Bone-Mounted Robotic System in Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery for Osteoporosis Patients: Clinical and Radiological Outcomes

References

• Galbusera F, Volkheimer D, Reitmaier S, et al. Pedicle screw loosening: a clinically relevant complication? Eur Spine J. 2015;24:1005–1016. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-3768-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rometsch E, Spruit M, Zigler JE, et al. Screw-related complications after instrumentation of the osteoporotic spine: a systematic literature review with meta-analysis. Glob Spine J. 2020;10:69–88. doi:10.1177/2192568218818164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bredow J, Boese CK, Werner CML, et al. Predictive validity of preoperative CT scans and the risk of pedicle screw loosening in spinal surgery. Arch Orth Trauma Surg. 2016;136:1063–1067. doi:10.1007/s00402-016-2487-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein CL, Brodke DS, Choma TJ. Surgical management of spinal conditions in the elderly osteoporotic spine. Neurosurg. 2015;77(Suppl 4):S98–S107. doi:10.1227/neu.0000000000000948
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Röllinghoff M, Schlüter-Brust K, Groos D, et al. Mid-range outcomes in 64 consecutive cases of multilevel fusion for degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine. Orth Rev. 2010;2:e3. doi:10.4081/or.2010.e3
   Google Scholar
• Stauff MP, Freedman BA, Kim JH, et al. The effect of pedicle screw redirection after lateral wall breach–a biomechanical study using human lumbar vertebrae. Spine J. 2014;14(1):98–103. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2013.03.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vadalà G, De Salvatore S, Ambrosio L, et al. Robotic spine surgery and augmented reality systems: a state of the art. Neurospine. 2020;17:88–100. doi:10.14245/ns.2040060.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le X, Tian W, Shi Z, et al. Robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-assisted cortical bone trajectory screw instrumentation in lumbar spinal surgery: a matched-cohort comparison. World Neurosurg. 2018;120:e745–e751. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonjon N, Chan-Seng E, Costalat V, Bonnafoux B, Vassal M, Boetto J. Robot-assisted spine surgery: feasibility study through a prospective case-matched analysis. Eur Spine J. 2016;25:947–955. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-3758-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keric N, Doenitz C, Haj A, et al. Evaluation of robot-guided minimally invasive implantation of 2067 pedicle screws. Neurosurg Focus. 2017;42:E11. doi:10.3171/2017.2.focus16552
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatlo B, Molliqaj G, Cuvinciuc V, Kotowski M, Schaller K, Tessitore E. Safety and accuracy of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw insertion for degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine: a matched cohort comparison. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;20:636–643. doi:10.3171/2014.3.spine13714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molliqaj G, Schatlo B, Alaid A, et al. Accuracy of robot-guided versus freehand fluoroscopy-assisted pedicle screw insertion in thoracolumbar spinal surgery. Neurosurg Focus. 2017;4:E14. doi:10.3171/2017.3.focus179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph JR, Smith BW, Liu X, Park P. Current applications of robotics in spine surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Neurosurg Focus. 2017;42:E2. doi:10.3171/2017.2.focus16544
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu X, Ohnmeiss DD, Lieberman IH. Robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement: lessons learned from the first 102 patients. Eur Spine J. 2013;22:661–666. doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2499-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatlo B, Martinez R, Alaid A, et al. Unskilled unawareness and the learning curve in robotic spine surgery. Acta Neurochirurgica. 2015;157:1819–1823; discussion 1823. doi:10.1007/s00701-015-2535-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiani B, Quadri SA, Ramakrishnan V, Berman B, Khan Y, Siddiqi J. Retrospective review on accuracy: a pilot study of robotically guided thoracolumbar/sacral pedicle screws versus fluoroscopy-guided and computerized tomography stealth-guided screws. Cureus. 2017;9(7):e1437. doi:10.7759/cureus.1437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiani B, Quadri SA, Farooqui M, et al. Impact of robot-assisted spine surgery on health care quality and neurosurgical economics: a systemic review. Neurosurg Rev. 2020;43(1):17–25. doi:10.1007/s10143-018-0971-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Souza M, Gendreau J, Feng A, Kim LH, Ho AL, Veeravagu A. Robotic-assisted spine surgery: history, efficacy, cost, and future trends. Rob Surg. 2019;6:9–23. doi:10.2147/rsrr.s190720
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Agha RA, Sohrabi C, Mathew G, et al. The PROCESS 2020 guideline: updating consensus Preferred Reporting Of CasESeries in Surgery (PROCESS) guidelines. Int J Surg. 2020;84:231–235. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.11.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanis JA, Melton LJ 3rd, Christiansen C, Johnston CC, Khaltaev N. The diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res. 1994;9:1137–1141. doi:10.1002/jbmr.5650090802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo KL, Su YF, Wu CH, et al. Assessing the intraoperative accuracy of pedicle screw placement by using a bone-mounted miniature robot system through secondary registration. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0153235. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai TH, Tzou RD, Su YF, Wu CH, Tsai CY, Lin CL. Pedicle screw placement accuracy of bone-mounted miniature robot system. Medicine. 2017;96:e5835. doi:10.1097/md.0000000000005835
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai TH, Wu DS, Su YF, Wu CH, Lin CL. A retrospective study to validate an intraoperative robotic classification system for assessing the accuracy of Kirschner wire (K-wire) placements with postoperative computed tomography classification system for assessing the accuracy of pedicle screw placements. Medicine. 2016;95:e4834. doi:10.1097/md.0000000000004834
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonstein JE, Denis F, Perra JH, Pinto MR, Smith MD, Winter RB. Complications associated with pedicle screws. J Bone Joint Surg. 1999;81:1519–1528. doi:10.2106/00004623-199911000-00003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkus JK, Foley K, Haid RW, LeHuec JC. Surgical Interbody Research Group–radiographic assessment of interbody fusion devices: fusion criteria for anterior lumbar interbody surgery. Neurosurg Focus. 2001;10:E11. doi:10.3171/foc.2001.10.4.12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee CS, Kang KC, Chung SS, Park WH, Shin WJ, Seo YG. How does back muscle strength change after posterior lumbar interbody fusion? J Neurosurg Spine. 2017;26:163–170. doi:10.3171/2016.7.spine151132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu ZX, Gong FT, Liu L, et al. A comparative study on screw loosening in osteoporotic lumbar spine fusion between expandable and conventional pedicle screws. Arch Orth Trauma Surg. 2012;132:471–476. doi:10.1007/s00402-011-1439-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhns CA, Reiter M, Pfeiffer F, Choma TJ. Surgical strategies to improve fixation in the osteoporotic spine: the effects of tapping, cement augmentation, and screw trajectory. Global Spine J. 2014;4:47–54. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1361588
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carlson GD, Abitbol JJ, Anderson DR, et al. Screw fixation in the human sacrum. An in vitro study of the biomechanics of fixation. Spine. 1992;17:S196–S203. doi:10.1097/00007632-199206001-00023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coe JD, Warden KE, Herzig MA, McAfee PC. Influence of bone mineral density on the fixation of thoracolumbar implants. A comparative study of transpedicular screws, laminar hooks, and spinous process wires. Spine. 1990;15:902–907. doi:10.1097/00007632-199009000-00012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soshi S, Shiba R, Kondo H, Murota K. An experimental study on transpedicular screw fixation in relation to osteoporosis of the lumbar spine. Spine. 1991;16:1335–1341. doi:10.1097/00007632-199111000-00015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittenberg RH, Shea M, Swartz DE, Lee KS, White AA, Hayes WC. Importance of bone mineral density in instrumented spine fusions. Spine. 1991;16:647–652. doi:10.1097/00007632-199106000-00009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozawa T, Takahashi K, Yamagata M, et al. Insertional torque of the lumbar pedicle screw during surgery. J Orth Sci. 2005;10:133–136. doi:10.1007/s00776-004-0883-3
   Google Scholar
• Glaser J, Stanley M, Sayre H, Woody J, Found E, Spratt K. A 10-year follow-up evaluation of lumbar spine fusion with pedicle screw fixation. Spine. 2003;28:1390–1395. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000067112.15753.ad
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pihlajämaki H, Myllynen P, Böstman O. Complications of transpedicular lumbosacral fixation for non-traumatic disorders. J Bone Joint Surg. 1997;79:183–189. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.79b2.7224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohlin A, Karlsson M, Düppe H, Hasserius R, Redlund-Johnell I. Complications after transpedicular stabilization of the spine. A survivorship analysis of 163 cases. Spine. 1994;19:2774–2779. doi:10.1097/00007632-199412150-00007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soini J, Laine T, Pohjolainen T, Hurri H, Alaranta H. Spondylodesis augmented by transpedicular fixation in the treatment of olisthetic and degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine. Clin Orth Relat Res. 1993;1993:111–116.
   Google Scholar
• Kim DH, Hwang RW, Lee GH, et al. Comparing rates of early pedicle screw loosening in posterolateral lumbar fusion with and without transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J. 2020;20:1438–1445. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2020.04.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho JH, Hwang CJ, Kim H, Joo YS, Lee DH, Lee CS. Effect of osteoporosis on the clinical and radiological outcomes following one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Orth Sci. 2018;23:870–877. doi:10.1016/j.jos.2018.06.009
   Google Scholar
• Okuyama K, Abe E, Suzuki T, Tamura Y, Chiba M, Sato K. Influence of bone mineral density on pedicle screw fixation: a study of pedicle screw fixation augmenting posterior lumbar interbody fusion in elderly patients. Spine J. 2001;1:402–407. doi:10.1016/s1529-9430(01)00078-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Langdahl B, Ferrari S, Dempster DW. Bone modeling and remodeling: potential as therapeutic targets for the treatment of osteoporosis. Ther Adv Musculoskeletal Dis. 2016;8:225–235. doi:10.1177/1759720x16670154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Defino HL, Vendrame JR. Role of cortical and cancellous bone of the vertebral pedicle in implant fixation. Eur Spine J. 2001;10:325–333. doi:10.1007/s005860000232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devito DP, Kaplan L, Dietl R, et al. Clinical acceptance and accuracy assessment of spinal implants guided with SpineAssist surgical robot: retrospective study. Spine. 2010;35:2109–2115. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d323ab
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantelhardt SR, Martinez R, Baerwinkel S, Burger R, Giese A, Rohde V. Perioperative course and accuracy of screw positioning in conventional, open robotic-guided and percutaneous robotic-guided, pedicle screw placement. Eur Spine J. 2011;20:860–868. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1729-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang HW, Hu YC, Wu ZY, et al. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and unilateral fixation for degenerative lumbar disease. Orth Surg. 2017;9:277–283. doi:10.1111/os.12345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmekaty M, Kotani Y, Mehy EE, et al. Clinical and radiological comparison between three different minimally invasive surgical fusion techniques for single-level lumbar isthmic and degenerative spondylolisthesis: minimally invasive surgical posterolateral fusion versus minimally invasive surgical transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus midline lumbar fusion. Asian Spine J. 2018;12:870–879. doi:10.31616/asj.2018.12.5.870
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bin Abd Razak HR, Dhoke P, Tay KS, Yeo W, Yue WM. Single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion provides sustained improvements in clinical and radiological outcomes up to 5 years postoperatively in patients with neurogenic symptoms secondary to spondylolisthesis. Asian Spine J. 2017;11:204–212. doi:10.4184/asj.2017.11.2.204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin GX, Sharma S, Rui G, Song MS, Kim JS. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with intraoperative fluoroscopy for disc space preparation: analysis of fusion rate and clinical results. Op Neurosurg. 2020;19:557–566. doi:10.1093/ons/opaa178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu CJ, Chen WC, Lu ML, Cheng CH, Niu CC. Comparison of paraspinal muscle degeneration and decompression effect between conventional open and minimal invasive approaches for posterior lumbar spine surgery. Sci Rep. 2020;10:14635. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-71515-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim S, Kim H, Chung J. Effects of spinal stabilization exercise on the cross-sectional areas of the lumbar multifidus and psoas major muscles, pain intensity, and lumbar muscle strength of patients with degenerative disc disease. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014;26:579–582. doi:10.1589/jpts.26.579
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gazzeri R, Panagiotopoulos K, Princiotto S, Agrillo U. Spontaneous spinal arthrodesis in stand-alone percutaneous pedicle screw fixation without in situ fusion in patients with lumbar segmental instability: long-term clinical, radiologic, and functional outcomes. World Neurosurg. 2018;110:e1040–e1048. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.11.159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar