Outdoor testing of the photoprotection provided by a new water-based broad-spectrum SPF50+ sunscreen product: two double-blind, split-face, randomized controlled studies in healthy adults

References

• Lautenschlager S, Wulf HC, Pittelkow MR. Photoprotection. Lancet. 2007;370(9586):528–537. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60638-217693182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sklar LR, Almutawa F, Lim HW, Hamzavi I. Effects of ultraviolet radiation, visible light, and infrared radiation on erythema and pigmentation: a review. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2013;12(1):54–64. doi:10.1039/c2pp25152c23111621
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Association of Dermatologists. Past Campaign Activities Available from: http://www.bad.org.uk/for-the-public/sun-awareness-campaign/past-campaigns. Accessed January 14, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Sunburn and sun protective behaviors among adults aged 18–29 years–United States, 2000–2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012;61(18):317–322.22572977
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gilchrest BA, Eller MS, Geller AC, Yaar M. The pathogenesis of melanoma induced by ultraviolet radiation. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(17):1341–1348. doi:10.1056/NEJM19990429340170710219070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis LK, Vanbeek MJ, Beane Freeman LE, Smith BJ, Dawson DV, Coughlin JA. Sunburns and risk of cutaneous melanoma: does age matter? A comprehensive meta-analysis. Ann Epidemiol. 2008;18(8):614–627. doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2008.04.00618652979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farberg AS, Glazer AM, Rigel AC, White R, Rigel DS. Dermatologists’ perceptions, recommendations, and use of sunscreen. JAMA Dermatol. 2017;153(1):99–101. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.369827760254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang SQ, Balagula Y, Osterwalder U. Photoprotection: a review of the current and future technologies. Dermatol Ther. 2010;23(1):31–47. doi:10.1111/j.1529-8019.2009.01289.x20136907
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faurschou A, Wulf HC. The relation between sun protection factor and amount of sunscreen applied in vivo. Br J Dermatol. 2007;156(4):716–719. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07684.x17493070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jovanovic Z, Schornstein T, Sutor A, Neufang G, Hagens R. Conventional sunscreen application does not lead to sufficient body coverage. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2017;39(5):550–555. doi:10.1111/ics.1241328699163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solky B, Phillips P, Christenson L, Weaver A, Roenigk R, Otley C. Patient preferences for facial sunscreens: a split-face, randomized, blinded trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;57(1):67–72. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2007.04.00317499389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu S, Kwa M, Agarwal A, Rademaker A, Kundu R. Sunscreen product performance and other determinants of consumer preferences. JAMA Dermatol. 2016;152(8):920–927. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.234427385189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. Standard 2444:2010. Cosmetics – Sun protection test methods – In vivo determination of the sun protection factor (SPF) Available from https://www.iso.org/standard/46523.html. Accessed 1 14, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Schalka S, Reis VM. Sun protection factor: meaning and controversies. An Bras Dermatol. 2011;86(3):507–515. [Article in English, Portuguese].21738968
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterwalder U, Schütz R, Vollhardt J. SPF assessment revisited – status and outlook. Sofw J. 2018;144:38–42.
   Google Scholar
• Food and Drug Administration. Labeling and Effectiveness Testing: Sunscreen Drug Products for Over-The-Counter Human Use — Small Entity Compliance Guide. December 2012 Available from: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/guidancecomplianceregulatoryinformation/guidances/ucm330694.htm. Accessed 1 14, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Pelizzo M, Zattra E, Nicolosi P, Peserico A, Garoli D, Alaibac M. In vitro evaluation of sunscreens: an update for the clinicians. ISRN Dermatol. 2012;2012:352135.23227355
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Calixto LS, Maia Campos PMBG, Savary G, Picard C. Interactions between UV filters and active substances in emulsion: effect on microstructure, physicochemical and in-vivo properties. Int J Pharm. 2018;553(1–2):220–228. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.10.02730316792
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binks BP, Brown J, Fletcher PD, et al. Evaporation of sunscreen films: how the UV protection properties change. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8(21):13270–13281. doi:10.1021/acsami.6b0269627167054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage (CIE). Erythema Reference Action Spectrum and Standard Erythema Dose, CIE S007E-1998. Vienna (Austria): CIE Central Bureau; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization, World Meteorological Organization, United Nations Environment Programme & International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. Global Solar UV Index: A Practical Guide. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002 Available from: http://www.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42459.Accessed January 14, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Bech J, Sola Y, Ossó A, Lorente J. Analysis of 14 years of broadband ground-based solar UV index observations in Barcelona. Int J Climatol. 2015;35(1):45–56. doi:10.1002/joc.3961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basketter D, Reynolds F, Rowson M, Talbot C, Whittle E. Visual assessment of human skin irritation: a sensitive and reproducible tool. Contact Dermatitis. 1997;37(5):218–220.9412749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams JD, Maitra P, Atillasoy E, Wu MM, Farberg AS, Rigel DS. SPF 100+ sunscreen is more protective against sunburn than SPF 50+ in actual use: results of a randomized, double-blind, split-face, natural sunlight exposure clinical trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;78(5):902–910.e2. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2017.12.06229291958
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ou-Yang H, Jiang LI, Meyer K, Wang SQ, Farberg AS, Rigel DS. Sun protection by beach umbrella vs sunscreen with a high sun protection factor: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2017;153(3):304–308. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.4922
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/skin/basic_info/sun-safety.htm. Accessed January 14, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• British Association of Dermatologists. Sunscreen and sun safety factsheet. 2013. Available from: http://www.bad.org.uk/shared/get-file.ashx?id=3917&itemtype=document. Accessed January 14, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• American Cancer Society. Choose the right sunscreen 2018 Available from: https://www.cancer.org/latest-news/choose-the-right-sunscreen.html. Accessed 1 14, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Linos E, Keiser E, Fu T, Colditz G, Chen S, Tang JY. Hat, shade, long sleeves, or sunscreen? Rethinking US sun protection messages based on their relative effectiveness. Cancer Causes Control. 2011;22(7):1067–1071. doi:10.1007/s10552-011-9780-121637987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green A, Williams G. Point: sunscreen use is a safe and effective approach to skin cancer prevention. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16(10):1921–1922. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-047717932337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glanz K, Buller DB, Saraiya M. Reducing ultraviolet radiation exposure among outdoor workers: state of the evidence and recommendations. Environ Health. 2007;6:22. doi:10.1186/1476-069X-6-2217686155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang SQ, Virmani P, Lim HW. Consumer acceptability and compliance: the next frontier in sunscreen innovation. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2016;32(1):55–56. doi:10.1111/phpp.1221126409211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar