A systematic review of transarterial embolization versus emergency surgery in treatment of major nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding

References

• HearnshawSALoganRFLoweDTravisSPMurphyMFPalmerKRAcute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the UK: patient characteristics, diagnoses and outcomes in the 2007 UK auditGut201160101327133521490373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LauJYSungJJLamYHEndoscopic retreatment compared with surgery in patients with recurrent bleeding after initial endoscopic control of bleeding ulcersN Engl J Med19993401075175610072409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ClarkeMGBuntingDSmartNJLowesJMitchellSJThe surgical management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a 12-year experienceInt J Surg20108537738020538082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RoschJDotterCTBrownMJSelective arterial embolization. A new method for control of acute gastrointestinal bleedingRadiology197210223033064536688
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GriffithsEADevittPGBrightTWatsonDIThompsonSKSurgical management of peptic ulcer bleeding by Australian and New Zealand upper gastrointestinal surgeonsANZ J Surg201383310410823586097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MirsadraeeSTirukondaPNicholsonAEverettSMMcPhersonSJEmbolization for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal tract haemorrhage: a systematic reviewClin Radiol201166650050921371695
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Society of Gastroenterology Endoscopy CommitteeNon-variceal upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage: guidelinesGut200251Suppl 4iv1iv612208839
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Intercollegiate Guidelines NetworkManagement of Acute Upper and Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A National Clinical GuidelineEdinburghScottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network2008
   Google Scholar
• BarkunANBardouMKuipersEJInternational Consensus Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Conference GroupInternational consensus recommendations on the management of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleedingAnn Intern Med2010152210111320083829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DworzynskiKPollitVKelseyAHigginsBPalmerKGuideline Development GroupManagement of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: summary of NICE guidanceBMJ2012344e341222695897
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StangACritical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analysesEur J Epidemiol201025960360520652370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LiberatiAAltmanDGTetzlaffJThe PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaborationAnn Intern Med20091514W65W9419622512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JairathVKahanBCLoganRFNational audit of the use of surgery and radiological embolization after failed endoscopic haemostasis for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleedingBr J Surg201299121672168023023268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RipollCBañaresRBeceiroIComparison of transcatheter arterial embolization and surgery for treatment of bleeding peptic ulcer after endoscopic treatment failureJ Vasc Interv Radiol200415544745015126653
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DefreyneLDe SchrijverIDecruyenaereJTherapeutic decision-making in endoscopically unmanageable nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhageCardiovasc Intervent Radiol200831589790518363055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ErikssonLGLjungdahlMSundbomMNymanRTranscatheter arterial embolization versus surgery in the treatment of upper gastrointestinal bleeding after therapeutic endoscopy failureJ Vasc Interv Radiol200819101413141818755604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PuaUShort- and long-term results of transcatheter embolization for massive arterial hemorrhage from gastroduodenal ulcers not controlled by endoscopic hemostasisCan J Gastroenterol2011251265422175053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchenkerMPDuszakRJrSoulenMCUpper gastrointestinal hemorrhage and transcatheter embolotherapy: clinical and technical factors impacting success and survivalJ Vasc Interv Radiol200112111263127111698624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AinaROlivaVLTherasseEArterial embolotherapy for upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: outcome assessmentJ Vasc Interv Radiol200112219520011265883
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EncarnacionCEKadirSBeamCAPayneCSGastrointestinal bleeding: treatment with gastrointestinal arterial embolizationRadiology199218325055081561358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CooperGSChakAWayLEHammarPJHarperDLRosenthalGEEarly endoscopy in upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: associations with recurrent bleeding, surgery, and length of hospital stayGastrointest Endosc19994921451529925690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PoultsidesGAKimCJOrlandoRPerosGHalliseyMJVignatiPVAngiographic embolization for gastroduodenal hemorrhage: safety, efficacy, and predictors of outcomeArch Surg2008143545746118490553
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LangEKTranscatheter embolization in management of hemorrhage from duodenal ulcer: long-term results and complicationsRadiology199218237037071535883
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SungJJTsoiKKMaTKYungMYLauJYChiuPWCauses of mortality in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding: a prospective cohort study of 10,428 casesAm J Gastroenterol20101051848919755976
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CrooksCJCardTRWestJExcess long-term mortality following non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a population-based cohort studyPLoS Med2013104e100143723637580
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinese University of Hong KongTAE and Surgery in Patients With Peptic Ulcer Bleeding Uncontrolled by Endoscopic Therapy Available from: http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00766961. NLM identifier: NCT00766961Accessed February 18, 2014
   Google Scholar
• KubbaAKChoudariCRajgopalCPalmerKRThe outcome of urgent surgery for major peptic ulcer haemorrhage following failed endoscopic therapyEur J Gastroenterol Hepatol1996812117511788980936
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HallandMYoungMFitzgeraldMNInderKDugganJMDugganACharacteristics and outcomes of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage in a tertiary referral hospitalDig Dis Sci201055123430343520407826
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AngDTeoEKTanAA comparison of surgery versus transcatheter angiographic embolization in the treatment of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding uncontrolled by endoscopyEur J Gastroenterol Hepatol201224892993822617363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LangnerILangnerSParteckeLIAcute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: is a radiological interventional approach an alternative to emergency surgery?Emerg Radiol200815641341918512090
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LarssenLMogerTBjørnbethBALygrenIKløwNETranscatheter arterial embolization in the management of bleeding duodenal ulcers: a 5.5-year retrospective study of treatment and outcomeScand J Gastroenterol200843221722218224566
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VenclauskasLBratlieSOZachrissonKMaleckasAPundziusJJönsonCIs transcatheter arterial embolization a safer alternative than surgery when endoscopic therapy fails in bleeding duodenal ulcer?Scand J Gastroenterol201045329930420017710
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WongTCWongKTChiuPWA comparison of angiographic embolization with surgery after failed endoscopic hemostasis to bleeding peptic ulcersGastrointest Endosc201173590090821288512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar