Teaching Medical Students About Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): The Design And Development Of An E-Learning Resource

References

• Kopelman P. The future of UK medical education curriculum – what type of medical graduates do we need? Future Hosp J. 2014;1(1):41–46. doi:10.7861/futurehosp.14.011
   Google Scholar
• Velthuis F, Varpio L, Helmich E, Dekker H, Jaarsma A. Navigating the complexities of undergraduate medical curriculum change: change leaders’ perspectives. Acad Med. 2018;93(10):1503–1510. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000002165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill P, Kitney L, Kozan D, Lewis M. Online learning in paediatrics: a student‐led web‐based learning modality. Clin Teach. 2010;7(1):53–57. doi:10.1111/tct.2010.7.issue-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McGready J, Brookmeyer R. Evaluation of student outcomes in online vs. campus biostatistics education in a graduate school of public health. Prev Med. 2013;56:142–144. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.11.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May L, Acquaviva K, Dorfman A, Posey L. Medical student perceptions of self-paced, web-based electives: a descriptive study. Am J Distance Educ. 2009;23:212–223. doi:10.1080/08923640903332120
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons A, Fairweather P. Computer-based instruction. In: Tobias S, Fletcher J, editors. Training & Retraining: A Handbook for Business, Industry, Government, and the Military. New York: Macmillan Library Reference; 2000:410–442.
   Google Scholar
• Chumley-Jones HS, Dobbie A, Alford CL. Web-based learning: sound educational method or hype? A review of the evaluation literature. Acad Med. 2002;77(10 suppl):S86–S93. doi:10.1097/00001888-200210001-00028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warnecke E, Pearson S. Medical students’ perceptions of using e-learning to enhance the acquisition of consulting skills. Australas Med J. 2011;4:300–307. doi:10.4066/AMJ.2011.73
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz JG, Mintzer MJ, Leipzig RM. The impact of e-learning in medical education. Acad Med. 2008;81(3):207–212. doi:10.1097/00001888-200603000-00002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beale EG, Tarwater PM, Lee VH. A retrospective look at replacing face-to-face embryology instruction with online lectures in a human anatomy course. Anat Sci Educ. 2014;7:234–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer MG, Giesen F, Walter G. Child psychiatry curricula in undergraduate medical education. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008;47(2):139–147. doi:10.1097/chi.0b013e31815cd9e0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay J. Child psychiatry and the undergraduate curriculum. J Psychiatr Educ. 1983;7(2):126–137.
   Google Scholar
• Worrall-Davies AE. Teaching child and adolescent psychiatry to medical undergraduates. Adv Psychiatr Treat. 1998;4(3):172–176. doi:10.1192/apt.4.3.172
   Google Scholar
• Lempp T, Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M, Bachmann C. Child and adolescent psychiatry: which knowledge and skills do primary care physicians need to have? A survey in general practitioners and paediatricians. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016;25(4):443–451. doi:10.1007/s00787-015-0757-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon G, Tombs M. Teaching undergraduate medical students Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (CAP): a Delphi study on curriculum content. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):315. doi:10.1186/s12909-018-1427-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dick W, Carey L, Carey JO. The Systematic Design of Instruction. 6th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Allen WC. Overview and evolution of the ADDIE training system. Adv Dev Hum Resour. 2006;8(4):430–441. doi:10.1177/1523422306292942
   Google Scholar
• Overbaugh RC. Research-based guidelines for computer-based instruction development. J Res Comput Educ. 1994;27(1):29–47. doi:10.1080/08886504.1994.10782114
   Google Scholar
• Sandars J. E-learning. In: Walsh K, editor. Oxford Textbook of Medical Education. Oxford, UK: Oxford; 2013:174–175.
   Google Scholar
• Beynon D. Designing Interactive Systems. 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Molenda M, Pershing JA, Reigeluth CM. Designing instructional systems. In: Craig R, editor. The ASTD Training and Development Handbook: A Guide to Human Resource Development. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1996:266–293.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs J. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Buckingham: Society for Research in Higher Education and Open University Press; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Beetham H. An approach to learning activity design. In: Beetham H, Sharpe R, editors. Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age. Abingdon: Routledge; 2007:26–38.
   Google Scholar
• JISC. Effective practice in a digital age: a guide to technology enhanced learning and teaching. 2009. Available from: https://library.educause.edu/resources/2009/6/effective-practice-in-a-digital-age-a-guide-to-technologyenhanced-learning-and-teaching. Accessed June 11, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Mayes T, de Freitas S. Learning and e-learning: the role of theory. In: Beetham H, Sharpe R, editors. Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age. Abingdon: Routledge; 2007:13–25.
   Google Scholar
• Gagné R. The Conditions of Learning. 4th ed. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart Winst; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Gagné RM, Wager WW, Golas KC, Keller JM, Russell JD. Principles of Instructional Design. 5th ed. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadworth; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Sandars J, Lafferty N. Twelve tips on usability testing to develop effective e-learning in medical education. Med Teach. 2010;32(12):956–960. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2010.507709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989;13:319–340. doi:10.2307/249008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knowles M. Self-Directed Learning: A Guide for Learners and Teachers. New York: Assoc. Press; 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Association of American Medical Colleges. Effective use of educational technology in medical education. Colloquium on Educational Technology: Recommendations and Guidelines for Medical Educators; 2007. Available from: https://members.aamc.org/eweb/upload/Effective%20Use%20of%20Educational.pdf. Accessed June 11, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer RE. Applying the science of learning: evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction. Am Psychol. 2008;63(8):760–769. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.63.8.760
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Issa N, Schuller M, Santacaterina S, et al. Applying multimedia design principles enhances learning in medical education. Med Educ. 2011;45(8):818–826. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.03988.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Issa N, Mayer RE, Schuller M, Wang E, Shapiro MB, DaRosa DA. Teaching for understanding in medical classrooms using multimedia design principles. Med Educ. 2013;47(4):388–396. doi:10.1111/medu.2013.47.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tapscott D. Growing up Digital: How the Net Generation Is Changing Your World. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom BS, Engelhart MD, Furst EJ, Hill WH, Krathwohl DR. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Company; 1956.
   Google Scholar
• Xerte Online Toolkits [homepage on the internet]. Nottingham: Nottingham University. Available from: https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/xerte/toolkits.aspx. Accessed May 28, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Hill J, Hannafin M. Teaching and learning in digital environments. The resurgence of resource- based learning. Edu Technol Res Dev. 2001;49(3):37–52. doi:10.1007/BF02504914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunwald T, Corsbie-Massay C. Guidelines for cognitively efficient multimedia learning tools: educational strategies, cognitive load, and interface design. Acad Med. 2006;81(3):213–223. doi:10.1097/00001888-200603000-00003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riesbeck CK, Schank RC. Inside Case-Based Reasoning. Hillsdale, NJ, USA: L. Erlbaum Associates Inc.; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Maier P, Warren A. Integrating Technology in Learning and Teaching: A Practical Guide for Educators. London: Kogan Page; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Ausubel D. The Psychology of Meaningful Verbal Learning. New York: Grune & Stratton; 1963.
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen DH, Hannum WH. Research-based principles for designing computer software. Instructional Technol. 1987;27(12):7–14.
   Google Scholar
• Schimmel BJ. Providing meaningful feedback in courseware. In: Jonassen D, editor. Instructional Designs for Microcomputer Software. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988:183–196.
   Google Scholar
• Keller JM. Motivational design of instruction. In: Reigeluth CM, editor. Instructional Design Theories and Instruction: An Overview of Their Current Status. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Zaharias P, Poylymenakou A. Developing a usability evaluation method for e-learning applications: beyond functional usability. Intl J Hum Comput Int. 2009;25(1):75–98. doi:10.1080/10447310802546716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen J. Usability Engineering. San Francisco: Elsevier; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Mazur A, Brown B, Jacobsen M. Conception d’apprentissage à l’aide de l’instruction en classe inversée [Learning designs using flipped classroom instruction]. Can J Learn Technol Rev Can l’apprentissage la Technol. 2015;41(2):1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker B. The flipped classroom: online instruction at home frees class time for learning. Educ Next. 2012;12(1):82–84.
   Google Scholar
• Amini R, Laughlin BS, Smith KW, Siwik VP, Adamas-Rappaport WJ, Fantry GT. “Flipped classroom” for academic and career advising: an innovative technique for medical student advising. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2018;9:371. doi:10.2147/AMEP.S162504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman S, Eddy SL, McDonough M, et al. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014;111(23):8410–8415. doi:10.1073/pnas.1319030111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick DL, Kirkpatrick JD. Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. 3rd ed. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers; 2006.
   Google Scholar