Description of Medical Students’ Behavioral, Cognitive, and Psychological Engagement with Faculty Online Teaching Styles

References

• Harden RM, Laidlaw JM. Essential Skills for a Medical Teacher; An introduction to teaching and learning in medicine; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor DCM, Hamdy H Adult learning theories: implications for learning and teaching in medical education: AMEE guide no. 83. med teach; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Bond M, Bedenlier S. Facilitating student engagement through educational technology: towards a conceptual framework. J Interactive Media Educ. 2019;2019:1.
   Google Scholar
• Mian A, Khan S. Medical education during pandemics: a UK perspective. BMC Med. 2020;18(1):18. doi:10.1186/s12916-019-1484-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie X, Siau K, Nah FFH COVID-19. pandemic–online education in the new normal and the next normal. J Inf Technol Case Appl Res. 2020;22:175–187.
   Google Scholar
• Eskici M, Çetinkaya S. Analysis of teaching styles of teachers regarding various variables. Bartin Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2019;8(1):138–160. doi:10.14686/buefad.426636
   Google Scholar
• Brown G, Manogue M, Association for Medical Education in Europe. Refreshing lecturing: a guide for lecturers. AMEE; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Deschaine ME, Whale DE. Increasing Student Engagement in Online Educational Leadership Courses. J Educators Online. 2017;14(1).
   Google Scholar
• Kahu ER. Framing student engagement in higher education. Stud High Educ. 2013;38:758–773. doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.598505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson CR, Andrade JP, Barbosa J, et al. The relationship between learner engagement and teaching effectiveness: a novel assessment of student engagement in continuing medical education. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(1):20. doi:10.1186/s12909-019-1907-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klasen JM, Meienberg A, Bogie BJM. Medical student engagement during COVID-19: lessons learned and areas for improvement. Med Educ. 2021;55(1):115–118. doi:10.1111/medu.14405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zayapragassarazan Z,COVID-19: strategies for online engagement of remote learners; 2020. doi:10.7490/f1000research.1117835.1.
   Google Scholar
• Fredricks JA, Reschly AL, Christenson SL. Handbook of student engagement interventions: Working with disengaged students. Elsevier Academic Press; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Abello A-T, Alonso Tapia J, Panadero Calderón E; Panadero. Development and validation of the teaching styles inventory for higher education (TSIHE). Anales de Psicologia. 2020;36(1):143–154. doi:10.6018/analesps.370661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Song HD, Hong AJ. Exploring factors, and indicators for measuring students’ sustainable engagement in e-learning. Sustainability. 2019;24:11.
   Google Scholar
• Chakraborty M. Learner engagement strategies in online class environment: a dissertation; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Ostapenko A, McPeck S, Liechty S, Has KD. COVID-19 hurt resident education? A network-wide resident survey on education and experience during the pandemic. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2020;7:238212052095969. doi:10.1177/2382120520959695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu B, Chen NS, Chen G. Effects of teacher role on student engagement in WeChat-Based online discussion learning. Comput Educ. 2020;57:157.
   Google Scholar
• Choi B, Andrade JP, Barbosa J, et al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on final year medical students in the United Kingdom: a national survey. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(1):20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Yateem N, Dias JM, Subu MA, et al. Reflections on the transition to online teaching for health science education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Med Educ. 2021;12:154–159. doi:10.5116/ijme.610c.1580
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcha RJ. Effectiveness of virtual medical teaching during the COVID-19 crisis: systematic review. JMIR Med Educ. 2020;567:6.
   Google Scholar
• Payne L. Student engagement: three models for its investigation. J Further High Edu. 2019;43(5):641–657. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2017.1391186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zepke N, Leach L, Butler P. Student engagement: students and teachers perceptions. High Educ Res Dev. 2014;33(2):386–398. doi:10.1080/07294360.2013.832160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuh GD, Cruce TM, Shoup R, Kinzie J, Gonyea RM. Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence. J Higher Educ. 2008;79:540–563. doi:10.1080/00221546.2008.11772116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pike GR, Kuh GD. A typology of student engagement for American colleges and universities. Res High Educ. 2005;185–209. doi:10.1007/s11162-004-1599-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley C, Song E, Lance S. Recommendations for medical students completing virtual rotations: lessons learned from our experience during the COVID-19 Pandemic. MedEdPublish. 2021;2021:10.
   Google Scholar
• Hamdy H, Sreedharan J, Rotgans JI, et al. Virtual Clinical Encounter Examination (VICEE): a novel approach for assessing medical students’ non-psychomotor clinical competency. Med Teach. 2021;43(10):1203–1209. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2021.1935828
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoy L, Roberts C, Hawthorne K, et al. Evaluating medical student engagement during virtual patient simulations: a sequential, mixed methods study. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16:16. doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0535-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dedeilia A, Sotiropoulos MG, Hanrahan JG, et al. Medical and surgical education challenges and innovations in the COVID-19 era: a systematic review. In Vivo. 2020;34(3 suppl):1603–1611. doi:10.21873/invivo.11950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilburg R, Patel N, Ambruso S, et al. Medical education during the coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic: learning from a distance. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2020;27(5):412–417. doi:10.1053/j.ackd.2020.05.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dash NR, Andrade JP, Barbosa J, et al. Preferred teaching styles of medical faculty: an international multi-center study. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(1):20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta N, End C, Kwan JC, Bernstein S, Law M. Adapting medical education during crisis: student–Faculty partnerships as an enabler of success. Med Teach. 2020;44(6):688–689. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2020.1811215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly PA, Haidet P, Schneider V, et al. A comparison of in-class learner engagement across lecture, problem-based learning, and team learning using the STROBE classroom observation tool. Teach Learn Med. 2005;17(2):112–118. doi:10.1207/s15328015tlm1702_4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinatra GM, Heddy BC, Lombardi D. The challenges of defining and measuring student engagement in science. Educ Psychol. 2015;50(1):1–13. doi:10.1080/00461520.2014.1002924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll M, Lindsey S, Chaparro M, Winslow B. An applied model of learner engagement and strategies for increasing learner engagement in the modern educational environment. Interactive Learning Environ. 2021;29(5):757–771. doi:10.1080/10494820.2019.1636083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loyens SMM, Magda J, Rikers RMJP. Self-directed learning in problem-based learning and its relationships with self-regulated learning. Educ Psychol Rev. 2008;20(4):411–427. doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9082-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commissiong MA. Student Engagement, Self-Regulation, Satisfaction, and Success in Online Learning Environments [dissertation]. Walden University; 2020. Available from: ScholarWorks, Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=9794&context=dissertations. Accessed 16 February, 2024.
   Google Scholar
• Wu H, Li S, Zheng J, Guo J. Medical students’ motivation and academic performance: the mediating roles of self-efficacy and learning engagement. Med Educ Online. 2020;25:1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu TKF. Applying the self-determination theory (SDT) to explain student engagement in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Res Technol Educ. 2021.2021:1.
   Google Scholar
• Motivation in the classroom: reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Li F, Qi J, Wang G, Wang X. Traditional classroom VS e-learning in higher education: difference between students’ behavioral engagement. Int J Emerging Technol Learn. 2014;9(2):48–51. doi:10.3991/ijet.v9i2.3268
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy G. What is student engagement in online learning and how do I know when it is there?; 2020. https://melbourne-cshe.unimelb.edu.au/data/assets/pdf_file/0004/3362125/student-engagement-online-learning_final.pdf. Accessed 16 February, 2024.
   Google Scholar
• Alpert JB, Young MG, Lala S, McGuinness G. Medical student engagement and educational value of a remote clinical radiology learning environment: creation of virtual read-out sessions in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Acad Radiol. 2021;28(1):112–118. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2020.09.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nedaa Waleed Izzat Zohud Supervisors Abdul Kareem Igbaria Fayez Aqel B. Teaching strategies and their role on students’ engagement in learning English; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan RM, Deci EL Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being self-determination theory; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Shahrvini BB, Coffey C, MacDonald BB, Lander SL. Pre-clinical remote undergraduate medical education during the covid-19 pandemic: a survey study. Res Square. 2020. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-33870/v1
   Google Scholar