Breast Cancer Detection Using Low-Frequency Bioimpedance Device

References

• CotterchioM, MireaL, OzcelikH, KreigerN. Active cigarette smoking, variants in carcinogen metabolism genes and breast cancer risk among pre- and postmenopausal women in Ontario, Canada. Breast J. 2014;20(5):468–480. doi:10.1111/tbj.1230425052559
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MombelliS. Cancers du sein et Immunologie anti-tumorale [Ph.D. dissertation]. France: Univ. Reims Champagne-Ardenne; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Le-PetrossHT, ShettyMK. Magnetic resonance imaging and breast ultrasonography as an adjunct to mammographic screening in high-risk patients. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2011;32(4):266–272. doi:10.1053/j.sult.2011.03.00521782116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TakkarN, KochharS, GargP, et al. Screening methods (clinical breast examination and mammography) to detect breast cancer in women aged 40–49 years. J Midlife Health. 2017;8(1):2–10.28458473
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ChengHD, ShanJ, JuW, GuoY, ZhangL. Automated breast cancer detection and classification using ultrasound images: a survey. Pattern Recognit. 2010;43(1):299–317. doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2009.05.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KuhlCK, SchradingS, LeutnerCC, et al. Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(33):8469–8476. doi:10.1200/JCO.2004.00.496016293877
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LehmanCD, IsaacsC, SchnallMD. Cancer yield of mammography, MR, and US in high-risk women: prospective multi-institution breast cancer screening study. Radiology. 2007;244:381–388. doi:10.1148/radiol.244206046117641362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SaslowD, BoetesC, BurkeW, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57(2):75–89. doi:10.3322/canjclin.57.2.7517392385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZouY, GuoZ. A review of electrical impedance techniques for breast cancer detection. Med Eng Phys. 2003;25(2):79–90. doi:10.1016/S1350-4533(02)00194-712538062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PipernoG, FreiEH, MoshitzkyM. Breast cancer screening by impedance measurements. Front Med Biol Eng. 1990;2:111–117.2271409
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MelloulM, PazA, OhanaG, et al. Double phase 99mTc-sestamibi scintimammography and trans-scan in diagnosing breast cancer. J Nucl Med. 1999;40(3):376–380.10086698
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CherepeninV, KarpovA, KorjenevskyA, et al. A 3D electrical impedance tomography [EIT] system for breast cancer detection. Physiol Meas. 2001;22:9–18. doi:10.1088/0967-3334/22/1/30211236894
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MorimotoT, KinouchiY, IritaniT, et al. Measurement of the electrical bio-impedance of breast tumors. Eur Surg Res. 1990;22(2):86–92. doi:10.1159/0001290872384126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MorimotoT, KimuraS, KonishiY, et al. A study of the electrical bioimpedance of tumors. J Invest Surg. 1993;6(1):25–32. doi:10.3109/089419393091411898452822
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• OstermanKS, KernerTE, WilliamsDB, et al. Multifrequency electrical impedance imaging: preliminary in vivo experience in breast. Physiol Meas. 2013;21:99–109. doi:10.1088/0967-3334/21/1/313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WolfI, SadetzkiS, CataneR, et al. Diabetes mellitus and breast cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6(2):103–111. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(05)01736-515683819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JossinetJ. The impedivity of freshly excised human breast tissue. Physiol Meas. 1998;19(1):61–75. doi:10.1088/0967-3334/19/1/0069522388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChenCM, ChouY-H, HanK-C, et al. Breast lesions on sonograms: computer-aided diagnosis with nearly setting-independent features and artificial neural networks. Radiology. 2003;226:504–514. doi:10.1148/radiol.226201184312563146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WarnerE, PlewesDB, HillKA, et al. Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination. JAMA. 2004;292(11):1317–1325. doi:10.1001/jama.292.11.131715367553
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JossinetJ, SchmittM. A review of parameters for the bioelectrical characterization of breast tissue. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1999;873:30–41.10372147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SardanelliF, PodoF, SantoroF, et al. Multicenter surveillance of women at high genetic breast cancer risk using mammography, ultrasonography, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging [the high breast cancer risk Italian 1 study]: final results. Invest Radiol. 2011;46(2):94–105. doi:10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181f3fcdf21139507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NitenbergG, LeverveX, ChioléroR. Nutrition Artificielle De L’adulte En Reanimation. Elsevier; 2002:25.
   Google Scholar
• MansouriS, MahjoubiH, Ben SalahR. Design of a peripheral bioimpedance prototype with an FPGA Virtex-5 LX30. IRBM. 2010;31(5–6):280–288. doi:10.1016/j.irbm.2010.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MelkikhAV, SutorminaMI. Model of active transport of ions in cardiac cell. J Theor Biol. 2008;252:247–254. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.02.00618353373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChungD. Flexible conductive polymer electrodes for applications in tissue electrical impedance scanning (EIS) [Doctoral dissertation]. Applied Science: School of Engineering Science; 2012
   Google Scholar
• TehW, WilsonARM. The role of ultrasound in breast cancer screening. A consensus statement by the European group for breast cancer screening. Eur J Cancer. 1998;34(4):449–450. doi:10.1016/S0959-8049(97)10066-19713292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WeinsteinSP, LocalioAR, ConantEF, et al. Multimodality screening of high-risk women: a prospective cohort study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(36):6124–6128. doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.24.427719884532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar