163
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Shear Bond Strength of Bulk-Fill Composites to Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Evaluated by Different Adhesion Protocols

ORCID Icon
Pages 367-375 | Published online: 16 Sep 2020

References

  • Wilson A, Kent B. A new translucent cement for dentistry. The glass ionomer cement. Br Dent J. 1972;132(4):133–135. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.4802810
  • Ngo H. Glass-ionomer cements as restorative and preventive. Mater Clin North Am. 2010;54(3):551–563.
  • Sidhu SK. Clinical evaluations of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations. Dent Mater. 2010;26:7–12. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2009.08.015
  • Nicholson JW, Sidhu SK, Czarnecka B. Enhancing the mechanical properties of glass-ionomer dental cements: a review. Mater (Basel). 2020;13(11):2510. doi:10.3390/ma13112510
  • Burgess JO, Barghi N, Chan DC, Hummert T. A comparative study of three glass ionomer base materials. Am J Dent. 1993;6(3):137–141.
  • Mount GJ, Tyas MJ, Ferracane JL, et al. A revised classification for direct tooth-colored restorative materials. Quintessence Int. 2009;40(8):691–697.
  • Farah CS, Orton VG, Collard SM. Shear bond strength of chemical and light-cured glass ionomer cements bonded to resin composites. Aust Dent J. 1998;43(2):81–86. doi:10.1111/j.1834-7819.1998.tb06095.x
  • McLean JW, Powis DR, Prosser HJ, Wilson AD. The use of glass-ionomer cements in bonding composite resins to dentin. Br Dent J. 1985;158(11):410–414. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.4805621
  • Andersson‐Wenckert IE, Van Dijken JWV, Hörstedt P. Modified Class II open sandwich restorations: evaluation of interfacial adaptation and influence of different restorative techniques. Eur J Oral Sci. 2002;110:270–275. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0447.2002.11210.x
  • Van Dijken J, Kieri C, Carlén M. Longevity of extensive Class II open sandwich restorations with a resin-modified GIC-composite. J Dent Res. 1999;78:1319–1325. doi:10.1177/00220345990780070601
  • Gopikrishna V, Abarajithin M, Krithikadatta J, Kandaswamy D. Shear bond strength evaluation of resin composite bonded to GIC using three different adhesives. Oper Dent. 2009;34(4):467–471. doi:10.2341/08-009-L
  • Gupta R, Mahajan S. Shear bond strength evaluation of resin composite bonded to GIC using different adhesives. J Clin Diagnost Res. 2015;9(1):ZC27–ZC29.
  • Liu LJ, Liu YY, Sundström SRF. Flexure strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cements and their bond strength to dental composites. Acta Odontol Scand. 1996;54(1):55–58. doi:10.3109/00016359609003510
  • Zhang Y, Burrow MF, Palamara JEA, Thomas CDL. Bonding to glass ionomer cements using resin-based adhesives. Oper Dent. 2011;36(6):618–625. doi:10.2341/10-140-L
  • Ilie N, Hickel R. Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite based on the SDR™ technology. Dent Mater. 2011;27(4):348–355. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2010.11.014
  • Gonçalves F, Campos LMP, Rodrigues-Júnior EC, et al. A comparative study of bulk-fill composites: degree of conversion, post-gel shrinkage and cytotoxicity. Braz Oral Res. 2018;32:e17. doi:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0017
  • Gonçalves F, Azevedo CL, Ferracane JL, Braga RR. BisGMA/TEGDMA ratio and filler content effects on shrinkage stress. Dent Mater. 2011;27(6):520–526. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2011.01.007
  • Van Dijken JW, Pallesen U. Posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations: a 5-year randomized controlled clinical study. J Dent. 2016;51:29–35. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2016.05.008
  • Bayraktar Y, Ercan E, Hamidi MM, Çolak H. One-year clinical evaluation of different types of bulk-fill composites. J Invest Clin Dent. 2017;8(2):1–9. doi:10.1111/jicd.12210
