Perceptions On Reciprocal Peer Teaching Among Medical Students As Learners And As Tutors

References

• Leung KC. Preliminary empirical model of crucial determinants of best practice for peer tutoring on academic achievement. J Educ Psychol. 2015;107(2):558–579. doi:10.1037/a0037698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees EL, Quinn PJ, Davies B, Fotheringham V. How does peer teaching compare to faculty teaching? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Teach. 2016;38(8):829–837. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2015.1112888
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung KC. An updated meta-analysis on the effect of peer tutoring on tutors’ achievement. Sch Psychol Int. 2019;40(2):200–214. doi:10.1177/0143034318808832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalid H, Shahid S, Punjabi N, Sahdev N. An integrated 2-year clinical skills peer tutoring scheme in a UK-based medical school: perceptions of tutees and peer tutors. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2018;9:423–432. doi:10.2147/AMEP.S159502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ten Cate O, Durning S. Peer teaching in medical education: twelve reasons to move from theory to practice. Med Teach. 2007;29(6):591–599. doi:10.1080/01421590701606799
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess A, McGregor D. Peer teacher training for health professional students: a systematic review of formal programs. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):263. doi:10.1186/s12909-018-1356-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• General Medical Council. Developing teachers and trainers in undergraduate medical education. May 2011. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/revalidation/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2015/04/developing-teachers-web.pdf. Accessed December 1, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• World Federation for Medical Education. Basic Medical Education WfME Global Standards for Quality Improvement. Published 2015. Available from: https://wfme.org/publications/wfme-global-standards-for-quality-improvement-bme/. Accessed February 15, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Song Y, Loewenstein G, Shi Y. Heterogeneous effects of peer tutoring: evidence from rural Chinese middle schools. Res Econ. 2018;72(1):33–48. doi:10.1016/j.rie.2017.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lelis C. Participation ahead: perceptions of masters degree students on reciprocal peer learning activities. J Learn Des. 2017;10(2):14–24. doi:10.5204/jld.v10i2.286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentley BS, Hill RV. Objective and subjective assessment of reciprocal peer teaching in medical gross anatomy laboratory. Anat Sci Educ. 2009;2(4):143–149. doi:10.1002/ase.96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaini RG, Bin Abdulrahman KA, Al-Khotani AA, Al-Hayani AMA, Al-Alwan IA, Jastaniah SD. Saudi meds: a competence specification for Saudi medical graduates. Med Teach. 2011;33(7):582–584. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2011.578180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bin Abdulrahman KA, Saleh F. Steps towards establishing a new medical college in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: an insight into medical education in the Kingdom. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15(1):85. doi:10.1186/s12909-015-0366-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gazula S, McKenna L, Cooper S, Paliadelis P. A systematic review of reciprocal peer tutoring within tertiary health profession educational programs. Health Prof Educ. 2017;3(2):64–78. doi:10.1016/j.hpe.2016.12.001
   Google Scholar
• Khaw C, Raw L. The outcomes and acceptability of near-peer teaching among medical students in clinical skills. Int J Med Educ. 2016;7:189–195. doi:10.5116/ijme.5749.7b8b
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess A, Dornan T, Clarke AJ, Menezes A, Mellis C. Peer tutoring in a medical school: perceptions of tutors and tutees. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16:1. doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0589-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tai J, Molloy E, Haines T, Canny B. Same-level peer-assisted learning in medical clinical placements: a narrative systematic review. Med Educ. 2016;50(4):469–484. doi:10.1111/medu.12898
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benè KL, Bergus G. When learners become teachers: a review of peer teaching in medical student education. Fam Med. 2014;46(10):783–787.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez S, Nikendei C, Schultz J-H. Development of a didactical training concept for peer tutors in gross anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2017;10(5):495–502. doi:10.1002/ase.1691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao YP (Amy), Brouns F, Bruggen JV, Sloep PB. Effects of training peer tutors in content knowledge versus tutoring skills on giving feedback to help tutees’ complex tasks. Educ Stud. 2015;41(5):499–512. doi:10.1080/03055698.2015.1062079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiozawa T, Hirt B, Celebi N, Werner A, Weyrich P, Lammerding-Koeppel M. Does a combined technical and didactical training program improve the acceptance of student tutors in the dissection course? A prospective controlled randomized study. Ann Anat. 2010;192(6):361–365. doi:10.1016/j.aanat.2010.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbot S, Graf AJ, Chatfield B. Listening to undergraduate peer tutors: roles, relationships, and challenges. Int J Teach Lear Higher Educ. 2018;30(2):245–261.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Mously N, Salem R, AlHamdan N. The impact of gender and english language on the academic performance of students: an experience from new Saudi medical school. J Contemp Med Educ. 2013;1(3):170. doi:10.5455/jcme.20130226121358
   Google Scholar
• Akudo AH, Eberechukwu AS. Gender differences on medical students’ perception of peer tutoring learning strategy on clinical skills training at macarthur clinical skills laboratory (mcsl). Br J Educ. 2018;6(5):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Langan MA, Wheater PC, Shaw EM, et al. Peer assessment of oral presentations: effects of student gender, University affiliation and participation in the development of assessment criteria. Assess Eval High Educ. 2005;30(1):21–34. doi:10.1080/0260293042003243878
   Google Scholar
• Tai J, Canny B, Molloy E, Haines T. Gender matters: students’ perceptions of peer learning in clinical education. Focus Health Prof Educ. 2017;18(1):3–15. doi:10.11157/fohpe.v18i1.203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hojat M, Glaser K, Xu G, Veloski JJ, Christian EB. Gender comparisons of medical students’ psychosocial profiles. Med Educ. 1999;33(5):342–349. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00331.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson DAM, Biederman LA, Andersen D, Ditonto TM, Roe K, Wilson RK. Mitigating gender bias in student evaluations of teaching. PLoS One. 2019;14(5):e0216241. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0216241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garland R. The mid-point on a rating scale: is it desirable. Mark Bull. 1991;2(1):66–70.
   Google Scholar