Nanofabrication of chitosan-based dressing to treat the infected wounds: in vitro and in vivo evaluations

References

• Sarheed O, Ahmed A, Shouqair D, Boateng J. Antimicrobial dressings for improving wound healing. In: Wound Healing-New Insights into Ancient Challenges. Alexandrescu V ( Ed.). 373–398 (2016).
   Google Scholar
• Savitskaya I, Shokatayeva D, Kistaubayeva A, Ignatova L, Digel I. Antimicrobial and wound healing properties of a bacterial cellulose based material containing B. subtilis cells. Heliyon 5(10), e02592 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halstead FD, Lee KC, Kwei J, Dretzke J, Oppenheim BA, Moiemen NS. A systematic review of quantitative burn wound microbiology in the management of burns patients. Burns 44(1), 39–56 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Percival SL, Finnegan S, Donelli G, Vuotto C, Rimmer S, Lipsky BA. Antiseptics for treating infected wounds: efficacy on biofilms and effect of pH. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 42(2), 293–309 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourtoom T, Chinnan MS. Preparation and properties of rice starch–chitosan blend biodegradable film. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 41(9), 1633–1641 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang K, Pan S, Qi Z et al. Recent advances in chitosan-based metal nanocomposites for wound healing applications. Advan. Mat. Sci. Engin. 2020, 3827912–3827925 (2020).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang C, Yan Z, Lian Y, Wang J, Zhang K. Graphene oxide coated shell-core structured chitosan/PLLA nanofibrous scaffolds for wound dressing. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 31(5), 622–641 (2020).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oryan A, Sahvieh S. Effectiveness of chitosan scaffold in skin, bone and cartilage healing. Intern. J. Biol. Macromol. 104, 1003–1011 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazemi MS, Mohammadi Z, Amini M et al. Thiolated chitosan-lauric acid as a new chitosan derivative: synthesis, characterization and cytotoxicity. Intern. J. Biol. Macromol. 136, 823–830 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen S, Wang H, Jian Z et al. Novel poly (vinyl alcohol)/chitosan/modified graphene oxide biocomposite for wound dressing application. Macromol. Biosci. 20(3), 1900385 (2020).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger J, Reist M, Mayer JM, Felt O, Peppas N, Gurny R. Structure and interactions in covalently and ionically crosslinked chitosan hydrogels for biomedical applications. European J. Pharmaceut. Biopharmaceut. 57(1), 19–34 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Q, Xu A, Li Z, Wang J, Zhang S. Influence of anionic structure on the dissolution of chitosan in 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium-based ionic liquids. Green Chem. 13(12), 3446–3452 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Giulio M, Zappacosta R, Di Lodovico S et al. Antimicrobial and antibiofilm efficacy of graphene oxide against chronic wound microorganisms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 62(7), e00547–18 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao HY, Laurent S, Chen W et al. Graphene: promises, facts, opportunities, and challenges in nanomedicine. Chem. Rev. 113(5), 3407–3424 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuila T, Bose S, Mishra AK, Khanra P, Kim NH, Lee JH. Chemical functionalization of graphene and its applications. Progress Mater. Sci. 57(7), 1061–1105 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L, Luo C, Li X, Duan H, Wang X. Preparation of magnetic ionic liquid/chitosan/graphene oxide composite and application for water treatment. Internat. J. Biolog. Macromol. 66, 172–178 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali IH, Ouf A, Elshishiny F et al. Antimicrobial and wound-healing activities of graphene-reinforced electrospun chitosan/gelatin nanofibrous nanocomposite scaffolds. ACS Omega 7(2), 1838–1850 (2022).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graça MF, Melo BL, Lima-Sousa R, Ferreira P, Moreira AF, Correia IJ. Reduced graphene oxide-enriched chitosan hydrogel/cellulose acetate-based nanofibers application in mild hyperthermia and skin regeneration. Internat. J. Biolog. Macromol. 229, 224–235 (2023).