347
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
PERSPECTIVES

Relationship Between Cognitive Load Theory, Intrinsic Motivation and Emotions in Healthcare Professions Education: A Perspective on the Missing Link

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 57-62 | Received 27 Sep 2023, Accepted 08 Jan 2024, Published online: 18 Jan 2024

References

  • Immordino-Yang MH, We Feel DA. Therefore we learn: the relevance of affective and social neuroscience to education. Mind Brain Educ. 2007;1(1):3–10.
  • Tohidi H, Jabbari MM. The effects of motivation in education. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2012;31:820–824. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.148
  • Ajjawi R, Olson RE, McNaughton N. Emotion as reflexive practice: a new discourse for feedback practice and research. Med Educ. 2022;56(5):480–488. doi:10.1111/medu.14700
  • Duffy MC, Lajoie SP, Pekrun R, Lachapelle K. Emotions in medical education: examining the validity of the Medical Emotion Scale (MES) across authentic medical learning environments. Learn Instr. 2020;70:101150. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.07.001
  • Dworkis DA, Jain A, Wolfe M, Sanko S, Arora S. Cognitive load during training for out‐of‐department emergency responses. AEM Educ Train. 2022;6(3):e10742. doi:10.1002/aet2.10742
  • Greer SK, Jeffe DB, Manga A, Murray DJ, Emke AR. Cognitive load assessment scales in simulation: validity evidence for a novel measure of cognitive load types. Simul Healthc J Soc Simul Healthc. 2023;18(3):172–180. doi:10.1097/SIH.0000000000000665
  • Huckaby LV, Cyr AR, Handzel RM, et al. Postprocedural cognitive load measurement with immediate feedback to guide curriculum development. Ann Thorac Surg. 2022;113(4):1370–1377. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.05.086
  • Mills LM, Boscardin C, Joyce EA, ten Cate O, O’Sullivan PS. Emotion in remediation: a scoping review of the medical education literature. Med Educ. 2021;55(12):1350–1362. doi:10.1111/medu.14605
  • Sashitzky I. The Science of Education; 2019.
  • What is Education Sciences ?; 2022. Available from: https://advise.education.uci.edu/what-is-education-sciences.html. Accessed January 16, 2024.
  • Cognitive Load Theory (John Sweller); 2022. Available from: https://www.instructionaldesign.org/theories/cognitive-load/. Accessed January 16, 2024.
  • Sweller J CHAPTER TWO - Cognitive Load Theory. In: Psychology of learning and motivation. Academic Press; 2011:37–76. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123876911000028. Accessed January 16, 2024.
  • Miller GA. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev. 1956;63(2):81–97. doi:10.1037/h0043158
  • Kirschner PA. Cognitive load theory: implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning. Learn Instr. 2002;12(1):1–10. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00014-7
  • Van Merriã«nboer JJG, Sweller J. Cognitive load theory in health professional education: design principles and strategies: cognitive load theory. Med Educ. 2010;44(1):85–93. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03498.x
  • Cognitive Load Theory; 2022. Available from: https://www.mindtools.com/aqxwcpa/cognitive-load-theory. Accessed January 16, 2024.
  • Hadie SNH, Yusoff MSB. Assessing the validity of the cognitive load scale in a problem-based learning setting. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2016;11(3):194–202.
  • Leppink J, Paas F, van GT, van der VCPM, van MJJG. Effects of pairs of problems and examples on task performance and different types of cognitive load. Learn Instr. 2014;30:32–42. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.12.001
  • Bergman EM, de Bruin ABH, Vorstenbosch MATM, et al. Effects of learning content in context on knowledge acquisition and recall: a pretest-posttest control group design. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15(1):133. doi:10.1186/s12909-015-0416-0
  • Klepsch M, Schmitz F, Seufert T. Development and validation of two instruments measuring intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1997. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01997
  • Andersen MS, Makransky G. The validation and further development of a multidimensional cognitive load scale for virtual environments. J Comput Assist Learn. 2021;37(1):183–196. doi:10.1111/jcal.12478
  • Cook DA, Hamstra SJ, Brydges R, et al. Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based education: systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Teach. 2013;35(1):e867–98. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2012.714886
  • Fraser KL, Ayres P, Sweller J. Cognitive load theory for the design of medical simulations. Simul Healthc J Soc Simul Healthc. 2015;10(5):295–307.
  • Meguerdichian M, Walker K, Bajaj K. Working memory is limited: improving knowledge transfer by optimising simulation through cognitive load theory. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2016;2(4):131–138. doi:10.1136/bmjstel-2015-000098
  • Adams T. The application of cognitive load theory to dual-task simulation training. Simul Healthc J Soc Simul Healthc. 2016;11(1):66–67. doi:10.1097/SIH.0000000000000143
  • Lumowa K, Lui KL, Daher N, Baek C, Tan LD, Alismail A. Evaluation of tracheostomy suctioning procedure among nursing and respiratory therapy students: wearable manikin vs. standard manikin. Front Med. 2023;2023:10.
  • Rossettini G, Rondoni A, Palese A, et al. Effective teaching of manual skills to physiotherapy students: a randomised clinical trial. Med Educ. 2017;51(8):826–838. doi:10.1111/medu.13347
  • Brown JS, Collins A, Duguid P. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educ Res. 1989;18(1):32–42. doi:10.2307/1176008
  • Fraser K, Ma I, Teteris E, Baxter H, Wright B, McLaughlin K. Emotion, cognitive load and learning outcomes during simulation training: emotion and cognitive load during simulation. Med Educ. 2012;46(11):1055–1062. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04355.x
  • Rudolph JW, Raemer DB, Simon R. Establishing a safe container for learning in simulation: the role of the presimulation briefing. Simul Healthc J Soc Simul Healthc. 2014;9(6):339–349. doi:10.1097/SIH.0000000000000047
  • Feldon DF, Callan G, Juth S, Jeong S. Cognitive load as motivational cost. Educ Psychol Rev. 2019;31(2):319–337. doi:10.1007/s10648-019-09464-6
  • Guay F, Vallerand RJ, Blanchard C. No title found. Motiv Emot. 2000;24(3):175–213. doi:10.1023/A:1005614228250
  • Escher C, Creutzfeldt J, Meurling L, Hedman L, Kjellin A, Felländer-Tsai L. Medical students’ situational motivation to participate in simulation based team training is predicted by attitudes to patient safety. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1):37. doi:10.1186/s12909-017-0876-5
  • Moll-Khosrawi P, Cronje JS, Zöllner C, Kubitz JC, Schulte-Uentrop L. Understanding how the motivational dimension of learning is influenced by clinical teaching in medical education: a prospective cohort study. Ann Med Surg. 2021;2021:65.
  • Hadie SNH, Tan VPS, Omar N, Nik Mohd Alwi NA, Lim HL, Ku Marsilla KI. COVID-19 disruptions in health professional education: use of cognitive load theory on students’ comprehension, cognitive load, engagement, and motivation. Front Med. 2021;8:739238. doi:10.3389/fmed.2021.739238
  • Plass JL, Kalyuga S. Four ways of considering emotion in cognitive load theory. Educ Psychol Rev. 2019;31(2):339–359. doi:10.1007/s10648-019-09473-5
  • Edwards MS, Moore P, Champion JC, Edwards EJ. Effects of trait anxiety and situational stress on attentional shifting are buffered by working memory capacity. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2015;28(1):1–16. doi:10.1080/10615806.2014.911846
  • Keitel A, Ringleb M, Schwartges I, et al. Endocrine and psychological stress responses in a simulated emergency situation. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2011;36(1):98–108. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.06.011
  • Harvey A, Nathens AB, Bandiera G, LeBlanc VR. Threat and challenge: cognitive appraisal and stress responses in simulated trauma resuscitations: appraisal and stress in simulated trauma resuscitations. Med Educ. 2010;44(6):587–594. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03634.x
  • Lyndon MP, Strom JM, Hussain M, et al. The relationship between academic assessment and psychological distress among medical students: a systematic review. Perspect Med Educ. 2014;3(6):405–418. doi:10.1007/S40037-014-0148-6
  • Stein C. The effect of clinical simulation assessment on stress and anxiety measures in emergency care students. Afr J Emerg Med. 2020;10(1):35–39. doi:10.1016/j.afjem.2019.12.001
  • Crawford JR, Henry JD. The positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS): construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol. 2004;43(3):245–265. doi:10.1348/0144665031752934
  • Toohey S, Wray A, Hunter J, et al. Comparing the psychological effects of manikin-based and augmented reality–based simulation training: within-subjects crossover study. JMIR Med Educ. 2022;8(3):e36447. doi:10.2196/36447
  • Rama A, Neiman N, Burdsall K, et al. Virtual immersion into a poorly-managed medical crisis worsens subsequent performance: a randomized, controlled trial. Clin Simul Nurs. 2022;70:47–55. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2022.06.008
  • Bourgeon L, Bensalah M, Vacher A, Ardouin JC, Debien B. Role of emotional competence in residents’ simulated emergency care performance: a mixed-methods study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25(5):364–371. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004032
  • Volonte M, Babu SV, Chaturvedi H, et al. Effects of virtual human appearance fidelity on emotion contagion in affective inter-personal simulations. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2016;22(4):1326–1335. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2016.2518158
  • Rogers T, Andler C, O’Brien B, van Schaik S. Self-reported emotions in simulation-based learning: active participants vs. Observers Simul Healthc J Soc Simul Healthc. 2019;14(3):140–145.
  • Ślósarz L, Jurczyk-Romanowska E, Rosińczuk J, Kazimierska-Zając M. Virtual reality as a teaching resource which reinforces emotions in the teaching process. SAGE Open. 2022;12(3):215824402211180. doi:10.1177/21582440221118083
  • Fraser K, Huffman J, Ma I, et al. The emotional and cognitive impact of unexpected simulated patient death: a randomized controlled trial. Chest. 2014;145(5):958–963. doi:10.1378/chest.13-0987
  • Fredericks S, ElSayed M, Hammad M, et al. Anxiety is associated with extraneous cognitive load during teaching using high-fidelity clinical simulation. Med Educ Online. 2021;26(1):1994691. doi:10.1080/10872981.2021.1994691