Benefits of multidisciplinary teamwork in the management of breast cancer

References

• PolyakKBreast cancer origins and evolutionJ Clin Invest2007117113155316317975657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of HealthManual for Cancer ServicesLondonDepartment of Health2004
   Google Scholar
• SainiKSTaylorCRamirezAJRole of the multidisciplinary team in breast cancer management: results from a large international survey involving 39 countriesAnn Oncol201223485385921821551
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HensonDEFrelickRWFordLGResults of a national survey of characteristics of hospital tumor conferencesSurg Gynecol Obstet19901701162294625
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KeatingNLLandrumMBLamontEBBozemanSRShulmanLNMcNeilBJTumor boards and the quality of cancer careJ Natl Cancer Inst2013105211312123274388
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• National Institute for Clinical ExcellenceImproving Outcomes in Breast CancerLondonNICE2002
   Google Scholar
• TaylorCMunroAJGlynne-JonesRMultidisciplinary team working in cancer: what is the evidence?BMJ2010340c95120332315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FleissigAJenkinsVCattSFallowfieldLMultidisciplinary teams in cancer care: are they effective in the UK?Lancet Oncol200671193594317081919
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HongNJWrightFCGagliardiARPaszatLFExamining the potential relationship between multidisciplinary cancer care and patient survival: an international literature reviewJ Surg Oncol2010102212513420648582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KessonEMAllardiceGMGeorgeWDBurnsHJGMorrisonDSEffects of multidisciplinary team working on breast cancer survival: retrospective, comparative, interventional cohort study of 13,722 womenBMJ2012344e271822539013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EakerSDickmanPWHellströmVZackMMAhlgrenJHolmbergLRegional differences in breast cancer survival despite common guidelinesCancer Epideimol Biomarkers Prev2005141229142918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KerstenCCvancarovaMMjålandSMjålandODoes in house availability of multidisciplinary teams increase survival in upper gastrointestinal cancer?World J Gastrointest Oncol201353606723671732
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HoussamiNSainsburyRBreast cancer: multidisciplinary care and clinical outcomesEur J Cancer200642152480249116904313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SelbyPGillisCHawardRBenefits from specialised cancer careLancet199634890233133188709693
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SatarianoERSwansonMGMollPPNonclinical factors associated with surgery received for treatment of early-stage breast cancerAm J Public Health19928221951981739146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KingsmoreDHoleDGillisCWhy does specialist treatment of breast cancer improve survival? The role of surgical managementBr J Cancer200490101920192515138472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee-FeldsteinAAnton-CulverHFeldsteinPJTreatment differences and other prognostic factors related to breast cancer survival. Delivery systems and medical outcomesJAMA199427115116311688151873
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HandRSenerSImperatoJChmielJSSylvesterJAFremgenAHospital variables associated with quality of care for breast cancer patientsJAMA199126624342934321744956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YarnoldJRBlissJMBruntMManagement of breast cancer. Refer women to multidisciplinary clinicsBMJ199430869301681718204162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SainsburyROrganization of breast cancer servicesCancer Treat Rev199723Suppl 1S3S119377599
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SchipperHDickJHerodotus and the multidisciplinary clinicLancet19953468986131213137475766
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DurantJRHow to organize a multidisciplinary clinic for the management of breast cancerSurg Clin North Am19907049779832371652
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BurtonSBrownGDanielsIRNormanARMasonBCunninghamDMRI directed multidisciplinary team preoperative treatment strategy: the way to eliminate positive circumferential margins?Br J Cancer200694335135716465171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DaviesARDeansDAPenmanIThe multidisciplinary team meeting improves staging accuracy and treatment selection for gastroesophageal cancerDis Esophagus200619649650317069595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CooryMGkoliaPYangIABowmanRVFongKMSystematic review of multidisciplinary teams in the management of lung cancerLung Cancer2008601142118304687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HawardRAmirZBorrillCBreast cancer teams: the impact of constitution, new cancer workload, and methods of operation on their effectivenessBr J Cancer2003891152212838294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MaguireGPLeeEGBevingtonDJKüchemannCSCrabtreeRJCornellCEPsychiatric problems in the first year after mastectomyBr Med J197816118963965565239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MaguirePBrookeMTaitAThomasCSellwoodRThe effects of counselling on physical disability and social recovery after mastectomyClin Oncol1983943193246362943
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RedmanSTurnerJDavisCImproving supportive care for women with breast cancer in Australia: the challenge of modifying health systemsPsychooncology200312652153112923793
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HalkettGArbonPScutterSBorgMThe role of the breast care nurse during treatment for early breast cancer: the patient’s perspectiveContemp Nurse2006231465717083319
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LaffertyJRankinFDuffyCContinuity of care for women with breast cancer: a survey of the views and experiences of patients, carers and health care professionalsEur J Oncol Nurs201115541942721112249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BeaverKTwomeyMWithamGFoySLukerKAMeeting the information needs of women with breast cancer: piloting a nurse-led interventionEur J Oncol Nurs200610537839016709465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AmirZScullyJBorrillCThe professional role of the breast care nurse in multidisciplinary breast care teamsEur J Oncol Nurs20048430631415550360
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• RichardsonATebbitPBrownVSitziaJHolistic Common Assessment of Supportive and Palliative Care Needs for Adults with Cancer: Assessment GuidanceLondonCancer Action Team2007
   Google Scholar
• RichardsonAAddington-HallJAmirZKnowledge, ignorance and priorities for research in key areas of cancer survivorship: findings from a scoping reviewBr J Cancer2011105Suppl 1S82S9422048036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ArmesJCroweMColbourneLPatients’ supportive care needs beyond the end of cancer treatment: a prospective, longitudinal surveyJ Clin Oncol200927366172617919884548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Cancer Action TeamPersonalised Information: Cancer Information Prescriptions. Our Progress So FarNCATLondon2011
   Google Scholar
• BeaverKTysver-RobinsonDCampbellMComparing hospital and telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: randomised equivalence trialBMJ2009338a314719147478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ArmesJFinnegan-JohnJMooreJBloomfieldJShewbridgeAReamEEnd of treatment consultation evaluation [abstract]Eur J Cancer201147S318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LambBWBrownKFNagpalKVincentCGreenJSSevdalisNQuality of care management decisions by multidisciplinary teams: a systematic reviewAnn Surg Oncol20111882116212521442345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LanceleyASavageJMenonUJacobsIInfluences on multidisciplinary team decision-makingInt J Gynecol Cancer200818221522217511801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TaylorCRamirezAJMultidisciplinary Team Members’ Views about MDT Working: Results from a Survey Commissioned by the National Cancer Action TeamLondonNational Cancer Action Team2009
   Google Scholar
• ThorntonSDodwellDMultidisciplinary team working: the emperor without clothes?Br J Hosp Med (Lond)201273418618722585192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SimcockRHeafordACosts of MDT are small in relation to benefits [letter]BMJ2012344e271822539013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KeKMBlazebyJMStrongSCarrollFENessARHollingworthWAre multidisciplinary teams in secondary care cost-effective? A systematic review of the literatureCost Eff Resour Alloc2013111723557141
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• TaylorCSippittJCollinsGA pre-post test evaluation of the impact of the PELICAN MDT-TME Development Programme on the working lives of colorectal team membersBMC Health Serv Res20101018720587062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FoskerCDodwellDThe cost of the MDTBMJ2010340c95120332315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChoyETChiuAButowPYoungJSpillaneAA pilot study to evaluate the impact of involving breast cancer patients in the multidisciplinary discussion of their disease and treatment planBreast200716217818917158048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of HealthEquity and Excellence: Liberating the NHSLondonDepartment of Health2010
   Google Scholar
• CoulterACollinsAMaking Shared Decision-Making a Reality: No Decision about Me Without MeLondonThe King’s Fund2011
   Google Scholar
• KunklerIHPrescottRJLeeRJTELEMAM: a cluster randomised trial to assess the use of telemedicine in multi-disciplinary breast cancer decision makingEur J Cancer200743172506251417962011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KunklerIHFieldingRGMacnabMGroup dynamics within telemedicine-delivered and standard multidisciplinary team meetings: results from the TELEMAM randomised trialJ Telemed Telecare200612Suppl 3s55s58
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LiddellAAdsheadSBurgessETechnology in the NHS: Transforming the Patient’s Experience of CareLondonThe King’s Fund2008
   Google Scholar
• PaulDLPearlsonKEMcDanielRRAssessing technological barriers to telemedicine: technology-management implicationsIEEE Trans Eng Manage1999463279288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DemerisGThe diffusion of virtual communities in healthcare: concepts and challengesPatient Educ Couns200662217818816406472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RothschildSKLapidosSMinnickAFoggLCatramboneCUsing virtual teams to improve the care of chronically ill patientsJ Clin Outcomes Manage2004116346350
   Google Scholar
• PatkarVAcostaDFoxJJonesADavidsonTKeshtgarMA novel support tool for Breast Multidisciplinary Meetings: an advanced evidence based computer decision support technologyEur J Cancer201083211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNairAGChohCTMetcalfeCMaximising recruitment into randomised controlled trials: the role of multidisciplinary cancer teamsEur J Cancer200844172623262618804999
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JenkinsVAFallowfieldLJPooleKAre members of multidisciplinary teams in breast cancer aware of each other’s informational roles?Qual Health Care2001102707511389314
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CattSFallowfieldLJenkinsVLangridgeCCoxAThe informational roles and psychological health of members of 10 oncology multidisciplinary teams in the UKBr J Cancer200593101092109716234824
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CoxAJenkinsVCattSLangridgeCFallowfeldLInformation needs and experiences: an audit of UK cancer patientsEur J Oncol Nurs200610426327216376146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Cancer Action TeamThe Characteristics of an Effective MDTLondonNCAT2010
   Google Scholar
• National Breast and Ovarian Cancer CentreMultidisciplinary Meetings for Cancer Care: A Guide for Health Service ProvidersCanberraDepartment of Health and Ageing2005
   Google Scholar
• National Cancer Action TeamNational Cancer Peer Review Programme Report 2009/2010: An Overview of the Findings from the 2009/2010 National Cancer Peer Review of Cancer Services in EnglandLondonNCAT2010
   Google Scholar
• FallowfieldLSaulJGilliganBTeaching senior nurses how to teach communication skills in oncologyCancer Nurs200124318519111409062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FallowfieldLLipkinMHallATeaching senior oncologists communication skills: results from phase I of a comprehensive longitudinal program in the United KingdomJ Clin Oncol1998165196119689586916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeoFVenissacNPoudenxMOttoJMourouxJMultidisciplinary management of lung cancer: how to test its efficacy?J Thorac Oncol200721697217410013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StalforsJLundbergCWestinTQuality assessment of a multidisciplinary tumour meeting for patients with head and neck cancerActa Otolaryngol20071271828717364335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BlazebyJMWilsonLMetcalfeCNicklinJEnglishRDonovanJLAnalysis of clinical decision-making in multi-disciplinary cancer teamsAnn Oncol200617345746016322114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WoodJJMetcalfeCPaesAAn evaluation of treatment decisions at a colorectal cancer multidisciplinary teamColorectal Dis200810876977218215197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KidgerJMurdochJDonovanJLBlazebyJMClinical decision-making in a multidisciplinary gynaecological cancer team: a qualitative studyBJOG2009116451151719250362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LambBWWongHWVincentCGreenJSSevdalisNTeamwork and team performance in multidisciplinary cancer teams: development and evaluation of an observational assessment toolBMJ Qual Saf20112010849856
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TaylorCAtkinsLRichardsonATarrantRRamirezAJMeasuring the quality of MDT working: an observational approachBMC Cancer20121220222642614
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TaylorCBrownKLambBHarrisJSevdalisNGreenJSDeveloping and testing TEAM (Team Evaluation and Assessment Measure) a tool for team self-assessment of cancer MDT performanceAnn Surg Oncol201219134019402722820934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TaylorCBrownKBSevdalisNGreenJSADeveloping and testing a novel, evidence-based and user-tested toolkit for assessing and improving teamworking in multidisciplinary cancer teamsPresented at: the European Cancer CongressSeptember 24–27, 2011Stockholm, Sweden
   Google Scholar