Aesthetic Delusions: An Investigation into the Role of Rapid Visual Adaptation in Aesthetic Practice

References

• Aybay Y, Kara N. The impact of teen magazines on adolescent girls in North Cyprus. Soc Behav Pers. 2018;46(1):49–62. doi:10.2224/sbp.6406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmstrom AJ. The effects of the media on body image: a meta-analysis. J Broadcasting Electronic Media. 2004;48(2):196–217. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4802_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucci S, Peters J. Media influences on body satisfaction in female students. Psicothema. 2008;20(4):521–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbon CC. Cognitive mechanisms for explaining dynamics of aesthetic appreciation. I-Perception. 2011;2:708–719. doi:10.1068/i0463aap
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes G, Jeffery L, Watson TL, Clifford CWG, Nakayama K. Fitting the mind to the world: face adaptation and attractiveness aftereffects. Psychol Sci. 2003;14(6):558–566. doi:10.1046/j.0956-7976.2003.psci_1465.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes G, Jeffery L. Adaptive norm-based coding of facial identity. Vision Res. 2006;46(18):2977–2987. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2006.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen HW, Russell R, Nakayama K, Livingstone M. Crossing the ‘uncanny valley’: adaptation to cartoon faces can influence perception of human faces. Perception. 2010;39(3):378–386. doi:10.1068/p6492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Principe CP, Langlois JH. Shifting the prototype: experience with faces influences affective and attractiveness preferences. Soc Cogn. 2012;30(1):109–120. doi:10.1521/soco.2012.30.1.109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbon CC, Leder H. Face adaptation: changing stable representations of familiar faces within minutes? Adv Cogn Psychol. 2005;1(1):1–7. doi:10.5709/acp-0038-8
   Google Scholar
• Leopold DA, Rhodes G, Mueller KM, Jeffery L. The dynamics of visual adaptation to faces. Proc Biol Sci. 2005;272(1566):897–904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditye T, Javadi AH, Carbon CC, Walsh V. Sleep facilitates long-term face adaptation. Proc Biol Sci. 2013;280(1769):20131698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbon CC, Ditye T. Sustained effects of adaptation on the perception of familiar faces. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011;37(3):615–625. doi:10.1037/a0019949
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbon CC, Ditye T. Face adaptation effects show strong and long-lasting transfer from lab to more ecological contexts. Front Psychol. 2012;3(3):1–6. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbon CC, Strobach T, Langton S, Harsanyi G, Leder H, Kovacs G. Adaptation effects of highly familiar faces: immediate and long lasting. Mem Cognit. 2007;35(8):1966–1976. doi:10.3758/BF03192929
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strobach T, Carbon CC. Face adaptation effects: reviewing the impact of adapting information, time, and transfer. Front Psychol. 2013;4:318. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbon CC, Leder H. The Mona Lisa effect: is ‘our’ Lisa fame or fake? Perception. 2006;35(3):411–414. doi:10.1068/p5452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Germine L, Russell R, Bronstad PM, et al. Individual aesthetic preferences for faces are shaped mostly by environments, not genes. Curr Biol. 2015;25(20):2684–2689. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2015.08.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiggemann M, Anderberg I. Social media is not real: the effect of ‘Instagram vs reality’ images on women’s social comparison and body image. New Media Soc. 2019;22(12):2183–2199. doi:10.1177/1461444819888720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seifert T. Anthropomorphic characteristics of centerfold models: trends towards slender, figures over time. Int J Eat Disord. 2005;37(3):271–274. doi:10.1002/eat.20086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton KI, Olds TS, Olive S, Dank S. Ken and Barbie at life size. Sex Role. 1996;34(3–4):287–294. doi:10.1007/BF01544300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon S, Kim YA. Cosmetic surgery and self-esteem in South Korea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2019;44(1):229–238. doi:10.1007/s00266-019-01515-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrich RJ, Adams WP, Potter JK. A review of psychological outcomes and suicide in aesthetic breast augmentation. Plast Reconstruct Surg. 2007;119(1):401–408. doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000245342.06662.00
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster MA, Kaping D, Mizokami Y, Duhamel P. Adaptation to natural facial categories. Nature. 2004;428(6982):557–561. doi:10.1038/nature02420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuckerman M. Item revisions in the sensation seeking scale form V (SSS-V). Pers Individ Dif. 1996;20(4):515. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(95)00195-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rammstedt B, John OP. Short version of the Big Five Inventory (BFI-K): development and validation of an economic inventory for assessment of the five factors of personality. Diagnostica. 2005;51(4):195–206. doi:10.1026/0012-1924.51.4.195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbon CC, Leder H. The Repeated Evaluation Technique (RET): a method to capture dynamic effects of innovativeness and attractiveness. App Cogn Psychol. 2005;19(5):587–601. doi:10.1002/acp.1098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed effects models using lme4. J Stat Software. 2015;67(1):48. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbon CC, Leder H. When feature information comes first! Early processing of inverted faces. Perception. 2005;34(9):1117–1134. doi:10.1068/p5192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grammer K, Fink B, Møller AP, Thornhill R. Darwinian aesthetics: sexual selection and the biology of beauty. Biol Rev. 2003;78:305–407. doi:10.1017/S1464793102006085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
   Google Scholar