91
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Age-Related Changes in Corneal Epithelial Thickness Measured with an Ultrasound Pachymeter

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1461-1470 | Received 10 Jun 2022, Accepted 06 Sep 2022, Published online: 13 Nov 2023

References

  • Kim BJ, Ryu IH, Kim SW. Age-related differences in corneal epithelial thickness measurements with anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2016;60(5):357–364. PMID: 27324656. doi:10.1007/s10384-016-0457-x
  • Yang Y, Hong J, Deng SX, Xu J. Age-related changes in human corneal epithelial thickness measured with anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(8):5032–5038. MID: 25052994. doi:10.1167/iovs.13-13831
  • Li HF, Petroll WM, Møller-Pedersen T, Maurer JK, Cavanagh HD, Jester JV. Epithelial and corneal thickness measurements by in vivo confocal microscopy through focusing (CMTF). Curr Eye Res. 1997;16(3):214–221. doi:10.1076/ceyr.16.3.214.15412
  • Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M, Silverman RH, Coleman DJ. Epithelial thickness in the normal cornea: three-dimensional display with Artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound. J Refract Surg. 2008;24(6):571–581. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20080601-05
  • Francoz M, Karamoko I, Baudouin C, et al. Ocular surface epithelial thickness evaluation with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(12):9116–9123. doi:10.1167/iovs.11-7988
  • Samy MM, Shaaban YM, Badran TAF. Age- and sex-related differences in corneal epithelial thickness measured with spectral-domain anterior segment optical coherence tomography among Egyptians. Medicine. 2017;96(42):e8314. PMID: 29049238; PMCID: PMC5662404. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000008314
  • Nam M, Kim SW. Changes in corneal epithelial thickness induced by topical antiglaucoma medications. J Clin Med. 2021;10(16):3464. doi:10.3390/jcm10163464
  • Wu Y, Wang Y. Detailed distribution of corneal epithelial thickness and correlated characteristics measured with SD-OCT in myopic eyes. J Ophthalmol. 2017;2017:1018321. doi:10.1155/2017/1018321
  • Reinstein DZ, Yap TE, Archer TJ, Gobbe M, Silverman RH. Comparison of corneal epithelial thickness measurement between Fourier-domain OCT and very high-frequency digital ultrasound. J Refract Surg. 2015;31(7):438–445. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20150623-01
  • Edawaji BSA. In vivo studies of normal and abnormal development of the anterior chamber of children using hand-held spectral domain optical coherence tomography [PhD Thesis]. Leicester, UK: Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Ulverscroft Eye Unit, Univ. of Leicester; 2019.
  • Available from: https://deakin.libguides.com/quantitative-study-designs/cross-sectional. Accessed July 20, 2022. What does a strong cross-sectional study look like? Libguides (Deakin University).
  • Rah MJ, Deng L, Jackson JM. Reproducibility of ultrasound pachymetry using the Sonogage Corneo-Gage Plus 2. Optometry. 2006;77(8):392–396. doi:10.1016/j.optm.2006.04.099
  • Lively GD, Jiang B, Hedberg-Buenz A, et al. Genetic dependence of central corneal thickness among inbred strains of mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(1):160–171. doi:10.1167/iovs.09-3429
  • Swarbrick HA, Kang P, Peguda R. Corneal total and epithelial thickness measured by sonogage ultrasound pachometry and high-resolution optical coherence tomography. Optom Vis Sci. 2020;97(5):346–350. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001508
  • Kanellopoulos AJ, Asimellis G. In vivo three-dimensional corneal epithelium imaging in normal eyes by anterior-segment optical coherence tomography: a clinical reference study. Cornea. 2013;32(11):1493–1498. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182a15cee
  • Zhang XR, Zhang ZY, Hoffman MR. Conjunctival thickness measured by optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(6):1305. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.12.031
  • Audelan T, Legrand M, M’Garrech M, et al. Vieillissement de la surface oculaire: physiopathologie et conséquences pratiques pour la prise en charge [Ocular surface aging: pathophysiology and consequences for management]. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2018;41(3):262–270. French. doi:10.1016/j.jfo.2017.12.004
  • Nissen J, Hjortdal JO, Ehlers N, Frost-Larsen K, Sørensen T. A clinical comparison of optical and ultrasonic pachometry. Acta Ophthalmol. 1991;69(5):659–663. doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768.1991.tb04857.x
  • Hashmani N, Hashmani S, Saad CM. Wide corneal epithelial mapping using an optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59(3):1652. doi:10.1167/iovs.17-23717
  • Lin HC, Tew TB, Hsieh YT, et al. Using optical coherence tomography to assess the role of age and region in corneal epithelium and palisades of Vogt. Medicine. 2016;95(35):e4234. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000004234
  • Rush SW, Matulich J, Biskup J, Cofoid P, Rush RB. Corneal epithelial thickness measured by manual electronic caliper spectral domain optical coherence tomography: distributions and demographic correlations in preoperative refractive surgery patients. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol. 2016;5(2):147–150. doi:10.1097/APO.0000000000000166
  • Ozalp O, Atalay E. Biometric determinants of epithelial thickness profile across a wide range of refractive errors. Ophthalmol Ther. 2022;11(3):1089–1100. doi:10.1007/s40123-022-00489-9
  • Salouti R, Alishiri AA, Gharebaghi R, et al. Comparison among Ocular Response Analyzer, Corvis ST and Goldmann applanation tonometry in healthy children. Int J Ophthalmol. 2018;11(8):1330–1336. PMID: 30140637; PMCID: PMC6090110. doi:10.18240/ijo.2018.08.13
  • Heidary F, Gharebaghi R, Wan Hitam WH, Shatriah I. Nerve fiber layer thickness. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(9):1861–1862. PMID: 20816254. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.05.024