122
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Antimicrobial action of chlorhexidine digluconate in self-ligating and conventional metal brackets infected with Streptococcus mutans biofilm

, , , &
Pages 69-74 | Published online: 19 Apr 2018

References

  • LoeHTheiladeEJensenSBExperimental gingivitis in manJ Periodontol19653617718714296927
  • PetersenPEBourgeoisDOgawaHEstupinan-DaySNdayeCThe global burden of oral diseases and risk to oral healthOrganizationWHBullGenevaWorld Health Organization2005661669
  • BagramianRAGarcia-GodoyFVolpeARThe global increase in dental caries. A pending public health crisisAm J Dent20092213819281105
  • RegoROOliveiraCAdos Santos-PintoAClinical and microbiological studies of children and adolescents receiving orthodontic treatmentAm J Dent201023631732321344829
  • RosenbloomRGTinanoffNSalivary Streptococcus mutans levels in patients before, during, and after orthodontic treatmentAm J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop1991100135372069145
  • TheiladeEThe experimental gingivitis studies: the microbiological perspectiveJ Dent Res1996757143414388876594
  • ShelleyWBGingival hyperplasia from dental bracesCutis19812821491507285623
  • ShivapujaPKBergerJA comparative study of conventional ligation and self-ligation bracket systemsAm J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop199410654724807977187
  • BalenseifenJWMadoniaJVStudy of dental plaque in orthodontic patientsJ Dent Res19704923203245264596
  • ForsbergCMBrattstromVMalmbergENordCELigature wires and elastomeric rings: two methods of ligation, and their association with microbial colonization of Streptococcus mutans and lactobacilliEur J Orthod19911354164201748191
  • DamonDHThe rationale, evolution and clinical application of the self-ligating bracketClin Orthod Res19981152619918646
  • PaduanoSCioffiIIodiceGRapuanoASilvaRTime efficiency of self-ligating vs conventional brackets in orthodontics: effect of appliances and ligating systemsProg Orthod200892748019350061
  • EnaiaMBockNRufSWhite-spot lesions during multibracket appliance treatment: a challenge for clinical excellenceAm J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop20111401e17e2421724067
  • VermaireJHvan LoverenCBrouwerWBKrolMValue for money: economic evaluation of two different caries prevention programmes compared with standard care in a randomized controlled trialCaries Res201448324425324526078
  • CostaMRSilvaVCMiquiMNSakimaTSpolidorioDMCirelliJAEfficacy of ultrasonic, electric and manual toothbrushes in patients with fixed orthodontic appliancesAngle Orthod200777236136617319775
  • KocakMMOzcanSKocakSTopuzOErtenHComparison of the efficacy of three different mouthrinse solutions in decreasing the level of Streptococcus mutans in salivaEur J Dent200931576119262732
  • UllsfossBNOgaardBArendsJRubenJRollaGAfsethJEffect of a combined chlorhexidine and NaF mouthrinse: an in vivo human caries model studyScand J Dent Res199410221091128016555
  • LundstromFKrasseBCaries incidence in orthodontic patients with high levels of Streptococcus mutansEur J Orthod1987921171213472889
  • PanPCHarperSRicci-NittelDLuxRShiWIn-vitro evidence for efficacy of antimicrobial mouthrinsesJ Dent201038Suppl 1S16S2020621239
  • LakadeLSShahPShirolDComparison of antimicrobial efficacy of chlorhexidine and combination mouth rinse in reducing the Mutans streptococcus count in plaqueJ Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent2014322919624739906
  • DuarteSKleinMIAiresCPCuryJABowenWHKooHInfluences of starch and sucrose on Streptococcus mutans biofilmsOral Microbiol Immunol200823320621218402606
  • AngleEHClassification of malocclusionDent Cosmos189941316
  • PetrovicDVukic-CulaficBIvicSDjuricMMilekicBStudy of the risk factors associated with the development of malocclusionVojnosanit Pregl201370981782324266308
  • RenYJongsmaMAMeiLvan der MeiHCBusscherHJOrthodontic treatment with fixed appliances and biofilm formation: a potential public health threat?Clin Oral Investig201418717111718
  • PejdaSVargaMLMilosevicSAClinical and microbiological parameters in patients with self-ligating and conventional brackets during early phase of orthodontic treatmentAngle Orthod201383113313922765511
  • PellegriniPSauerweinRFinlaysonTPlaque retention by self-ligating vs elastomeric orthodontic brackets: quantitative comparison of oral bacteria and detection with adenosine triphosphate-driven bioluminescenceAm J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop20091354426.e1e9 Discussion-719361723
  • PandisNPapaioannouWKontouENakouMMakouMEliadesTSalivary Streptococcus mutans levels in patients with conventional and self-ligating bracketsEur J Orthod2010321949919474229
  • BuckTPellegriniPSauerweinRElastomeric-ligated vs self-ligating appliances: a pilot study examining microbial colonization and white spot lesion formation after 1 year of orthodontic treatmentOrthodontics201112210812121935504
  • GreensteinGBermanCJaffinRChlorhexidine. An adjunct to periodontal therapyJ Periodontol19865763703773522851
  • EliadesTEliadesGBrantleyWAMicrobial attachment on orthodontic appliances: I. Wettability and early pellicle formation on bracket materialsAm J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop199510843513607572846
  • CastroRMNetoPSHortaMCPithonMMOliveiraDDComparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design and conventional bracketsJ Appl Oral Sci201321431431924037069
  • PandisNPolychronopoulouAEliadesTSelf-ligating vs conventional brackets in the treatment of mandibular crowding: a prospective clinical trial of treatment duration and dental effectsAm J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2007132220821517693371