367
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
LETTER

Inappropriate Analysis of a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial Due to Not Accounting for Nesting and Clustering: Comment on “A Home-Based Dyadic Music-with-Movement Intervention for People with Dementia and Caregivers: A Hybrid Type 2 Cluster-Randomized Effectiveness-Implementation Design” [Letter]

, , , , &
Pages 141-142 | Received 10 Dec 2022, Accepted 03 Jan 2023, Published online: 02 Feb 2023

References

  • Cheung DSK, Ho LYW, Chan LCK, Kwok RKH, Lai CKY. A home-based dyadic music-with-movement intervention for people with dementia and caregivers: a hybrid type 2 cluster-randomized effectiveness-implementation design. Clin Interv Aging. 2022;17:1199–1216. doi:10.2147/CIA.S370661
  • Brown AW, Li P, Bohan Brown MM, et al. Best (but oft-forgotten) practices: designing, analyzing, and reporting cluster randomized controlled trials. Am J Clin Nutr. 2015;102(2):241–248. doi:10.3945/ajcn.114.105072
  • Murray D. Design and Analysis of Group Randomized Trials. Oxford University Press Inc; 1998.
  • Leyrat C, Morgan KE, Leurent B, Kahan BC. Cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters: which analyses should be used? Int J Epidemiol. 2018;47(1):321–331. doi:10.1093/ije/dyx169
  • COPE Council. COPE flowcharts and infographics—Handling of post-publication critiques. ©2021 Committee on Publication Ethics (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Available from: 10.24318/o1VgCAih. Accessed January 4, 2023.