References
- SongYYangYChenWClinical response and hospital costs associated with the empirical use of vancomycin and linezolid for hospital-acquired pneumonia in a Chinese tertiary care hospital: a retrospective cohort studyClinicoecon Outcomes Res2014645146125378939
- ChanJDPhamTNWongJClinical outcomes of linezolid vs vancomycin in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ventilator-associated pneumonia: retrospective analysisJ Intensive Care Med201126638539121606058
- PeyraniPWiemkenTLKelleyRHigher clinical success in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus treated with linezolid compared with vancomycin: results from the IMPACT-HAP studyCrit Care2014183R11824916853
- WatanabeAGotoHSomaKUsefulness of linezolid in the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia caused by MRSA: a prospective observational studyJ Infect Chemother201218216016822041987
- LinDFZhangYYWuJFLinezolid for the treatment of infections caused by Gram-positive pathogens in ChinaInt J Antimicrob Agents200832324124918635341
- LiuYNCaoBWangHAdult hospital acquired pneumonia: a multicenter study on microbiology and clinical characteristics of patients from 9 Chinese citiesZhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi20123510739746 Chinese23289990
- ZhangYYaoZZhanSDisease burden of intensive care unit-acquired pneumonia in China: a systematic review and meta-analysisInt J Infect Diss2014298490
- WunderinkRGNiedermanMSKollefMHLinezolid in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial pneumonia: a randomized, controlled studyClin Infect Dis201254562162922247123
- LiuCBayerACosgroveSEClinical practice guidelines by the infectious diseases society of america for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children: executive summaryClin Infect Dis201152328529221217178
- JiangHTangRNWangJLinezolid versus vancomycin or teicoplanin for nosocomial pneumonia: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trialsEur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis20133291121112823568605
- KalilACKlompasMHaynatzkiGRuppMETreatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia with linezolid or vancomycin: a systematic review and meta-analysisBMJ Open2013310e003912
- KalilACMurthyMHHermsenEDNetoFKSunJRuppMELinezolid versus vancomycin or teicoplanin for nosocomial pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysisCrit Care Med20103891802180820639754
- WalkeyAJO’DonnellMRWienerRSLinezolid vs glycopeptide antibiotics for the treatment of suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial pneumonia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsChest201113951148115520864609
- WangYZouYXieJLinezolid versus vancomycin for the treatment of suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial pneumonia: a systematic review employing meta-analysisEur J Clin Pharmacol201571110711525355172
- TanSCWangXWuBCost-effectiveness of linezolid versus vancomycin among patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus confirmed nosocomial pneumonia in ChinaValue Health Regional Issue201494100
References
- SongYYangYChenWClinical response and hospital costs associated with the empirical use of vancomycin and linezolid for hospital-acquired pneumonia in a Chinese tertiary care hospital: a retrospective cohort studyClinicoecon Outcomes Res2014645146125378939
- LiuYNCaoBWangHAdult hospital acquired pneumonia: a multicenter study on microbiology and clinical characteristics of patients from 9 Chinese citiesZhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi20123510739746 Chinese23289990
- KalilACLinezolid does not show advantages over vancomycin in modulating the pulmonary immune response: how should we conciliate these new findings with the Zephyr trial results?Crit Care Med20113982009201021768811
- WangYZouYMXieJLinezolid versus vancomycin for the treatment of suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial pneumonia: a systematic review employing meta-analysisEur J Clin Pharmacol201571110711525355172
- KalilACKlompasMHaynatzkiGTreatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia with linezolid or vancomycin: a systematic review and meta-analysisBMJ Open2013310e003912