Medical school teaching on interprofessional relationships between primary and social care to enhance communication and integration of care – a pilot study

References

• NHS England. Five year forward view. NHS England; 2014. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/5yfv-web.pdf. Accessed December, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• NHS Confederation. Stepping up to the place: the key to successful health and care integration. NHS Confederation; 2016. Available from: https://www.nhsconfed.org/resources/2016/06/stepping-up-to-the-place-the-key. Accessed January, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• White J, Sanderson J. Making the case for the personalised approach. NHS Choices; 2018. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/blog/making-the-case-for-the-personalised-approach/. Accessed October 1, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Integrated care. “critically important” for older people with social care needs and multiple long-term conditions. NICE News and features; November 4, 2015. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/news/article/integrated-care-critically-important-for-older-people-with-social-care-needs-and-multiple-long-term-conditions. Accessed December 1, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Berwick DM, Nolan TW, Whittington J. The triple aim: care, health, and cost. Health Aff. 2008;27(3):759–769. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.27.3.759
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang C, Kern EAM, Schulte T, Hildebrandt H. Integrated diabetes care in germany: triple aim in gesundes kinzigtal. Integr Diabetes Care. 2016;169–184. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-13389-8_10
   Google Scholar
• Fillingham D. Can lean save lives? Leadersh Health Serv. 2007;20(4):231–241. doi:10.1108/17511870710829346
   Google Scholar
• Wood S, Henderson S. What the system can do: the role of national bodies in realising the value of people and communities in health and care. National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts (NESTA); 2016. Available from: https://www.nesta.org.uk/sites/default/files/what-the-system-can-do-the-role-of-national-bodies-in-realising-the-value.pdf. Accessed July 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Morden A, Jinks C, Ong BN, Porcheret M, Dziedzic KS. Acceptability of a ‘guidebook’ for the management of Osteoarthritis: a qualitative study of patient and clinician’s perspectives. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:427. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-15-427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas P. Achieving community oriented integrated care through the 2014 England GP contract. London J Primary Care. 2015;6(3):55–64. doi:10.1080/17571472.2014.11493416
   Google Scholar
• Lucas L, Maker J. The state of care in counties. Local Government Information Unit (LGIU); 2015. Available from: http://www.lgiu.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/The-state-of-care-in-counties.pdf. Accessed February, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. World report on ageing and health. World Health Organisation; 2015. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/186463/1/9789240694811_eng.pdf?ua=1. Accessed February, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Penhale B, Young J. A review of the literature concerning what the public and users of social work services in England think about the conduct and competence of social workers. Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care; March, 2015. Available from: https://www.professionalstandards.org.uk/docs/default-source/publications/research-paper/what-the-public-think-about-the-conduct-and-competence-of-social-workers-2015.pdf?sfvrsn=71c47f20_6. Accessed February, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar P. Growing older in the UK: a series of expert-authored briefing papers on ageing and health. British Medical Association; September 14, 2016. Available from: . Accessed February, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Waterson P. Health information technology and sociotechnical systems: A progress report on recent developments within the UK National Health Service (NHS). Appl Ergon. 2014;45(2):150–161. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2013.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastellos N, Car J, Majeed A, Aylin P. Using information to deliver safer care: a mixed-methods study exploring general practitioners’ information needs in North West London primary care. J Innovation Health Inf. 2014;22(1):207–213. doi:10.14236/jhi.v22i1.77
   Google Scholar
• McDonald A. A long and winding road: improving communication with patients in the NHS. Marie Curie; February, 2016. Available from: https://www.mariecurie.org.uk/globalassets/media/documents/policy/campaigns/the-long-and-winding-road.pdf. Accessed February, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• National Voices. A narrative for person-centred coordinated care. National Voices; May, 2013. Available from: https://www.nationalvoices.org.uk/publications/our-publications/narrative-person-centred-coordinated-care. Accessed February, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. High quality care for all: NHS next stage review final report. Department of Health; 2008. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/228836/7432.pdf. Accessed February 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Mcnair R, Griffiths L, Reid K, Sloan H. Medical students developing confidence and patient centredness in diverse clinical settings: a longitudinal survey study. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16:1. doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0689-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifton M, Dale C, Bradshaw C. The impact and effectiveness of inter-professional education in primary care: an RCN literature review. Royal College of Nursing’s; February, 2007. Available from: https://www.rcn.org.uk/-/media/royal-college-of-nursing/documents/publications/2007/october/pub-003091.pdf. Accessed November, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Barwell J, Arnold F, Berry H. How interprofessional learning improves care. Nursing Practice; June 29, 2013. Available from: https://www.nursingtimes.net/Journals/2013/05/30/p/q/j/290513-How-interprofessional-learning-improves-care.pdf. Accessed November 29, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Olson R, Bialocerkowski A. Interprofessional education in allied health: a systematic review. Med Educ. 2014;48(3):236–246. doi:10.1111/medu.12290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves S, Perrier L, Goldman J, Freeth D, Zwarenstein M. Interprofessional education: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002213.pub3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• General Medical Council. Outcomes for graduates. General Medical Council; 2018. Available from: https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/dc11326-outcomes-for-graduates-2018_pdf-75040796.pdf. Accessed 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Osters S, Tiu FS Writing measurable learning outcomes. Director of Student Life Studies; Available from: https://www.gavilan.edu/research/spd/Writing-Measurable-Learning-Outcomes.pdf. Accessed February, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Julious SA. Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study. Pharm Stat. 2015;4(4):231–300. doi:10.1002/pst.185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaac S, Michael WB. Handbook in Research and Evaluation: A Collection of Principles, Methods, and Strategies Useful in the Planning, Design, and Evaluation of Studies in Education and the Behavioral Sciences San Diego. CA: EdITS; 1981. doi:10.1177/105960118200700111
   Google Scholar
• Hill R. What sample size is “enough” in internet survey research? Interpersonal Comput Technol. 1998;6(3–4). Available from: http://www.reconstrue.co.nz/IPCT-JVol6RobinhillSampleSize.pdf. Accessed 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Gvan B. Statistical Rules of Thumb. New York: Wiley-Interscience; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• The NHS workforce in numbers. The nuffield trust; April 26, 2018. Available from: https://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/resource/the-nhs-workforce-in-numbers#1what-kinds-of-staff-make-up-the-nhs-workforce. Accessed May 18, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Gröne O, Garcia-Barbero M. Integrated care: A position paper of the WHO European office for integrated health care services. Int J Integr Care. 2001;1(e21). doi:10.5334/ijic.28
   Google Scholar
• Kodner DL, Spreeuwenberg C. Integrated care: meaning, logic, applications, and implications – a discussion paper. Int J Integr Care. 2002;2. doi:10.5334/ijic.67
   Google Scholar
• National Voices. A narrative for person-centred coordinated care | national voices; May, 2013. Available from: https://www.nationalvoices.org.uk/publications/our-publications/narrative-person-centred-coordinated-care. Accessed January 2018.
   Google Scholar
• NHS England. New care models: empowering patients and communities. NHS England; 2015. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/vanguards-support-directory.pdf. Accessed January, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Sanderson J, White J. Making the case for the personalised approach. NHS England; January, 2018. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/blog/making-the-case-for-the-personalised-approach/. Accessed January, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Stoye G. UK Health Spending. The Institute for Fiscal Studies; May, 2017. doi:10.1920/bn.ifs.2017.bn0201
   Google Scholar
• Spann SJ. Report on financing the new model of family medicine. Ann Family Med. 2004;2(suppl_3). doi:10.1370/afm.237
   Google Scholar
• Allikmets S, Vink J. The benefits of peer-led teaching in medical education. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2016;329–330. doi:10.2147/amep.s107776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess A, Dornan T, Clarke AJ, Menezes A, Mellis C. Peer tutoring in a medical school: perceptions of tutors and tutees. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16:1. doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0589-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar