474
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
REVIEW

The Challenges in Investigating the Pathogenesis of Sensitive Skin by Noninvasive Measurements: A Systematic Review

, , , , , , ORCID Icon & show all
Pages 237-251 | Received 10 Oct 2022, Accepted 14 Jan 2023, Published online: 26 Jan 2023

References

  • Kim YR, Cheon HI, Misery L, Taieb C, Lee YW. Sensitive skin in Korean population: an epidemiological approach. Skin Res Technol. 2018;24(2):229–234. doi:10.1111/srt.12418
  • Falcone D, Richters R, Uzunbajakava NE, van Erp P, van de Kerkhof P. Risk factors associated with sensitive skin and potential role of lifestyle habits: a cross-sectional study. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2017;42(6):656–658. doi:10.1111/ced.13133
  • Misery L, Ständer S, Szepietowski JC, et al. Definition of Sensitive Skin: an Expert Position Paper from the Special Interest Group on Sensitive Skin of the International Forum for the Study of Itch. Acta Derm-Venereol. 2017;97(1):4–6. doi:10.2340/00015555-2397
  • Misery L, Boussetta S, Nocera T, Perez-Cullell N, Taieb C. Sensitive skin in Europe. J Eur Acad Dermatol. 2009;23(4):376–381. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3083.2008.03037.x
  • Misery L, Loser K, Stander S. Sensitive skin. J Eur Acad Dermatol. 2016;30(Suppl 1):2–8. doi:10.1111/jdv.13532
  • Guinot C, Malvy D, Mauger E, et al. Self-reported skin sensitivity in a general adult population in France: data of the SU.VI.MAX cohort. J Eur Acad Dermatol. 2006;20(4):380–390. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3083.2006.01455.x
  • Brenaut E, Misery L, Taieb C. Sensitive Skin in the Indian Population: an Epidemiological Approach. Front Med-Lausanne. 2019;6:29. doi:10.3389/fmed.2019.00029
  • Xu F, Yan S, Wu M, et al. Self-declared sensitive skin in China: a community-based study in three top metropolises. J Eur Acad Dermatol. 2013;27(3):370–375. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3083.2012.04648.x
  • Farage MA. Does sensitive skin differ between men and women? Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2010;29(3):153–163. doi:10.3109/15569521003774990
  • Escalas-Taberner J, Gonzalez-Guerra E, Guerra-Tapia A. Sensitive skin: a complex syndrome. Actas Dermo-Sifilogr. 2011;102(8):563–571. Spanish. doi:10.1016/j.ad.2011.04.011
  • Richters R, Falcone D, Uzunbajakava N, Verkruysse W, van Erp P, van de Kerkhof P. What is sensitive skin? A systematic literature review of objective measurements. Skin Pharmacol Phys. 2015;28(2):75–83. doi:10.1159/000363149
  • Arun CI, Aparna P. Sensitive skin: an overview. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2013;79(1):548.
  • Pons-Guiraud A. Sensitive skin: a complex and multifactorial syndrome. J Cosmet Dermatol-Us. 2004;3(3):6598.
  • Do LHD, Azizi N, Maibach H. Sensitive Skin Syndrome: an Update. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2020;21(3):401–409. doi:10.1007/s40257-019-00499-7
  • Berardesca E, Farage M, Maibach H. Sensitive skin: an overview. Int J Cosmetic Sci. 2013;35(1):2–8. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2494.2012.00754.x
  • Yokota T, Matsumoto M, Sakamaki T, et al. Classification of Sensitive Skin and Development of a Treatment System Appropriate for Each Group. IFSCC Mag. 2003;6(4):303–307.
  • Pinto P, Rosado C, Parreirao C, Rodrigues LM. Is there any barrier impairment in sensitive skin?: a quantitative analysis of sensitive skin by mathematical modeling of transepidermal water loss desorption curves. Skin Res Technol. 2011;17(2):181–185. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0846.2010.00478.x
  • Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, et al. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372.
  • von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg. 2014;12(12):1495–1499. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.013
  • Imhof RE, De Jesus ME, Xiao P, Ciortea LI, Berg EP. Closed-chamber transepidermal water loss measurement: microclimate, calibration and performance. Int J Cosmetic Sci. 2009;31(2):97–118. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2494.2008.00476.x
  • Warren R, Bauer A, Greif C, et al. Transepidermal water loss dynamics of human vulvar and thigh skin. Skin Pharmacol Phys. 2005;18(3):139–143. doi:10.1159/000084911
  • Seidenari S, Francomano M, Mantovani L. Baseline biophysical parameters in subjects with sensitive skin. Contact Dermatitis. 1998;38(6):311–315. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.1998.tb05764.x
  • Zheng Y, Liang H, Li Z, Tang M, Song L. Skin microbiome in sensitive skin: the decrease of Staphylococcus epidermidis seems to be related to female lactic acid sting test sensitive skin. J Dermatol Sci. 2020;97(3):225–228. doi:10.1016/j.jdermsci.2019.12.004
  • Li S, Wang X, Gao Y, et al. CPT, the main test method of skin neuronal sensitivity. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2015;34(3):208–211. doi:10.3109/15569527.2014.950379
  • Ding DM, Tu Y, Man MQ, et al. Association between lactic acid sting test scores, self‐assessed sensitive skin scores and biophysical properties in Chinese females. Int J Cosmetic Sci. 2019;41(4):398–404. doi:10.1111/ics.12550
  • Yu LL, Wang XM, Zou Y, et al. Correlation between the capsaicin test and objective skin measurements in evaluating sensitive skin in Chinese females. J Dermatol Sci. 2012;68(2):108–109. doi:10.1016/j.jdermsci.2012.08.006
  • Qiao Z, Huang S, Leng F, et al. Analysis of the Bacterial Flora of Sensitive Facial Skin Among Women in Guangzhou. Clin Cosmet Inv Derm. 2021;14:655–664. doi:10.2147/CCID.S307668
  • Pan Y, Ma X, Song Y, Zhao J, Yan S. Questionnaire and Lactic Acid Sting Test Play Different Role on the Assessment of Sensitive Skin: a Cross-sectional Study. Clin Cosmet Inv Derm. 2021;14:1215–1225. doi:10.2147/CCID.S325166
  • An S, Lee E, Kim S, et al. Comparison and correlation between stinging responses to lactic acid and bioengineering parameters. Contact Dermatitis. 2007;57(3):158–162. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01182.x
  • Georgieva F. THE SKIN BARRIER IN SENSITIVE SKIN SYNDROME. J IMAB. 2021;27(4):4120–4124. doi:10.5272/jimab.2021274.4120
  • Fan L, Jia Y, Cui L, Li X, He C. Analysis of sensitive skin barrier function: basic indicators and sebum composition. Int J Cosmetic Sci. 2018;40(2):117–126. doi:10.1111/ics.12442
  • Richters RJ, Falcone D, Uzunbajakava NE, et al. Sensitive Skin: assessment of the Skin Barrier Using Confocal Raman Microspectroscopy. Skin Pharmacol Phys. 2017;30(1):1–12. doi:10.1159/000452152
  • Raj N, Voegeli R, Rawlings AV, et al. A fundamental investigation into aspects of the physiology and biochemistry of the stratum corneum in subjects with sensitive skin. Int J Cosmetic Sci. 2016;39(1):2–10. doi:10.1111/ics.12334
  • Falcone D, Uzunbajakava N, Richters R, van de Kerkhof P, van Erp P. Histamine Iontophoresis as in vivo Model to Study Human Skin Inflammation with Minimal Barrier Impairment: pilot Study Results of Application of the Model to a Sensitive Skin Panel. Skin Pharmacol Phys. 2017;30(5):246–259. doi:10.1159/000477416
  • Cho HJ, Chung BY, Lee HB, Kim HO, Park CW, Lee CH. Quantitative study of stratum corneum ceramides contents in patients with sensitive skin. J Dermatol. 2012;39(3):295–300. doi:10.1111/j.1346-8138.2011.01406.x
  • Kim SJ, Lim SU, Won YH, et al. The perception threshold measurement can be a useful tool for evaluation of sensitive skin. Int J Cosmetic Sci. 2008;30(5):333–337. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2494.2008.00434.x
  • Ahn HJ, Kim HJ, Ham H, et al. Visualizing the in-vivo application of zinc in sensitive skin using reflectance confocal microscopy. Sci Rep-Uk. 2021;11(1):7738. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-87346-0
  • Bai Y, Wang YJ, Zheng HJ, Tan F, Yuan C. CorrelationBetweenFacialSkinMicrobiota and SkinBarriersinaChineseFemalePopulationwithSensitiveSkin. Infect Drug Resist. 2021;14:219–226. doi:10.2147/IDR.S287844
  • Diogo L, Papoila AL. Is it possible to characterize objectively sensitive skin? Skin Res Technol. 2010;16(1):30–37. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0846.2009.00404.x
  • Boyer G, Belilovsky CD, Brédif S, Baudouin C, Misery L, Bellemère G. Clinical and Instrumental Exploration of Sensitive Skin in a Pediatric Population. Cosmetics-Basel. 2021;8(2):43. doi:10.3390/cosmetics8020043
  • Ye C, Chen J, Yang S, et al. Skin sensitivity evaluation: what could impact the assessment results? J Cosmet Dermatol-Us. 2020;19(5):1231–1238. doi:10.1111/jocd.13128
  • Agner T, Serup J. Individual and instrumental variations in irritant patch-test reactions--clinical evaluation and quantification by bioengineering methods. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1990;15(1):29–33. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2230.1990.tb02014.x
  • Pierard GE, Arrese JE, Rodriguez C, Daskaleros PA. Effects of softened and unsoftened fabrics on sensitive skin. Contact Dermatitis. 1994;30(5):286–291. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.1994.tb00600.x
  • Barel AO, Clarys P. In vitro calibration of the capacitance method (Corneometer CM 825) and conductance method (Skicon-200) for the evaluation of the hydration state of the skin. Skin Res Technol. 1997;3(2):107–113. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0846.1997.tb00171.x
  • Roussaki-Schulze AV, Zafiriou E, Nikoulis D, Klimi E, Rallis E, Zintzaras E. Objective biophysical findings in patients with sensitive skin. Drugs Exp Clin Res. 2005;31:Suppl:17–24.
  • Takekuma K, Ando F, Niino N, Shimokata H. Age and gender differences in skin sensory threshold assessed by current perception in community-dwelling Japanese. J Epidemiol. 2000;10(1 Suppl):S33–8. doi:10.2188/jea.10.1sup_33
  • Manav V, Karaali MG, Erdem O, Koku AA. Association between biophysical properties and anxiety in patients with sensitive skin. Skin Res Technol. 2022;28(4):556–563. doi:10.1111/srt.13156
  • Runeman B, Faergemann J, Larko O. Experimental Candida albicans lesions in healthy humans: dependence on skin pH. Acta Derm-Venereol. 2000;80(6):421–424. doi:10.1080/000155500300012819
  • Thune P, Nilsen T, Hanstad IK, Gustavsen T, Dahl HL. The water barrier function of the skin in relation to the water content of stratum corneum, pH and skin lipids. The effect of alkaline soap and syndet on dry skin in elderly, non-atopic patients. Acta Derm-Venereol. 1988;68(4):277–283.
  • Selander C, Zargari A, Mollby R, Rasool O, Scheynius A. Higher pH level, corresponding to that on the skin of patients with atopic eczema, stimulates the release of Malassezia sympodialis allergens. Allergy. 2006;61(8):1002–1008. doi:10.1111/j.1398-9995.2006.01108.x
  • Issachar N, Gall Y, Borrel MT, Poelman MC. pH measurements during lactic acid stinging test in normal and sensitive skin. Contact Dermatitis. 1997;36(3):152–155. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.1997.tb00399.x
  • Berardesca E, Cespa M, Farinelli N, Rabbiosi G, Maibach H. In vivo transcutaneous penetration of nicotinates and sensitive skin. Contact Dermatitis. 1991;25(1):35–38. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.1991.tb01770.x
  • Chen SY, Yin J, Wang XM, Liu YQ, Gao YR, Liu XP. A new discussion of the cutaneous vascular reactivity in sensitive skin: a sub‐group of SS? Skin Res Technol. 2018;24(3):432–439. doi:10.1111/srt.12446
  • Robinson MK, Perkins MA. Evaluation of a quantitative clinical method for assessment of sensory skin irritation. Contact Dermatitis. 2001;45(4):205–213. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0536.2001.450403.x
  • Dieamant GC, Velazquez PMC, Eberlin S, Nogueira C, Werka RM, Queiroz ML. Neuroimmunomodulatory compound for sensitive skin care: in vitro and clinical assessment. J Cosmet Dermatol-Us. 2008;7(2):112–119. doi:10.1111/j.1473-2165.2008.00373.x
  • Issachar N, Gall Y, Borrel MT, Poelman MC. Correlation between percutaneous penetration of methyl nicotinate and sensitive skin, using laser Doppler imaging. Contact Dermatitis. 1998;39(4):182186. doi:;39(4):182186. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.1998.tb05890.x
  • Sun L, Wang X, Zhang Y, Wang T, Li X, Ma Y. The evaluation of neural and vascular hyper-reactivity for sensitive skin. Skin Res Technol. 2016;22(3):381–387. doi:10.1111/srt.12278
  • Ham H, An SM, Lee EJ, Lee E, Kim HO, Koh JS. Itching sensation and neuronal sensitivity of the skin. Skin Res Technol. 2016;22(1):104–107. doi:10.1111/srt.12236
  • Lee E, An S, Lee TR, Kim HK. Development of a novel method for quantitative evaluation of sensory skin irritation inhibitors. Skin Res Technol. 2009;15(4):464–469. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0846.2009.00391.x
  • Seitz CS, Pfeuffer P, Raith P, Brocker EB, Trautmann A. Radiocontrast media-associated exanthema: identification of cross-reactivity and tolerability by allergologic testing. Eur J Radiol. 2009;72(1):167–171. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.06.010
  • Ma YF, Yuan C, Jiang WC, Wang XL, Humbert P. Reflectance confocal microscopy for the evaluation of sensitive skin. Skin Res Technol. 2017;23(2):227–234. doi:10.1111/srt.12327
  • Ma Y, Li L, Chen J, Chen T, Yuan C. Distinguishing rosacea from sensitive skin by reflectance confocal microscopy. Skin Res Technol. 2020;26(5):671–674. doi:10.1111/srt.12851
  • Luedtke MA, Papazoglou E, Neidrauer M, Kollias N. Wavelength effects on contrast observed with reflectance in vivo confocal laser scanning microscopy. Skin Res Technol. 2009;15(4):482–488. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0846.2009.00394.x
  • Zha WF, Song WM, Ai JJ, Xu AE. Mobile connected dermatoscope and confocal laser scanning microscope: a useful combination applied in facial simple sensitive skin. Int J Cosmetic Sci. 2012;34(4):318–321. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2494.2012.00726.x
  • Darvin ME, Schleusener J, Lademann J, Choe C. Current views on non-invasive in vivo determination of physiological parameters of the stratum corneum using confocal Raman microspectroscopy. Skin Pharmacol Phys. 2022;35(3):125–136. doi:10.1159/000521416
  • Mani R, Holmes J, Rerkasem K, Papanas N. Blood Vessel Density Measured Using Dynamic Optical Coherence Tomography is a Tool for Wound Healers. Int J Low Extr Wound. 2021;153473462110173. doi:10.1177/15347346211017334
  • Jiang WC, Zhang H, Xu Y, et al. Cutaneous vessel features of sensitive skin and its underlying functions. Skin Res Technol. 2020;26(3):431–437. doi:10.1111/srt.12819
  • Xu DT, Yan JN, Cui Y, Liu W. Quantifying facial skin erythema more precisely by analyzing color channels of The VISIA Red images. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2016;18(5):296–300. doi:10.3109/14764172.2016.1157360
  • Wang XY, Liu YY, Liu YX, et al. A predictive model for differential diagnosis between rosacea and sensitive skin: a cross-sectional study. Chinese Med J-Peking. 2020;133(17):2132–2134. doi:10.1097/CM9.0000000000001001
  • Wang Y, Viennet C, Jeudy A, Fanian F, He L, Humbert P. Assessment of the efficacy of a new complex antisensitive skin cream. J Cosmet Dermatol-Us. 2018;17(6):1101–1107. doi:10.1111/jocd.12486
  • Jeong S, Lee SH, Park BD, Wu Y, Man G, Man MQ. Comparison of the Efficacy of Atopalm((R)) Multi-Lamellar Emulsion Cream and Physiogel((R)) Intensive Cream in Improving Epidermal Permeability Barrier in Sensitive Skin. Dermatology Ther. 2016;6(1):47–56. doi:10.1007/s13555-016-0097-6
  • Zhang Y, Jin Y, Humbert P, et al. An herbal cream reduces erythema of sensitive skin. J Cosmet Dermatol-Us. 2021;20(3):792–797. doi:10.1111/jocd.13610
  • Berardesca E, Bonfigli A, Cribier B, et al. A Split-Face Study Assessing the Clinical Benefit, Tolerability and Subject Satisfaction of a Dermocosmetic in Subjects with Rosacea Associated with Erythema and Sensitive Skin. Clin Cosmet Inv Derm. 2020;13:751–758. doi:10.2147/CCID.S266879
  • Fatemi S, Jafarian-Dehkordi A, Hajhashemi V, Asilian-Mahabadi A, Nasr-Esfahani MH. A comparison of the effect of certain inorganic salts on suppression acute skin irritation by human biometric assay: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial. J Res Med Sci. 2016;21:102. doi:10.4103/1735-1995.193174
  • Hawkins SS, Subramanyan K, Liu D, Bryk M. Cleansing, moisturizing, and sun-protection regimens for normal skin, self-perceived sensitive skin, and dermatologist-assessed sensitive skin. Dermatol Ther. 2004;17(Suppl 1):63–68. doi:10.1111/j.1396-0296.2004.04s1008.x
  • Berardesca E, Abril E, Serio M, Cameli N. Effects of topical gluco-oligosaccharide and collagen tripeptide F in the treatment of sensitive atopic skin. Int J Cosmetic Sci. 2009;31(4):271–277. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2494.2009.00495.x
  • Isoda K, Seki T, Inoue Y, et al. Efficacy of the combined use of a facial cleanser and moisturizers for the care of mild acne patients with sensitive skin. J Dermatol. 2015;42(2):181–188. doi:10.1111/1346-8138.12720
  • Draelos ZD, Gunt H, Zeichner J, Levy S. Clinical Evaluation of a Nature-Based Bakuchiol Anti-Aging Moisturizer for Sensitive Skin. J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19(12):1181–1183. doi:10.36849/JDD.2020.5522
  • Bornkessel A, Flach M, Arens-Corell M, Elsner P, Fluhr JW. Functional assessment of a washing emulsion for sensitive skin: mild impairment of stratum corneum hydration, pH, barrier function, lipid content, integrity and cohesion in a controlled washing test. Skin Res Technol. 2005;11(1):53–60. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0846.2005.00091.x
  • Muizzuddin N, Marenus KD, Maes DH. Factors defining sensitive skin and its treatment. Am J Contact Dermat. 1998;9(3):170–175.
  • Pierard GE, Goffin V, Hermanns-Le T, Arrese JE, Pierard-Franchimont C. Surfactant-induced dermatitis: comparison of corneosurfametry with predictive testing on human and reconstructed skin. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1995;33(3):462–469. doi:10.1016/0190-9622(95)
  • Messaraa C, Drevet J, Jameson D, Zuanazzi G, De Ponti I. CanPerformance and GentlenessBeReconciled? A Skin Care Approach for Sensitive Skin. Cosmetics-Basel. 2022;9(2):214.
  • Nisbet SJ, Dykes P, Snatchfold J. Single application of lamellar moisturizers provides significantly increased hydration of the stratum corneum for up to 24 hours in a randomized trial. J Cosmet Dermatol-Us. 2020;19(11):3091–3095. doi:10.1111/jocd.13361
  • Nojiri H, Ishida K, Yao X, Liu W, Imokawa G. Amelioration of lactic acid sensations in sensitive skin by stimulating the barrier function and improving the ceramide profile. Arch Dermatol Res. 2018;310(6):495–504. doi:10.1007/s00403-018-1833-9
  • Tan YM, Wang XM, Yuan C, et al. Skin sensitivity and intolerance in Shanghai: cumulative influence of different meteorological parameters. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2015;34(2):132–138. doi:10.3109/15569527.2014.914036
  • Gueniche A, Philippe D, Bastien P, et al. Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled study of the effect of Lactobacillus paracasei NCC 2461 on skin reactivity. Benef Microbes. 2014;5(2):137–145. doi:10.3920/BM2013.0001
  • Neukam K, De Spirt S, Stahl W, et al. Supplementation of flaxseed oil diminishes skin sensitivity and improves skin barrier function and condition. Skin Pharmacol Phys. 2011;24(2):67–74. doi:10.1159/000321442
  • Trojahn C, Dobos G, Blume-Peytavi U, Kottner J. The skin barrier function: differences between intrinsic and extrinsic aging. Giorn Ital Dermat V. 2015;150(6):687–692.
  • Farage MA. Vulvar susceptibility to contact irritants and allergens: a review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2005;272(2):167–172. doi:10.1007/s00404-005-0732-4
  • Sandby-Moller J, Poulsen T, Wulf HC. Epidermal thickness at different body sites: relationship to age, gender, pigmentation, blood content, skin type and smoking habits. Acta Derm-Venereol. 2003;83(6):410–413. doi:10.1080/00015550310015419
  • Jourdain R, Maibach HI, Bastien P, De Lacharrière O, Breton L. Ethnic variations in facial skin neurosensitivity assessed by capsaicin detection thresholds. Contact Dermatitis. 2009;61(6):325–331. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.2009.01641.x
  • Wang H, Papoiu AD, Coghill RC, Patel T, Wang N, Yosipovitch G. Ethnic differences in pain, itch and thermal detection in response to topical capsaicin: African Americans display a notably limited hyperalgesia and neurogenic inflammation. Brit J Dermatol. 2010;162(5):1023–1029. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09628.x
  • Aramaki J, Kawana S, Effendy I, Happle R, Loffler H. Differences of skin irritation between Japanese and European women. Brit J Dermatol. 2002;146(6):1052–1056. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2133.2002.04509.x
  • Robinson MK. Population differences in acute skin irritation responses. Race, sex, age, sensitive skin and repeat subject comparisons. Contact Dermatitis. 2002;46(2):86–93. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0536.2002.460205.x