Cortical Trajectory Fixation Versus Traditional Pedicle-Screw Fixation in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Patients with Osteoporosis: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

References

• Lee N, Kim KN, Yi S, et al. Comparison of outcomes of anterior, posterior, and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery at a single lumbar level with degenerative spinal disease. World Neurosurg. 2017;101:216–226. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.01.114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng X, Zhang K, Sun X, et al. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with stenosis. Spine J. 2017;17(8):1127–1133. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2017.04.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidar Z, Beaumont A, Lifshutz J, Maiman DJ. Clinical and radiological relationship between posterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterolateral lumbar fusion. Surg Neurol. 2005;64(4):303–308. doi:10.1016/j.surneu.2005.03.025
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Babu R, Park JG, Mehta AI, et al. Comparison of superior-level facet joint violations during open and percutaneous pedicle screw placement. Neurosurgery. 2012;71(5):962–970. doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e31826a88c8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Deng H, Long X, Chen X, Xu R, Liu Z. A comparative study of perioperative complications between transforaminal versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J. 2016;25(5):1575–1580. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-4086-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta VA, McGirt MJ, Garces Ambrossi GL, et al. Trans-foraminal versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of surgical morbidity. Neurol Res. 2011;33(1):38–42. doi:10.1179/016164110X12681290831289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santoni BG, Hynes RA, McGilvray KC, et al. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws. Spine J. 2009;9(5):366–373. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2008.07.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung CW, Wu MF, Hong RT, Weng MJ, Yu GF, Kao CH. Comparison of multifidus muscle atrophy after posterior lumbar interbody fusion with conventional and cortical bone trajectory. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2016;145:41–45. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsukawa K, Yato Y, Nemoto O, Imabayashi H, Asazuma T, Nemoto K. Morphometric measurement of cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screw insertion using computed tomography. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013;26(6):E248–E253. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e318288ac39
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matsukawa K, Kato T, Yato Y, et al. Incidence and risk factors of adjacent cranial facet joint violation following pedicle screw insertion using cortical bone trajectory technique. Spine. 2016;41(14):E851–E856. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000001459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsukawa K, Taguchi E, Yato Y, et al. Evaluation of the fixation strength of pedicle screws using cortical bone trajectory: what is the ideal trajectory for optimal fixation? Spine. 2015;40(15):E873–E878. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000983
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsukawa K, Yato Y, Hynes RA, et al. Cortical bone trajectory for thoracic pedicle screws: a technical note. Clin Spine Surg. 2017;30(5):E497–E504. doi:10.1097/BSD.0000000000000130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsukawa K, Yato Y, Imabayashi H, Hosogane N, Asazuma T, Nemoto K. Biomechanical evaluation of cross trajectory technique for pedicle screw insertion: combined use of traditional trajectory and cortical bone trajectory. Orthop Surg. 2015;7(4):317–323. doi:10.1111/os.12212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsukawa K, Yato Y, Kato T, Imabayashi H, Asazuma T, Nemoto K. In vivo analysis of insertional torque during pedicle screwing using cortical bone trajectory technique. Spine. 2014;39(4):E240–E245. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakaura H, Miwa T, Yamashita T, Kuroda Y, Ohwada T. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cortical bone trajectory screw fixation versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion using traditional pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a comparative study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;25(5):591–595. doi:10.3171/2016.3.SPINE151525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakaura H, Miwa T, Yamashita T, Kuroda Y, Ohwada T. Cortical bone trajectory screw fixation versus traditional pedicle screw fixation for 2-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of surgical outcomes for 2-level degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018;28(1):57–62. doi:10.3171/2017.5.SPINE161154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu YZ, Hai Y, Zhang XN, et al. [Comparison of cortical bone trajectory screw fixation and pedicle screw fixation in posterior lumbar fusion]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019;99(19):1473–1478. Chinese. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2019.19.008
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Pocock SJ, Evans SJ, Altman DG, Group C. Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement. JAMA. 2012;308(24):2594–2604. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.87802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding H, Han B, Hai Y, et al. The feasibility of assessing the cortical bone trajectory screw placement accuracy using a traditional pedicle screw insertion evaluation system. Clin Spine Surg. 2020. doi:10.1097/BSD.0000000000001059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abul-Kasim K, Strombeck A, Ohlin A, Maly P, Sundgren PC. Reliability of low-radiation dose CT in the assessment of screw placement after posterior scoliosis surgery, evaluated with a new grading system. Spine. 2009;34(9):941–948. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819b22a4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson BB, Salzmann SN, Shirahata T, et al. Prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia diagnosed using quantitative CT in 296 consecutive lumbar fusion patients. Neurosurg Focus. 2020;49(2):E5. doi:10.3171/2020.5.FOCUS20241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin DK, Park JY, Yoon YS, et al. Prevalence of osteoporosis in patients requiring spine surgery: incidence and significance of osteoporosis in spine disease. Osteoporos Int. 2007;18(9):1219–1224. doi:10.1007/s00198-007-0370-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjerke BT, Zarrabian M, Aleem IS, et al. Incidence of osteoporosis-related complications following posterior lumbar fusion. Global Spine J. 2018;8(6):563–569. doi:10.1177/2192568217743727
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalid SI, Nunna RS, Maasarani S, et al. Association of osteopenia and osteoporosis with higher rates of pseudarthrosis and revision surgery in adult patients undergoing single-level lumbar fusion. Neurosurg Focus. 2020;49(2):E6. doi:10.3171/2020.5.FOCUS20289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park MK, Kim KT, Bang WS, et al. Risk factors for cage migration and cage retropulsion following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J. 2019;19(3):437–447. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2018.08.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho JH, Hwang CJ, Kim H, Joo YS, Lee DH, Lee CS. Effect of osteoporosis on the clinical and radiological outcomes following one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Orthop Sci. 2018;23(6):870–877. doi:10.1016/j.jos.2018.06.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Formby PM, Kang DG, Helgeson MD, Wagner SC. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with osteoporosis. Global Spine J. 2016;6(7):660–664. doi:10.1055/s-0036-1578804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer CR, Hanson G, Eller M, Lehman RA. A systematic review of treatment strategies for degenerative lumbar spine fusion surgery in patients with osteoporosis. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2016;7(4):188–196. doi:10.1177/2151458516669204
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu L, Zhang S, Liu G, Yang B, Wu X. Early clinical outcome of lumbar spinal fixation with cortical bone trajectory pedicle screws in patients with osteoporosis with degenerative disease. Orthopedics. 2019;42(5):e465–e471. doi:10.3928/01477447-20190604-01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Liu S, Zhang J, et al. [A comparative study on treatment of lumbar degenerative disease with osteoporosis by manual and robot-assisted cortical bone trajectory screws fixation]. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020;34(9):1142–1148. Chinese. doi:10.7507/1002-1892.202001070
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Takenaka S, Mukai Y, Tateishi K, Hosono N, Fuji T, Kaito T. Clinical outcomes after posterior lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of cortical bone trajectory and conventional pedicle screw insertion. Clin Spine Surg. 2017;30(10):E1411–E1418. doi:10.1097/BSD.0000000000000514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee GW, Son JH, Ahn MW, Kim HJ, Yeom JS. The comparison of pedicle screw and cortical screw in posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective randomized noninferiority trial. Spine J. 2015;15(7):1519–1526. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2015.02.038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee GW, Ahn MW. Comparative study of cortical bone trajectory-pedicle screw (cortical screw) versus conventional pedicle screw in single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a 2-year post hoc analysis from prospectively randomized data. World Neurosurg. 2018;109:e194–e202. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.09.137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, He X, Sun T. Comparative clinical efficacy and safety of cortical bone trajectory screw fixation and traditional pedicle screw fixation in posterior lumbar fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2019;28(7):1678–1689. doi:10.1007/s00586-019-05999-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho W, Cho SK, Wu C. The biomechanics of pedicle screw-based instrumentation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92(8):1061–1065. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.92B8.24237
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weiser L, Sellenschloh K, Puschel K, et al. Cortical threaded pedicle screw improves fatigue strength in decreased bone quality. Eur Spine J. 2020. doi:10.1007/s00586-020-06593-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar