CAD/CAM Customized Glass Fiber Post and Core With Digital Intraoral Impression: A Case Report

References

• Dietschi D, Duc O, Krejci I, Sadan A. Biomechanical considerations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review of the literature, Part II (Evaluation of fatigue behavior, interfaces, and in vivo studies). Quintessence Int. 2008;39(2):117–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albani F, Ballesio I, Campanella V, Marzo G. Pit and fissure sealants: results at five and ten years. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2005;6(2):61–65.
   Google Scholar
• Nagasiri R, Chitmongkolsuk S. Long-term survival of endodontically treated molars without crown coverage: a retrospective cohort study. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;93:164–170. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortu E, Sgolastra F, Barone A, Gatto R, Marzo G, Monaco A. Salivary streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus spp. levels in patients during rapid palatal expansion. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2014;15(3):271–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchetti E, Tecco S, Caterini E, et al. Alcohol-free essential oils containing mouth rinse efficacy on three-day supragingival plaque regrowth: a randomized crossover clinical trial. Trials. 2017;18:73–80. doi:10.1186/s13063-017-1901-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mummolo S, Nota A, Caruso S, Quinzi V, Marchetti E, Marzo G. Salivary markers and microbial flora in mouth breathing late adolescents. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:8687608. doi:10.1155/2018/8687608
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libonati A, Montemurro E, Nardi R, Campanella V. Percentage of gutta-percha-filled areas in canals obturated by 3 different techniques with and without the use of endodontic sealer. J Endod. 2018;44(3):506–509. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2017.09.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libonati A, Di Taranto V, D Agostini C, et al. Comparison of coronal leakage of different root canal filling techniques: an ex vivo study. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2018;32(2):397–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campanella V, Di Taranto V, Libonati A, et al. Indirect adhesive rehabilitation by cementation under pressure of a case of Dentinogenesis Imperfecta type II: follow-up after 13 years. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2018;19(4):303–306. doi:10.23804/ejpd.2018.19.04.10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zicari F, Couthino E, De Munck J, et al. Bonding effectiveness and sealing ability of fiber-post bonding. Dent Mater. 2008;24:967–977. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2007.11.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libonati A, Marzo G, Klinger FG, et al. Embryotoxicity assays for leached components from dental restorative materials. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2011;9:136. doi:10.1186/1477-7827-9-136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballesio I, Angotti V, Gallusi G, et al. Durability of adhesion between an adhesive and post-space dentin: push-out evaluation at one and six months. Int J Adhes and Adhes. 2012;38:75–78. doi:10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bru E, Forner L, Llena C, Almenar A. Fiber post behaviour prediction factors. A review of the literature. J Clin Exp Dent. 2013;5:e150–e153. doi:10.4317/jced.50619
   Google Scholar
• Lassila LVJ, Tanner J, Le Bell AM, Narva K, Vallittu PK. Flexural properties of fiber reinforced root canal posts. Dent Mater. 2004;20:29–36. doi:10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00065-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goracci C, Ferrari M. Current perspectives on post systems: a literature review. Aust Dent J. 2011;56:77–83. doi:10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01298.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gloria A, Maietta S, Martorelli M, Lanzotti A, Watts DC, Ausiello P. FE analysis of conceptual hybrid composite endodontic post designs in anterior teeth. Dent Mat. 2018;34(7):1063–1071. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2018.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grandini S, Goracci C, Monticelli F, Borracchini A, Ferrari M. SEM evaluation of the cement layer thickness after luting two different posts. J Adhes Dent. 2005;7(3):235–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomes GM, De Rezende EC, Gomes OMM, Gomes JC, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Influence of the resin cement thickness on bond strength and gap formation of fiber posts bonded to root dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2014;16(1):71–78. doi:10.3290/j.jad.a30878
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuttler S, Mc Lean A, Dorn S, Fischzang A. The impact of post space preparation with Gates-Glidden drills on residual dentin thickness in distal roots of mandibular molars. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004;135:903–909. doi:10.14219/jada.archive.2004.0336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grande NM, Butti A, Plotino G, Somma F. Adapting fiber-reinforced composite root canal posts for use in noncircular-shaped canals. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2006;18(9):593–599.
   Google Scholar
• Rocha AT, Gonçalves LM, Vasconcelos AJC, Matos Maia Filho E, Nunes Carvalho C, De Jesus Tavarez RR. Effect of anatomical customization of the fiber post on the bond strength of a self-adhesive resin cement. Int J Dent. 2017;2017:5010712. doi:10.1155/2017/5010712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsintsadze N, Juloski J, Carrabba M, et al. Performance of CAD/CAM fabricated fiber posts in oval-shaped root canals: an in vitro study. Am J Dent. 2017;30:248–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruse ND, Sadoun MJ. Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications. J Dent Res. 2014;93:1232–1234. doi:10.1177/0022034514553976
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangano F, Gandolfi A, Luongo G, Logozzo S. Intraoral scanners in dentistry: a review of the current literature. BMC Oral Health. 2017;17(1):149. doi:10.1186/s12903-017-0442-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangano FG, Veronesi G, Hauschild U, Mijiritsky E, Mangano C. Trueness and precision of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study. PLoS One. 2016;11(9):e0163107. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0163107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangano FG, Hauschild U, Veronesi G, Imburgia M, Mangano C, Admakin O. Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners in the impressions of single and multiple implants: a comparative in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19(1):101. doi:10.1186/s12903-019-0792-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JH, Sohn DS, Lee CH. Fabricating a fiber-reinforced post and zirconia core with CAD/CAM technology. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112:683–685. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.01.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu P, Deng XL, Wang XZ. Use of a CAD/CAM-fabricated glass fiber post and core to restore fractured anterior teeth: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2010;103:330–333. doi:10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60071-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Li Y, Deng X, Wang X. A novel computer-aided method to fabricate a custom one-piece glass fiber dowel-and-core based on digitized impression and crown preparation data. J Prosthodont. 2014;23:276–283. doi:10.1111/jopr.2014.23.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Spina F, da Costa RG, Correr GM, Rached RN. Scanning of root canal impression for the fabrication of a resin CAD-CAM-customized post-and-core. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;120(2):242–245. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto A, Arcuri L, Carosi P, et al. In vitro evaluation of the post-space depth reading with an intraoral scanner (IOS) compared to a traditional silicon impression. Oral Implantol (Rome). 2017;10:360–368. doi:10.11138/orl/2017.10.4.360
   Google Scholar
• Campanella V, Libonati A, Nardi R, et al. Single tooth anesthesia versus conventional anesthesia: a cross-over study. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22:3205–3213. doi:10.1007/s00784-018-2413-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libonati A, Nardi R, Gallusi G, et al. Pain and anxiety associated with computer-controlled local anaesthesia: systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-over studies. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2018;19(4):324–332. doi:10.23804/ejpd.2018.19.04.14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eid RY, Koken S, Baba NZ, Ounsi H, Ferrari M, Salameh Z. Effect of fabrication technique and thermal cycling on the bond strength of CAD/CAM milled custom fit anatomical post and core: an in vitro study. J Prosthodont. 2019;28(8):898–905. doi:10.1111/jopr.13101
   Google Scholar
• Ferrini F, Sannino G, Chiola C, Capparè P, Gastaldi G, Gherlone EF. Influence of Intra-Oral Scanner (I.O.S.) in the marginal accuracy of CAD/CAM single crowns. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(4):E544. doi:10.3390/ijerph16040544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruschel GH, Gomes ÉA, Silva-Sousa YT, et al. Mechanical properties and superficial characterization of a milled CAD-CAM glass fiber post. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018;82:187–189. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.03.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oguz Ahmet BS, Egilmez F, Ergun G, Cekic Nagas I. Surface treatment effects on bond strength of CAD/CAM fabricated posts to root canal dentin. Am J Dent. 2019;32(3):113–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsintsadze N, Juloski J, Carrabba M, et al. Effects of scanning technique on in vitro performance of CAD/CAM-fabricated fiber posts. J Oral Sci. 2018;60:262–268. doi:10.2334/josnusd.17-0254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayama H, Fueki K, Wadachi J, Wakabayashi N. Trueness and precision of digital impression obtained using an intraoral scanner with different head size in the partially edentulous mandible. J Prosthodont Res. 2018;62:347–352. doi:10.1016/j.jpor.2018.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar