Advanced search
Publication Cover
Advances in Medical Education and Practice Volume 10, 2019 - Issue
Submit an article Journal homepage
108
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

The Quality Of Evidence In Preclinical Medical Education Literature: A Systematic Review

Marilyn Leif1 University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
,
Natali Semarad2 Creighton University in Omaha, Omaha, NE, USA
,
Vaishnavi Ganesan1 University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
,
Kevin Selting1 University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USAORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8501-4353
ORCID Icon,
Justin Burr1 University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USAORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0673-0349
ORCID Icon,
Austin Svec1 University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
,
Peggy Clements3 Wofford College, Spartanburg, SC, USA
&
Geoffrey Talmon4 Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USACorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4841-286X
ORCID Icon show all
Pages 925-933 | Published online: 01 Nov 2019

References

  • Taylor DC, Hamdy H. Adult learning theories: implications for learning and teaching in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 83. Med Teach. 2013;35(11):e1561–e1572. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2013.828153
  • Talmon G, Beck-Dallahan G. Mind the Gap: Generational Differences in Medical Education. North Syracuse, NY: Gegensatz Press; 2017.
  • Brown DR, Warren JB, Hyderi A, et al. Finding a path to entrustment in undergraduate medical education: a progress report from the AAMCCore entrustable professional activities for entering residency entrustment concept group. J Gen Intern Med. 2017;92(6):774–779. (epub ahead of print).
  • Beck M Innovation is sweeping through U.S. Medical Schools. Wall Street Journal. February 26, 2015. Available from: https://www.wsj.com/articles/innovation-is-sweeping-through-u-s-medical-schools-1424145650. Accessed July 7, 2017.
  • Shelton PG, Corral I, Kyle B. Advancements in undergraduate medical education: meeting the challenges of an evolving world of education, healthcare, and technology. Psychiatr Q. 2017;88(2):225–234. doi:10.1007/s11126-016-9471-x
  • Ruiz JG, Mintzer MJ, Leipzing R. The impact of E-learning in medical education. Acad Med. 2006;81(3):207–212. doi:10.1097/00001888-200603000-00002
  • Jones F, Passos-Neto CE, Braghiroli OFM. Simulation in medical education: brief history and methodology. Princ Pract Clin Res. 2015;1(2):56–63.
  • Chen FM, Baucher H, Burstin H. A call for outcomes research in medical education. Acad Med. 2004;79:955. doi:10.1097/00001888-200410000-00010
  • Prystowsky JB, Bordage G. An outcomes research perspective on medical education: the predominance of trainee assessment and satisfaction. Med Educ. 2001;35:334. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.01054.x
  • Sanner MA. Medical students’ attitude toward autopsy: how does experience with autopsies influence opinion? Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1995;119(9):851–858.
  • Verma SK. Teaching students the value of autopsy. Acad Med. 1999;74(8):855. doi:10.1097/00001888-199908000-00005
  • Burton JL. Teaching pathology to medical undergraduates. Curr Diag Pathol. 2005;11(5):308–316. doi:10.1016/j.cdip.2005.05.009
  • Reed DA, Cook DA, Beckman TJ, Levine RB, Kern DE, Wright SM. Association between funding and quality of published medical education research. JAMA. 2007;298(9):1002–1009. doi:10.1001/jama.298.9.1002
  • Kirkpatrick D. Revisiting Kirkpatrick’s four-level-model. Train Develop. 1996;1:54–57.
  • Hartling E, Spooner C, Tjosvold L, Oswald A. Problem based learning in preclinical medical education: 22 years of outcome research. Med Teach. 2010;35:28–35. doi:10.3109/01421590903200789
  • Smith R, Learman L. A plea for MESQRI: the medical education research study quality instrument. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(4):686–690. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002091
  • Windish DM, Reed DA, Boonyasai RT, Chakraborti C, Bass EB. Methodological rigor of quality improvement curricula for physician trainees: a systematic review and recommendations for change. Acad Med. 2009;84(12):1677–1692. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181bfa080
  • Sullivan GM. Getting off the “gold-standard”: randomized controlled trials and education research. J Grad Med Educ. 2011;3:285–289. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-11-00147.1
  • Torgerson CJ. Educational research and randomised trials. Med Educ. 2002;36(11):1002–1003. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01335.x
  • Norman G. RCT = results confounded and trivial: the perils of grand educational experiments. Med Educ. 2003;37:582–584. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01586.x
  • Gilman SC, Cullen RJ, Leist JC, Craft CA. Domains-based outcomes assessment of continuing medical education: the VA’s model. Acad Med. 2002;77:812. doi:10.1097/00001888-200208000-00010
  • Spencer A, Brosenitsch T, Levine AS, Kanter SL. Back to the basic sciences: an innovative approach to teaching senior medical students how best to integrate basic science and clinical medicine. Acad Med. 2008;83(7):662–669. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e318178356b
  • Pathology Competencies for Medical Education. Association of Pathology Chairs. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/page/apc/pcme. Accessed December 19, 2018.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.