Cost-Utility Analysis of Sacroiliac Joint Fusion in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Multi-Level Lumbar Fusion to the Sacrum

References

• Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), National Inpatient Sample (NIS). Clinical classifications software Refined (CCSR) for ICD-10-PCS procedure codes; 2018. Available from: https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/faststats/NationalProceduresServlet?year1=2018&characteristic1=0&included1=1&year2=2018&characteristic2=43&included2=1&expansionInfoState=hide&dataTablesState=hide&definitionsState=hide&exportState=hide. Accessed June 11, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanov AA, Kiapour A, Ebraheim NA, Goelet V. Lumbar fusion leads to increases in angular motion and stress across sacroiliac joint: a finite element study. Spine. 2009;34:E162–E169. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181978ea3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unoki E, Miyakoshi N, Abe E, et al. Sacropelvic fixation with S2 alar iliac screws may prevent sacroiliac joint pain after multisegment spinal fusion. Spine. 2019;44(17):E1024–E1030. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000003041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unoki E, Miyakoshi N, Abe E, et al. Sacroiliac joint pain after multiple-segment lumbar fusion: a long-term observational study – non-fused sacrum vs. fused sacrum. Spine Surg Relat Res. 2017;1(2):90–95. doi:10.22603/ssrr.1.2016-0010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finger T, Bayer S, Bertog M, et al. Impact of sacropelvic fixation on the development of postoperative sacroiliac joint pain following multilevel stabilization for degenerative spine disease. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2016;150:18–22. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.08.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonosu J, Kurosawa D, Nishi T, et al. The association between sacroiliac joint-related pain following lumbar spine surgery and spinopelvic parameters: a prospective multicenter study. Eur Spine J. 2019;28(7):1603–1609. doi:10.1007/s00586-019-05952-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husereau D, Drummond M, Augustovski F, et al; CHEERS 2022 ISPOR Good Research Practices Task Force. Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations. Value Health. 2022;25(1):3–9. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2021.11.1351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebert U, Alagoz O, Bayoumi AM, et al. State-transition modeling: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM modeling good research practices task force-3. Med Decis Making. 2012;32(5):690–700. doi:10.1177/0272989X12455463
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders GD, Neumann PJ, Basu A, et al. Recommendations for conduct, methodological practices, and reporting of cost-effectiveness analyses: second panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. JAMA. 2016;316(10):1093–1103. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.12195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC. Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. Oxford University Press; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Health Statistics. Health, United States, 2019: table 026. Hyattsville, MD; 2021. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/hus/contents2019.htm. Accessed August 29, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Baker JF. Sacropelvic parameters and L5 spondylolysis: computed tomography analysis. Asian Spine J. 2022;16(1):66–74. doi:10.31616/asj.2020.0442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh SK, Chung SS, Lee CS. Correlation of pelvic parameters with isthmic spondylolisthesis. Asian Spine J. 2009;3(1):21–26. doi:10.4184/asj.2009.3.1.21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Legaye J. The femoro-sacral posterior angle: an anatomical sagittal pelvic parameter usable with dome-shaped sacrum. Eur Spine J. 2007;16(2):219–225. doi:10.1007/s00586-006-0090-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ackerman SJ, Polly DW, Knight T, Holt T, Cummings J. Non-operative care to manage sacroiliac joint disruption and degenerative sacroiliitis is costly and requires high medical resource utilization in the Medicare population. J Neurosurg: Spine. 2014;20(4):354–363. doi:10.3171/2014.1.SPINE13188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ackerman SJ, Polly DW, Knight T, Schneider K, Holt T, Cummings J. Comparison of cost of non-operative care to minimally invasive surgery for sacroiliac joint disruption and degenerative sacroiliitis in a United States commercial payer population: potential economic implications of a new minimally-invasive technology. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2014;6:283–296. doi:10.2147/CEOR.S63757
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cher DJ, Frasco MA, Arnold RJG, Polly DW. Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2016;8:1–14. doi:10.2147/CEOR.S107803
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Healy WL, Rana AJ, Iorio R. Hospital economics of primary total knee arthroplasty at a teaching hospital. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(1):87–94. doi:10.1007/s11999-010-1486-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rana AJ, Iorio R, Healy WL. Hospital economics of primary THA decreasing reimbursement and increasing cost, 1990 to 2008. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(2):355–361. doi:10.1007/s11999-010-1526-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez CD, Boddapati V, Lombardi JM, et al. Recent trends in Medicare utilization and reimbursement for lumbar spine fusion and discectomy procedures. Spine J. 2020;20(10):1586–1594. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2020.05.558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polly DW, Swofford J, Whang PG, et al.; INSITE Study Group. Two-year outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion vs. non-surgical management for sacroiliac joint dysfunction. Int J Spine Surg. 2016;10(28):1–22. doi:10.14444/3028
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duhon BS, Bitan F, Lockstadt H, Kovalsky D, Cher D, Hillen T; SIFI Study Group. Triangular titanium implants for minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: 2-year follow-up from a prospective multicenter trial. Int J Spine Surg. 2016;10:13. doi:10.14444/3013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturesson B, Kools D, Pflugmacher R, Gasbarrini A, Prestamburgo D, Dengler J; iMIA Study Group. Six-month outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of minimally invasive SI joint fusion with triangular titanium implants vs. conservative management. Eur Spine J. 2017;26(3):708–719. doi:10.1007/s0058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cher D. SI-BONE Internal Report (12-month EQ-5D TTO data pooled from INSITE, SIFI, iMIA); June 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health. The cost-effectiveness analysis registry. Boston: Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center. Available from: www.cearegistry.org. Accessed May 13, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Blissett DB, Blissett RS, Newton Ede MPN, et al. Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion with triangular titanium implants: cost‑utility analysis from NHS perspective. PharmacoEcon Open. 2021;5:197–209. doi:10.1007/s41669-020-00236-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dakin H, Gray A, Fitzpatrick R, Maclennan G, Murray D; KAT Trial Group. Rationing of total knee replacement: a cost-effectiveness analysis on a large trial data set. BMJ Open. 2012;2(1):e000332. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Losina E, Walensky RP, Kessler CL, et al. Cost-effectiveness of total knee arthroplasty in the United States: patient risk and hospital volume. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(12):1113–1121. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.136
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chang RW, Pellisier JM, Hazen GB. A cost-effectiveness analysis of total Hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the Hip. JAMA. 1996;275(11):858–865. doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03530350040032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker SL, Anderson LH, Nelson T, Patel VV. Cost-effectiveness of three treatment strategies for lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative care, laminectomy, and the Superion interspinous spacer. Int J Spine Surg. 2015;9:28. doi:10.14444/2028
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tosteson AN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, et al. Comparative effectiveness evidence from the spine patient outcomes research trial: surgical versus nonoperative care for spinal stenosis, degenerative spondylolisthesis, and intervertebral disc herniation. Spine. 2011;36(24):2061–2068. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318235457b
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujimori T, Miwa T, Iwasaki M, Oda T. Cost-effectiveness of posterior lumbar interbody fusion in the Japanese universal health insurance system. J Orthop Sci. 2018;23(2):299–303. doi:10.1016/j.jos.2017.11.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dengler JD, Kools D, Pflugmacher R, et al. 1-year results of a randomized controlled trial of conservative management vs. minimally invasive surgical treatment for sacroiliac joint pain. Pain Physician. 2017;20(6):537–550. doi:10.36076/ppj.20.5.537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SI Joint Stabilization in Long Fusion to the Pelvis (SILVIA). Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04062630. Accessed January 13, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsey DP, Kiapour A, Yerby SA, Goel VK. Sacroiliac joint fusion minimally affects adjacent lumbar segment motion: a finite element study. Int J Spine Surg. 2015;9:64. doi:10.14444/2064
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Joukar A, Chande RD, Carpenter RD, et al. Effects on hip stress following sacroiliac joint fixation: a finite element study. JOR Spine. 2019;2:e1067. doi:10.1002/jsp2.1067
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whang PG, Darr E, Meyer SC, et al. Long-term prospective clinical and radiographic outcomes after minimally invasive lateral transiliac sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular titanium implants. Med Devices Evid Res. 2019;12:411–422. doi:10.2147/MDER.S219862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bureau of Labor Statistics, Division of Consumer Prices and Price Indexes. CPI-All Urban Consumers (Current Series). Available from: https://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/surveymost?cu. Accessed June 7, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Sheikh SR, Thompson NR, Benzel E, et al. Can we justify it? Trends in the utilization of spinal fusions and associated reimbursement. Neurosurgery. 2020;86(2):E193–E202. doi:10.1093/neuros/nyz400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang H, Frean M, Sylwestrzak G, Ukert B. Trends in disenrollment and reenrollment within US commercial health insurance plans, 2006–2018. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;2(5):e220320. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.0320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlotte D, Mathew NH, Tamir A, et al. Variations in LOS and its main determinants overtime at an academic spinal care center from 2006–2019. Eur Spine J. 2022;11:1–8. doi:10.1007/s00586-021-07086-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christelis N, Simpson B, Russo M, et al. Persistent spinal pain syndrome: a proposal for failed back surgery syndrome and ICD-11. Pain Medicine. 2021;22(4):807–818. doi:10.1093/pm/pnab015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar