Memes Adoption in Basic Medical Science Education as a Successful Learning Model: A Mixed Method Quasi-Experimental Study

References

• Engels F. Pharmacology education: reflections and challenges. Eur J Pharmacol. 2018;833(May):392–395. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2018.06.032
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flexner ABulletin of the World Health Organization. 2002; 80 (7):4.
   Google Scholar
• Park JH, Han WS, Kim J, Lee H. Experiences of pathology course among hospital management graduates. Healthcare. 2021;9(3):1–13. doi:10.3390/healthcare9030347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopel J, Brower G, Culberson JW. Teaching methods fostering enjoyment and creativity in medical education. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2021;11(6):821–824. doi:10.1080/20009666.2021.1979739
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krähenbühl-Melcher A, Schlienger R, Lampert M, Haschke M, Drewe J, Krähenbühl S. Drug-related problems in hospitals. Drug Saf. 2007;30(5):379–407. doi:10.2165/00002018-200730050-00003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nooney L, Portwood-Stacer L. One does not simply: an introduction to the special issue on internet memes. J Visual Cult. 2014;13(3):248–252. doi:10.1177/1470412914551351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawkins R. The Extended Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Underwood SM, Kararo AT. Using memes in the classroom as a final exam review activity. J Chem Educ. 2020;97(5):1381–1386. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayali NK, Altuntaş A. Using Memes in the Language Classroom. Shanlax Interns J Educ. 2021;9(3):155–160. doi:10.34293/education.v9i3.3908
   Google Scholar
• Subbiramaniyan V, Apte C, Mohammed CA. A meme-based approach for enhancing student engagement and learning in renal physiology. Adv Physiol Educ. 2021;46(1):27–29. doi:10.1152/ADVAN.00092.2021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn L, Corrigan J, Donaldson M. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, D.C: NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS; 2000. doi:10.17226/9728
   Google Scholar
• Elkhamisy F, Sharif A. Project-based learning with memes as an innovative competency-boosting tool: a phenomenological interpretive study. Interactive Learning Environ. 2022. 1:1–18.
   Google Scholar
• D COM. Study plan - college of medicine. Published 2023. Accessed February 14, 2023. https://dau.edu.sa/medicine/en/study-plan-2/.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger RA. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. Sage publications; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson J Likert Scale. In: Michalos AC, ed. Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer Netherlands; 2014:3620–3621. 10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_1654
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Research Designs: quantitative, Qualitative, Neuropsychological, and Biological. In: Cooper H, Camic PM, Long DL, Panter AT, Rindskopf DSK, editors. Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology. Ameri Psychol Assoc. psycnet.apa.org; 2012:701.
   Google Scholar
• Atwa H, Shehata MH, Al-Ansari A, et al. Online, face-to-face, or blended learning? Faculty and medical students’ perception during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-method study. Res Sq. 2021;NA(NA):1–19. doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.791352
   Google Scholar
• Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2):105–112. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frambach JM, van der Vleuten CPM, Durning SJ. AM last page: quality criteria in qualitative and quantitative research. Acad Med. 2013;88(4):552. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828abf7f
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Syed M, Nelson SC. Guidelines for Establishing Reliability When Coding Narrative Data. Emerging Adulthood. 2015;3(6):375–387. doi:10.1177/2167696815587648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative Data Analysis. An Expanded Sourcebook ed. sage; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles MS. From pedagogy to andragogy. Religious Education. 1980;42–49.
   Google Scholar
• Parekh U, Gupta S. LIVE FM (lecture improvised with video elements in forensic medicine): does a video worth a thousand pictures? A comparative study in medical education*. J Vis Commun Med. 2021;44(2):45–51. doi:10.1080/17453054.2021.1901057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennett DC. Memes and the exploitation of imagination. J Aesth Art Criticism. 1990;48(2):127–135. doi:10.1111/1540_6245.jaac48.2.0127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wurdinger S, Rudolph J. Teaching practices that improve student learning: five experiential approaches. J Teach. 2009;6(1). doi:10.22329/jtl.v6i1.505
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad S. Meme as a tool of social and political commentary: discourse analysis of meme in Pakistani social media. Pakistan J Human Social Sci Res. 2022;55(2):1–11. doi:10.37605/pjhssr.v5i2.321
   Google Scholar
• Iloh C. Do it for the culture: the case for memes in qualitative research. Int J Qual Methods. 2021;20:1–10. doi:10.1177/16094069211025896
   Google Scholar
• Brown JD. What do you meme, professor? an experiment using “memes” in pharmacy education. Pharmacy. 2020;8(4):202. doi:10.3390/pharmacy8040202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowder J, Song YK. Memes in medical education. Med Anthropol Theory. 2019;6(2):102–119. doi:10.17157/mat.6.2.714
   Google Scholar
• Shifman L. Memes in a digital world: reconciling with a conceptual troublemaker. J Comput-Mediated Commun. 2013;18(3):362–377. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsden P Memetics and Social Contagion: Two Sides of the Same Coin.; 2008. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Paul-Marsden-5/publication/279556688_Memetics_and_Social_Contagion_Two_Sides_of_the_Same_Coin/links/5abbc28a45851584fa6d9b29/Memetics-and-Social-Contagion-Two-Sides-of-The-Same-Coin.pdf#page=1361.Accessed May 25 2024.
   Google Scholar
• Budd JW The eye sees what the mind knows. The conceptual foundations of invisible work. Invisible labor: Hidden work in the contemporary world. Published online 2016:28–46.
   Google Scholar
• Literat I, van den Berg S. Buy memes low, sell memes high: vernacular criticism and collective negotiations of value on reddit’s memeeconomy. Inf Commun Soc. 2019;22(2):232–249. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2017.1366540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobel M, Lankshear C. Online memes, affinities, and cultural production. In: A new literacies sampler.Lankshear C, Knobel M, Bigum C, Peters M. New York: Die Deutsche Bibliothek. 2007;29:199–227.
   Google Scholar
• Jarodzka H, Boshuizen HPA, Kirschner PA Cognitive skills in medicine. Catheter-based cardiovascular interventions: A knowledge-based approach. Published online 2013:69–86.
   Google Scholar