaze, “othering” Latina, and recuperating Xicanisma, In E. A. St. Pierre & W. S. Pillow (Eds.), Working the ruins: Feminist poststructural theory and methods in education (pp. 74–95). New York: Routledge.
  • Visweswaran, K. (1994). Fictions of feminist ethnography. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
  • Wachter, C. J., & Kelly, J. R. (1998). Exploring VCR use as a leisure activity. Leisure Sciences, 20(3), 213–227.
  • Yep, G., & Camacho, O. (2004). The normalization of heterogendered relations In The Bachelor. Feminist Media Studies, 4(3), 338–341.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.