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Liu S, Yu W. Functionalized graphene oxide-reinforced chitosan hydrogel as biomimetic dressing for wound healing. Macromol. Biosci. 21(4), 2000432 (2021).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin H, Cai M, Deng F. Antioxidation effect of graphene oxide on silver nanoparticles and its use in antibacterial applications. Polymers. 15(14), 3045 (2023).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahmoradi S, Golzar H, Hashemi M et al. Optimizing the nanostructure of graphene oxide/silver/arginine for effective wound healing. Nanotechnology 29(47), 475101 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmonds M. Body of knowledge around the diabetic foot and limb salvage. J. Cardiovasc. Surg. 53(5), 605–616 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James GA, Swogger E, Wolcott R et al. Biofilms in chronic wounds. Wound Repair Regen. 16(1), 37–44 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Jiang Y, Ding Y, Povey M, York D. Investigation into the antibacterial behaviour of suspensions of ZnO nanoparticles (ZnO nanofluids). J. Nanopart. Res. 9(3), 479–489 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y-W, Cao A, Jiang Y et al. Superior antibacterial activity of zinc oxide/graphene oxide composites originating from high zinc concentration localized around bacteria. ACS Appl. Mater. Interf. 6(4), 2791–2798 (2014).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• You J, Zhang Y, Hu Z. Bacteria and bacteriophage inactivation by silver and zinc oxide nanoparticles. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 85(2), 161–167 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanmugam A, Vikraman D, Park HJ, Kim H-S. One-Pot facile methodology to synthesize chitosan-ZnO-graphene oxide hybrid composites for better dye adsorption and antibacterial activity. Nanomaterials 7(11), 363 (2017).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shu G, Xu D, Xie S et al. The antioxidant, antibacterial, and infected wound healing effects of ZnO quantum dots-chitosan biocomposite. Applied Surface Sci. 611, 155727 (2023).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govindasamy GA, Mydin RBS, Effendy WNFWE, Sreekantan S. Novel dual-ionic ZnO/CuO embedded in porous chitosan biopolymer for wound dressing application: physicochemical, bactericidal, cytocompatibility and wound healing profiles. Mater. Today Commun. 33, 104545 (2022).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar P, Lakshmanan V-K, Anilkumar T et al. Flexible and microporous chitosan hydrogel/nano ZnO composite bandages for wound dressing. Vitro In Vivo Eval. 11, 28596 (2019).
   Google Scholar
• Bagheri M, Validi M, Gholipour A, Makvandi P, Sharifi E. Chitosan nanofiber biocomposites for potential wound healing applications: antioxidant activity with synergic antibacterial effect. Bioeng. Translat. Med. 7(1), e10254 (2022).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhuri AR, Tripathy S, Chandra S, Roy S, Sahu SK. A ZnO decorated chitosan–graphene oxide nanocomposite shows significantly enhanced antimicrobial activity with ROS generation. RSC Advan. 5(61), 49420–49428 (2015).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azimi N, Gandomkar A, Sharif M. Relationship between production condition, microstructure and final properties of chitosan/graphene oxide–zinc oxide bionanocomposite. Poly. Bulletin 80(6), 6455–6469 (2023).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C, Wang X, Chen F et al. The antifungal activity of graphene oxide–silver nanocomposites. Biomaterials 34(15), 3882–3890 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 13726-2: BE. Test Methods for Primary Wound Dressings. Part 1: Aspect of Absorbency, Section 3.6, Dispersion Characteristics (2002). https://www.en-standard.eu/search/?q=13726-2%3A2002
   Google Scholar
• International A. ASTM D882-12, Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Thin Plastic Sheeting. ASTM International (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Standardization IOF. Measurement of Antibacterial Activity on Plastics and Other Non-porous Surfaces ISO 22196. ISO (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Standard I. Biological evaluation of medical devices—Part 5: Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity. International Organization for Standardization, Geneve, Switzerland (2009).
   Google Scholar
• 10993–10 I. Biological evaluation of medical devices Part 10: tests for irritation and delayed-type hypersensitivity (2010). https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:10993:-10:ed-4:v1:en
   Google Scholar
• Han Y, Lu Y. Characterization and electrical properties of conductive polymer/colloidal graphite oxide nanocomposites. Comp. Sci. Technol. 69(7–8), 1231–1237 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang X, Tu Y, Li L, Shang S, Tao X-M. Well-dispersed chitosan/graphene oxide nanocomposites. ACS Appl. Mater. Interf. 2(6), 1707–1713 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salehi R, Arami M, Mahmoodi NM, Bahrami H, Khorramfar S. Novel biocompatible composite (chitosan–zinc oxide nanoparticle): preparation, characterization and dye adsorption properties. Coll. Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 80(1), 86–93 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuo P-P, Feng H-F, Xu Z-Z et al. Fabrication of biocompatible and mechanically reinforced graphene oxide-chitosan nanocomposite films. Chem. Central J. 7, 1–11 (2013).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• El Rouby WM, Farghali AA, Sadek M, Khalil WF. Fast removal of Sr (II) from water by graphene oxide and chitosan modified graphene oxide. J. Inorgan. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 28, 2336–2349 (2018).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun L, Sun J, Chen L, Niu P, Yang X, Guo Y. Preparation and characterization of chitosan film incorporated with thinned young apple polyphenols as an active packaging material. Carbohyd. Polym. 163, 81–91 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuo P-P, Feng H-F, Xu Z-Z et al. Fabrication of biocompatible and mechanically reinforced graphene oxide-chitosan nanocomposite films. Chem. Cent. J. 7(1), 1–11 (2013).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Terzioglu P, Altin Y, Kalemtas A, Bedeloglu AC. Graphene oxide and zinc oxide decorated chitosan nanocomposite biofilms for packaging applications. J. Polym. Engin. 40(2), 152–157 (2020).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sathiya S, Okram G, Dhivya SM, Manivannan G, Rajan MJ. Interaction of chitosan/zinc oxide nanocomposites and their antibacterial activities with Escherichia coli. Materials Today: Proceedings 3(10), 3855–3860 (2016).
   Google Scholar
• Thomas S, Hughes G, Fram P, Hallett A. An in-vitro comparison of the physical characteristics of hydrocolloids, hydrogels, foams and alginate/CMC fibrous dressings. SMTL Rep 1, 1–24 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Uzun M, Anand S, Shah T. In vitro characterisation and evaluation of different types of wound dressing materials. J. Biomed. Eng. Technol. 1(2013), 1–7 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Helfman T, Ovington L, Falanga V. Occlusive dressings and wound healing. Clin. Dermatol. 12(1), 121–127 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mir M, Ali MN, Barakullah A et al. Synthetic polymeric biomaterials for wound healing: a review. Progress in Biomat. 7(1), 1–21 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman JN, Khan U, Gun'ko YK. Mechanical reinforcement of polymers using carbon nanotubes. Advan. Mater. 18(6), 689–706 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najafabadi SAA, Mohammadi A, Kharazi AZ. Polyurethane nanocomposite impregnated with chitosan-modified graphene oxide as a potential antibacterial wound dressing. Mater. Sci. Engin.: C 115, 110899 (2020).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kara F, Aksoy EA, Yuksekdag Z, Hasirci N, Aksoy S. Synthesis and surface modification of polyurethanes with chitosan for antibacterial properties. Carbohyd. Poly. 112, 39–47 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parwani L, Bhatnagar M, Bhatnagar A, Sharma V, Sharma V. Evaluation of Moringa oleifera seed biopolymer-PVA composite hydrogel in wound healing dressing. Iranian Polymer. J. 25(11), 919–931 (2016).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boateng JS, Matthews KH, Stevens HN, Eccleston GM. Wound healing dressings and drug delivery systems: a review. J. Pharm. Sci. 97(8), 2892–2923 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar