Translation, Adaptation, and Psychometric Testing of the Almere Technology Acceptance Questionnaire (ATAQ) Among Older Adults in China

References

• Xiaozhao H, Yiqin S, Hongli M, et al. Progress and development strategies of artificial intelligence-enabled nursing. Chin J Mod Nurs. 2021;27(06):701–707.
   Google Scholar
• Thachampoyil A, Steuber V, Amirabdollahian F. Influence of muscle fatigue on electromyogram-kinematic correlation during robot-assisted upper limb training. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2020;7:205566832090301. doi:10.1177/2055668320903014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu YH, Jérémy W, Mélanie C, et al. Acceptance of an assistive robot in older adults: a mixed-method study of human–robot interaction over a 1-month period in the Living Lab setting. Clin Interv Aging. 2014;9:801–811. doi:10.2147/CIA.S56435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurley K, Norcio AF. A systematic review of technologies designed to improve and assist cognitive decline for both the current and future aging populations. In: Aykin N, editor. Internationalization, Design and Global Development. Springer: Berlin; 2009:156–163.
   Google Scholar
• Scheutz M, Arnold T. Are we ready for sex robots? In:Proceedings of the 11h ACM/IEEE Intemational Conference on Human Robot Interaction. Christchurch New Zealand; 2016: 351–358.
   Google Scholar
• Sakuma M, Kuramochi K, Shimada N, et al. Positive and negative opinions about living with robots in Japanese university students. In:Proceedings of the 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction; Daegu Republic of Korea; 2019: 640–641.
   Google Scholar
• Geoffrey LWY, Derek M, Goldie N. Acceptance and attitudes toward a human-like socially assistive robot by older adults. Assist Technol. 2014;26(3):140–150. doi:10.1080/10400435.2013.869703
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan AD, Sanders TL, Hancock PA. Likert or Not? How using likert rather than bipolar ratings reveal individual difference scores using the godspeed scales. Int J Soc Robot. 2021;13(7):1–10. doi:10.1007/s12369-020-00740-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nomura T, Kanda T, Suzuki T, et al. Psychology in humanrobot communication: an attempt through investigation of negative attitudes and anxiety toward robots. In: IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. New Delhi; 2004: 35–40.
   Google Scholar
• Heerink M, Kröse B, Evers V, et al. Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: the Almere model. Int J Soc Robot. 2010;2(4):361–375. doi:10.1007/s12369-010-0068-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vankatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, et al. Use acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003;27(3):425–478. doi:10.2307/30036540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piasek J, Wieczorowska-Tobis K. Acceptance and long-term use of a social robot by elderly users in a domestic environment. In: 11th International Conference on Human System Interaction (HSI), 2018:478–482.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann S, Ruf E, Misoch S. Emotions and attitudes of older adults toward robots of different appearances and in different situations. In: Ziefle M, editor. ICT4AWE 2020, CCIS 1387; 2021: 21–43
   Google Scholar
• Lv W, Zhong Q, Guo J, et al. Instrument context relevance evaluation, translation, and psychometric testing of the Diabetes Eating Problem Survey-Revised (DEPS-R) among people with Type 1 diabetes in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(7):3450. doi:10.3390/ijerph18073450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brislin RW. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. J Cross Cult Psychol. 1970;1(3):185–216. doi:10.1177/135910457000100301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jingzheng S, M Xiankun. Application of content validity index in scale development. J Cent South Univ. 2012;37(2):152–155.
   Google Scholar
• Min F. Reliability test under structural equation modeling. Chin J Health Stat. 2009;26(5):524.
   Google Scholar
• Taber KS. The use of Cronbach’s Alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Res Sci Educ. 2018;48(6):1273–1296. doi:10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartko J. The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability. Psychol Rep. 1966;19(1):3–11. doi:10.2466/pr0.1966.19.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindell R, Ding L. Establishing reliability and validity: an ongoing process. In Proceedings of the 2012 Physics Education Research Conference. Philadelphia, PA, USA; 2012: 27–29.
   Google Scholar
• Nia HS, Ebadi A, Lehto RH, et al. Reliability and validity of the Persian version of templer death anxiety scale-extended in veterans of Iran–Iraq warfare. Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2014;8(4):29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xiaohua J, Zhuozhi S, Z Nannan et al. Analysis of the reliability and validity of the questionnaire. Mod Prevent Med. 2010;37(03):429–431.
   Google Scholar
• Minglong W. Structural Equation Modeling: Operation and Application of AMOS. 2nd ed. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Yunhua X, Xiaohui W. Intelligent escort: a new approach for mental health management of the elderly. Gansu Soc Sci. 2019;3:125–131.
   Google Scholar
• Zizhen C, Zhang Q, Yanling G. Research progress on the application of robots in home care for the elderly. J Nurs. 2019;26(09):42–45.
   Google Scholar
• Chen N. Acceptance of social robots by aging users: towards a pleasure-oriented view. International Conference on Cross-cultural Design. USA; 2018: 387–397.
   Google Scholar
• Huang T, Huang C. Attitudes of the elderly living independently towards the use of robots to assist with activities of daily living. Work. 2021;69(5):55–65. doi:10.3233/WOR-205166
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chu L, Chen HW, Cheng PY, et al. Identifying features that enhance older adults’ acceptance of robots: a mixed methods study. Gerontology. 2019;65(4):441–450. doi:10.1159/000494881
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng Y, Kaiping P, Xianjun Z. Psychology in the context of big data: reconstruction of the discipline system and characteristics of Chinese psychology. Sci Bull. 2015;60(Z1):520–533.
   Google Scholar