  • Fronza BM, Ayres A, Pacheco RR, Rueggeberg FA, Dias C, Giannini M. Characterization of inorganic filler content, mechanical properties, and light transmission of bulk-fill resin composites. Oper Dent. 2017;42(4):445–455. doi:10.2341/16-024-L
  • Pereira R, Giorgi MCC, Lins RBE, et al. Physical and photoelastic properties of bulk-fill and conventional composites. Clin Cosmet Invest Dent. 2018;10:287–296. doi:10.2147/CCIDE.S184660
  • Smith GE. Surface deterioration of glass-ionomer cement during acid etching: an SEM evaluation. Oper Dent. 1988;13(1):3–7.
  • Knight GM, McIntyre JM. Bond strengths between composite resin and auto cure glass ionomer cement using the co-cure technique. Aust Dent J. 2006;51(2):175–179. doi:10.1111/j.1834-7819.2006.tb00423.x
  • Inoue S, Abe Y, Yoshida Y, et al. Effect of conditioner on bond strength of glass-ionomer adhesive to dentin/enamel with and without smear layer interposition. Oper Dent. 2004;29(6):685–692.
  • Pamir T, Şen BH, Evcin Ö. Effects of etching and adhesive applications on the bond strength between composite resin and glass-ionomer cements. J Appl Oral Sci. 2012;20(6):636–642. doi:10.1590/S1678-77572012000600008
  • Lima RBW, Troconis CCM, Moreno MBP, Murillo-Gómez F, De Goes MF. Depth of cure of bulk fill resin composites: a systematic review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018;30(6):492–501. doi:10.1111/jerd.12394
  • Becci ACO, Benetti MS, Domingues NB, Giro EMA. Bond strength of a composite resin to glass ionomer cements using different adhesive systems. Rev Odontol UNESP. 2017;46(4):214–219. doi:10.1590/1807-2577.01717
  • Mangum FI, Berry EA 3rd, Parikh UK, Ladd D. Optimal etching time of glass ionomer cement for maximum bond of composite resin. J Am Dent Assoc. 1990;120:535–538. doi:10.14219/jada.archive.1990.0072
  • Jang J-H, Park S-H, Hwang I-N. Polymerization shrinkage and depth of cure of bulk-fill resin composites and highly filled flowable resin. Oper Dent. 2015;40(2):172–180. doi:10.2341/13-307-L
  • Ilie N, Bucuta S, Draenert M. Bulk-fill resin-based composites: an in vitro assessment of their mechanical performance. Oper Dent. 2013;38(6):618–625. doi:10.2341/12-395-L
  • Kim RJ, Kim YJ, Choi NS, Lee IB. Polymerization shrinkage, modulus, and shrinkage stress related to tooth-restoration interfacial debonding in bulk-fill composites. J Dent. 2015;43(4):430–439. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2015.02.002
  • Bona AD, Pinzetta C, Rosa V. Effect of acid etching of glass ionomer cement surface on the microleakage of sandwich restorations. J Appl Oral Sci. 2007;15(3):230–234. doi:10.1590/S1678-77572007000300014
  • Arora V, Kundabala M, Parolia A, Thomas MS, Pai V. Comparison of the shear bond strength of RMGIC to a resin composite using different adhesive systems: an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2010;13(2):80–83. doi:10.4103/0972-0707.66716
  • Hinoura K, Suzuki H, Onose H. Factor influencing bond strengths between unetched glass ionomer and resins. Oper Dent. 1991;16:90–95.
  • Ha H‑T. The effect of the maturation time of calcium silicate‑based cement (Biodentine™) on resin bonding: an in vitro study. Appl Adhes Sci. 2019;7:1. doi:10.1186/s40563-019-0118-7
  • Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, et al. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res. 2004;83(6):454–458. doi:10.1177/154405910408300604
  • Muñoz MA, Luque-Martinez I, Malaquias P, et al. In vitro longevity of bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentin. Oper Dent. 2015;40:282–292. doi:10.2341/14-055-L
  • Cardoso GC, Nakanishi L, Isolan CP, Jardim PS, Moraes RR. Bond stability of universal adhesives applied to dentin using etch-and-rinse or self-etch strategies. Braz Dent J. 2019;30(5):467–475. doi:10.1590/0103-6440201902578