Value analysis of digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening in a commercially-insured US population

References

• SiegelRMaJZouZJemalACancer statistics, 2014CA Cancer J Clin201464192924399786
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HowladerNNooneAMKrapchoMSEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2011Bethesda, MD, USANational Cancer Institute2014 Available from: http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2011/Accessed November 17, 2014
   Google Scholar
• SmithRAManassaram-BaptisteDBrooksDCancer screening in the United States, 2014: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screeningCA Cancer J Clin2014641305124408568
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BerryDACroninKAPlevritisSKCancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network CollaboratorsEffect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancerN Engl J Med2005353171784179216251534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Cancer SocietyBreast Cancer Facts and Figures 2012Atlanta, GA, USAAmerican Cancer Society Inc2012 Available from: http://www.cancer.org/research/cancerfactsfigures/cancerfactsfigures/cancer-facts-figures-2012Accessed October 16, 2014
   Google Scholar
• American Cancer SocietyGuidelines for the early detection of cancer Available from: http://www.cancer.org/healthy/findcancerearly/cancerscreeningguidelines/american-cancer-society-guidelines-for-the-early-detection-of-cancerAccessed October 16, 2014
   Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and GynecologistsPractice bulletin no 122: breast cancer screeningObstet Gynecol20111182 Pt 137238221775869
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SmithRASaslowDSawyerKAAmerican Cancer Society High-Risk Work GroupAmerican Cancer Society Screening Older Women Work GroupAmerican Cancer Society Mammography Work GroupAmerican Cancer Society Physical Examination Work GroupAmerican Cancer Society New Technologies Work GroupAmerican Cancer Society Breast Cancer Advisory GroupAmerican Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening: update 2003CA Cancer J Clin200353314116912809408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NelsonHDTyneKNaikAScreening for Breast Cancer: Systematic Evidence Review Update for the US Preventive Services Task ForceEvidence Review Update No 74. AHRQ Publication No 10-05142-EF-1Rockville, MD, USAAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality2009 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK36392/Accessed October 16, 2014
   Google Scholar
• American Cancer SocietyBreast Cancer Facts and Figures 2013–2014Atlanta, GA, USAAmerican Cancer Society Inc2013 Available from: http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@research/documents/document/acspc-042725.pdfAccessed October 16, 2014
   Google Scholar
• HubbardRAZhuWHorblyukRDiagnostic imaging and biopsy pathways following abnormal screen-film and digital screening mammographyBreast Cancer Res Treat2013138387988723471650
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NewmanLIOM report sets policy priorities for improving breast cancer screeningJ Natl Cancer Inst200193857457511309426
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• RosenbergRDYankaskasBCAbrahamLAPerformance benchmarks for screening mammographyRadiology20062411556616990671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchellMJYankaskasBCBallard-BarbashREvidence-based target recall rates for screening mammographyRadiology2007243368168917517927
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)Imaging efficiency: percentage of patients with mammography screening studies that are followed by a diagnostic mammography, ultrasound or MRI of the breast in an outpatient or office setting within 45 days. Measure Summary NQMC-8949572014 Available from: http://www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/content.aspx?id=47053Accessed October 16, 2014
   Google Scholar
• RauscherGHMurphyAMOrsiJMDupuyDMGrablerPMWeldonCBBeyond the mammography quality standards act: measuring the quality of breast cancer screening programsAJR Am J Roentgenol2014202114515124261339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SmithATomosynthesis: the use of breast tomosynthesis in a clinical settingWhite paper WP-00060 Rev 00262012Bedford, MA, USAHologic, Inc2012 Available from: http://www.breasttomo.com/sites/default/files/010-WP-00060-Rev2_June2012-TomoWhitePaper.pdfAccessed October 16, 2014
   Google Scholar
• US Food and Drug AdministrationSelenia Dimensions 3D System–P080003 Available from: http://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/productsandmedicalprocedures/deviceapprovalsandclearances/recently-approveddevices/ucm246400.htmAccessed October 16, 2014
   Google Scholar
• SmithAFull-field breast tomosynthesisRadiol Manage2005275253116294583
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DestounisSArienoAMorganRInitial experience with combination digital breast tomosynthesis plus full field digital mammography or full field digital mammography alone in the screening environmentJ Clin Imaging Sci20144924744966
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SkaanePBandosAIGullienRComparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening programRadiology20132671475623297332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CiattoSHoussamiNBernardiDIntegration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison studyLancet Oncol201314758358923623721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RoseSLTidwellALBujnochLJKushwahaACNordmannASSextonRJrImplementation of breast tomosynthesis in a routine screening practice: an observational studyAJR Am J Roentgenol201320061401140823701081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HaasBMKalraVGeiselJRaghuMDurandMPhilpottsLEComparison of tomosynthesis plus digital mammography and digital mammography alone for breast cancer screeningRadiology2013269369470023901124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ConantEWanFThomasMImplementing digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in a screening population: PPV1 as a measure of outcomeAbstract presented at the Radiological Society of North America Scientific Assembly and Annual MeetingChicago, IL, USADecember 1–6, 2013 Available from: http://www2.rsna.org/timssnet/rsna/media/pr2013/Conant/abstract/Conant-Tomosynthesis-Abstract-LH.pdfAccessed October 16, 2014
   Google Scholar
• GreenbergJSJavittMCKatzenJMichaelSHollandAEClinical performance metrics of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis compared with 2D digital mammography for breast cancer screening in community practiceAJR Am J Roentgenol2014203368769324918774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FriedewaldSMRaffertyEARoseSLBreast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammographyJAMA2014311242499250725058084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KalraVHaasBFormanHPhilpottsLCost-effectiveness of digital breast tomosynthesisAbstract presented at the Radiological Society of North America Scientific Assembly and Annual MeetingChicago, IL, USANovember 25–30, 2012 Available from: http://archive.rsna.org/2012/12043617.htmlAccessed October 16, 2014
   Google Scholar
• KalraVHaasBPhilpottsLCost-effectiveness of tomosynthesis in screening mammography: analysis by breast density and patient ageAbstract presented at the Radiological Society of North America Scientific Assembly and Annual MeetingChicago, IL, USADecember 1–6, 2013 Available from: http://archive.rsna.org/2013/13044485.htmlAccessed October 16, 2014
   Google Scholar
• ElmoreJGNakanoCYKoepsellTDDesnickLMD’OrsiCJRansohoffDFInternational variation in screening mammography interpretations in community-based programsJ Natl Cancer Inst200395181384139313130114
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Truven Health Analytics, IncTruven Health Analytics MarketScan^® Research Databases Available from: http://truvenhealth.com/your-healthcare-focus/analytic-research/marketscan-research-databasesAccessed October 16, 2014
   Google Scholar
• BonafedeMMMillerJDLenhartGMNelsonJFajardoLLHealth insurer burden of patient recall following breast cancer screening mammographyValue Health2014173A82
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TiceJAOllendorfDALeeJMPearsonSDThe comparative clinical effectiveness and value of supplemental screening test following negative mammography in women with dense breast tissueCalifornia Technology Assessment ForumSan Francisco, CA, USACalifornia Technology Assessment Forum1142013 Available from: http://www.ctaf.org/sites/default/files/assessments/ctaf-final-report-dense-breast-imaging-11.04.2013-b.pdfAccessed October 16, 2014
   Google Scholar
• SicklesEAD’OrsiCJBassettLWACR BI-RADS® mammographyACR BI-RADS^® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data SystemReston, VA, USAAmerican College of Radiology2013
   Google Scholar
• PartridgeAHHughesMEOttesenRAThe effect of age on delay in diagnosis and stage of breast cancerOncologist201217677578222554997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SkaanePBandosAIGullienRProspective trial comparing full-field digital mammography (FFDM) versus combined FFDM and tomosynthesis in a population-based screening programme using independent double reading with arbitrationEur Radiol20132382061207123553585
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MittmannNIsogaiPKSaskinRPopulation-based health care cost estimates related to breast cancer by stagingJ Clin Oncol201129Suppl 156108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LegorretaAPBrooksRJLeibowitzANSolinLJCost of breast cancer treatment. A 4-year longitudinal studyArch Intern Med199615619219722018885818
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LindforsKKMcGahanMCRosenquistCJHurlockGSComputer-aided detection of breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness studyRadiology2006239371071716569787
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ElmoreJGGrossCPThe cost of breast cancer screening in the United States: a picture is worth … a billion dollars?Ann Intern Med2014160320324658697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BarlowWEChiCCarneyPAAccuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologistsJ Natl Cancer Inst200496241840185015601640
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• US Food and Drug AdministrationMammography Quality Standards Act and Program, National Statistics. Total annual mammography procedures reported, as of June 1, 2014 Available from: http://www.fda.gov/Radiation-EmittingProducts/MammographyQualityStandardsActandProgram/FacilityScorecard/ucm113858.htmAccessed October 16, 2014
   Google Scholar
• O’DonoghueCEklundMOzanneEMEssermanLJAggregate cost of mammography screening in the United States: comparison of current practice and advocated guidelinesAnn Intern Med2014160314524658691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrodersenJJørgensenKJGøtzschePCThe benefits and harms of screening for cancer with a focus on breast screeningPol Arch Med Wewn20101203899420332715
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrodersenJSiersmaVDLong-term psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening mammographyAnn Fam Med201311210611523508596
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SalzTRichmanARBrewerNTMeta-analyses of the effect of false-positive mammograms on generic and specific psychosocial outcomesPsychooncology201019101026103420882572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BondMPaveyTWelchKSystematic review of the psychological consequences of false-positive screening mammogramsHealth Technol Assess201317131170vvi23540978
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HarveySCVegesnaAMassSClarkeJSkoufalosAUnderstanding patient options, utilization patterns, and burdens associated with breast cancer screeningJ Womens Health (Larchmt)201423Suppl 1S3S925247383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlcuskyMPhilpottsLBonafedeMClarkeJSkoufalosAThe patient burden of screening mammography recallJ Womens Health (Larchmt)201423Suppl 1S11S1925247382
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChubakJBoudreauDMFishmanPAElmoreJGCost of breast-related care in the year following false positive screening mammogramsMed Care201048981582020706161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PhilpottsLKalraVCrenshawJButlerRHow tomosynthesis optimizes patient work up, throughput, and resource utilizationAbstract presented at the Radiological Society of North America Scientific Assembly and Annual MeetingChicago, IL, USADecember 1–6, 2013 Available from: http://archive.rsna.org/2013/13016543.htmlAccessed October 16, 2014
   Google Scholar
• American Cancer SocietyCancer Prevention and Early Detection Facts and Figures 2013Atlanta, GA, USAAmerican Cancer Society2013 Available from: http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@epidemi-ologysurveilance/documents/document/acspc-037535.pdfAccessed October 16, 2014
   Google Scholar
• CroninKAMigliorettiDLKrapchoMBias associated with self-report of prior screening mammographyCancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev20091861699170519505902
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar