122
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Barriers and Enablers to the Use of Web-Based Applications for Older Adults and Their Caregivers Post-Hip Fracture Surgery: A Descriptive Qualitative Study

ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, , , , , ORCID Icon & show all
Pages 1635-1645 | Received 03 Aug 2022, Accepted 22 Oct 2022, Published online: 13 Nov 2023

References

  • Health Quality Ontario. Hip fracture: care for people with fragility fractures. Health Quality Ontario; 2022. Available from: https://www.hqontario.ca/evidence-to-improve-care/quality-standards/view-all-quality-standards/hip-fracture. Accessed June 24, 2022.
  • Zidén L, Scherman MH, Wenestam CG. The break remains – elderly people’s experiences of a hip fracture 1 year after discharge. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(2):103–113. doi:10.3109/09638280903009263
  • Pitzul KB, Wodchis WP, Carter MW, Kreder HJ, Voth J, Jaglal SB. Post-acute pathways among hip fracture patients: a system-level analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:275. doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1524-1
  • Jensen CM, Smith AC, Overgaard S, Wiil UK, Clemensen J. ”If only had I known”: a qualitative study investigating a treatment of patients with a hip fracture with short time stay in hospital. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-Being. 2017;12(1):1307061. doi:10.1080/17482631.2017.1307061
  • Jensen CM, Overgaard S, Wiil UK, Smith AC, Clemensen J. Bridging the gap: a user-driven study on new ways to support self-care and empowerment for patients with hip fracture. SAGE Open Med. 2018;6:2050312118799121. doi:10.1177/2050312118799121
  • Seitz DP, Adunuri N, Gill SS, Rochon PA. Prevalence of dementia and cognitive impairment among older adults with hip fractures. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2011;12(8):556–564. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2010.12.001
  • Rao M, Fogarty P. What did the doctor say? J Obstetr Gynecol. 2009;27(5):479–480. doi:10.1080/01443610701405853
  • Elliott J, Forbes D, Chesworth BM, Ceci C, Stolee P. Information sharing with rural family caregivers during care transitions of hip fracture patients. Int J Integr Care. 2014;14:e018. doi:10.5334/ijic.1195
  • World Health Organization. WHO Guideline: Recommendations on Digital Interventions for Health System Strengthening. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
  • Coulter A, Ellins J. Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients. BMJ. 2007;335(7609):24–27. doi:10.1136/bmj.39246.581169.80
  • Zhang J, Yang M, Ge Y, Ivers R, Webster R, Tian M. The role of digital health for post-surgery care of older patients with hip fracture: a scoping review. Int J Med Inform. 2022;160:104709. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104709
  • Ramachandran HJ, Jiang Y, Teo JYC, Yeo TJ, Wang W. Technology acceptance of home-based cardiac telerehabilitation programs in patients with coronary heart disease: systematic scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24(1):e34657. doi:10.2196/34657
  • Hale TM, Jethwani K, Kandola MS, Saldana F, Kvedar JC. A remote medication monitoring system for chronic heart failure patients to reduce readmissions: a two-arm randomized pilot study. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(4):e91. doi:10.2196/jmir.5256
  • Lee PA, Greenfield G, Pappas Y. Patients’ perception of using telehealth for type 2 diabetes management: a phenomenological study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):549. doi:10.1186/s12913-018-3353-x
  • Cafazzo JA, Casselman M, Hamming N, Katzman DK, Palmert MR. Design of an mHealth app for the self-management of adolescent type 1 diabetes: a pilot study. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(3):e70. doi:10.2196/jmir.2058
  • Tenforde AS, Hefner JE, Kodish-Wachs JE, Iaccarino MA, Paganoni S. Telehealth in physical medicine and rehabilitation: a narrative review. PM R. 2017;9(5S):S51–S58. doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.02.013
  • Chehade MJ, Yadav L, Jayatilaka A, Gill TK, Palmer E. Personal digital health hubs for multiple conditions. Bull World Health Organ. 2020;98(8):569–575. doi:10.2471/BLT.19.249136
  • Jensen CM, Overgaard S, Wiil UK, Clemensen J. Can tele-health support self-care and empowerment? A qualitative study of hip fracture patients’ experiences with testing an “app”. SAGE Open Nurs. 2019;5:2377960819825752. doi:10.1177/2377960819825752
  • Mora-Traverso M, Prieto-Moreno R, Molina-Garcia P, et al. Effects of the @ctivehip telerehabilitation program on the quality of life, psychological factors and fitness level of patients with hip fracture [published online ahead of print, 2022 Jan 21]. J Telemed Telecare. 2022;1357633X211073256. doi:10.1177/1357633X211073256
  • Yadav L, Gill TK, Taylor A, De Young J, Chehade MJ. Identifying opportunities, and motivation to enhance capabilities, influencing the development of a personalized digital health hub model of care for hip fractures: mixed methods exploratory study. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(10):e26886. doi:10.2196/26886
  • Morris C, Van den Berg M, Barr C, George S, Crotty M. Demographic characteristics and functional levels of patients with fragility fractures who accept tele-rehabilitation as an alternative to face-to-face home rehabilitation. Home Health Care Manag Pract. 2021;33(3):171–176. doi:10.1177/1084822320983314
  • Crotty M, Killington M, van den Berg M, Morris C, Taylor A, Carati C. Telerehabilitation for older people using off-the-shelf applications: acceptability and feasibility. J Telemed Telecare. 2014;20(7):370–376. doi:10.1177/1357633X14552382
  • Shulver W, Killington M, Morris C, Crotty M. ‘Well, if the kids can do it, I can do it’: older rehabilitation patients’ experiences of telerehabilitation. Health Expect. 2017;20(1):120–129. doi:10.1111/hex.12443
  • Backman C, Harley A, Kuziemsky C, Mercer J, Peyton L. MyPath to home web-based application for the geriatric rehabilitation program at bruyère continuing care: user-centered design and feasibility testing study. JMIR Form Res. 2020;4(9):e18169. doi:10.2196/18169
  • Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, et al. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14(1):26–33. doi:10.1136/qshc.2004.011155
  • Atkins L, Francis J, Islam R, et al. A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):77. doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0605-9
  • Michie S, Atkins L, West R. The Behaviour Change Wheel. A Guide to Designing Interventions. 1st ed. Great Britain: Silverback Publishing; 2014.
  • Francis JJ, Stockton C, Eccles MP, et al. Evidence-based selection of theories for designing behaviour change interventions: using methods based on theoretical construct domains to understand clinicians’ blood transfusion behaviour. Br J Health Psychol. 2009;14(Pt 4):625–646. doi:10.1348/135910708X397025
  • Cane J, O’Connor D, Michie S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012;7:37. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-37
  • Francis JJ, Presseau J. Healthcare practitioner behaviour. In: Llewellyn C, Ayers S, McManus C, et al., editors. Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2018.
  • Squires JE, Graham N, Coughlin M, et al. Barriers and enablers to organ donation after circulatory determination of death: a qualitative study exploring the beliefs of frontline intensive care unit professionals and organ donor coordinators. Transplant Direct. 2018;4(7):e368. doi:10.1097/TXD.0000000000000805
  • Lee B, Chen Y, Hewitt L. Age differences in constraints encountered by seniors in their use of computers and the internet. Comput Human Behav. 2011;27(3):1231–1237. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.01.003
  • Reed ME, Huang J, Graetz I, et al. Patient characteristics associated with choosing a telemedicine visit vs office visit with the same primary care clinicians. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(6):e205873. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5873
  • Jørgensen BB, Gregersen M, Pallesen SH, Damsgaard EM. A group-based real-time videoconferencing telerehabilitation programme in recently discharged geriatric patients: a feasibility study. Eur Geriatr Med. 2021;12(4):801–808. doi:10.1007/s41999-020-00444-6
  • Yadav L, Gill TK, Taylor A, deYoung J, Visvanathan R, Chehade MJ. ”Context, content, and system” supporting digital health hub (DHH)-enabled models of care (MoCs) for fragility Hip fractures: perspectives of diverse multidisciplinary stakeholders in South Australia from qualitative in-depth interviews. Arch Osteoporos. 2021;16(1):167. doi:10.1007/s11657-021-01031-3
  • Barrie H, La Rose T, Detlor B, Julien H, Serenko A. “Because I’m Old”: the role of ageism in older adults’ experiences of digital literacy training in public libraries. J Technol Hum Serv. 2021;39(4):379–404. doi:10.1080/15228835.2021.1962477
  • Ortiz-Piña M, Molina-Garcia P, Femia P, et al. Effects of tele-rehabilitation compared with home-based in-person rehabilitation for older adult’s function after hip fracture. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(10):5493. doi:10.3390/ijerph18105493
  • Ariza-Vega P, Castillo-Pérez H, Ortiz-Piña M, Ziden L, Palomino-Vidal J, Ashe MC. The journey of recovery: caregivers’ perspectives from a hip fracture telerehabilitation clinical trial. Phys Ther. 2021;101(3):pzaa220. doi:10.1093/ptj/pzaa220
  • Geerds MAJ, Nijmeijer WS, Hegeman JH, Vollenbroek-Hutten MMR. Mobile app for monitoring 3-month postoperative functional outcome after hip fracture: usability study. JMIR Hum Factors. 2020;7(3):e16989. doi:10.2196/16989
  • Li CT, Hung GK, Fong KN, Gonzalez PC, Wah SH, Tsang HW. Effects of home-based occupational therapy telerehabilitation via smartphone for outpatients after hip fracture surgery: a feasibility randomised controlled study. J Telemed Telecare. 2022;28(4):239–247. doi:10.1177/1357633X20932434