Junior-to-junior research interviews as method for clinical practitioner-researchers

References

• Myint PK, MacLullich AMJ, Witham MD. The role of research training during higher medical education in the promotion of academic medicine in the UK. Postgrad Med J. 2006;82(973):767–770. doi:10.1136/pgmj.2006.047001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowe S, Clarke N, Brugha R. ‘You do not cross them’: hierarchy and emotion in doctors’ narratives of power relations in specialist training. Soc Sci Med. 2017;186:70–77. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.05.048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson C. Appendix B: the roles of practitioner-researchers, researchers and consultants in real world research. In: Robson C, editor. Real World Research. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers; 2002:534–545.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland P, Ng S. Multiple boundaries: professional and institutional identities of clinician-scientists. Med Educ. 2017;51(6):568–570. doi:10.1111/medu.2017.51.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Medical Association. Doctors’ titles explained [Internet]. [ cited November 1, 2018]. Available from: https://www.bma.org.uk. Accessed November 1, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Goddard A. Lessons to be learned from the UK junior doctors’ strike. JAMA. 2016;316(14):1445–1446. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.12029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devotta K, Woodhall-Melnik J, Pedersen C, et al. Enriching qualitative research by engaging peer interviewers: a case study. Qual Res. 2016;16(6):661–680. doi:10.1177/1468794115626244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer J. The challenges of insider research in educational institutions: wielding a double-edged sword and resolving delicate dilemmas. Oxford Rev Educ. 2007;33:1. doi:10.1080/03054980601094651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne E, Brugha R, Clarke E, et al. Peer interviewing in medical education research: experiences and perceptions of student interviewers and interviewees. BMC Res Notes. 2015;8:513. doi:10.1186/s13104-015-1484-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harding R, Whitefield G, Stillwell N. Service users as peer research interviewers: why bother? In: Greener I, Holden C, Kilkey M, editors. Social Policy Review 22: Analysis and Debate in Social Policy. Bristol: Policy Press; 2010:317–335.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards PK, O’Mahoney J, Vincent S. Critical realism and interviewing subject. In: Edwards PK, O'Mahoney J, Vincent S, editors. Studying Organizations Using Critical Realism: A Practical Guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014:109–131.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkmann S, Kvale S. Part 1: conceptualizing the research interview. In: Brinkmann S, Kvale S, editors. InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. 3rd ed. London: Sage; 2015:25–123.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley M, Atkinson P. Oral accounts and the role of interviewing. In: Hammersley M, Atkinson P, editors. Ethnography. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge; 2003:97–120.
   Google Scholar
• Crotty M. The research process. In: Crotty M, editor. The Foundations of Social Research. Sage; 1998:1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt M, Chan L, Mehata A. Transitioning from clinical to qualitative research interviewing. Int J Qual Methods. 2011;10(3):191–201. doi:10.1177/160940691101000301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liamputtong Rice P, Ezzy D. In-depth interviews. In: Liamputtong Rice P, Ezzy D, editors. Qualitative Research Methods: A Health Focus. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999:51–70.
   Google Scholar
• British Medical Association. Medical training pathway. British Medical Association [Internet]. [ cited November 1, 2018]. Available from: https://www.bma.org.uk. Accessed November 1, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Gerada C. Why has medicine become such a miserable profession? [Internet]. [cited November 1, 2018]. Available from: https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2017/12/05/clare-gerada-why-has-medicine-become-such-a-miserable-profession/. Accessed November 1, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hamel C, Jenner LE. Prepared for practice? A national survey of UK foundation doctors and their supervisors. Med Teach. 2015;37(2):181–188. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2014.947929
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meredith J. Survey Reveals Crisis of Confidence in Medicine as a Future Career. London: Royal Medical Benevolent Fund the Doctors’ Charity; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbins J, McCoubrie R, Maher J, Wee B, Forbes K. Recognizing that it is part and parcel of what they do: teaching palliative care to medical students in the UK. Palliat Med. 2010;24(3):299–305. doi:10.1177/0269216309356029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Illing J, Morrow G, Kergon C, et al. How prepared are medical graduates to begin practice? A comparison of three diverse UK medical schools. Final report to GMC April 2008. Project Report. Newcastle University, Warwick University, Glasgow University. Available from: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/48953/. Accessed November 1, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Schwandt T. Judging interpreations. New Directions for Eval. 2007;114:11–25. doi:10.1002/ev.223
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M. Theory unmasked: the uses and guises of theory in qualitative research. Res Nurs Health. 1993;16:213–218. doi:10.1002/nur.4770160308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith J. Beyond the divide between cognition and discourse: using IPA in health psychology. Psychol Heal. 1996;11(2):261–271. doi:10.1080/08870449608400256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith J, Flowers P, Larkin M. Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Theory, Method and Research. London: Sage; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Bentz M, Shapiro J. Mindful Inquiry in Social Research. London: Sage Publications; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Reid AM, Brown JM, Smith JM, et al. Ethical dilemmas and reflexivity in qualitative research. Perspect Med Ed. 2018;7(2):69–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw R. Embedding reflexivity within experiential qualitative psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2010;7(3):233–243. doi:10.1080/14780880802699092
   Google Scholar
• Finlay L. The reflexive journey: mapping multiple routes. In: Finlay L, Gough B, editors. Reflexivity: A Practical Guide for Researchers in Health and Social Sciences. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 2003:3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Archer MS. Structure, Agency, and the Internal Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson S. The role of reflexivity in feminist psychology. Women’s Stud Int Forum. 1998;11:493–502. doi:10.1016/0277-5395(88)90024-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough B. Deconstructing reflexivity. In: Finlay L, Gough B, editors. Reflexivity: A Practical Guide for Researchers in Health and Social Sciences. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 2003:21–36.
   Google Scholar
• Austgard K. Doing it the Gadamerian way – using philosophical hermeneutics as a methodological approach in nursing science. Scand J Caring Sci. 2012;26(4):829–834. doi:10.1111/scs.2012.26.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang KH, Horrocks S. Is there a place for ontological hermeneutics in mental‐health nursing research? A review of a hermeneutic study. Int J Nurs Pract. 2008;14(5):383–390. doi:10.1111/j.1440-172X.2008.00702.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polit-O’Hara D, Beck CT. Essentials of Nursing Research: Appraising Evidence for Nursing Practice. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluer Health; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Clancy M. Is reflexivity the key to minimising problems of interpretation in phenomenological research? Nurse Res. 2013;20(6):12–16. doi:10.7748/nr2013.07.20.6.12.e1209
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elliott R, Fischer C, Rennie D. Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. Br J Clin Psychol. 1999;38:215–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlay L. Negotiating the swamp: the opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qual Res. 2002;2(2):209–230. doi:10.1177/146879410200200205
   Google Scholar
• Yardley L. Dilemmas in qualitative health research. Psychol Health. 2000;15(2):215–228. doi:10.1080/08870440008400302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lempp H, Seale C. The hidden curriculum in undergraduate medical education: qualitative study of medical students’ perceptions of teaching. BMJ. 2004;329(7469):770–773. doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7469.770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis A, Warren R, Neville F, Laidlaw A, Ozakinci G. Anxiety about anxiety in medical undergraduates. Clin Teach. 2012;9(5):330–333. doi:10.1111/j.1743-498X.2012.00569.x
   Google Scholar
• Ellis C. Autoethnographic projects: putting the self into research. In: Ellis C, editor. The Ethnographic I: A Methodological Novel about Autoethnography. Oxford: Altamira; 2004:86–111.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman D. Interview data. In: Silverman D, editor. Interpreting Qualitative Data. London: Sage; 1993:90–114.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall M, Murray S, Carduff E, et al. Use of multiperspective qualitative interviews to understand patients’ and carers’ beliefs, experiences and needs. BMJ. 2010;340:169–199. doi:10.1136/bmj.c293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin NK. Triangulation 2.0. J Mix Methods Res. 2012;6(2):80–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant K. More Canadian medical-school graduates than ever failed to secure residency [Internet]. The Globe and Mail. 2018 [cited November 1, 2018]. Available from: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-more-canadian-medical-school-graduates-than-ever-failed-to-secure/. Accessed November 1, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Medical Students’ Association. National Internship Crisis [Internet]. [ cited November 1, 2018]. Available from: https://www.amsa.org.au/node/861. Accessed November 1, 2018.
   Google Scholar