Economic analysis of the breast cancer screening program used by the UK NHS: should the program be maintained?

Robert Morton1 Imperial College Business School, Imperial College London, London;2 Department of Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen

Meelad Sayma1 Imperial College Business School, Imperial College London, London;3 Knowledge Spa, Peninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry, TruroCorrespondence[email protected]

Manraj Singh Sura1 Imperial College Business School, Imperial College London, London;4 Department of Medicine, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

Pages 217-225 | Published online: 24 Mar 2017

Cite this article
CrossMark

Full Article
Figures & data
References
Citations
Metrics
Licensing
Reprints & Permissions
View PDF PDF

References

HallPSHamiltonPHulmeCTCosts of cancer care for use in economic evaluation: a UK analysis of patient-level routine health system dataBr J Cancer2015112594895625602964
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
LomasALeonardi-BeeJBath-HextallFA systematic review of worldwide incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancerBr J Dermatol201216651069108022251204
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
MistryMParkinDMAhmadASSasieniPCancer incidence in the United Kingdom: projections to the year 2030Br J Cancer2011105111795180322033277
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
MyersERMoormanPGierischJMBenefits and harms of breast cancer screening: a systematic reviewJAMA2015314151615163426501537
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
RaoRWiechmannLTreatment of early breast cancerMinerva Endocrinol200934431132420046160
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
MarmotMGAltmanDGCameronDADewarJAThompsonSGWilcoxMThe benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent reviewBr J Cancer2013108112205224023744281
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Independent-UK-Panel-on-Breast-Cancer-ScreeningThe benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent reviewLancet201238098551778178623117178
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Downs-HolmesCSilvermanPBreast cancer: overview & updatesNurse Pract201136122026 quiz 722089837
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Cancer-ResearchBreast cancer mortality statisticsCancer ResearchUK2015 Available from: http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/statistics-by-cancer-type/breast-cancer/mortality-ref-0Accessed February 26, 2016
Google Scholar
LawlessGDThe working patient with cancer: implications for payers and employersAm Health Drug Benefits20092416817325126288
PubMedGoogle Scholar
NguyenJCramarossaGBrunerDA literature review of symptom clusters in patients with breast cancerExpert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res201111553353921958098
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
RafteryJChorozoglouMPossible net harms of breast cancer screening: updated modelling of Forest reportBMJ2011343d762722155336
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Cancer-ResearchBreast screening statisticscancer researchUK2015 Available from: http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/statistics-by-cancer-type/breast-cancer/screeningAccessed February 26, 2016
Google Scholar
LobergMLousdalMLBretthauerMKalagerMBenefits and harms of mammography screeningBreast Cancer Res2015176325928287
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
GotzschePCJorgensenKJScreening for breast cancer with mammographyCochrane Database Syst Rev20136CD001877
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Taylor-PhillipsSO’SullivanEKearinsOParsonsHClarkeAThe effects of a UK review of breast cancer screening on uptake: an observational before/after studyJ Med Screen2013202869024009089
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
MorrisSDevlinNParkinDEconomic Analysis in Health CareChichester, UKJohn Wiley & Sons2007
Google Scholar
HaywoodKLGarrattAMLallRSmithJFLambSEEuroQol EQ-5D and condition-specific measures of health outcome in women with urinary incontinence: reliability, validity and responsivenessQuality Life Res2008173475483
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
NICEGuide to the methods of technology appraisalNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence2013
Google Scholar
WhiteheadSJAliSHealth outcomes in economic evaluation: the QALY and utilitiesBr Med Bull20109652121037243
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
AndersonPPhillipsCWhat is a QALY? Available from: http://www.whatisseries.co.uk/what-is-a-qaly/Accessed March 3, 20172222017
Google Scholar
MillerABScreening for breast cancer – is there an alternative to mammography?Asian Pac J Cancer Prev200561838615780039
PubMedGoogle Scholar
YaffeMJMainprizeJGRisk of radiation-induced breast cancer from mammographic screeningRadiology201125819810521081671
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
NIHbreast cancer screening–for health professionals (PDQ®)National cancer Institute2016 Available from: http://www.cancer.gov/types/breast/hp/breast-screening-pdqAccessed February 26, 2016
Google Scholar
PharoahPDSewellBFitzsimmonsDBennettHSPashayanNCost effectiveness of the NHS breast screening programme: life table modelBMJ2013346f261823661112
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
CSIDiscount rates and net present value: Centre for Social Impact2016 Available from: https://data.gov.uk/sib_knowledge_box/discount-rates-and-net-present-valueAccessed February 26, 2016
Google Scholar
HarkerRNHS funding and expenditureStandard Note: SN/SG/724Library; House of Commons2012
Google Scholar
MadanJRawdinAStevensonMTappendenPA rapid-response economic evaluation of the UK NHS cancer reform strategy breast cancer screening program extension via a plausible bounds approachValue Health201013221522119878494
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
RobertsonCArcot RagupathySKBoachieCThe clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different surveillance mammography regimens after the treatment for primary breast cancer: systematic reviews registry database analyses and economic evaluationHealth Technol Assess20111534vvi1322
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
GrootMTBaltussenRUyl-de GrootCAAndersonBOHortobagyiGNCosts and health effects of breast cancer interventions in epidemiologically different regions of Africa, North America, and AsiaBreast J200612Suppl 1S819016430401
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
ChaloupkaFJWarnerKEAcemogluDAn evaluation of the FDA’s analysis of the costs and benefits of the graphic warning label regulationTob Control201524211211925550419
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
HendersonJBAn economic appraisal of the benefits of screening for open spina bifidaSoc Sci Med19821655455606808668
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
WolkRBHidden costs of mobile mammography: is subsidization necessary?AJR Am J Roentgenol19921586124312451590115
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
DevlinNParkinDDoes NICE have a cost-effectiveness threshold and what other factors influence its decisions? A binary choice analysisHealth Econ200413543745215127424
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Share icon
Back to Top

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.

People also read
Recommended articles
Cited by

To cite this article:

Reference style: APA Chicago Harvard

Citation copied to clipboard

Reference styles above use APA (6th edition), Chicago (16th edition) & Harvard (10th edition)

Download citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by citation management software including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks and Reference Manager.

Choose format: RIS BibTex RefWorks Direct Export

Choose options: Citation Citation & abstract Citation & references

Economic analysis of the breast cancer screening program used by the UK NHS: should the program be maintained?

References

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

Economic analysis of the breast cancer screening program used by the UK NHS: should the program be maintained?

References

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date